Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Glossary

Liquidation Threshold

The specific collateralization ratio at which a borrower's position becomes eligible for forced liquidation in a decentralized lending protocol.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
DEFINITION

What is Liquidation Threshold?

A precise definition of the liquidation threshold, a critical risk parameter in decentralized finance (DeFi) lending protocols.

The liquidation threshold is the maximum loan-to-value (LTV) ratio at which a borrower's collateral position is considered undercollateralized and becomes eligible for liquidation by external liquidators. It is a risk parameter set by a lending protocol, expressed as a percentage, that defines the point where the value of borrowed assets becomes too high relative to the posted collateral. For example, if a user deposits $10,000 of ETH as collateral with a 75% liquidation threshold, their position becomes at risk when the borrowed amount exceeds $7,500.

This threshold is distinct from the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio, which is the maximum amount a user can initially borrow against their collateral. The liquidation threshold is always set higher than the LTV ratio, creating a safety buffer or "liquidation margin." This buffer protects the protocol from instantaneous insolvency due to market volatility. If the health factor of a position—calculated as (Collateral Value * Liquidation Threshold) / Borrowed Value—falls below 1.0, the position is flagged for liquidation to repay the debt and protect the protocol's solvency.

Protocols like Aave and Compound set different liquidation thresholds for each collateral asset based on its volatility and liquidity. Stablecoins like USDC typically have higher thresholds (e.g., 85%), while more volatile assets like cryptoassets may have lower thresholds (e.g., 65-75%). This granular risk management ensures the protocol can reliably recover the loan value even during rapid price declines. The liquidation process itself is typically incentivized, with liquidators receiving a liquidation bonus (a discount on the seized collateral) for repaying the delinquent debt.

For borrowers, understanding the liquidation threshold is essential for risk management. It dictates the required collateralization level to avoid involuntary closure of their position. A position's proximity to its liquidation threshold is often represented by its health factor or collateral ratio. Automated tools and dashboards monitor this metric, and borrowers may be required to either deposit more collateral or repay part of their loan to maintain a healthy buffer above the liquidation threshold, especially in volatile markets.

key-features
LIQUIDATION MECHANICS

Key Features

The Liquidation Threshold is a critical risk parameter in DeFi lending protocols that defines the collateral value at which a position becomes eligible for liquidation.

01

Dynamic Risk Buffer

The Liquidation Threshold creates a safety buffer between the Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio and the point of insolvency. For example, if a vault has a 75% LTV and an 80% Liquidation Threshold, the position can lose value until the collateral ratio hits 80% before liquidation is triggered, providing a 5% buffer for the borrower.

02

Asset-Specific Configuration

Each collateral asset has a unique threshold set by governance, reflecting its volatility and liquidity. Stablecoins like USDC may have a high threshold (~85%), while volatile assets like memecoins have a much lower one (~40-60%). This customization manages the protocol's overall risk exposure.

03

Liquidation vs. LTV

It's crucial to distinguish this from the Maximum LTV.

  • Maximum LTV: The ratio at which you can initially borrow (e.g., borrow up to 75% of collateral value).
  • Liquidation Threshold: The higher ratio that triggers liquidation if your health factor deteriorates. The gap between them is the liquidation buffer.
04

Health Factor Calculation

The threshold is the core variable in the Health Factor (HF) formula: HF = (Collateral Value * Liquidation Threshold) / Total Borrowed Value. A health factor below 1.0 means the collateral value has fallen below the liquidation threshold, making the position under-collateralized and eligible for liquidation.

05

Protocol Incentive Mechanism

The threshold indirectly sets the liquidation incentive (or bonus) for liquidators. A lower threshold on volatile assets means positions are liquidated earlier, requiring a larger incentive to compensate liquidators for the higher risk of price slippage during the auction.

06

Governance Control Point

As a key risk parameter, the Liquidation Threshold is typically controlled by protocol governance. DAOs vote to adjust thresholds in response to market conditions, new oracle data, or asset re-evaluations, making it a dynamic tool for systemic risk management.

how-it-works
DEFINITION & MECHANICS

How the Liquidation Threshold Works

A technical breakdown of the liquidation threshold, a critical risk parameter in DeFi lending protocols that determines when a borrower's collateral becomes eligible for forced sale.

