Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Glossary

Fee Token

A fee token is a cryptocurrency, which may be different from the network's native asset, that is accepted by a protocol for the payment of transaction fees.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
BLOCKCHAIN GLOSSARY

What is a Fee Token?

A fee token is a specific cryptocurrency required to pay for transaction processing and computational services on a blockchain network.

A fee token is a cryptocurrency designated by a blockchain protocol as the mandatory medium of exchange for paying gas fees or transaction fees. These fees compensate network validators (like miners or stakers) for the computational resources required to execute and secure transactions. On networks like Ethereum, the native token ETH is the fee token, while other chains, such as BNB Chain, use BNB. The fee token is distinct from the tokens being transferred in a transaction; it is the 'fuel' that powers the network's operations.

The primary function of a fee token is to secure the network through an economic mechanism. By requiring a valuable asset for transaction submission, the protocol discourages spam and denial-of-service attacks. The fee amount is typically dynamic, fluctuating based on network demand in a gas auction model. This creates a market for block space, where users can pay higher fees to prioritize their transactions. The collected fees are then distributed to the validators, incentivizing them to maintain the network's infrastructure and security.

Some blockchain ecosystems support fee abstraction or gasless transactions, where the fee token requirement can be bypassed. In these systems, a third party (a relayer or a dApp) may pay the fee on the user's behalf, or the fee may be paid using a different token through meta-transactions. However, the underlying settlement still ultimately occurs in the network's native fee token. This abstraction layer improves user experience but does not eliminate the fundamental role of the designated fee token in the protocol's economic security model.

Choosing a fee token is a critical protocol design decision. Using the native token (e.g., ETH for Ethereum) aligns economic incentives, as the token's value is tied to network usage. Some networks allow for multicoin fee payment, where users can pay with various tokens, but these are typically swapped for the native fee token automatically in the background. The efficiency, predictability, and cost of fees are major factors in a blockchain's usability, making the fee token's design and monetary policy a central concern for developers and users alike.

how-it-works
MECHANICS

How Fee Tokens Work

A technical breakdown of the operational mechanics behind fee tokens, the specialized assets used to pay for network services on a blockchain.

A fee token is a cryptocurrency or token designated as the required medium of exchange for paying transaction fees, gas fees, or other network service costs on a specific blockchain or decentralized application. Unlike general-purpose cryptocurrencies, their primary utility is to compensate validators, sequencers, or node operators for processing and securing transactions. This designation is typically enforced at the protocol level, creating a mandatory demand for the token within its native ecosystem. For example, Ether (ETH) is the fee token for the Ethereum network, used to pay gas for smart contract execution and transfers.

The core mechanism involves a user initiating a transaction, such as a token swap or an NFT mint, and specifying a fee amount in the designated fee token. This fee is then broadcast with the transaction. Network validators or miners prioritize transactions based on the fee offered, a process known as fee market dynamics. Once the transaction is included in a block and validated, the fee token is typically burned (destroyed) or distributed as a reward to the block producer. This creates a direct economic loop where network usage generates continuous demand for the fee token, intrinsically linking its value to the utility and security of the underlying blockchain.

There are several key architectural models for fee token implementation. In a single-token model, like Ethereum, one token (ETH) is used for both staking (security) and fee payment. A dual-token model separates these functions; for instance, a network might use Token A for staking and governance while Token B is the dedicated fee token. Some Layer 2 solutions and app-chains employ a fee abstraction or sponsored transaction model, where users can pay fees in any token, and a relayer converts it to the native fee token behind the scenes, improving user experience.

The economic design of a fee token is critical for network security and sustainability. A well-designed fee token ensures that the cost to attack the network (the cost-of-corruption) remains high by requiring substantial value to be staked or burned. Mechanisms like EIP-1559 on Ethereum, which burns a base fee, can make the fee token deflationary under high usage. Furthermore, the predictability and stability of fee costs are major factors in developer and user adoption, influencing the design of fee estimation algorithms and gas optimization techniques within wallets and dApps.

