A transaction accelerator is a third-party service that, for a fee, submits a user's pending or "stuck" transaction to specialized mining pools or validators with a higher priority, increasing its likelihood of being included in the next block. This mechanism is primarily used on networks like Ethereum during periods of high congestion, where the standard gas fee attached to a transaction may be insufficient to outbid others in the mempool. The service effectively acts as a secondary fee market, allowing users to circumvent long confirmation delays without having to cancel and re-broadcast their original transaction with a higher gas price.
Transaction Accelerator
What is a Transaction Accelerator?
A service that allows users to pay an additional fee to have their pending blockchain transaction prioritized for inclusion in the next block.
The technical operation typically involves a user submitting their transaction hash to the accelerator's platform. The service then bundles this transaction data and transmits it directly to partnered miners or validators who have agreed to prioritize these submissions. This bypasses the standard peer-to-peer gossip network, giving the transaction a direct path into a block. It's important to distinguish this from simply increasing the gas fee via a wallet's "speed up" function, which creates a new, replacement transaction. Accelerators work on the original transaction ID, though some services may employ transaction replacement techniques under the hood.
Major use cases include time-sensitive DeFi operations, such as closing a leveraged position near liquidation, or securing a rare NFT mint. Prominent examples include the Ethereum ecosystem's former "Tx Accelerator" from Etherscan and Flashbots' MEV-Boost relays, which can prioritize transactions for a fee as part of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) strategies. On the Bitcoin network, services like ViaBTC offer similar functionality by allowing users to submit transactions for inclusion in their mined blocks.
While useful, transaction accelerators have limitations and considerations. Their effectiveness is not guaranteed, as it depends on the cooperating miners' hash power and current network conditions. They also raise questions about network neutrality and centralization, as they create a paid fast lane that favors users who can afford the premium. Furthermore, with the advent of Ethereum's EIP-1559 fee market and more sophisticated RPC endpoints, the need for standalone accelerators has diminished but not disappeared during extreme demand spikes.
When evaluating the need for an accelerator, users should first check if their wallet supports native transaction replacement ("speed up") and compare the cost against the accelerator's fee. It is also critical to use reputable services to avoid scams that might steal transaction details or funds. As blockchain protocol designs evolve, the role and implementation of transaction prioritization services continue to adapt within the broader infrastructure of block building and MEV.
How a Transaction Accelerator Works
A transaction accelerator is a service that helps users get their pending blockchain transactions confirmed more quickly by submitting them directly to miners or validators.
A transaction accelerator is a third-party service that helps users get their pending or stuck transactions confirmed more quickly on a blockchain network. When a user broadcasts a transaction with a low gas fee or gas price, it may be ignored by the network's mempool (the pool of unconfirmed transactions). Accelerators work by resubmitting the user's transaction data—specifically its unique transaction ID (TXID)—directly to mining pools or validator nodes, often for a fee, incentivizing them to include it in the next block.
The core mechanism involves bypassing the standard peer-to-peer gossip protocol. Normally, nodes propagate transactions based on fee priority. An accelerator establishes private, prioritized channels with major mining entities. When a user submits their TXID, the service packages it into a high-priority bundle and sends it directly to its partnered miners, who then give it precedence over other transactions in the public mempool. This is particularly effective on networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum during periods of high congestion.
There are two primary models: free services offered by some mining pools (often with usage limits) and paid premium services. The effectiveness depends on the accelerator's relationships with miners controlling significant hash rate. It's important to note that accelerators do not modify the original transaction's fee; they only increase its visibility. For maximum control, users can also perform a Replace-By-Fee (RBF) transaction, which creates a new transaction with a higher fee to replace the original, though this requires wallet support.
Key considerations when using an accelerator include network compatibility (Ethereum accelerators differ from Bitcoin's), security (only the TXID is shared, not private keys), and cost-effectiveness versus simply waiting. On Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) chains, users can also increase priority by using a private transaction service like Flashbots, which submits transactions directly to block builders via a sealed-bid auction, protecting them from front-running.
Key Features & Characteristics
Transaction accelerators are third-party services that allow users to replace a pending transaction with a new one that pays a higher gas fee, effectively 'bidding' for priority inclusion in the next block.
Fee Replacement (Replace-by-Fee)
The core mechanism is Replace-by-Fee (RBF), a protocol-level feature on networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. It allows a user to broadcast a new transaction that spends the same nonce as a pending one, but with a higher fee. Miners are incentivized to include the higher-fee version, accelerating confirmation.
Accelerator Pools
Many services operate private mempool relay networks or have direct relationships with mining pools. When a user submits a transaction hash and pays a fee, the service broadcasts the accelerated transaction directly to these partners, bypassing the public mempool for faster inclusion.
Use Cases & Scenarios
Common scenarios for using an accelerator include:
- Stuck Transactions: When a transaction is pending due to a low initial gas price.