The liquidation threshold is the maximum collateralization ratio at which a borrower's position becomes eligible for liquidation by the protocol. It is expressed as a percentage (e.g., 80%) and acts as a safety buffer below the Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio. When the health of a position, often measured by the health factor, falls below 1 due to market movements, the collateral value has dropped to a point where it no longer sufficiently secures the borrowed assets, triggering the liquidation process to protect the protocol's solvency.

This parameter is set per collateral asset by the protocol's governance, reflecting its risk assessment based on volatility and liquidity. A stablecoin like USDC might have a high threshold (e.g., 85%), while a more volatile asset like a memecoin may have a much lower one (e.g., 65%). The gap between the LTV (the borrowing limit) and the liquidation threshold creates a safety cushion, allowing the position's value to fluctuate without immediate risk of liquidation, giving the borrower time to add more collateral or repay debt.

For example, if Alice deposits 10 ETH (worth $30,000) as collateral with an 80% liquidation threshold, her position enters the liquidation zone when its collateral value drops to a level where the borrowed amount equals or exceeds $24,000 (80% of $30,000). At this point, liquidators can repay a portion of her debt in exchange for a discounted seizure of her collateral. This mechanism ensures the protocol's loans remain over-collateralized, protecting the liquidity pool and other users.

The liquidation threshold is distinct from the liquidation penalty (or bonus), which is the discount liquidators receive. It is also a key component in calculating the health factor, typically formulated as (Collateral Value * Liquidation Threshold) / Borrowed Value. Managing this threshold is a core function of protocol risk management, balancing user borrowing capacity with systemic safety. Users must monitor their health factor relative to this threshold to avoid involuntary position closure.

examples
LIQUIDATION THRESHOLD

Protocol Examples & Thresholds

The Liquidation Threshold is a protocol-specific parameter that defines the maximum Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio at which a position becomes eligible for liquidation. Different DeFi platforms set distinct thresholds based on their risk models and the volatility of the underlying collateral assets.

05

Typical Threshold Ranges by Asset Class

Thresholds are set based on asset volatility and liquidity.

  • Stablecoins (USDC, DAI): High thresholds (75-85%) due to low price volatility.
  • Major Cryptos (ETH, WBTC): Moderate thresholds (70-82%) reflecting higher volatility.
  • Liquid Staking Tokens (stETH): Slightly lower thresholds (~70%) due to derivative and potential depeg risk.
  • Long-Tail / Altcoin Assets: Much lower thresholds (40-60%) due to extreme volatility and lower liquidity.
06

The Role of Oracle Price Feeds

Liquidation thresholds are enforced using real-time price data from oracles (e.g., Chainlink). The accuracy and latency of these feeds are critical. A price deviation or stale data can cause premature or delayed liquidations. Protocols often use a safety margin (a buffer below the official threshold) in their internal calculations and may implement circuit breakers to pause liquidations during extreme market volatility or oracle failure.

DEFINITIONS

Liquidation Threshold vs. Related Metrics

A comparison of key risk parameters used in DeFi lending protocols to manage collateralized debt positions.

MetricLiquidation ThresholdLoan-to-Value (LTV) RatioHealth Factor / Collateral Factor

Primary Function

Triggers liquidation when breached

Determines maximum initial borrowing power

Indicates real-time position safety

Typical Value Range

75% - 85%

50% - 80%

1.0 is safe, <1.0 triggers liquidation

Direction of Risk

Lower value = higher safety margin

Lower value = more conservative borrowing

Higher value = safer position

Calculation Input

Collateral Value

Collateral Value

Collateral Value, Borrowed Amount, Threshold

Protocol Action on Breach

Liquidation is enabled

Borrowing is blocked

Liquidation is triggered

Dynamic vs. Static

Static protocol parameter per asset

Static protocol parameter per asset

Dynamic value for each user position

Direct User Control

No

Yes (when opening a position)

Indirectly, via managing debt/collateral

security-considerations
LIQUIDATION THRESHOLD

Security & Risk Considerations

The Liquidation Threshold is a critical risk parameter in DeFi lending protocols that determines when a user's collateralized position becomes eligible for forced closure. Understanding its mechanics is essential for managing liquidation risk.

01

Core Definition & Function

The Liquidation Threshold is the collateral asset value, expressed as a percentage of the borrowed asset value, at which a position becomes undercollateralized and can be liquidated. It is a protocol-set parameter, distinct from the Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio used for initial borrowing. For example, if ETH has an 80% threshold, a position is liquidatable when the value of the borrowed assets reaches 80% of the collateral's value.

02

Liquidation Threshold vs. LTV

These are two distinct but related risk parameters that create a safety buffer.

  • Loan-to-Value (LTV): The maximum you can borrow initially (e.g., 75% for ETH).
  • Liquidation Threshold: The point where your loan is at risk (e.g., 80% for ETH). The difference between them (e.g., 5%) is the liquidation buffer or safety margin. This buffer gives users time to add collateral or repay debt before a price drop triggers liquidation.
03

The Liquidation Process

When a position's Health Factor falls below 1.0 (meaning debt value exceeds the liquidation threshold), it becomes eligible for liquidation. The process involves:

  • A liquidator repays part or all of the user's outstanding debt.
  • In return, they receive the user's collateral at a liquidation bonus (a discount).
  • The protocol may charge an additional liquidation penalty to the borrower, which is paid to the protocol's treasury or reserve fund. This penalty makes the effective loss for the borrower greater than just the price decline.
04

Key Risk Factors for Users

Borrowers must monitor several dynamic factors to avoid liquidation:

  • Asset Volatility: Sudden price drops in collateral or spikes in borrowed asset value can rapidly erode the safety buffer.
  • Protocol Parameter Updates: Governance can vote to change liquidation thresholds, potentially making existing positions riskier.
  • Health Factor Monitoring: This real-time metric (Total Collateral in ETH / Total Borrowed in ETH) must be tracked. A Health Factor approaching 1.0 signals imminent risk.
  • Gas Costs & Network Congestion: During market volatility, high gas fees can delay or prevent preventative actions like adding collateral.
05

Risk Mitigation Strategies

Prudent users employ several strategies to manage liquidation risk:

  • Conservative Borrowing: Borrow significantly less than the maximum LTV to create a larger safety buffer.
  • Diversified Collateral: Using a basket of less-correlated assets can reduce portfolio volatility.
  • Automated Monitoring & Alerts: Using tools to track Health Factors and set price alerts for key levels.
  • Over-collateralization: Deliberately depositing more collateral than required to withstand larger market swings.
  • Understanding Asset-Specific Risks: Knowing which assets in your portfolio have lower thresholds (higher risk) and adjusting accordingly.
06

Protocol Design & Systemic Risk

From a protocol perspective, the liquidation threshold is a lever for managing systemic risk.

  • Setting Thresholds: Protocols must balance user flexibility (higher thresholds) with system safety (lower thresholds). Stablecoins typically have higher thresholds than volatile assets.
  • Liquidation Incentives: The liquidation bonus must be sufficient to incentivize liquidators to act as a decentralized risk management layer, especially during high gas fee environments.
  • Cascading Liquidations: In extreme volatility, a wave of liquidations can drive down collateral prices, potentially triggering more liquidations—a feedback loop known as a liquidation spiral. Robust threshold settings and liquidation mechanisms aim to prevent this.
LIQUIDATION THRESHOLD

Common Misconceptions

Clarifying widespread misunderstandings about the liquidation threshold, a critical risk parameter in DeFi lending protocols that is often confused with related concepts like Loan-to-Value (LTV).

No, the liquidation threshold and the Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio are distinct but related risk parameters. The LTV ratio determines the maximum amount you can borrow against your collateral (e.g., 80% LTV means you can borrow up to $80 against $100 of collateral). The liquidation threshold is the higher collateral value ratio at which your position becomes eligible for liquidation (e.g., 85%). The gap between your initial LTV and the liquidation threshold is your safety buffer. For example, on Aave, ETH might have a 82.5% LTV and an 86% liquidation threshold, meaning liquidation risk begins when your borrowed value reaches 86% of your collateral's value.

LIQUIDATION THRESHOLD

Frequently Asked Questions

Essential questions and answers about the liquidation threshold, a critical risk parameter in DeFi lending protocols.

A liquidation threshold is the maximum Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio at which a borrower's collateral position can be automatically liquidated by the protocol to repay their debt. It is a risk parameter set by the protocol for each collateral asset type. For example, if ETH has a liquidation threshold of 80%, a loan backed by ETH collateral will be subject to liquidation if the LTV rises above 80%. This mechanism protects the protocol from undercollateralized loans and ensures lenders are repaid. The threshold is always set higher than the maximum LTV at which a loan can be initially taken out, creating a safety buffer.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team