In practice, interacting with fee tokens requires technical awareness. Users must hold a balance of the correct token in their wallet to initiate transactions, a requirement that can create onboarding friction. Developers must accurately estimate gas costs and implement fee logic in their smart contracts. The evolution of fee tokens continues with proposals for account abstraction, which aims to allow users to pay fees in ERC-20 tokens directly, and modular blockchain designs that may separate execution, settlement, and data availability layers, each potentially having its own distinct fee token economy.

key-features
MECHANICS

Key Features of Fee Tokens

A fee token is a native or protocol-specific cryptocurrency required to pay for transaction execution, network security, or governance actions within a blockchain ecosystem.

01

Transaction Execution Fuel

The primary function is to pay gas fees for executing smart contracts and transferring assets. This includes:

  • Computation costs for opcode execution.
  • State storage costs for writing new data.
  • Network prioritization, where users can pay higher fees for faster inclusion in a block.

Examples: ETH on Ethereum, SOL on Solana, MATIC on Polygon PoS.

02

Network Security & Staking

Fee tokens often secure the network through Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus. Validators must stake the token as collateral to propose and validate blocks, earning fees and inflationary rewards. This creates a direct link between the token's economic value and the chain's security budget.

Key mechanisms:

  • Slashing: Penalties for malicious behavior are deducted from staked tokens.
  • Delegation: Token holders can delegate to validators without running infrastructure.
03

Governance Rights

Many fee tokens confer governance rights, allowing holders to vote on protocol upgrades, treasury management, and parameter changes (e.g., fee schedules). This is typically implemented via decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs).

Examples:

  • UNI holders govern Uniswap protocol parameters.
  • AAVE holders vote on Aave Protocol risk models and asset listings.
04

Fee Abstraction & Sponsored Transactions

Protocols can abstract gas fees to improve user experience. Mechanisms include:

  • Gasless Transactions: A relayer or dApp pays fees on behalf of the user, often settled in a different token.
  • Fee Delegation: Smart contracts allow a third party to pay for specific function calls.
  • Account Abstraction (ERC-4337): Enables smart contract wallets to pay fees with any ERC-20 token, with a backend system converting it to the native fee token.
05

Burn Mechanisms & Tokenomics

Fee tokens often incorporate burn mechanisms to create deflationary pressure or redistribute value. A portion of fees paid is permanently removed from circulation (burned), potentially making the token disinflationary.

Examples:

  • EIP-1559: A base fee on Ethereum is burned, making ETH a "ultrasound money" asset.
  • BNB Auto-Burn: Binance Smart Chain uses quarterly burns based on network usage.
06

Multi-Token Fee Models

Some ecosystems support paying fees in tokens other than the native asset, increasing flexibility.

  • Parallel Chains (Polkadot): Parachains can define their own fee tokens but must still stake DOT for security.
  • Avalanche C-Chain: Fees are paid in AVAX, but subnets can use their own tokens.
  • Cosmos Zones: Each sovereign chain sets its own fee token, with IBC enabling cross-chain transfers.
ecosystem-usage
FEE TOKEN

Ecosystem Usage & Examples

A fee token is the native cryptocurrency required to pay for transaction execution and network security on a blockchain. This section explores its primary functions and real-world implementations.

02

Priority Fees & Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)

Users can pay priority fees (tips) in the fee token to incentivize validators to include their transactions faster. This is crucial during network congestion. This system is also integral to MEV, where searchers bid high fees to influence transaction ordering for arbitrage or liquidation opportunities.

  • Mechanism: A base fee is burned, while the priority fee goes to the block proposer.
  • Impact: Creates a fee market that dynamically allocates block space.
03

Alternative Fee Tokens on L2s & Sidechains

Some Layer 2s and sidechains allow fees to be paid in tokens other than their native asset, enhancing user experience. Polygon allows gas fees in MATIC or approved ERC-20 tokens via a meta-transaction system. Arbitrum's canonical gas token is ETH, but its AnyTrust chains can configure different fee tokens.

  • Benefit: Reduces friction for users holding specific application tokens.
  • Consideration: Adds complexity to economic security and bridge design.
04

Staking for Network Security

In Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchains, the fee token is typically the same asset used for staking. Validators lock (stake) the token as collateral to participate in consensus and earn rewards from transaction fees and new token issuance. This dual role aligns economic incentives.

  • Examples: ETH on Ethereum, SOL on Solana, AVAX on Avalanche.
  • Function: Staking secures the network; fees compensate stakers for their service and capital lock-up.
05

Governance Rights & Utility

Beyond fees, the native fee token often grants governance rights within the ecosystem. Token holders can vote on protocol upgrades, treasury allocations, and parameter changes. This creates a utility feedback loop: using the network (paying fees) can grant influence over its future.

