An overview of the fundamental components required to build and evaluate a simple yield farming strategy backtester, from data handling to performance analysis.
Building a Simple Yield Farming Strategy Backtester
Core Backtesting Concepts
Data Ingestion & Cleaning
Historical blockchain data is the foundation. This involves sourcing and processing on-chain information like pool reserves, token prices, and transaction fees from providers like The Graph or decentralized exchanges.
- Fetching accurate APY/APR time-series data for target liquidity pools.
- Handling missing data points and correcting for anomalies or forks.
- Normalizing timestamps and structuring data into candlestick or tick formats for consistent analysis.
- Real use: Simulating a Uniswap V3 position requires minute-by-minute pool price and liquidity data to calculate impermanent loss accurately.
Strategy Logic & Simulation Engine
The backtesting engine executes your defined strategy against historical data. It's a rule-based system that mimics on-chain interactions without spending real gas.
- Codifying entry/exit rules, like depositing when TVL is low and APY is above a threshold.
- Simulating compound interest by automatically reinvesting harvested rewards.
- Accounting for transaction costs (gas fees, protocol commissions) in the simulation.
- Real example: A strategy that harvests and compounds COMP rewards from a Compound Finance market every 24 hours, subtracting estimated gas costs from profits.
Portfolio & Position Tracking
This module maintains a virtual ledger of all strategy actions and asset balances over time, crucial for calculating returns.
- Tracking the changing value of LP token holdings and associated farmed rewards.
- Calculating impermanent loss by comparing the value of held LP tokens against a simple buy-and-hold of the underlying assets.
- Logging every simulated deposit, withdrawal, harvest, and swap event with a timestamp and value.
- Why it matters: It provides the raw transaction log needed to generate accurate profit/loss statements and understand capital allocation.
Performance Metrics & Analysis
Transforming raw simulation results into actionable insights using standardized financial metrics.
- Calculating Total Return, Annual Percentage Yield (APY), and Sharpe Ratio to gauge profitability and risk-adjusted returns.
- Generating equity curves and drawdown charts to visualize performance over time.
- Performing benchmarking against simple strategies like HODLing or a market index.
- Real use: Comparing a complex yield-optimizing vault strategy's max drawdown to a simple staking strategy to assess if the extra complexity justifies the risk.
Architecture and Initial Setup
Process overview
Define Core Data Structures
Establish the foundational data models for the backtester.
Detailed Instructions
First, define the core data structures that will represent the state of your strategy and the blockchain environment. This includes a StrategyState object to track the user's position and a PoolState object to simulate the liquidity pool. The StrategyState should hold the user's token balances (e.g., tokenA, tokenB, lpTokens), total value locked (TVL), and accrued fees. The PoolState must model the pool's reserves, the current liquidity provider (LP) token supply, and the swap fee percentage (commonly 0.3% for Uniswap V2).
- Sub-step 1: Create a
PoolStateclass with attributes:reserveA,reserveB,totalSupply, andfee. - Sub-step 2: Create a
StrategyStateclass with attributes:balanceA,balanceB,lpBalance, andtotalValue. - Sub-step 3: Initialize a sample pool with
reserveA = 1000000,reserveB = 500000,totalSupply = 1000000, andfee = 0.003.
Tip: Use TypeScript interfaces or Python dataclasses for clarity and type safety. These structures are the backbone of all simulation logic.
Implement Core AMM Math Functions
Code the essential constant product formula and helper calculations.
Detailed Instructions
The backtester's heart is the Automated Market Maker (AMM) mathematics. You must implement the constant product formula x * y = k to calculate swap outputs and LP token minting. Key functions include getOutputAmount for swaps, getLPTokenMintAmount for adding liquidity, and getWithdrawalAmounts for removing liquidity. These functions must account for the protocol fee (if any) and the slippage incurred on large trades. For accuracy, use precise decimal math libraries like decimal.js or Python's Decimal.
- Sub-step 1: Write
getOutputAmount(inputReserve, outputReserve, inputAmount, fee=0.003)that returns the output token amount after fees. - Sub-step 2: Write
calculateLPTokens(reserveA, reserveB, amountA, amountB)that returns LP tokens minted based on share of pool. - Sub-step 3: Write
calculateWithdrawal(lpTokens, totalSupply, reserveA, reserveB)to return the amounts of tokenA and tokenB received.
Tip: Thoroughly test these functions with edge cases (e.g., zero inputs, massive swaps) to ensure they mirror real DEX behavior like Uniswap V2.
Set Up Historical Price Feed
Integrate a source for historical token price data to drive simulations.
