Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Glossary

DID Peer Method

A Decentralized Identifier (DID) method designed for private, peer-to-peer relationships where DID documents are exchanged directly between parties and are not intended for global resolution.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
DECENTRALIZED IDENTIFIER PROTOCOL

What is DID Peer Method?

The DID Peer Method is a Decentralized Identifier (DID) specification designed for private, peer-to-peer connections without requiring a global ledger.

The DID Peer Method is a Decentralized Identifier (DID) specification defined by the W3C DID Working Group that enables the creation of self-certifying, cryptographically verifiable identifiers for direct, private communication between two or more entities. Unlike ledger-based DID methods (e.g., did:ethr, did:ion), a did:peer is not registered on any public, global blockchain or distributed ledger. Instead, its DID Document is created, exchanged, and stored locally by the peers involved, making it inherently private and suitable for closed ecosystems, offline scenarios, and secure agent-to-agent communication.

The core innovation of the DID Peer Method is its resolution process. A did:peer identifier is generated directly from the DID Document itself using a deterministic algorithm, such as a multibase-encoded hash. This means the DID and its corresponding document are intrinsically linked; possessing one allows you to derive or verify the other. This peer DID is then exchanged out-of-band (e.g., via QR code, NFC, or a secure messaging channel) between parties establishing a connection. The resolution of the DID—translating the did:peer string into its verifiable DID Document—happens entirely locally, without querying an external network.

This architecture provides distinct advantages, including enhanced privacy (no public correlation of interactions), offline usability (no internet required for creation or verification), and low latency (no consensus or network delays). However, it also imposes limitations: peer DIDs are not globally resolvable or discoverable, and they are only meaningful within the context of the specific relationship for which they were created. They are ephemeral by design for single-use contexts or can be made persistent for long-lived connections.

The DID Peer Method is a foundational component for implementing the DIDComm secure messaging protocol and building decentralized, interoperable agent ecosystems, such as those defined by the Hyperledger Aries framework. In these systems, agents generate a unique did:peer for each new relationship, ensuring compartmentalized trust and communication channels. This method is formally specified in the DID Peer Method maintained by the Decentralized Identity Foundation (DIF), ensuring interoperability across different vendor implementations.

In practice, using the DID Peer Method involves a sequence of cryptographic operations. When Alice wants to connect with Bob, her agent generates a DID Document containing her public keys and service endpoints. This document is hashed and encoded to form the did:peer:2 identifier. She sends this DID to Bob via an invitation. Bob's agent can then deterministically reconstruct the expected DID Document from the identifier to verify its authenticity. Once verified, both parties store the peer DID and its document, establishing a trusted, encrypted channel for all future interactions without ever exposing their connection details to a public registry.

key-features
DID PEER METHOD

Key Features

The DID Peer Method is a decentralized identifier (DID) specification designed for direct, peer-to-peer relationships without requiring a global ledger. It is defined by the DIF DIDComm Working Group and is a core component of the DIDComm v2 protocol stack.

01

Peer-to-Peer & Offline-First

A DID Peer is created dynamically between two parties for a specific relationship. It does not rely on a blockchain or any other global, online resolver. This makes it ideal for:

  • Offline-first interactions where connectivity is intermittent.
  • Ephemeral connections that don't require a permanent, public record.
  • Private relationships where the existence of the connection itself should not be broadcast.
02

Embedded DID Document

Unlike ledger-based DIDs, a DID Peer's DID Document—containing public keys, service endpoints, and verification methods—is encoded directly into the DID identifier itself. The document is serialized, hashed, and multibase-encoded, forming the unique did:peer:... string. This means:

  • No resolution latency; the document is instantly available.
  • Guaranteed integrity via the embedded hash.
  • The document is only accessible to entities that possess the full DID string.
03

Deterministic Generation

DID Peer identifiers are generated deterministically from the agreed-upon DID Document content. Both parties in a relationship can independently generate the identical did:peer identifier if they follow the same algorithm and input data. This process typically involves:

  • Agreeing on the document's structure and keys (e.g., via an out-of-band exchange).
  • Applying the DID Peer Method's specified algorithms for serialization and encoding.
  • This ensures consistency without a central coordinator.
05

Comparison to Ledger-Based DIDs

DID Peer differs fundamentally from ledger-based methods like did:ethr or did:ion. Key distinctions:

  • Resolvability: Peer DIDs are resolved locally; ledger DIDs require querying a global network.
  • Persistence: Peer DIDs are for bilateral relationships; ledger DIDs are persistent public assertions.
  • Discovery: Peer DIDs are not publicly discoverable; ledger DIDs can be looked up by anyone.
  • Use Case: Peer is for private communication; ledger is for public verification and credentials.
06

Common Encoding Formats

The DID Peer Method specification defines specific encoding rules. The two primary types are:

  • did:peer:0: A legacy, simple encoding.
  • did:peer:1: The current standard, using a multibase prefix (like z) followed by a multicodec-encoded, hashed representation of the DID Document.
  • did:peer:2: An advanced format supporting more complex document structures and key types. The encoding ensures the DID is a compact, self-contained package of trust information.
how-it-works
DECENTRALIZED IDENTIFIER METHOD

How the DID Peer Method Works

The DID Peer Method is a decentralized identifier specification designed for private, peer-to-peer connections without requiring a global ledger.

The DID Peer Method is a W3C-compliant Decentralized Identifier (DID) method defined by the Decentralized Identity Foundation (DIF) that creates identifiers for direct, ephemeral relationships. Unlike ledger-based methods (e.g., did:ethr, did:ion), a did:peer is generated and exchanged solely between the involved parties, typically during an agent-to-agent protocol like DIDComm. Its core value is enabling offline-first and private identity interactions, as the DID Document is not published to any public verifiable data registry, ensuring the relationship details remain confidential between the peers.

A did:peer is constructed directly from the DID Document itself, creating a self-referential and self-certifying identifier. The standard defines several generation methods, with Method 2 being common for its simplicity: the DID Document's content is encoded (e.g., using Base58BTC) and appended to the did:peer:2 prefix. Because the identifier is derived from the document, any party receiving the DID can instantly reconstruct and verify the associated public keys and service endpoints without querying a resolver. This design eliminates latency, dependency on internet connectivity, and public metadata leakage inherent in blockchain-based lookups.

The primary use case for DID Peer is establishing secure communication channels. When two agents connect, they exchange their did:peer DIDs, which contain the public keys needed for encryption and the service endpoint (e.g., a WebSocket URI) for sending messages. This forms the foundation for the DIDComm v2 messaging protocol. The relationship's context is entirely managed within the agents' wallets or edge agents, making it ideal for mobile applications, IoT device pairing, and any scenario requiring a trusted, direct connection without a public audit trail.

While did:peer identifiers are not intended for long-term, publicly resolvable identity, they are crucial for the peer DID topology in decentralized identity ecosystems. They often serve as the "child" DIDs in a hierarchical relationship, where a long-term, public did:key or did:web acts as a publicly discoverable root. This layered approach combines the benefits of public verifiability for initial discovery with the privacy and efficiency of peer-to-peer interactions for ongoing secure communication, forming a robust architecture for decentralized trust.

examples
DID PEER METHOD

Examples and Use Cases

The DID Peer method enables direct, secure connections without a global ledger. These examples illustrate its practical applications in decentralized systems.

02

Offline & Local-First Applications

Because Peer DIDs are generated and resolved locally without requiring blockchain consensus, they are ideal for air-gapped systems or environments with intermittent connectivity. Examples include:

  • Secure device pairing for IoT networks.
  • Proximity-based authentication at events.
  • Storing verifiable credentials on a mobile wallet for use without an internet connection, leveraging the peer DID's embedded verification material.
03

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)

Within a DAO, members can use DID Peer to create secure, verifiable side channels for sensitive governance communications or voting. Each member's agent can hold a Peer DID for the organization, enabling:

  • Encrypted proposal discussions.
  • Private voting with verifiable, member-specific signatures.
  • Delegation of voting power through verifiable credentials, all while keeping the specific communication relationships private and off the main governance ledger.
04

Confidential Business-to-Business Transactions

Enterprises can leverage DID Peer to establish private digital relationships for supply chain or data exchange. Two companies can generate a unique Peer DID for their bilateral relationship, using it to:

  • Digitally sign and verify contracts.
  • Authenticate API calls between their systems.
  • Exchange verifiable credentials for compliance (e.g., proof of certification). This keeps the business relationship and its transaction volume confidential, not exposed on a public blockchain.
05

Contrast with DID:Web & DID:Key

Understanding DID Peer is easier by comparison:

  • DID:Web: Resolves via a URL on a web domain you control. It's for public, discoverable identities.
  • DID:Key: A simple DID formed directly from a public key, but it cannot be updated or rotated.
  • DID:Peer: Designed for private, pairwise relationships. It is not publicly discoverable, can embed service endpoints directly, and supports key rotation through its DID Document, making it superior for ongoing, secure connections.
COMPARISON

DID Peer Method vs. Ledger-Based DID Methods

Key technical and operational differences between peer-to-peer and traditional ledger-based Decentralized Identifier (DID) methods.

