A positive sum game is a strategic interaction, or game, in which the total gains and losses for all participants sum to a value greater than zero. This creates a scenario where cooperation, trade, or collaboration can lead to outcomes where all players are better off than they were before. It contrasts directly with zero-sum games, where one participant's gain is exactly balanced by another's loss, and negative-sum games, where the total outcome is a net loss for the group. The concept is central to understanding economic growth, technological innovation, and cooperative blockchain network design.
LABS
Glossary
Positive Sum Game
A positive sum game is a strategic interaction or economic scenario where the total gains and losses for all participants sum to a net positive, creating value for the overall system.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
GAME THEORY
What is a Positive Sum Game?
A positive sum game is a foundational concept in game theory and economics where interactions result in a net gain for all participants, increasing the total resources or utility available.
In blockchain and decentralized systems, positive sum dynamics are often engineered into protocol design and tokenomics. For example, a well-designed proof-of-stake network creates value for validators through block rewards and transaction fees while simultaneously providing security and finality for users—a win-win. Similarly, liquidity pools in decentralized finance (DeFi) generate fees for liquidity providers while offering efficient trading for users. The core mechanism enabling these outcomes is the alignment of incentives, where participants are rewarded for contributing to the network's overall health and utility.
Identifying and fostering positive sum environments is a critical skill for developers and protocol architects. Key indicators include non-rivalrous goods (like open-source software), network effects that increase value with more users, and synergistic interactions between different protocol layers. In contrast, systems plagued by maximal extractable value (MEV), toxic transaction flow, or poorly calibrated inflation can devolve into zero-sum or negative-sum competitions. The goal of sustainable Web3 design is to structure economic and governance rules—such as fee distribution, reward schedules, and voting rights—to maximize cooperative, value-creating behavior among all network stakeholders.
etymology
GAME THEORY
Etymology & Origin
The term 'Positive-Sum Game' originates from game theory, a branch of mathematics that studies strategic interactions between rational decision-makers. It describes a foundational concept for analyzing cooperative and competitive systems, including economic markets and, more recently, blockchain networks.
A positive-sum game is a strategic interaction where the total gains and losses for all participants sum to a net positive, meaning the overall 'pie' of resources or utility increases. This contrasts with a zero-sum game, where one participant's gain is exactly balanced by another's loss, and a negative-sum game, where the total outcome is a net loss for the group. The concept was formally developed in the mid-20th century by mathematicians like John von Neumann and economist Oskar Morgenstern in their seminal work, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944).
The etymology is directly descriptive: 'sum' refers to the mathematical total of outcomes, and 'positive' indicates that this total is greater than zero. In economic and social contexts, trade is the classic example of a positive-sum interaction; both buyer and seller engage because each values what they receive more than what they give up, creating mutual benefit and new value. This framework provides a powerful lens for analyzing whether a system incentivizes pure competition, collaboration, or destructive behavior.
In blockchain and cryptocurrency, the positive-sum game concept is crucial for evaluating protocol design and tokenomics. A well-designed decentralized network aims to be positive-sum by aligning incentives so that participants—users, validators, developers—are rewarded for contributions that increase the network's overall security, utility, and value. Protocols that foster composability and open innovation are often cited as modern digital positive-sum games, where new applications built on the platform create value for all existing participants without taking value away.
key-features
CORE MECHANICS
Key Features of Positive Sum Games
Positive-sum games are economic systems where participants can collectively gain value, contrasting with zero-sum or negative-sum structures. Their design is foundational to sustainable crypto-economic models.
01
Non-Zero-Sum Outcome
A positive-sum game is defined by a system where the total gains of all participants exceed the total losses, creating net new value. This contrasts with zero-sum games (e.g., poker) where one player's gain is another's loss, and negative-sum games where the system itself destroys value (e.g., high-friction markets). The core mechanism enables win-win scenarios through cooperation and coordination.