Detailed Instructions
To simulate realistically, you need historical price data for the token pair. Use a reliable API like CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, or a blockchain indexer like The Graph. You'll fetch OHLCV (Open, High, Low, Close, Volume) data at a specific interval (e.g., hourly). Store this data in a local CSV or database for efficient access. The simulation will iterate through each time step, updating the simulated pool's reserves based on price movements and volume to reflect impermanent loss and trading fee accrual.
- Sub-step 1: Choose a data source. For a public test, use the free CoinGecko API endpoint:
https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/coins/ethereum/market_chart?vs_currency=usd&days=365. - Sub-step 2: Write a script to fetch and parse data for your target pair (e.g., ETH/USDC). Save it as
price_data.csv. - Sub-step 3: Create a
DataLoaderclass in your backtester that reads this file and yields{timestamp, price}for each step.
Tip: Cache the data locally to avoid rate limits. Consider using a moving average or volatility derived from this data to generate more realistic simulated swap volumes.
Initialize Simulation Engine Loop
Build the main loop that progresses through time and applies the strategy logic.
Detailed Instructions
Create the main simulation engine that orchestrates the backtest. This loop will iterate through each historical data point. For each time step, it must: update the pool state (simulating price changes via virtual swaps), apply your yield farming strategy logic (e.g., compound fees, rebalance), and record metrics. The strategy logic is where you define rules, such as "harvest and compound rewards every 24 hours" or "add liquidity when price is within a 5% range." Track key performance indicators (KPIs) like Total Value Locked (TVL), Annual Percentage Yield (APY), and impermanent loss.
- Sub-step 1: Define the main function
runBacktest(initialCapital, priceData, strategyFunction). - Sub-step 2: Inside the loop, call a helper
simulateMarketActivity(poolState, priceChange, volume)to adjust reserves. - Sub-step 3: Call the user-provided
strategyFunction(currentState, poolState)to execute deposits, withdrawals, or harvests. - Sub-step 4: Append the updated
StrategyStateto a results array for later analysis.
Tip: Start with a simple buy-and-hold strategy as a baseline to compare your farming strategy against. Use
console.logor a logging library to output progress every 1000 steps.
Historical Data Source Comparison
Comparison of data sources for backtesting a yield farming strategy on Ethereum mainnet.
| Feature | The Graph (Subgraphs) | Dune Analytics | Covalent |
|---|---|---|---|
Data Freshness | Near real-time (1-2 block delay) | 15-30 minute delay | Real-time via WebSocket, 5 min batch via REST |
Historical Depth | From subgraph deployment date | Full Ethereum history | Full Ethereum history |
Query Cost | Free (decentralized) | Free tier (100k rows/month) | Freemium ($0-400/month based on volume) |
Data Structure | GraphQL, custom schema per protocol | SQL, flattened event tables | REST API, unified schema |
Uniswap V3 LP Data | Requires custom subgraph | Available in decoded tables | Available via Class A endpoints |
Developer Onboarding | Steep (must learn GraphQL & subgraphs) | Moderate (SQL knowledge required) | Easy (REST API with SDKs) |
Data Reliability | Depends on subgraph indexing health | High, managed service | High, managed service with SLA |
Compound Finance Support | Official subgraph available | Community queries available | Full historical endpoints |
Implementing the Strategy Engine
Process for building the core logic to simulate and evaluate a yield farming strategy's historical performance.
Define Strategy Parameters and Data Structure
Establish the foundational inputs and data model for the backtester.
Detailed Instructions
Begin by defining the core strategy parameters that will drive the simulation. This includes the initial capital (e.g., INITIAL_CAPITAL_USD = 10000), the specific DeFi protocols and pools to interact with (e.g., Uniswap V3 WETH/USDC pool on Ethereum mainnet at address 0x8ad599c3A0ff1De082011EFDDc58f1908eb6e6D8), and the time period for the backtest (e.g., from block 15000000 to 17000000). Create a structured data model to hold the portfolio state, tracking assets, their quantities, and accrued fees or rewards over time.
- Sub-step 1: Declare constants for the strategy's fixed inputs, such as swap fee percentages and reward token addresses.
- Sub-step 2: Design a
Portfolioclass with attributes likeholdings(a dictionary mapping token addresses to balances) andtotal_value_usd. - Sub-step 3: Set up a data fetching mechanism to pull historical price feeds, typically from an archive node or a service like The Graph, for the required tokens.
Tip: Use
dataclassesorpydanticmodels for your data structures to ensure type safety and clean serialization.
Implement the Core Strategy Logic Loop
Code the main simulation loop that processes historical data and executes strategy decisions.
