A zkRollup is a Layer 2 (L2) blockchain scaling solution that executes transactions off-chain and then posts compressed data along with a validity proof, known as a zero-knowledge proof (ZK-proof), to the main chain (Layer 1). This proof, typically a ZK-SNARK or ZK-STARK, cryptographically guarantees the correctness of all batched transactions without requiring the main network to re-execute them. The primary goals are to drastically increase transaction throughput (TPS) and reduce gas fees while inheriting the security guarantees of the underlying Layer 1, such as Ethereum.
LABS
Glossary
zkRollup
A zkRollup is a Layer 2 blockchain scaling solution that executes transactions off-chain, bundles them, and submits a cryptographic validity proof to the main chain for secure settlement.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
LAYER 2 SCALING
What is a zkRollup?
A zkRollup is a Layer 2 scaling solution that bundles, or 'rolls up,' hundreds of transactions into a single cryptographic proof to increase blockchain throughput and reduce costs.
The operational flow involves a central party, the sequencer or operator, which collects user transactions, executes them in its own off-chain environment, and generates a new state root. It then produces a succinct non-interactive argument of knowledge (SNARK) that proves the new state is the correct result of executing all transactions in the batch. Only this small proof and the minimal essential state data are posted to the main chain. This approach enables massive data compression; for example, a single proof can validate thousands of transfers, making transaction costs negligible.
A key differentiator from Optimistic Rollups is the security model. While Optimistic Rollups rely on a fraud-proof challenge period where transactions can be disputed, zkRollups use cryptographic validity proofs which are verified instantly upon submission to Layer 1. This allows for near-instant finality for Layer 1 confirmation and faster withdrawal times back to the main chain. However, generating these proofs is computationally intensive, requiring specialized hardware (provers), which has historically been a barrier to general-purpose smart contract support.
Prominent implementations include zkSync Era, Starknet, and Polygon zkEVM, which have evolved to support the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatibility. This allows developers to deploy existing smart contracts with minimal modifications. Use cases span high-frequency decentralized exchanges (DEXs), NFT minting, and gaming, where low latency and cost are critical. As proof generation becomes more efficient, zkRollups are increasingly seen as a foundational technology for scaling blockchains while preserving security and decentralization.
how-it-works
MECHANISM
How Does a zkRollup Work?
A zkRollup is a Layer 2 scaling solution that batches thousands of transactions off-chain and submits a single cryptographic proof of their validity to the underlying blockchain.
A zkRollup operates by moving computation and state storage off-chain while anchoring data and a validity proof on the main chain, often referred to as Layer 1 (L1). A central party, the sequencer, collects and executes transactions, compressing them into a batch. This batch includes the new state root—a cryptographic commitment to the new state of the rollup—and minimal transaction data (calldata) required for reconstruction. The core innovation is the generation of a zero-knowledge proof, specifically a zk-SNARK or zk-STARK, which cryptographically attests that the state transition from the old root to the new root is correct, without revealing the underlying transaction details.
The sequencer submits two critical pieces of data to the L1 smart contract, known as the rollup verifier contract: the compressed batch data and the validity proof. The on-chain contract verifies the proof against the publicly available data. If the proof is valid, the contract accepts the new state root, finalizing all transactions in the batch instantly. This mechanism ensures trustlessness and capital efficiency, as users do not need to trust the sequencer and funds can be withdrawn immediately after proof verification, unlike optimistic rollups which have a long challenge period.
Data availability is a critical component. While computation is proven, the transaction data must be published to the L1 so anyone can reconstruct the rollup's state and ensure censorship resistance. Solutions like Ethereum's blob transactions (EIP-4844) significantly reduce this cost. The architecture enables massive scalability—processing thousands of transactions per second—while inheriting the full security guarantees of the underlying L1, as the system's correctness is enforced by cryptographic proofs, not social or economic games.
key-features
ARCHITECTURE
Key Features of zkRollups
zkRollups are a Layer 2 scaling solution that bundles transactions off-chain and submits a single validity proof to the underlying blockchain, inheriting its security while dramatically increasing throughput and reducing costs.
03
Trustless Security & Finality
Security is inherited directly from the underlying L1 blockchain. The validity proof mathematically guarantees the correctness of state transitions. Once the proof is verified on L1, the rollup state is considered final, eliminating the need for a lengthy challenge period (like in optimistic rollups). Withdrawals to L1 are fast and trustless.
04
Scalability & Throughput
zkRollups achieve massive scalability by:
- Batching: Thousands of transactions are compressed into a single proof.
