Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Glossary

Capability Delegation

Capability delegation is a security model in decentralized systems where one entity grants a specific set of permissions to another using cryptographically signed authorization tokens or Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs).
Chainscore © 2026
definition
BLOCKCHAIN SECURITY MODEL

What is Capability Delegation?

Capability delegation is a security model for managing access rights on blockchains, where a user can grant a specific, limited permission to another party without transferring the underlying asset or full account control.

In blockchain systems, capability delegation is a fundamental security primitive that enables fine-grained, revocable access control. Instead of sharing private keys—a high-risk practice—a user (the delegator) creates a signed authorization token, or capability, that grants a delegate (e.g., a dApp or another user) permission to perform a specific action on their behalf. This action is strictly bounded, such as spending up to a certain amount of a specific token or interacting with one smart contract function. The model is inspired by object-capability security in computer science, which emphasizes the principle of least privilege.

The technical implementation often involves creating a signed delegation message or a delegation certificate. This signed data structure specifies the delegate's address, the precise actions permitted, any resource limits, and an expiration time. The delegate can then present this signed capability when submitting a transaction. A smart contract or the blockchain's native logic verifies the signature and the delegation's parameters before allowing the action to proceed. This mechanism is central to systems like Flow Blockchain for resource management and is increasingly used for gas fee sponsorship and batch transaction protocols on EVM chains.

Key advantages over traditional allowance models include revocability and safety. Since the capability is often validated on-chain at the moment of use, the delegator can invalidate it at any time by changing a nonce or revoking a public key, instantly removing the delegate's power. This is more responsive than revoking an ERC-20 allowance, which requires a new transaction. Furthermore, capabilities are context-specific and non-ambient; possessing one does not grant any authority outside its narrowly defined scope, drastically reducing the attack surface if the delegate is compromised.

A common application is gasless transactions or meta-transactions. Here, a user delegates the capability to a relayer to pay gas fees for their transactions. The user signs a message authorizing a specific transaction, and the relayer submits it, paying the fee. The network verifies the user's signature against the delegation before execution. Another use case is delegated staking, where a token holder grants a staking provider the capability to stake and unstake tokens on their behalf without transferring custody, allowing for professional management while maintaining asset ownership.

Capability delegation contrasts with account abstraction and multisignature wallets, though they can be complementary. While account abstraction focuses on flexible transaction validation logic for a single account, delegation creates a trust relationship between accounts. It is a more lightweight and composable pattern than a multisig for many use cases, as it does not require setting up a new shared wallet contract. As blockchain interoperability grows, capability-based security models are becoming essential for secure cross-chain messaging and resource management in modular architectures.

key-features
CAPABILITY DELEGATION

Key Features

Capability Delegation is a security model for smart contracts where specific permissions are granted for a limited scope and duration, rather than giving away full control of an asset.

01

Principle of Least Privilege

This core security principle is enforced by granting a contract or user only the minimum permissions necessary to perform a specific task. For example, a DeFi protocol might be delegated the right to spend a specific token up to a set amount, rather than receiving an unlimited approval for all tokens in a wallet.

02

Scoped Permissions

Delegations are narrowly defined to limit risk. Common scopes include:

  • Spending Cap: A maximum amount a contract can transfer.
  • Time Lock: An expiration date for the delegation.
  • Function Selector: Permission to call only specific functions on a target contract.
  • Asset Specificity: Delegation for a single ERC-20 token, not all assets in a wallet.
03

Revocable & Time-Bound

Unlike traditional token approvals, delegations can be designed to be revocable at any time by the delegator. They are also often time-bound, automatically expiring after a set block height or timestamp, which mitigates the risk of forgotten, stale permissions being exploited.

04

Composability Enabler

This model is foundational for secure DeFi composability. It allows protocols to interact with user assets in a controlled way without requiring constant transaction signing. For instance, a lending protocol can be delegated the right to liquidate a collateral position, while a yield optimizer can be delegated the right to harvest and compound rewards.

05

Implementation Standards (ERC-20 / ERC-721)

Standard token contracts like ERC-20 use the approve and transferFrom functions for basic delegation. More advanced patterns are formalized in standards like ERC-2612 (Permit for gasless approvals) and ERC-2771 (meta-transactions). The ERC-4337 account abstraction standard also relies heavily on delegated signature verification for user operations.