- Time-Sensitive Actions: Needing to execute a trade, claim an NFT, or complete a DeFi transaction before a deadline.
- Security: Replacing a transaction suspected of being front-run or containing an error.
Limitations & Risks
Accelerators are not guaranteed and have key limitations:
- Network Congestion: Effectiveness diminishes during extreme network load.
- Nonce Management: Requires careful handling to avoid invalidating subsequent transactions.
- Centralization Reliance: Depends on the service's connections, introducing a trust element.
- Cost: Accelerator fees are in addition to the network gas fee.
Ethereum vs. Bitcoin
Implementation differs by chain:
- Ethereum: Uses a type of RBF, though not all clients enable it by default. Accelerators often use private transaction relays.
- Bitcoin: Has a formal BIP-125 RBF standard. Accelerators submit the replacement transaction to mining pools.
- Other EVM Chains: Similar to Ethereum, but effectiveness depends on the chain's specific mempool and validator infrastructure.
Alternative: Gas Price Bumping
A related user-initiated technique is gas price bumping within a wallet (e.g., MetaMask's 'Speed Up'). This creates a replacement transaction without a third-party service. The key difference is the user manages the rebroadcast themselves, relying on the public peer-to-peer network.
Transaction Accelerator vs. Gas Price Bump
A comparison of two primary methods for expediting a pending blockchain transaction.
| Feature | Transaction Accelerator Service | Gas Price Bump (Replace-by-Fee) |
|---|---|---|
Primary Mechanism | Third-party relay network | Direct chain replacement |
User Action | Submit transaction hash to service | Broadcast a new, higher-fee transaction |
Required Signing Key | No | Yes |
Typical Cost Model | Fixed fee or subscription | Increased network gas fee |
Speed of Inclusion | Variable, often < 10 blocks | Depends on mempool priority |
Reliability | High (service guarantees) | Variable (mempool competition) |
Network Support | Often limited to specific chains (e.g., Ethereum) | Universal where RBF is supported |
Risk of Front-Running | Low (private relay) | Higher (public mempool) |
Ecosystem Usage & Providers
Transaction accelerators are third-party services that allow users to pay an additional fee to have their pending transactions prioritized for inclusion in the next block, bypassing normal mempool congestion.
Core Mechanism
An accelerator works by rebroadcasting a user's pending transaction with a higher gas price (or priority fee). This incentivizes block producers (miners or validators) to include it ahead of other pending transactions. The service typically operates by submitting the accelerated transaction directly to a private transaction pool or directly to a mining/validator node, giving it preferential treatment over the public mempool.
- User submits TX hash and pays a fee to the accelerator.
- Accelerator rebroadcasts the TX with increased fees.
- Block producer selects the higher-fee version for the next block.
Primary Use Cases
Accelerators are used during periods of network congestion when users need urgent transaction confirmation.
- Time-sensitive DeFi actions: Closing a leveraged position, executing an arbitrage opportunity, or claiming a reward before a deadline.
- NFT minting: Securing a spot in a highly competitive, gas-auction style mint.
- Stuck transactions: Resolving transactions that were initially broadcast with insufficient gas and are stuck pending.
- Security responses: Quickly moving funds from a potentially compromised wallet.
Provider Examples
Several notable providers offer accelerator services, often integrated into block explorers or wallets.
- Ethereum: Flashbots Protect RPC, Etherscan's Tx Accelerator (historically for PoW).
- Bitcoin: ViaBTC and BTC.com accelerators for Bitcoin transactions.
- Polygon: PolygonScan Transaction Accelerator.
- Generalized RPCs: Services like Flashbots Protect offer private transaction submission as a core feature, functioning as a built-in accelerator to prevent frontrunning and reduce latency.
Limitations & Considerations
Using an accelerator is not a guarantee and comes with specific constraints.
- Network Dependency: Effectiveness depends on the accelerator's direct connections to active block producers.
- Time Windows: Most services only work on transactions that are very recent (e.g., last 1-5 blocks).
- No Guarantee: Payment is for a service attempt, not a confirmed result. If network fees spike further, the accelerated TX may still be outbid.
- Cost: The accelerator fee is in addition to the on-chain gas fee, increasing total cost.
- Alternative: Manually replacing-by-fee (RBF) is a native protocol option on some chains like Bitcoin and Ethereum (EIP-1559).
How It Differs from Fee Bumping
While related, acceleration and fee bumping are distinct concepts.
- Fee Bumping (e.g., RBF): A user-driven, on-chain action where the sender broadcasts a new transaction that spends the same nonce with a higher fee, invalidating the original. This is a direct protocol feature.
- Transaction Acceleration: A service-driven, off-chain coordination where a third party facilitates the repackaging and preferential submission of the existing transaction data. The accelerator acts as an intermediary to increase its visibility to miners/validators.
Accelerators are often used when the user cannot perform RBF (e.g., wallet doesn't support it, or the transaction is already signed and broadcast).