- Reduced On-Chain Footprint: Only proof verification and minimal data are posted to L1.
- Parallel Execution: Computation happens off-chain, unconstrained by L1 block gas limits. This results in high transactions per second (TPS) and significantly lower gas fees for users.
05
Prover & Sequencer Roles
The network is operated by key actors:
- Sequencer: Orders transactions, produces blocks, and posts data to L1. Often centralized initially for efficiency.
- Prover: A specialized node that generates the cryptographic validity proof for each batch. This is computationally intensive work. Decentralization of these roles is a major focus for future development.
examples
MAJOR NETWORKS
zkRollup Examples & Implementations
zkRollups have evolved from theoretical concepts to production networks, each with distinct design trade-offs in security, programmability, and finality. This section details prominent implementations.
SCALING SOLUTION ARCHITECTURE
zkRollup vs. Optimistic Rollup Comparison
A technical comparison of the two dominant Layer 2 scaling approaches, focusing on security models, performance, and trade-offs.
| Feature / Metric | zkRollup | Optimistic Rollup |
|---|---|---|
Security Model | Cryptographic Proof (ZK-SNARK/STARK) | Economic Challenge Period (Fraud Proof) |
Fund Withdrawal to L1 | Immediate (no delay) | Delayed (7-day typical challenge period) |
Transaction Finality on L1 | ~10 minutes | ~1 week |
On-Chain Data Requirement | State diff or validity proof only | Full transaction data (calldata) |
Computational Overhead | High (proof generation) | Low (no complex proof generation) |
EVM Compatibility | Limited (ZK-EVM required) | Native (full EVM equivalence) |
Transaction Cost (Typical) | $0.01 - $0.10 | $0.10 - $0.50 |
Primary Use Case | Payments, DEX (high throughput) | General-purpose smart contracts |
security-considerations
ZKROLLUP
Security Considerations & Trust Assumptions
zkRollups enhance scalability by moving computation off-chain, but they introduce a specific set of security models and trust assumptions distinct from Layer 1 blockchains.
01
Data Availability
The security of a zkRollup depends on the availability of transaction data on the underlying Layer 1 (L1). If this data is withheld, users cannot reconstruct the state or prove fraud. Most modern zkRollups use Ethereum calldata or blobs to guarantee this availability, making it a cryptoeconomic assumption rather than a cryptographic one.
02
Prover & Verifier Integrity
The system's security rests on the correctness of two components:
- Prover: Must generate a valid zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) for the correct state transition. A malicious prover cannot create a valid proof for an invalid state.
- Verifier Smart Contract: The on-chain contract must correctly verify the ZKP. This is a small, auditable piece of code, representing a trust-minimized assumption.
03
Upgradeability & Centralization Risks
Many zkRollups have upgradeable contracts controlled by a multi-sig or DAO. This introduces a social trust assumption: the governing entities will not perform a malicious upgrade. Key risks include:
- Changing proof verification logic.
- Censoring transactions.
- Pausing withdrawals (introducing liveness risk). The trend is toward increasing decentralization and time-locked upgrades.
04
Sequencer Decentralization
The sequencer orders transactions and produces blocks. A centralized sequencer creates risks:
- Censorship: Ability to reorder or exclude transactions.
- Liveness Failure: If the single sequencer fails, the chain halts.
- MEV Extraction: Centralized control can lead to maximal extractable value (MEV) abuse. Decentralizing the sequencer set is a major focus for reducing these trust assumptions.
05
Escape Hatches & Force Exits
Users have a self-custodial fallback via force exit or escape hatch mechanisms. If the rollup operator is malicious or offline, a user can submit a fraud proof (in optimistic rollups) or directly provide a state inclusion proof to the L1 contract to withdraw their assets. This ensures users are not permanently locked in, assuming L1 data is available.
06
Cryptographic Assumptions
zkRollup security ultimately depends on the cryptographic soundness of its proof system (e.g., PLONK, STARK). This includes assumptions that:
- The underlying elliptic curves are secure (e.g., no breakthroughs in solving the discrete log problem).
- The trusted setup ceremony (for SNARKs) was performed correctly and the toxic waste was destroyed.
- The proof system implementation is bug-free.
ZKROLLUP
Technical Deep Dive
A comprehensive FAQ on zkRollups, a leading Layer 2 scaling solution that uses zero-knowledge proofs to batch transactions off-chain while inheriting Ethereum's security.