06

Security vs. UX Trade-off

Capability delegation navigates the trade-off between security and user experience. Unlimited approvals are a major security risk but require fewer transactions. Granular, expiring delegations are far more secure but can increase transaction frequency and complexity for users, a challenge addressed by session keys and account abstraction.

how-it-works
MECHANISM

How Capability Delegation Works

Capability delegation is a security model for granting and managing access rights in decentralized systems, distinct from traditional permission-based models.

Capability delegation is a security paradigm where access rights, or capabilities, are unforgeable tokens that can be passed between entities. Unlike an Access Control List (ACL) model, which checks a central registry to see if a subject is allowed to perform an action, a capability model grants the authority directly via a possession-based token. The holder of a valid capability inherently has the right to perform the specific action it represents, such as writing to a file or calling a smart contract function. This shifts the security model from "who is allowed?" to "who holds the key?"

The delegation mechanism is core to this model. A capability holder can create a new, derived capability—often with reduced or scoped permissions—and pass it to another party. For example, a parent smart contract holding a capability to manage a treasury could delegate a child capability to a specific module, allowing it only to pay out rewards up to a certain amount. This is typically implemented using cryptographic signatures or secure references within a runtime environment, ensuring the derived capability is both verifiable and non-repudiable.

In blockchain contexts, this pattern is fundamental to object-capability languages like those in the Cosmos SDK's x/capability module or Scrypto for Radix. It enables secure, composable applications by ensuring that modules can only interact with resources for which they hold an explicit capability. This principle of least authority is enforced by design, as a smart contract cannot access a resource unless it was directly passed the requisite capability, drastically reducing the attack surface compared to global permission checks.

A key advantage over traditional models is composability without vulnerability. In an ACL system, granting a module broad permissions to call any contract can lead to safety issues if that module is exploited. With capability delegation, the module only has access to the specific capabilities it was given. Furthermore, capabilities can be revoked by destroying the root token or by implementing time-bound or condition-based logic in the delegating authority, providing fine-grained control over the lifecycle of delegated access.

examples
CAPABILITY DELEGATION

Examples and Use Cases

Capability delegation is a security primitive for granting specific, revocable permissions. These examples illustrate its practical applications across different blockchain ecosystems.

01

Delegating Signing Authority

A user can delegate the capability to sign transactions for a specific smart contract function without handing over their private key. For example, delegating the right to vote with their tokens in a DAO to a trusted delegate, or allowing a dApp's UI to submit a specific type of swap transaction on their behalf. This is more secure than providing a full private key or unlimited spending approval.

02

Secure Session Keys in Gaming

In blockchain games, a player can create a session key—a temporary capability—that allows the game client to perform specific in-game actions (like moving a character or using an item) for a limited time. This eliminates the need to sign a transaction for every minor action, improving UX, while strictly limiting the scope of what the game can do with the user's assets.

03

Composable DeFi Interactions

A user can delegate a capability to a DeFi aggregator or smart wallet, allowing it to execute a complex, multi-step transaction (e.g., a cross-chain swap followed by a deposit into a yield vault). The capability is scoped to only the required tokens, contracts, and functions, preventing the aggregator from accessing any other assets in the user's wallet.

04

Revocable API Access

A service provider can issue a capability token to a third-party analytics dashboard. This token grants read-only access to specific on-chain data or event logs from the provider's contracts. The provider maintains control and can instantly revoke this access by invalidating the capability, unlike with traditional API keys which may have delayed revocation.

ecosystem-usage
CAPABILITY DELEGATION

Ecosystem Usage

Capability delegation is a security model for managing smart contract interactions, moving beyond simple token approvals. It enables fine-grained, revocable permissions for specific actions.

01

The Problem with ERC-20 Approvals

Traditional ERC-20 approve() grants a spender unlimited or fixed access to a user's token balance, creating persistent security risks. This coarse-grained permission is difficult to revoke without complex patterns and is a major vector for exploits if a spender contract is compromised.

02

How ERC-20 Permit Works

EIP-2612 permit() introduces off-chain signatures for gasless token approvals. A user signs a structured message containing the spender, amount, and a deadline. The spender submits this signature on-chain to gain approval, eliminating the need for a prior transaction and improving UX for DeFi onboarding.

04

Session Keys in Gaming & Social

Applications use session keys—temporary private keys delegated to a client—to allow seamless interactions without constant wallet pop-ups. For example, a gaming dApp might receive a key valid for 24 hours to submit moves, which is revoked automatically after expiry or by the user's main key.

05

Capability-Based Security Model

This model treats permissions as unforgeable tokens (capabilities) that must be presented to perform an action. It enforces the principle of least privilege: a delegated agent can only perform the exact authorized action on a specific resource, drastically reducing the attack surface compared to all-or-nothing approvals.