Detailed Instructions
The engine's heart is a loop that iterates through historical price and event data chronologically. At each timestep (e.g., daily or per block), the logic must evaluate the current market state and decide on actions. The primary decision is often a rebalancing trigger, such as moving liquidity when the price moves outside a predetermined range or claiming rewards when they reach a threshold. Implement functions like should_rebalance(current_price, range_low, range_high) that return a boolean.
- Sub-step 1: Load your historical DataFrame, ensuring it's sorted by timestamp. Iterate over each row.
- Sub-step 2: At each step, update the portfolio's value based on the new token prices.
- Sub-step 3: Call your strategy's decision function. If it returns true, execute the simulated trade or pool interaction, updating the
Portfolioobject's holdings.
pythonfor index, row in historical_data.iterrows(): current_price = row['eth_price'] portfolio.update_value(current_price) if strategy.check_rebalance_condition(current_price): portfolio.execute_swap('WETH', 'USDC', amount=100)
Simulate DeFi Interactions and Track Performance
Model the mechanics of swaps, liquidity provision, and reward accrual, then calculate key metrics.
Detailed Instructions
Accurately simulate the financial mechanics of yield farming. For a liquidity provision strategy, this involves calculating impermanent loss and fee income. When your logic decides to add liquidity, you must deduct the paired tokens from the portfolio and start tracking the pool share. Use formulas to estimate fees earned based on historical volume data (e.g., a 0.3% fee on a simulated $1M daily volume yields $3). Simultaneously, track any governance token rewards (e.g., UNI or COMP) emitted by the protocol, using known emission rates per block.
- Sub-step 1: Implement a
add_liquidity(token_a, token_b, amount_a, amount_b)method that reduces holdings and creates aLiquidityPositionobject. - Sub-step 2: At each step, calculate fees for active positions using:
fees = volume * fee_percentage * (my_liquidity_share / total_liquidity). - Sub-step 3: Calculate impermanent loss by comparing the value of held LP tokens against the value of the initial token amounts if simply held (HODL).
Tip: Store all transactions and state changes in a list for later analysis and to enable a step-by-step replay of the simulation.
Calculate Metrics and Generate Analysis Output
Compute final performance indicators and export the results for evaluation.
Detailed Instructions
After the simulation loop completes, analyze the final portfolio state to compute key performance indicators (KPIs). The most critical metric is the Total Return, calculated as (Final Portfolio Value - Initial Capital) / Initial Capital. Compare this to a simple buy-and-hold benchmark. Also calculate the Sharpe Ratio to assess risk-adjusted returns, using the daily portfolio returns to find the standard deviation. Generate a comprehensive report that includes a equity curve (portfolio value over time) and a breakdown of returns from fees, rewards, and capital gains/losses.
- Sub-step 1: Compute final value and total return. For example:
final_value = portfolio.total_value_usd; total_return_pct = ((final_value - 10000) / 10000) * 100. - Sub-step 2: Generate a pandas Series of daily returns and calculate annualized volatility and Sharpe Ratio (assuming a 0% risk-free rate for simplicity).
- Sub-step 3: Use
matplotlibto plot the equity curve versus the benchmark. Export all transaction logs and the final report to a CSV file for further inspection.
pythonimport pandas as pd returns_series = portfolio_value_history.pct_change().dropna() sharpe_ratio = (returns_series.mean() / returns_series.std()) * (np.sqrt(365)) print(f'Sharpe Ratio: {sharpe_ratio:.2f}')
Analysis and Interpretation
Understanding Your Backtest Results
Yield farming backtesting is the process of simulating a DeFi strategy using historical data to see how it would have performed, without risking real capital. It helps you learn if your plan to provide liquidity or stake tokens would have been profitable, considering factors like impermanent loss and gas fees.
Key Metrics to Analyze
- Total Return: The overall profit or loss from your simulated position, combining trading fees, rewards, and price changes.
- Annual Percentage Yield (APY): The projected yearly return rate, which can be highly volatile and often differs from advertised "farm" APYs.
- Impermanent Loss (IL): The potential loss compared to simply holding your assets, which occurs when the prices of your paired tokens (e.g., ETH/USDC on Uniswap V3) diverge significantly.
- Net Profit After Fees: Your final gain after subtracting all transaction costs, which on Ethereum can be substantial for frequent compounding.
Practical Example
When backtesting a strategy on Curve Finance, you might simulate providing liquidity to the 3pool (DAI, USDC, USDT). Your analysis would show if the stablecoin trading fees and CRV token rewards outweighed the minimal impermanent loss from stablecoin pegs drifting, giving you confidence before depositing real funds.
FAQ and Common Pitfalls
Further Reading and Tools
Ready to Start Building?
Let's bring your Web3 vision to life.
From concept to deployment, ChainScore helps you architect, build, and scale secure blockchain solutions.