FeatureDID Peer MethodLedger-Based DID Methods (e.g., did:ethr, did:ion)

Underlying Infrastructure

Direct peer-to-peer communication

Public blockchain or distributed ledger

DID Document Publication

Exchanged directly between peers (off-ledger)

Written to and resolved from a ledger (on-ledger)

Transaction/Creation Fees

None

Network gas/transaction fees apply

Write/Update Latency

< 1 second (peer-to-peer)

Varies by ledger finality (e.g., 12 sec to 10 min)

Resilience to Network Outages

High (requires only local peer connectivity)

Depends on ledger node availability and sync

Verifiable Data Registry Dependency

No dependency

Absolute dependency for resolution and updates

Inherent Privacy of Connections

High (direct exchange, no public broadcast)

Low (DID creation and updates are public)

Primary Use Case

Private, dynamic peer relationships (e.g., Aries agents)

Public, verifiable claims and long-term identifiers

security-considerations
DID PEER METHOD

Security and Privacy Considerations

The DID Peer method enables direct, private peer-to-peer connections without a global ledger, creating unique security and privacy trade-offs compared to public DID methods.

01

Decentralized Trust & No Registry

A DID Peer is exchanged directly between parties, eliminating reliance on a centralized registry or blockchain. This prevents censorship and single points of failure but shifts the burden of trust establishment and DID persistence to the communicating endpoints. There is no global resolver to verify the DID's existence or history.

02

Ephemeral & Pairwise Identifiers

DIDs can be generated for a single interaction (ephemeral) or uniquely for each relationship (pairwise). This practice enhances privacy by preventing correlation across different contexts. For example, you would use a different DID Peer with your bank than with a social app, making it impossible for those entities to collude and track you.

03

Secure Peer-to-Peer Exchange

The initial DID document exchange must occur over a secure, authenticated channel (e.g., via DIDComm). If this channel is compromised, a malicious actor could perform a man-in-the-middle attack and substitute their own keys. Subsequent verifiable credentials and messages rely entirely on the integrity of this initial key agreement.

04

Key Management & Revocation

Since there is no ledger to publish key updates, key rotation and revocation are challenging. Revocation must be communicated directly to all peers who hold the old DID. Loss of private keys for a long-lived DID Peer can be irrecoverable, as there is no blockchain-based recovery mechanism.

05

Data Minimization & Selective Disclosure

The method naturally supports data minimization. A DID Peer document contains only the public keys necessary for the specific relationship. When combined with Verifiable Credentials, it enables selective disclosure, allowing a user to prove specific claims (e.g., age > 21) without revealing their full identity or other attributes.

06

Comparison to Public DID Methods

AspectDID PeerPublic DID (e.g., on Blockchain)
PrivacyHigh, no public footprintLow, all metadata is public & permanent
VerifiabilityOnly by direct peersBy anyone with the DID
PersistenceDependent on peersGuaranteed by the ledger
RevocationDirect peer notificationUpdate published to ledger
This highlights the core trade-off: enhanced privacy versus global verifiability.
technical-details
DID PEER METHOD

Technical Details: DID Syntax and Document Structure

This section details the specific syntax and document structure of the DID Peer method, a decentralized identifier designed for secure, offline-first communication between peers.

The DID Peer method, defined by the Decentralized Identity Foundation (DIF), creates a self-contained, peer-to-peer identifier that does not require resolution on a blockchain or centralized registry. Its syntax follows the W3C DID standard, beginning with the did:peer: method-specific identifier (MSI). The core of a DID Peer is a cryptographically generated, multibase-encoded string derived from the peer's public key and optional routing information, resulting in a complete, portable identifier like did:peer:2.Ez6LSms.... This design enables two parties to establish a direct, verifiable connection by simply exchanging their DID documents.

A DID Peer document is not fetched from a network; it is embedded within the identifier itself or derived deterministically from it. The document structure contains essential verification methods, such as public keys for authentication and key agreement, and service endpoints for communication (e.g., DIDComm messaging). For the did:peer:2 version, the document is generated by decoding the MSI. This approach ensures the identifier and its verification material are intrinsically linked, providing cryptographic certainty and eliminating dependency on external resolution, which is critical for offline or air-gapped scenarios.

The method supports key rotation and peer routing through specific encodings within its syntax. For instance, a DID Peer can encode a list of routing peers, allowing messages to be forwarded through a trusted network. The document's service block is crucial, as it defines the protocols and addresses for secure interactions. Because the entire state is encapsulated, peers can independently verify each other's credentials and communication endpoints without consulting a third party, making DID Peer a foundational protocol for decentralized agent-to-agent communication and secure digital relationships.

DID PEER METHOD

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Direct answers to common technical questions about the DID Peer method, a decentralized identifier designed for private, peer-to-peer connections.

The DID Peer method is a Decentralized Identifier (DID) specification designed for creating and resolving DIDs directly between peers without requiring a global ledger or resolver. It works by encoding the DID Document itself into the DID identifier using a multi-base, multi-codec format. When two peers establish a connection (e.g., via DIDComm), they exchange their did:peer identifiers, which contain all the cryptographic material—like public keys and service endpoints—needed for secure communication. This creates a self-contained, offline-verifiable identity system where the DID's authenticity is proven by its own structure, not by an external registry. The method is defined by the Decentralized Identity Foundation (DIF) and is a core component of peer-to-peer identity architectures.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team