  • Examples: UNI for Uniswap governance, AAVE for Aave Protocol.
  • Model: Fee revenue can sometimes be used to buy back and distribute the governance token, creating a value accrual mechanism.
06

Fee Abstraction & Sponsored Transactions

Fee abstraction mechanisms allow a third party (like a dApp) to pay transaction fees on behalf of users, using the fee token. This is enabled by paymasters in account abstraction (ERC-4337) or similar systems. It allows for:

  • Gasless transactions for improved UX.
  • Payment of fees in ERC-20 tokens that the dApp converts.
  • Sponsored transactions where projects cover costs to onboard users.
KEY DISTINCTION

Fee Token vs. Native Gas Token

A comparison of the two primary methods for paying transaction fees on a blockchain, focusing on their technical and economic properties.

FeatureNative Gas TokenFee Token (ERC-20)

Definition

The blockchain's intrinsic currency, required for all core operations.

An external token, often an ERC-20, accepted for fee payment via a fee abstraction mechanism.

Examples

ETH on Ethereum, SOL on Solana, AVAX on Avalanche.

USDC, USDT, or a project's own governance token on an EIP-4337 or similar-compatible chain.

Primary Purpose

Network security (staking, fee burning) and transaction execution.

User convenience, stablecoin fee payment, and token utility enhancement.

Fee Market Dynamics

Directly tied to network demand; gas price fluctuates with congestion.

Price is derived from the token's market value; fee conversion may add complexity.

Smart Contract Integration

Native to the VM; accessed via msg.value or tx.gasprice.

Requires a fee abstraction layer (e.g., Paymaster) to sponsor or convert fees.

User Experience

Requires holding the specific native token.

Allows payment in a preferred asset, often enabling gasless transactions.

Security Model

Fees contribute directly to chain security (e.g., base fee burn).

Relies on the security of the fee abstraction mechanism and token's stability.

Protocol Revenue

Fees are typically burned or awarded to validators/stakers.

Fees may be collected by the fee abstraction service or the token treasury.

benefits
FEE TOKEN

Benefits & Advantages

Fee tokens are the designated cryptocurrency used to pay for transaction execution and network services on a blockchain. Their design offers several key advantages for users, developers, and the network's economic security.

01

Predictable Transaction Costs

Using a dedicated fee token allows users to calculate transaction costs with greater certainty. The price of the token is directly tied to the network's gas fees, eliminating the volatility of paying with a separate, fluctuating asset. This is crucial for developers building applications that require stable operational costs.

02

Enhanced Network Security

A well-designed fee token aligns user and validator incentives. Validators (or sequencers) earn fees in the native token, which is also used for staking to secure the network. This creates a circular economy where network usage directly funds its security, making attacks more expensive.

03

Simplified User Experience

For end-users, a single fee token streamlines the process of interacting with a blockchain. They only need to hold one asset to pay for all transactions, rather than managing multiple tokens for gas. This reduces complexity and is a key factor in improving mainstream adoption.

04

Economic Alignment & Value Accrual

The fee token's value is often directly correlated with network usage. As demand for block space increases, so does the demand for the token to pay fees. This can create a sustainable economic model where the token captures value from the ecosystem's growth, benefiting long-term holders and stakers.

05

Governance & Protocol Control

On many networks, the fee token also serves as a governance token. This grants holders the right to vote on protocol upgrades, fee parameter changes, and treasury management. This decentralizes control and ensures the network evolves according to the preferences of its most active users.

06

Example: Ethereum's ETH

Ethereum is the canonical example. ETH is used to pay gas fees for all transactions and smart contract executions. It is also the staking asset for validators securing the Proof-of-Stake consensus. This unified model underpins the network's security and economic sustainability.

challenges-considerations
FEE TOKEN

Challenges & Considerations

While fee tokens enable flexible payment mechanisms, their implementation introduces specific technical and economic complexities that must be addressed.

01

Liquidity Fragmentation

Introducing a new fee token can fragment liquidity across multiple assets, increasing slippage for users and complicating the economic model for validators. Projects must incentivize deep liquidity pools to ensure the token's utility and price stability. This often requires significant liquidity mining programs or protocol-owned liquidity strategies, which can be capital-intensive and dilute existing token holders.