A zkRollup is a Layer 2 scaling solution that bundles, or 'rolls up,' hundreds of transactions into a single batch, executes them off-chain, and submits a cryptographic proof of their validity to the underlying Layer 1 blockchain (like Ethereum). It works through a continuous cycle: users submit transactions to a zkRollup operator, who aggregates them, generates a zero-knowledge proof (typically a ZK-SNARK or ZK-STARK) attesting to the correctness of the new state, and posts this succinct proof along with minimal essential data to the L1. The L1 smart contract verifies the proof and updates its state accordingly, ensuring security and finality.
ecosystem-usage
SCALING SOLUTION
zkRollup
A Layer 2 scaling technology that bundles (rolls up) transactions off-chain, generates a cryptographic proof of their validity, and posts that proof to the underlying Layer 1 blockchain for final settlement.
01
Core Mechanism
A zkRollup executes transactions off-chain in a virtual machine and periodically publishes a compressed data batch (calldata) to the main chain. The key innovation is the accompanying zero-knowledge proof (typically a zk-SNARK or zk-STARK), which cryptographically verifies the correctness of all transactions in the batch without revealing their details. This allows the main chain to trustlessly accept the state transition.
02
Security & Trust Model
Security is inherited directly from the underlying Layer 1 (e.g., Ethereum). The validity proof ensures that only correct state transitions can be finalized. This creates a trustless environment where users do not need to monitor the rollup for fraud, as the cryptographic proof is mathematically verified on-chain. This is a key difference from Optimistic Rollups, which rely on a fraud-proof challenge period.
03
Data Availability
For users to reconstruct the rollup state and exit to Layer 1, transaction data must be available. In a zkRollup, this is typically achieved by posting the essential transaction data (as calldata) to the Layer 1. This is known as on-chain data availability. Some newer designs explore validiums, which keep data off-chain with a separate data availability committee or layer, trading off some decentralization for lower costs.
04
Performance Advantages
- High Throughput: Can process thousands of transactions per second (TPS) by batching.
- Low Fees: Transaction costs are split across all users in a batch.
- Fast Finality: Once the proof is verified on Layer 1 (minutes), funds are considered final, unlike the 7-day challenge window in optimistic systems.
- Privacy Potential: While not inherent, the zero-knowledge framework can enable privacy-preserving features.
05
Key Examples & Implementations
- zkSync Era: A general-purpose zkEVM rollup by Matter Labs.
- Starknet: Uses zk-STARK proofs, developed by StarkWare.
- Polygon zkEVM: An Ethereum-equivalent zkRollup.
- Loopring & dYdX (v3): Early pioneers for payments and decentralized exchanges.
- Linea: ConsenSys's zkEVM rollup.
06
Trade-offs & Challenges
- Proving Complexity: Generating zero-knowledge proofs is computationally intensive, requiring specialized provers.
- EVM Compatibility: Achieving full equivalence with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (zkEVM) is complex, with trade-offs between performance and compatibility.
- Centralization Risks: Early stages often have centralized sequencers and provers, though decentralization is a roadmap goal.
- Upgradeability: Many use upgradeable contracts, introducing trust assumptions in the short term.
DEBUNKED
Common Misconceptions About zkRollups
zkRollups are a leading Layer 2 scaling solution, but their complexity often leads to widespread misunderstandings about their capabilities, security, and trade-offs.
No, zkRollups are not inherently private for user transactions. The 'zk' stands for zero-knowledge proofs, which are used to prove the validity of state transitions without revealing all underlying data, but this is a mechanism for data compression and verification, not for privacy. While transaction details like sender, receiver, and amount are typically hashed and aggregated in a zk-SNARK or zk-STARK proof, the core transaction data is still published as calldata on the Layer 1 for availability. True privacy requires additional cryptographic layers like zk-SNARKs applied directly to transaction logic, which is a separate feature from the rollup's scaling function.
ZKROLLUP
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Essential questions and answers about zkRollups, a leading Layer 2 scaling solution that uses zero-knowledge proofs to batch transactions and secure them on Ethereum.
A zkRollup is a Layer 2 scaling solution that bundles, or 'rolls up,' hundreds of transactions off-chain into a single cryptographic proof, which is then posted to a base layer like Ethereum for verification and data availability. It works by having an operator (or prover) execute transactions off-chain, generate a validity proof (typically a ZK-SNARK or ZK-STARK), and submit a minimal data summary along with this proof to the main chain. A smart contract on the main chain verifies the proof, ensuring all transactions in the batch are valid according to the rollup's rules, without re-executing them. This process dramatically increases throughput and reduces costs while inheriting the security of the underlying blockchain.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall