Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Guides

Setting Up Decentralized Identity for Reputation

A technical guide for developers on implementing decentralized identity (DID) standards like W3C DID and Verifiable Credentials to create portable, user-owned reputation systems.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
TUTORIAL

Setting Up Decentralized Identity for Reputation

A practical guide to establishing a portable, user-controlled identity foundation for building on-chain reputation across Web3 applications.

Decentralized identity (DID) is the cornerstone of a verifiable, user-owned digital identity on the blockchain. Unlike traditional logins, a DID is not issued by a platform but is a self-sovereign identifier anchored to a public key. For reputation systems, this means your achievements, credentials, and history are tied to your DID, not a specific app's database. This portability allows you to carry your reputation from one decentralized application (dApp) to another, creating a unified profile across the Web3 ecosystem. Protocols like the W3C Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) standard provide the foundational specification for this architecture.

To begin, you need to create a DID and a corresponding Verifiable Data Registry (VDR) to store attestations. A common approach is to use Ethereum as your VDR, where your Ethereum Address (0x...) can function as a simple DID (e.g., did:ethr:0x...). More sophisticated solutions use dedicated DID methods like did:key or did:ion. For developers, libraries such as did-ethr or did-key handle the cryptographic generation and management. The core components are a DID Document (containing public keys and service endpoints) and a DID Controller (the private key holder who can update the document).

Once your DID is established, you can start collecting Verifiable Credentials (VCs). These are tamper-proof digital certificates issued by trusted entities (issuers) about you (the holder). For reputation, a VC could attest that you completed a course, are a reputable liquidity provider, or passed a KYC check. You store these credentials in a wallet that you control, like a mobile identity wallet (e.g., SpruceID's Credible or Veramo's agent). The issuer signs the VC with their private key, and you can cryptographically prove its authenticity to any verifier without revealing unnecessary personal data.

The final step is selective disclosure and presentation of your credentials to build reputation. When a dApp (the verifier) requires proof of your qualifications, you do not send the raw VC. Instead, you create a Verifiable Presentation (VP), which is a packaged proof containing only the specific claims the dApp needs. This is often done using Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) for maximum privacy. For example, you could prove you are over 18 without revealing your birthdate, or prove you have a "Trusted Trader" credential without showing its entire issuance history. Frameworks like Veramo and Serto provide SDKs to easily create and verify these presentations in your application.

Integrating DID-based reputation into an application involves querying a user's DID Document, requesting specific VPs, and verifying them on-chain or off-chain. Smart contracts can be written to check for the presence of a valid VC from a known issuer registry. A practical code snippet using the Veramo framework in TypeScript might look like this:

typescript
import { createAgent } from '@veramo/core';
import { CredentialPlugin } from '@veramo/credential-wdl';
// Create agent and verify a received presentation
const agent = createAgent({ plugins: [new CredentialPlugin()] });
const verificationResult = await agent.verifyPresentation({
  presentation: receivedVerifiablePresentation,
});
if (verificationResult.verified) {
  // Grant reputation-based access or rewards
}

The long-term vision is a composable reputation graph where credentials from various sources—DeFi protocols, DAOs, educational platforms—interoperate. Standards like W3C Verifiable Credentials and decentralized attestation networks like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS) or Ceramic Network are building this infrastructure. By setting up your DID today, you position yourself to accumulate and leverage a portable reputation layer, moving beyond isolated platform scores to a user-centric model of trust and provenance in Web3.

prerequisites
DECENTRALIZED IDENTITY

Prerequisites and Setup

A practical guide to establishing the foundational components for a decentralized identity system that can manage on-chain reputation.

Decentralized identity (DID) for reputation systems moves user credentials off centralized databases and onto user-controlled wallets. The core prerequisites are a cryptographic key pair and a DID method. The key pair, typically generated by a wallet like MetaMask or Rainbow, provides the signing capability to prove ownership. The DID method, such as did:ethr or did:pkh, defines the syntax and resolution process for creating a globally unique identifier (e.g., did:ethr:0xabc123...) from your public key. This DID becomes your portable, self-sovereign identity across applications.