06

Revocation & Expiry Mechanisms

Effective delegation requires clear revocation. Common patterns include:

  • Time-based expiry via deadline parameters.
  • Nonce invalidation where a new signature cancels old ones.
  • Explicit revocation functions called by the delegator.
  • Consent-ledger patterns that track active permissions on-chain.
ARCHITECTURAL COMPARISON

Capability Delegation vs. Traditional Access Control

A technical comparison of capability-based and identity-based authorization models.

Core FeatureCapability DelegationTraditional Access Control (ACL/RBAC)

Authorization Primitive

Object reference (capability)

Identity-based permission

Delegation Model

Direct, by passing a capability

Indirect, via policy updates by a central authority

Principle of Least Privilege

Inherent; capability scope is explicit

Must be manually enforced in policy design

Authority Figure

Holder of the capability

Central policy server or administrator

Revocation Mechanism

Capability invalidation or time-bound tokens

Policy list modification

Ambient Authority Risk

Eliminated; no global permission checks

Present; system checks caller's identity against a central list

Verification Overhead

Low; validity check of the token/reference

High; requires context lookup and policy evaluation

Example System

Object-capability languages, UCANs, Macaroons

Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), Access Control Lists (ACLs)

security-considerations
CAPABILITY DELEGATION

Security Considerations

Capability delegation introduces powerful but complex security patterns. Understanding the associated risks—from key management to revocation—is critical for safe implementation.

01

Principle of Least Privilege

The cornerstone of secure delegation. A delegated capability should grant the minimum necessary permissions for the specific task. For example, a DApp might only need permission to spend up to 100 USDC from your wallet, not unlimited access to all your assets. Overly broad delegations, like granting unlimited approve() on an ERC-20 token, are a major attack vector for wallet drainers.

02

Key Management & Signer Separation

Delegation often relies on off-chain signatures (e.g., EIP-712). The security of the private key used to sign the delegation is paramount. Best practices include:

  • Using dedicated, lower-value delegator keys separate from your primary asset-holding wallet.
  • Storing these keys in hardware wallets or secure enclaves.
  • Never exposing the raw private key to the delegated service.
03

Revocation & Expiry Mechanisms

A critical risk is the inability to revoke a granted capability. Secure systems must implement:

  • Expiration Timestamps: Delegations should automatically expire after a set period (e.g., 30 days).
  • Explicit Revocation Functions: Users need a clear, gas-efficient way to revoke permissions on-chain.
  • Stateful vs. Stateless: Stateless delegations (signed messages) are harder to revoke than stateful ones (on-chain allowances), requiring careful design.
04

Replay & Reentrancy Attacks

Delegated signatures and calls can be vulnerable to replay across different contexts.

  • Replay Attacks: A signature meant for one network (e.g., Ethereum Mainnet) could be replayed on another (e.g., Polygon). Solutions include incorporating chain IDs and domain separators (EIP-712).
  • Reentrancy: A delegated contract call could re-enter the delegating contract if state isn't updated before the external call (checks-effects-interactions pattern is essential).
05

Front-running & Permission Scope

On public blockchains, delegated transactions are visible in the mempool.

  • Front-running: A malicious actor could see a delegation signature and submit their own transaction using it before the intended one.
  • Permission Scope Creep: A delegated agent might use its permissions in unexpected ways if the capability's scope isn't rigorously defined and enforced by the smart contract logic.
06

Auditing the Delegate

The security of the entire system depends on the delegatee (the smart contract or service receiving the capability). Key audit points include:

  • Contract Immutability & Upgradability: Can the delegatee's logic be changed maliciously?
  • Code Quality & Audits: Has the delegatee contract been professionally audited?
  • Centralization Risks: Does the delegatee rely on a single admin key that could be compromised?
CAPABILITY DELEGATION

Frequently Asked Questions

Capability delegation is a core security and composability pattern in blockchain applications. These questions address its core concepts, implementation, and practical use cases.

Capability delegation is a security model where a smart contract or user grants a specific, limited permission to another actor, rather than granting broad authority like full spending rights. It works by creating a signed, cryptographically verifiable token—often called a capability token or delegation signature—that explicitly authorizes a single, predefined action. This is fundamentally different from the allowance model common in ERC-20 tokens, where a spender is given a blanket allowance up to a certain amount. Capabilities are object-capability (ocap) inspired, promoting the principle of least privilege by ensuring delegates can only perform the exact action they were authorized for, nothing more.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team