The Mempool & Priority Queue
To understand accelerators, one must understand the mempool (memory pool). This is a network-wide holding area for unconfirmed transactions. Validators/miners select transactions from this pool based primarily on gas price.
An accelerator effectively creates a priority queue. It takes a transaction from the general, congested public mempool and places it into a private, high-priority queue with direct access to block producers. This bypasses the standard first-in-first-served (or fee-ranked) wait in the public pool, reducing time-to-inclusion from potentially hours to minutes or seconds during peak demand.
Security & Trust Considerations
Transaction accelerators are third-party services that can expedite pending transactions, but they introduce specific security and trust trade-offs that users must evaluate.
Centralized Trust Model
Accelerators operate as centralized intermediaries, requiring users to trust a single entity with their transaction data and fees. This creates a single point of failure and potential censorship risk, contrasting with the decentralized ethos of the underlying blockchain. Users must rely on the accelerator's honesty to include their transaction and not front-run or censor it.
Transaction Privacy Risks
Submitting a transaction to an accelerator exposes its details (sender, recipient, amount, data) to the accelerator operator before it is public on-chain. This can lead to:
- Information leakage and potential front-running.
- Loss of transaction ordering privacy.
- Risk if the accelerator service is compromised, exposing pending transaction data.
Fee Extraction & Economic Security
Accelerators monetize network congestion, which raises economic considerations:
- They can create a pay-to-prioritize system that disadvantages users unwilling or unable to pay extra fees.
- High accelerator fees can indicate underlying network scalability issues.
- There is a risk of fee market distortion if accelerators gain significant influence over block space allocation.
Reliability & Service-Level Guarantees
Most accelerators provide no SLA (Service Level Agreement) or guarantee of inclusion. Success depends on:
- The accelerator's own fee bid to miners/validators.
- Network conditions at the moment of submission.
- Potential for service downtime during peak congestion when needed most. Users have little recourse if the service fails.
Alternative On-Chain Methods
For users concerned with trust minimization, several on-chain alternatives exist:
- Replace-by-Fee (RBF): Broadcast a new transaction with a higher fee from your own wallet (supported by Bitcoin and some Ethereum clients).
- Child Pays for Parent (CPFP): For Ethereum, create a dependent transaction with a high fee to incentivize inclusion of both.
- Direct Builder Communication: On Ethereum post-Merge, sophisticated users can submit transactions directly to block builders via mev-boost relays.
Verification & Transparency
Due to their opaque nature, it is difficult to verify an accelerator's actions. Key questions include:
- How does the accelerator select which transactions to promote?
- What fee is actually paid to the miner/validator versus kept as profit?
- Is there a public audit trail of their submissions and success rate? Lack of transparency makes it hard to assess trustworthiness.
Evolution & Relevance
The concept of a transaction accelerator emerged as a direct response to the inherent limitations of permissionless blockchain networks, where transaction finality is probabilistic and subject to competitive fee markets.
A transaction accelerator is a service, typically offered by mining pools or dedicated platforms, that allows users to pay an additional fee to have their pending transaction prioritized for inclusion in the next block. This mechanism evolved to address the problem of transaction finality uncertainty, where a broadcast transaction with a low fee can remain stuck in the mempool indefinitely during periods of high network congestion. By offering a side-channel payment directly to block producers, accelerators provide a pragmatic, if centralized, solution for time-sensitive transactions, effectively creating a secondary market for block space.
The relevance of accelerators is intrinsically tied to the fee market mechanics of networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. In a first-price auction model, users compete by attaching higher gas fees or transaction fees. Accelerators bypass this public auction by allowing a user to signal urgency and willingness to pay directly to a miner, often through a separate payment channel or smart contract. This highlights a tension between pure decentralization and practical usability, as it grants significant influence over transaction ordering to the entities controlling the accelerator service.
With the evolution of Ethereum towards Proof-of-Stake and the implementation of MEV-Boost, the landscape for transaction prioritization has shifted. While traditional accelerators still exist, much of the market for fast inclusion has been subsumed by sophisticated MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) strategies. Builders and searchers now compete to construct the most profitable blocks, often offering priority gas auctions or direct payments via flashbots-style bundles. Consequently, the simple accelerator model has become less prevalent on Ethereum, though it remains a common tool on Bitcoin and other Proof-of-Work chains where block production is more opaque.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Common questions about blockchain transaction accelerators, services that help users speed up pending transactions by paying a premium fee to miners or validators.
A transaction accelerator is a service that allows users to increase the priority of a pending or 'stuck' blockchain transaction by paying an additional fee to miners or validators. It works by broadcasting the transaction's unique identifier (its transaction ID or TXID) to a pool of miners who then include it in the next block they mine, overriding the original low-fee submission. This is necessary because most blockchains process transactions based on fee-per-gas priority, where higher fees are selected first from the mempool.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.