You will need a development environment with Node.js (v18+) and a package manager like npm or yarn installed. Essential libraries include ethers.js or viem for blockchain interaction and a DID toolkit. For Ethereum-based identities, the ethr-did library and its resolver are common choices. Begin by initializing a new project and installing dependencies: npm init -y followed by npm install ethers ethr-did ethr-did-resolver. Ensure you have access to a blockchain RPC endpoint; for testing, services like Alchemy or Infura provide reliable connections to networks like Sepolia or Goerli.

The first actionable step is to generate or import a wallet. Using ethers, you can create a new wallet instance: const wallet = ethers.Wallet.createRandom();. This gives you a private key, public key, and address. Never commit the private key to version control. Instead, use environment variables via a .env file. Your DID is derived from this wallet. For example, with ethr-did, you create a DID registry linked to your address on a specific network. This setup forms the bedrock for issuing and verifying Verifiable Credentials, which are cryptographically signed attestations about your reputation that you can present to dApps.

key-concepts-text
SETUP GUIDE

Decentralized Identity for Reputation Systems

A technical guide to implementing Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) and Verifiable Credentials (VCs) as the foundation for on-chain reputation.

Decentralized Identity (DID) provides a user-owned, portable identifier for Web3, replacing centralized logins. A DID is a URI, like did:ethr:0xabc123..., that points to a DID Document containing public keys and service endpoints. This document is stored on a verifiable data registry, such as the Ethereum blockchain for did:ethr or IPFS for did:key. Users control their DID via a private key, enabling them to prove ownership and interact with applications without intermediaries. This self-sovereign model is the bedrock for portable, user-centric reputation.

Verifiable Credentials (VCs) are the mechanism for issuing and holding attestations. A VC is a tamper-evident credential (like a JSON object) issued by an authority (issuer) to a subject (holder). It contains claims (e.g., "isKYCVerified": true) and is cryptographically signed with the issuer's DID. The holder stores the VC in their digital wallet. Crucially, VCs support selective disclosure, allowing a user to prove specific claims without revealing the entire credential. For reputation, VCs can attest to on-chain activity, community contributions, or skill certifications.

To set up a basic reputation flow, you need a DID method library. For Ethereum, use the ethr-did library. First, a user generates a DID anchored to their Ethereum address. The issuer (e.g., a DAO governance contract) also has a DID. The issuer creates a VC with a claim like "reputationScore": 850 and signs it. The user receives and stores this signed VC in their wallet. When interacting with a dApp, the user can present a Verifiable Presentation—a wrapper around the VC—to prove their reputation score.

Here is a simplified code example using ethr-did and the did-jwt-vc library to issue a reputation credential:

javascript
import { EthrDID } from 'ethr-did';
import { createVerifiableCredentialJwt } from 'did-jwt-vc';
// Issuer creates a VC for a user's DID
const issuer = new EthrDID({ address: '0xIssuer...', privateKey: issuerKey });
const vcPayload = {
  sub: 'did:ethr:0xUser...',
  vc: {
    '@context': ['https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1'],
    type: ['VerifiableCredential', 'ReputationCredential'],
    credentialSubject: {
      id: 'did:ethr:0xUser...',
      protocol: 'Uniswap V3',
      reputationTier: 'Liquidity Provider'
    }
  }
};
const vcJwt = await createVerifiableCredentialJwt(vcPayload, issuer);
// vcJwt is sent to and stored by the user

For the system to be useful, dApps must be able to verify these credentials. Using a library like did-jwt-vc, a verifier can check the VC's signature against the issuer's DID Document on-chain and ensure it has not been revoked. A common pattern is to use a revocation registry, like an on-chain smart contract that holds a list of revoked credential IDs. This setup allows for reputation to be composable and interoperable; a user can bring credentials from multiple protocols (e.g., Aave, Gitcoin) to a new dApp to establish trust, moving beyond isolated, siloed reputation scores.

