Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Glossary

Sovereign SDK

An open-source toolkit for building sovereign rollups, where the execution layer defines its own data availability and consensus, operating independently from any settlement layer.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
BLOCKCHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE

What is Sovereign SDK?

A modular framework for building sovereign, interoperable blockchain rollups.

The Sovereign SDK is an open-source software development kit designed to enable developers to build sovereign rollups, a type of blockchain that publishes its transaction data to a parent chain (like Celestia or Ethereum) for data availability but maintains independent execution and full sovereignty over its state transitions and governance. Unlike a smart contract rollup (or "settlement rollup"), a sovereign rollup does not rely on the parent chain's virtual machine for fraud or validity proofs; it uses the parent solely as a secure data publication layer and a neutral communication bridge to other rollups in the ecosystem.

Architecturally, the SDK provides a modular stack that separates core concerns: a Data Availability Layer interface, a State Transition Function (STF) framework, and a Proof System abstraction. Developers implement their custom STF—defining the rules of their blockchain—using the provided interfaces, while the SDK handles the underlying complexities of zk-proof generation, DA sampling, and inter-rollup communication via the Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol. This modularity allows for flexibility in choosing a proof system (e.g., RISC Zero, SP1) and a DA layer without rewriting the entire rollup logic.

The primary use case for the Sovereign SDK is creating application-specific blockchains (appchains) or sovereign chains that require maximum autonomy. This is critical for projects needing custom fee markets, governance models, or virtual machines that are not possible within the constraints of a host chain's smart contract environment. By decoupling execution and settlement, it enables a multi-chain ecosystem where each rollup is a truly independent chain, capable of forking and upgrading its protocol without permission from a base layer's smart contract logic.

how-it-works
DEVELOPER FRAMEWORK

How the Sovereign SDK Works

The Sovereign SDK is a modular, open-source framework for building fully sovereign, interoperable blockchain rollups.

At its core, the Sovereign SDK provides a standardized, reusable architecture for sovereign rollups. Unlike smart contract rollups that execute within a parent chain's virtual machine (like Ethereum's EVM), a sovereign rollup publishes its transaction data to a data availability (DA) layer but retains full autonomy over its state transitions and consensus. The SDK abstracts the complexities of this architecture, offering developers a unified interface to define their chain's logic, state machine, and proof system without being locked into a specific execution environment or settlement layer.

The framework operates on a clear separation of concerns through its modular stack. The Data Availability Interface handles the posting and retrieval of transaction data from a chosen DA layer (e.g., Celestia, EigenDA, or Ethereum). The State Transition Function, defined by the developer using the SDK's APIs, contains the core business logic that processes this data to update the chain's state. Finally, the Proof System (initially a zkVM) generates validity proofs for these state transitions, enabling light clients to verify the chain's correctness trustlessly. This modularity allows each component to be upgraded or swapped independently.

Development with the Sovereign SDK begins by implementing the state transition logic, typically in Rust, which defines the rules of the application—such as a decentralized exchange or a gaming ledger. The SDK then compiles this logic, along with the selected DA and proof system modules, into a fully functional node client. This node can sync from genesis by downloading and verifying all data from the DA layer, executing the state transitions locally, and producing proofs. Because the chain's validity is cryptographically ensured by proofs and available data, it does not require a separate settlement layer for security, achieving true sovereignty.

key-features
SOVEREIGN SDK

Key Features of Sovereign Rollups

The Sovereign SDK is a framework for building rollups where the rollup's own nodes, not a base layer smart contract, are the ultimate arbiters of state validity. This grants developers unprecedented control over the stack.

01

Full Stack Sovereignty

Developers control the entire technology stack, from the data availability layer and virtual machine to the consensus mechanism and settlement logic. This allows for:

  • Custom fee markets and economic models.
  • Experimentation with novel VMs (e.g., SVM, MoveVM).
  • Independent upgrades without base-layer governance.
02

Flexible Data Availability

Sovereign rollups can post transaction data to any data availability (DA) layer that provides sufficient security guarantees, such as Celestia, EigenDA, or Avail. This separates execution security from data availability, enabling:

  • Lower costs by choosing cost-effective DA.
  • Interoperability across multiple ecosystems.
  • Resilience against base-layer congestion.
03

Sovereign Consensus

The rollup's state transition is validated by its own full nodes, which independently verify blocks against the rules defined in the rollup's state transition function (STF). This means:

  • No reliance on a base-layer smart contract for fraud or validity proofs.
  • The canonical chain is determined by the rollup's community, not an L1.
  • Enables sovereign forks for governance disputes.
04

Developer Experience & Interop

The SDK provides modular components and default implementations (like the Sovereign VM) to accelerate development. It is designed for interoperability, allowing sovereign rollups to:

  • Communicate via IBC or other bridging protocols.
  • Share security through restaking mechanisms.
  • Be deployed across multiple DA layers and settlement chains.
05

Contrast with Smart Contract Rollups

Unlike optimistic or zk-rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, zkSync), which rely on a verification contract on an L1 like Ethereum for finality, sovereign rollups use the L1 purely for data publishing and optional dispute resolution. The key difference is the locus of consensus: it resides with the rollup's nodes, not the L1.

ARCHITECTURAL COMPARISON

Sovereign vs. Smart Contract Rollups

A technical comparison of the two primary rollup paradigms, focusing on their core architectural differences and implications for developers.

Architectural FeatureSovereign RollupSmart Contract Rollup

Settlement Layer

Data Availability (DA) Layer (e.g., Celestia)

Smart Contract on L1 (e.g., Ethereum)

State Validation

Self-validating (via full nodes)

L1 Smart Contract validates proofs

Upgrade Mechanism

Social consensus / Fork of the rollup

Governance of the L1 smart contract

Bridge Security Model

Based on the rollup's own light client security

Derived from the underlying L1's security

Execution Environment

Defined by the rollup's own virtual machine

Constrained by the host L1's VM (e.g., EVM)

Native Token for Fees

Typically required for sequencer/DA payment

Uses the L1's native token (e.g., ETH) for gas

Protocol Forkability

Fully forkable as an independent chain

Fork requires redeploying the smart contract on L1

Data Posting Cost

Cost of DA layer blob space

Cost of L1 calldata / blob space

examples
SOVEREIGN SDK

Examples and Implementations

The Sovereign SDK is a framework for building sovereign rollups—application-specific blockchains that handle their own execution and data availability. These examples illustrate its core implementations and the ecosystem it enables.

01

Sovereign Rollup Architecture

The SDK provides the core components for a sovereign rollup, a blockchain where the rollup's full nodes are responsible for sequencing transactions and publishing data to a data availability (DA) layer like Celestia. Key elements include:

  • State Transition Function (STF): Defines the chain's logic (e.g., a zkVM or SVM).
  • Proof System: Optional, for generating validity proofs (ZK) or fraud proofs.
  • DA Interface: Abstracts communication with the underlying DA layer for data posting and retrieval.
02

zkVM Example: RISC Zero

A primary use case is building ZK-rollups using a zero-knowledge virtual machine. Developers can write their chain's logic in a high-level language (like Rust), and the SDK compiles it to run inside a zkVM such as RISC Zero.

  • The zkVM generates a cryptographic proof (a STARK or SNARK) for each block.
  • This proof is posted to the DA layer, allowing light clients to verify state transitions without re-executing transactions.
  • Enables sovereign validity rollups with minimal trust assumptions.
03

SVM Example: Nitro

For developers familiar with Solana, the SDK supports the Sealevel Virtual Machine (SVM) via the Nitro rollup. This allows for building high-throughput, parallelized sovereign chains.

  • Uses the same parallel execution model and developer tooling as Solana.
  • Transactions and state roots are posted to a DA layer (e.g., Celestia, EigenLayer).
  • Provides an alternative path for sovereign appchains that need Solana's performance characteristics but require their own governance and fee markets.
04

Modular Stack Integration

The SDK exemplifies modular blockchain design by cleanly separating execution, settlement, and data availability. Implementations show how to integrate with various layers:

  • DA Layer: Configurable to use Celestia, EigenLayer, Avail, or a local mock for testing.
  • Settlement: Can be configured to settle proofs on a layer 1 (e.g., Ethereum) for interoperability, or can remain sovereign.
  • Bridging: Includes light client verification for secure cross-chain communication without centralized bridges.
05

Developer Tooling & Full Node

A key implementation is the Sovereign Node, the reference full node client. It provides:

  • State Management: Maintains the rollup's state by syncing from the DA layer.
  • JSON-RPC API: A standard interface for wallets and dApps to query state and submit transactions.
  • Proof Generation/Verification: Modules for creating and checking zk-proofs or fraud proofs.
  • This turns the SDK from a theoretical framework into a runnable, production-ready node.
technical-details
TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE

Sovereign SDK

A framework for building application-specific blockchains, or **sovereign rollups**, that prioritize full control over the execution environment and data availability layer.

A Sovereign SDK is a software development kit that provides the core components—such as a consensus engine, data availability layer, and state transition function—for developers to construct a sovereign rollup. Unlike smart contract rollups, which rely on a parent chain's settlement and governance, a chain built with a Sovereign SDK is fully autonomous; it publishes its transaction data to a data availability layer (like Celestia or Avail) but is responsible for its own execution, settlement, and fork-choice rules. This architecture grants developers sovereignty, meaning they have ultimate authority over the chain's protocol upgrades and rule changes without requiring permission from an underlying L1.

The technical architecture typically separates the execution layer from the consensus and data availability layer. The SDK handles the heavy lifting of peer-to-peer networking, block production, and data publication, while developers implement a custom state transition function (often in a general-purpose language like Rust or Go) to define the chain's logic. This is a key differentiator from EVM rollup frameworks; a Sovereign SDK does not inherit the EVM's architecture or gas model by default, allowing for novel virtual machines, fee markets, and governance mechanisms. The chain's full nodes verify correctness by downloading the published data and re-executing transactions independently.

A primary use case is enabling sovereign interoperability, where chains can communicate via bridging protocols without a shared settlement layer. Because each sovereign chain controls its own state, it can adopt a light client-based trust-minimized bridge to verify the state of another chain directly from its data availability layer. This contrasts with shared security models where validity is enforced by a root chain. Prominent examples include the Rollkit framework, which can be used to build sovereign rollups on Celestia, and the Cosmos SDK, which, when configured to use a separate data availability layer, can produce sovereign chains outside the Cosmos IBC ecosystem.

benefits-tradeoffs
SOVEREIGN SDK

Benefits and Trade-offs

The Sovereign SDK is a framework for building sovereign rollups, which are blockchains that publish data to a parent chain but retain independent execution and governance. This architecture presents distinct advantages and inherent complexities.

01

Technical Sovereignty

The core benefit is full control over the execution environment. Developers can choose any virtual machine (e.g., custom VM, EVM, SVM, Move VM) and modify it without permission. This enables:

  • Unconstrained innovation in state transitions and consensus mechanisms.
  • Independent upgrades without relying on the parent chain's governance.
  • Full control over transaction ordering and block production.
02

Data Availability & Security

Sovereign rollups derive security from publishing their transaction data to a Data Availability (DA) layer, like Celestia or Ethereum. This creates a key trade-off:

  • Benefit: Security is decoupled from execution, potentially lowering costs compared to settlement rollups.
  • Trade-off: The chain's state validity must be proven by full nodes, not automatically verified by the parent chain's smart contracts. Security relies on at least one honest full node.
03

Interoperability & Bridging

Sovereign chains operate as independent state machines, creating both flexibility and friction for cross-chain communication.

  • Benefit: Can implement custom light client bridges or leverage the parent chain's settlement layer for trust-minimized transfers.
  • Trade-off: Native asset bridging is not automatic. It requires explicit bridge contracts or IBC-like protocols, adding complexity compared to shared settlement layer models.
04

Developer Experience

The SDK abstracts the complexity of building a consensus and DA layer, but introduces new responsibilities.

  • Benefit: Provides a standardized stack for sovereign rollup development (e.g., zk-rollup or optimistic rollup frameworks).
  • Trade-off: Teams must run and maintain their own sequencer and prover infrastructure (if using ZK), and ensure a robust network of full nodes for state verification.
05

Economic Model & Fees

The economic structure is self-determined, separating execution fees from data publication costs.

  • Benefit: All execution fees (e.g., gas) are captured by the sovereign chain's validators/sequencers, creating a direct revenue model.
  • Trade-off: Must pay fees in the native token of the chosen DA layer (e.g., TIA, ETH) for data publishing, which is a variable operational cost.
06

Comparison to Settlement Rollups

A key distinction is the relationship with the parent chain. Sovereign rollups use it only for data availability and consensus, while settlement rollups (e.g., Arbitrum, Optimism) also use it for dispute resolution or proof verification.

  • Sovereign Pro: Maximum autonomy and fee capture.
  • Sovereign Con: Greater burden for state validity and bridging.
  • Settlement Pro: Inherited security and simpler trust assumptions for bridging.
  • Settlement Con: Constrained by the parent chain's VM and governance for upgrades.
SOVEREIGN SDK

Common Misconceptions

Clarifying frequent misunderstandings about the architecture, capabilities, and purpose of the Sovereign SDK for building rollups.

No, the Sovereign SDK is a fundamentally different paradigm for building sovereign rollups, not smart contract rollups. While frameworks like OP Stack and Arbitrum Nitro are designed to create rollups that are execution environments within a parent chain (like Ethereum), the Sovereign SDK enables the creation of independent, sovereign chains. The key distinction is the settlement layer: a smart contract rollup's canonical chain is the parent L1, whereas a sovereign rollup's canonical chain is its own data availability layer (like Celestia), with the parent chain acting only as a data availability and dispute resolution provider, not a settlement layer. This grants sovereign rollups full autonomy over their state transition logic and fork choice rules.

SOVEREIGN SDK

Frequently Asked Questions

Essential questions and answers about the Sovereign SDK, a framework for building modular, interoperable rollups.

The Sovereign SDK is an open-source framework for building zk-rollups and optimistic rollups that are interoperable and sovereign. It works by providing a standardized, modular architecture where developers implement a state transition function for their application logic. The SDK handles the underlying data availability, consensus, and proof generation/verification layers, allowing the rollup to publish its data to any compatible data availability (DA) layer (like Celestia or EigenDA) and settle on any connected settlement layer (like Ethereum or Bitcoin). This separation of concerns enables sovereign rollups, which have full autonomy over their governance and upgrade path, unlike smart contract rollups which are constrained by their settlement layer's rules.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team