02
Value Creation Engine
The system generates new utility or assets that did not previously exist. This is achieved through:
- Productive Work: Rewarding contributions like providing liquidity, validating transactions, or curating data.
- Network Effects: Each new participant increases the utility for all others, as seen in social networks or decentralized exchanges.
- Innovation: Protocols that enable new financial primitives (e.g., automated market makers) expand the total addressable market.
03
Aligned Incentives
Protocols use tokenomics and smart contract rules to align individual participant rewards with the long-term health of the network. Key mechanisms include:
- Staking Rewards: Compensating validators for securing the network.
- Fee Distribution: Sharing protocol revenue with liquidity providers.
- Governance Rights: Granting tokens that give holders a stake in collective decision-making, incentivizing stewardship.
04
Cooperative, Not Purely Competitive
While competition exists, the foundational layer encourages cooperation to grow the overall pie. Examples include:
- Liquidity Pools: LPs collectively earn fees from traders; their success is interdependent.
- Proof-of-Stake: Validators are incentivized to act honestly to preserve the value of the network they secure.
- Open-Source Development: Contributors build public goods, enhancing the ecosystem for all users and derivative builders.
05
Contrast with Zero-Sum Trading
It's critical to distinguish the protocol's economic design from activities on top of it. A decentralized exchange (DEX) like Uniswap is a positive-sum engine for liquidity providers who earn fees, but individual speculative trading on that DEX remains a zero-sum game between counterparties. The underlying protocol's fee generation is what creates the positive-sum layer.
06
Examples in Practice
Real-world blockchain implementations:
- Ethereum: A global settlement layer where developers create applications, paying fees (ETH) to validators. The net value is the world's open financial and computational infrastructure.
- Curve Finance: Its veTokenomics model aligns long-term token lockers (veCRV holders) with protocol fee revenue and gauge voting, creating a cooperative system to direct liquidity.
- Bitcoin Mining: Miners are rewarded with new BTC and fees for securing the network, creating the foundational asset of the crypto economy.
how-it-works-refi
COORDINATION MECHANICS
How It Works in ReFi & DAOs
This section explores how the economic principle of a positive-sum game is operationalized within the decentralized governance and incentive structures of ReFi and DAOs.
A positive-sum game is an economic or strategic interaction where the total gains for all participants can increase, creating a net benefit for the group rather than merely redistributing a fixed pool of value. In contrast to zero-sum games (where one's gain is another's loss) or negative-sum games (where the total value decreases), this framework is foundational to designing systems where cooperation and aligned incentives lead to collective growth. In the context of blockchain and decentralized organizations, this principle moves beyond theory into a programmable reality.
In ReFi (Regenerative Finance), positive-sum dynamics are engineered through mechanisms that internalize externalities and reward contributions to public goods. For example, a protocol might issue token rewards for verifiable carbon sequestration or biodiversity conservation, aligning individual profit with planetary health. This transforms environmental stewardship from a cost center into a revenue-generating activity, creating new value streams rather than competing over existing ones. The system's design ensures that as the underlying regenerative asset (e.g., a healthier ecosystem) appreciates, all stakeholders—from land stewards to token holders—benefit.
DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) institutionalize positive-sum games through transparent governance and shared ownership. Instead of hierarchical profit extraction, value created by the community—through development, curation, or liquidity provision—is often captured and redistributed via the DAO's native token or treasury. Key mechanisms include retroactive public goods funding, protocol-owned liquidity, and participatory grant programs. These structures align long-term interests, ensuring that contributors are rewarded in proportion to the value they create for the network, fostering a virtuous cycle of investment and innovation.
The technical implementation relies on smart contracts and cryptoeconomic design to automate and enforce these cooperative rules. Staking mechanisms, vesting schedules, and quadratic funding are all tools to discourage short-term extraction and promote behaviors that increase the total protocol value. This transforms governance from a political battle over fixed resources into a collaborative process of growing the shared pie. Success is measured not by a participant's share of the treasury, but by the growth of the treasury itself.