Key implementation considerations include DID method choice (did:ethr for Ethereum, did:key for lightweight use), VC data formats (JWT vs. JSON-LD), and privacy-preserving techniques like zero-knowledge proofs for anonymous reputation verification. The ultimate goal is a system where users own and control their reputation capital, enabling trustless, granular, and portable identity across the decentralized web.

credential-issuance-smart-contract
TUTORIAL

Issuing Reputation Credentials via Smart Contract

A technical guide to implementing a decentralized identity system for on-chain reputation using verifiable credentials and smart contracts.

Decentralized identity (DID) systems allow users to own and control their digital credentials without relying on a central authority. For on-chain reputation, this means a user's trustworthiness, skills, or achievements can be represented as verifiable credentials—tamper-proof digital claims signed by an issuer. These credentials are stored in a user's digital wallet (like a MetaMask or WalletConnect wallet) and can be presented to smart contracts to prove specific attributes, such as being a verified contributor or having a certain credit score, without revealing unnecessary personal data.

The core technical components for issuing credentials are the issuer's smart contract and the verifiable credential standard. A common approach is to use the W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model with Ethereum-based proofs. The issuer contract, deployed by a trusted entity (e.g., a DAO or protocol), has a function to issue a credential. This function typically takes a recipient's DID (a string like did:ethr:0x123...) and a credential hash, then emits an event or writes to a mapping. The actual credential JSON-LD document, containing the claim and the issuer's cryptographic signature, is stored off-chain (e.g., on IPFS or a server), with its content identifier (CID) or URL recorded on-chain for verification.

Here is a simplified example of an issuer smart contract written in Solidity. The contract mints a Soulbound Token (SBT)—a non-transferable NFT—to represent a reputation credential. The token URI points to the off-chain verifiable credential document.

solidity
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.19;

import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/ERC721.sol";

contract ReputationCredential is ERC721 {
    uint256 public nextTokenId;
    address public immutable issuer;

    constructor() ERC721("ReputationCredential", "REP") {
        issuer = msg.sender;
    }

    function issueCredential(address to, string memory tokenURI) external onlyIssuer returns (uint256) {
        uint256 tokenId = nextTokenId++;
        _safeMint(to, tokenId);
        _setTokenURI(tokenId, tokenURI); // Stores the link to the VC JSON document
        return tokenId;
    }

    modifier onlyIssuer() {
        require(msg.sender == issuer, "Not authorized issuer");
        _;
    }
}

This contract ensures only the designated issuer can mint credentials, and the tokens are non-transferable by default due to the lack of transfer functions.

Once issued, a verifier (another smart contract or off-chain service) can check the credential's validity. The verification process involves two steps: first, checking the on-chain proof that a credential was issued to a specific DID (by verifying the token ownership or event log). Second, fetching the off-chain credential document and cryptographically verifying the issuer's signature against their known public key or DID document. This separation keeps detailed claim data private and scalable off-chain while anchoring proof and revocation status on-chain.

Key design considerations include revocation mechanisms and privacy. For revocation, the issuer contract can maintain a revocation registry or simply burn the SBT. For privacy, use zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) via circuits (e.g., with Circom and SnarkJS) to allow users to prove they hold a valid credential for a specific claim (e.g., "reputation score > 100") without revealing the credential's full contents or their identity. Frameworks like Veramo or SpruceID's Kepler can streamline the off-chain signing and storage processes.

Integrating these credentials into DeFi or DAO governance creates powerful use cases. A lending protocol could offer better rates to users with a "Trusted Borrower" credential issued by a credit DAO. A governance system could weight votes based on a "Contributor Tier" credential. By implementing this architecture, developers build a portable, user-centric reputation layer that interoperates across the Web3 ecosystem, moving beyond isolated protocol-specific point systems.

