Multi-Chain Liquidity Bridge Security Analysis

We go beyond generic smart contract checks. Our analysis includes custom threat models for your specific bridge architecture (lock-and-mint, burn-and-mint, liquidity pools) to identify cross-chain attack vectors.

We audit the economic logic of your bridge, including validator/staker incentives, slashing conditions, and liquidity provider risks. We identify vulnerabilities that could lead to insolvency or de-pegging events.

Our team performs adversarial testing by simulating real-world bridge exploits (e.g., signature replay, oracle manipulation, governance attacks) in a forked environment to validate your mitigations.

Receive a prioritized vulnerability report with severity scores (CVSS), exploit scenarios, and direct code fixes. Our findings are formatted for your engineering team to implement immediately.

Security is continuous. We provide 90 days of post-audit support for vulnerability verification and advisory on upgrades or new feature implementations to maintain your security posture.

Our audit reports and security attestations are trusted by institutional partners and VCs. We provide the documentation you need for compliance checks and technical due diligence during funding rounds.

We begin by analyzing your bridge's design documents, tokenomics, and threat model. This foundational review identifies systemic risks and logic flaws before any code is examined, ensuring the architecture is sound.

We employ a suite of proprietary and industry-standard tools (Slither, MythX) for static and dynamic analysis. This automated layer catches common vulnerabilities like reentrancy, integer overflows, and access control issues with high efficiency.

Our senior auditors conduct line-by-line manual review of core contracts (deposit, withdrawal, verification). We simulate complex multi-chain attack vectors, economic exploits, and edge cases that automated tools miss.

We rigorously test message relay, state synchronization, and finality assumptions across all supported chains (EVM, non-EVM). This ensures the bridge behaves correctly under network delays, reorgs, and chain-specific quirks.

We analyze tokenomics, fee structures, validator/staker incentives, and governance mechanisms. This identifies risks like centralization, liquidity crises, and incentive misalignment that could threaten the system's long-term health.

We provide a prioritized list of findings with PoC exploits. After your team addresses them, we re-audit the fixes to ensure they are complete and correct. The final report includes a security score and certification.