A canonical example is a liquidity mining program that attracts capital to a decentralized exchange. While individual farmers compete for yields, their collective participation deepens liquidity, reduces slippage for all traders, and increases the utility and value of the underlying protocol token. This creates a win-win: liquidity providers earn fees, traders get better prices, and token holders see appreciation. The game is positive-sum because the act of participation itself enhances the fundamental utility of the network, generating new value that did not previously exist.
examples
POSITIVE SUM GAME
Real-World Blockchain Examples
A positive-sum game is an economic interaction where the total gains exceed the total losses, creating net value for all participants. In blockchain, this is achieved through protocols that align incentives and enable new forms of coordination.
GAME THEORY FRAMEWORK
Positive Sum vs. Zero Sum vs. Negative Sum
A comparison of economic game types based on the net outcome for participants.
| Core Metric | Positive Sum Game | Zero Sum Game | Negative Sum Game |
|---|---|---|---|
Net Outcome | Total gains > total losses | Total gains = total losses | Total gains < total losses |
Participant Relationship | Cooperative or symbiotic | Purely competitive | Destructive or conflictual |
Wealth Creation | |||
Wealth Destruction | |||
Example in Crypto | Liquidity provision (LP fees) | Futures trading (one wins, one loses) | Protocol exploit or rug pull |
Long-Term Viability | Sustainable ecosystem growth | Redistributive, no net growth | Systemic collapse |
Primary Incentive | Alignment and participation | Outperformance of others | Extraction or sabotage |
ecosystem-usage
POSITIVE SUM GAME
Ecosystem Applications
A positive-sum game is an economic interaction where the total gains exceed the total losses, creating net value for all participants. In blockchain, this is a foundational principle for protocols designed to align incentives and foster collaborative growth.
06
Contrast with Zero-Sum Games
Understanding what a positive-sum game is not is critical. In traditional trading or many GameFi models with pure extraction, one participant's profit is directly another's loss, with fees draining value from the system. Positive-sum designs focus on value expansion through:
- Fee generation from external demand (e.g., trading, borrowing).
- Alignment of long-term incentives (e.g., staking, governance).
- Network effects that increase utility for all users.
visual-explainer
GAME THEORY
Positive Sum Game
A framework for understanding interactions where the total gains and losses for all participants can be greater than zero, creating collective value.
In game theory, a positive sum game describes a strategic interaction where the total gains for all participants, when summed, are greater than the total losses. This creates a net increase in value for the group, allowing for outcomes where all players can benefit—often referred to as a win-win scenario. This contrasts with zero-sum games, where one participant's gain is exactly balanced by another's loss, and negative-sum games, where the total losses exceed the gains, destroying value for the collective.
In blockchain and decentralized networks, the concept is foundational to understanding sustainable protocol design. A protocol functions as a positive sum game when its economic and governance mechanisms align the incentives of all network participants—users, developers, validators, and token holders—toward a common goal of network growth and value creation. This alignment is often engineered through mechanisms like tokenomics, staking rewards, and fee distribution, which ensure that contributing to the network's health (e.g., through security, liquidity, or development) is directly rewarded, thereby expanding the overall value pie.
The value flywheel effect is a prime example of a positive sum dynamic in action. As more users join a network, it becomes more useful (increased utility), which attracts developers to build applications, which in turn attracts more users and capital. Each cycle of this flywheel increases the total value of the ecosystem for all stakeholders. Successful protocols like Ethereum and its layer-2 networks explicitly design for this outcome, where fees paid by users are distributed to stakers and builders, reinvesting value back into the ecosystem's security and innovation.
POSITIVE SUM GAME
Common Misconceptions
The concept of a 'positive-sum game' is central to understanding blockchain's economic potential but is often misunderstood. This section clarifies its precise meaning, mechanics, and limitations within decentralized systems.