TECHNICAL SPECS

DID Method Comparison for Reputation Systems

A comparison of popular DID methods for building on-chain reputation, focusing on developer experience, privacy, and interoperability.

Feature / Metricdid:ethr (Ethereum)did:key (Portable)did:web (Centralized Control)did:ion (Bitcoin/Sidetree)

Primary Blockchain

Ethereum (any EVM chain)

Key-pair agnostic

Web domain (central server)

Bitcoin + IPFS

On-Chain Registry

Update/Revoke Cost

~$2-10 (gas fees)

Free (off-chain)

Free (server-side)

~$0.50-2 (BTC fees)

Privacy (Selective Disclosure)

Decentralized Resolution

W3C Compliance

Typical Resolution Time

< 1 sec

< 100 ms

< 500 ms

2-5 sec

Best For

DeFi, DAO membership

Portable credentials, testing

Enterprise pilots, closed systems

Censorship-resistant systems

DECENTRALIZED IDENTITY

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions and technical clarifications for developers implementing decentralized identity (DID) systems for on-chain reputation.

A Decentralized Identifier (DID) is a portable, self-sovereign identifier controlled by the user, not a centralized registry. It is defined by the W3C standard and typically looks like did:method:identifier. A wallet address (e.g., 0x...) is a specific type of identifier for a blockchain account, often used as a proxy for identity but lacking portability and verifiable credentials.

Key Differences:

  • Control: DIDs are controlled via cryptographic keys, independent of any single blockchain. A wallet address is tied to a specific chain's account system.
  • Portability: A DID can resolve to different verification methods (keys) across systems. A wallet address is chain-bound.
  • Data: DIDs are linked to a DID Document containing public keys and service endpoints, enabling verifiable credentials for reputation. A wallet address has no inherent document.

Example: did:ethr:0xab... is an Ethereum-based DID that can hold credentials proving a user's reputation score, which can be verified without relying on the issuing dApp's server.

conclusion-next-steps
IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY

Conclusion and Next Steps

You have now configured the core components for a decentralized identity (DID) system that can underpin on-chain reputation.

This guide walked through the practical steps of establishing a self-sovereign identity foundation. You have deployed a Verifiable Credential (VC) issuer smart contract, integrated a Decentralized Identifier (DID) method like did:ethr or did:pkh, and set up a Verifiable Data Registry (such as Ethereum Attestation Service or Ceramic) to store attestations. The key takeaway is that reputation is built from a collection of verifiable, tamper-proof claims issued by trusted entities and anchored to a user's DID.

To move from a proof-of-concept to a production system, several critical next steps remain. First, design your credential schemas with precision. Define the specific claims (e.g., totalValueLocked, successfulTrades, communityKarma) and their data types. Second, implement a robust revocation mechanism, such as a revocation registry or timestamp-based expiry, to handle credentials that are no longer valid. Third, build privacy-preserving features using zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) to allow users to prove they hold a credential (e.g., "KYC verified") without revealing the underlying data.

For developers, the immediate technical next step is to integrate a VC verification library into your dApp's frontend or backend. Libraries like veramo or daf can parse JWTs or JSON-LD proofs and validate them against the on-chain registry. You should also write and test the smart contract logic that consumes verified credentials. For example, a lending protocol's borrow() function might check for a CreditScore attestation from a trusted oracle before approving a loan.

The ecosystem for decentralized identity is rapidly evolving. Follow these resources for deeper exploration: the W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model specification for standards, the Decentralized Identity Foundation (DIF) for working groups, and platforms like Gitcoin Passport for real-world aggregation models. Experimenting on testnets like Sepolia or Polygon Amoy is crucial for refining your architecture without cost.

Ultimately, a well-constructed DID-based reputation layer transforms anonymous wallet addresses into context-rich, portable identities. This enables more sophisticated DeFi primitives, trustworthy governance systems, and user-centric applications. Start by issuing a simple "Tutorial Completer" credential to your test users, and iterate from there.