02

Regulatory Uncertainty

Using a token for transaction fees can attract regulatory scrutiny, as it may be classified as a security or payment instrument depending on jurisdiction. This creates legal risk for the issuing entity and potential compliance burdens for users. The classification often hinges on the Howey Test and whether the token's value is derived from the managerial efforts of others. Navigating this landscape requires careful legal structuring.

03

User Experience Friction

Requiring users to acquire a specific token to pay fees adds steps to the onboarding process, creating friction. This is especially problematic for new users who must first acquire a base currency (e.g., ETH) and then swap it for the fee token. Solutions like gas abstraction or sponsored transactions can mitigate this, but they introduce complexity and potential centralization points for the sponsoring entity.

04

Economic Security & Attack Vectors

If the fee token's value is volatile or manipulable, it can threaten network security. A sudden price drop could make transaction fees negligible, enabling spam attacks or denial-of-service attacks at low cost. Conversely, a price spike could make the network prohibitively expensive. Mechanisms like dynamic fee adjustment or pegging fees to a stable value (e.g., USD) are critical but complex to implement robustly.

05

Validator/Staker Incentive Alignment

Validators or stakers who receive fees in a native token are exposed to its price volatility, which may not align with their operational costs (often denominated in fiat). This misalignment can disincentivize network participation during bear markets. Protocols may implement fee switching (allowing validators to choose the token) or fee burning mechanisms to manage tokenomics, but these require careful economic design.

06

Cross-Chain & Interoperability Hurdles

A fee token native to one blockchain creates barriers for cross-chain interactions. Users bridging assets must also bridge or acquire the fee token on the destination chain to perform actions, adding cost and complexity. While omnichain and layer-zero solutions aim to abstract this, they often rely on trusted relayers or complex messaging protocols, introducing new trust assumptions and potential failure points.

economic-model
ECONOMIC MODEL & INCENTIVES

Fee Token

A fee token is a native cryptocurrency or utility token specifically designated to pay for transaction processing, computational services, or network access within a blockchain ecosystem.

A fee token is the primary medium of exchange for settling gas fees or transaction costs on its native blockchain. Its core function is to compensate validators or miners for the computational resources required to process and secure transactions. Prominent examples include Ether (ETH) on Ethereum, which is used to pay for gas, and SOL on Solana, used for transaction fees and staking. The token's value is intrinsically linked to network demand; high usage typically increases fee token demand, influencing its market price.

Beyond basic transaction fees, fee tokens often serve multiple roles within a protocol's cryptoeconomic model. They can be staked to participate in Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus, granting stakers the right to validate transactions and earn rewards, often paid in the same fee token. This creates a circular economy where the token is used for both paying for services and securing the network. Some networks, like Polygon, use a dedicated fee token (MATIC) for staking and gas, while others may implement mechanisms like EIP-1559 to burn a portion of fees, making the token deflationary.

The design of a fee token directly impacts user experience and network security. A poorly designed model with volatile or expensive fees can deter usage. Consequently, many Layer 2 solutions and alternative Layer 1s innovate with fee token mechanics to enhance scalability and cost predictability. For instance, zkSync uses ETH for fees on its Layer 2 but explores future native token models, while Avalanche uses its fee token (AVAX) for all subnet transactions, creating a unified economic layer. The tokenomics must balance incentivizing validators with keeping costs low for end-users.

When analyzing a blockchain, understanding its fee token is crucial for assessing its economic sustainability and security budget. The total value of fees collected, often called the security spend, indicates how much is being paid to protect the network. A robust fee market ensures validators are adequately compensated, which is essential for preventing centralization and attacks. Furthermore, fee tokens can be governance tokens, allowing holders to vote on parameter changes like fee structures, creating a feedback loop between the network's users and its economic policy.

FEE TOKEN

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Clear answers to common questions about the tokens used to pay for blockchain transaction fees.

A fee token is the native cryptocurrency or designated token required to pay for transaction fees (gas) on a specific blockchain network. It is the medium of exchange that compensates validators or miners for the computational resources and security they provide. On Ethereum, the fee token is ETH. On other networks like Polygon, it is MATIC, and on Binance Smart Chain, it is BNB. The fee token is burned, distributed, or used to incentivize network participants according to the protocol's economic rules.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team