A positive-sum game is an economic scenario where the total gains of all participants exceed the total losses, creating net new value. In blockchain, this is achieved through protocols that generate utility, such as enabling decentralized finance (DeFi), creating digital scarcity via non-fungible tokens (NFTs), or providing verifiable compute through smart contracts. Unlike a zero-sum game where one participant's gain is another's loss (e.g., pure trading), a positive-sum system expands the overall economic pie. For example, the Ethereum network creates value by allowing developers to build applications that were previously impossible, generating fees for validators, utility for users, and returns for ETH stakers from a growing ecosystem, not merely from redistributing existing capital.
POSITIVE SUM GAME
Frequently Asked Questions
A positive sum game is a foundational economic concept in crypto and DeFi, describing interactions where the total gains exceed the total losses, creating net value. This contrasts with zero-sum games, where one participant's gain is another's loss.
A positive sum game in crypto is an economic interaction where the total benefits generated for all participants exceed the total costs, creating net new value for the ecosystem. This occurs when a protocol's design or a network's growth incentivizes behaviors that increase the overall size of the economic pie, rather than merely redistributing existing value. Key examples include liquidity mining that bootstraps a decentralized exchange, staking rewards that secure a proof-of-stake blockchain, and the development of public infrastructure like the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) that enables countless applications. The core mechanism is value creation through composability and network effects, where each new user or application increases the utility for all others.
further-reading
POSITIVE SUM GAME
Further Reading
Explore the foundational concepts, economic models, and real-world applications that define positive-sum systems in technology and finance.
02
Network Effects & Value Creation
Positive-sum dynamics are often powered by network effects, where each new user increases the value of the network for all existing users. Key examples include:
- Social Media Platforms: More users create more content and connections.
- Protocols like Ethereum: More developers build applications, attracting more users, which in turn makes the native asset (ETH) more valuable for all holders.
- Liquidity Pools: More liquidity reduces slippage for all traders, encouraging more trading volume and fee generation for liquidity providers.
03
DeFi as a Positive-Sum Engine
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocols are engineered to be positive-sum by design. Mechanisms include:
- Yield Generation: Capital is put to productive use (e.g., lending, providing insurance) to generate real yield from economic activity, not just redistribution.
- Composability (Money Legos): Protocols can be seamlessly combined, allowing developers to build new financial products on top of existing ones, creating value for all layers.
- Protocol-Owned Revenue: Some protocols use treasury assets to generate revenue that benefits all token holders, rather than extracting value from users.
04
Contrast with Zero-Sum Systems
Understanding what a positive-sum game is not is crucial. Zero-sum systems dominate traditional trading and speculation:
- Pure Speculation: Buying an asset hoping someone else will pay more (the "greater fool" theory).
- Most Traditional Derivatives: Options and futures are largely redistributive.
- Extractive Fees: Platforms that charge high fees without providing proportional value back to the ecosystem. A key challenge in crypto is distinguishing protocols that create new value from those that merely redistribute existing value.
05
The Role of Tokenomics
Tokenomics—the economic design of a crypto asset—determines if a system is positive or zero-sum. Positive-sum token models feature:
- Value Accrual: Clear mechanisms for how protocol revenue or utility benefits the token (e.g., fee burning, staking rewards).
- Aligned Incentives: Rewards are structured so that participants' success benefits the network's health.
- Sustainable Emissions: Token issuance rewards long-term contributors and stakeholders, not just short-term speculators. Poor tokenomics often lead to inflationary dilution and zero-sum outcomes.
06
Real-World Analogies
Positive-sum games exist beyond crypto:
- Open-Source Software: Developers contribute code, everyone benefits from a better tool, and contributors build reputation.
- Scientific Research: Knowledge is published, enabling others to build upon it, accelerating progress for all.
- Marketplaces like eBay: More sellers attract more buyers, and vice versa, increasing total transactions and value. These analogies help frame how blockchain aims to create cooperative, value-creating ecosystems rather than purely competitive ones.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall