Capability Invocation is a security model, often contrasted with the more common Access Control List (ACL) model, that governs authorization in decentralized systems. Instead of checking a central list of permissions, a capability is an unforgeable token or reference that combines authority with designation—it both identifies a resource and grants the right to perform a specific action on it. To invoke an action, such as transferring tokens from a vault, a user must present the precise capability object, proving they were previously granted that exact authority. This model is foundational to secure, composable smart contract design on platforms like Ethereum, Cosmos, and Radix.
LABS
Glossary
Capability Invocation
Capability invocation is the cryptographic act of using a specific token or key to authorize an action, such as accessing a resource or signing a transaction, on behalf of a Decentralized Identifier (DID) controller.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
BLOCKCHAIN SECURITY MODEL
What is Capability Invocation?
A security paradigm for smart contracts and decentralized applications that governs how one entity can perform actions on behalf of another.
The core principle is object-capability (ocap) security, where authority is derived from possession of a reference. In practice, a smart contract function that creates a new vault might return a VaultCapability object to the caller. This object, often a unique identifier or a cryptographically signed message, is the only way to later call functions like withdraw on that specific vault. This eliminates ambient authority, where a broadly authorized actor could access any resource. Instead, capabilities must be explicitly created and passed between contracts and users, creating a verifiable chain of delegation. This is analogous to possessing a physical key to a specific safe, rather than having your name on a master list of authorized personnel.
This model enables secure composability and least-privilege design. Different capabilities can be minted for different operations (e.g., a DepositCap and a WithdrawCap), allowing fine-grained control. A user can delegate a limited DepositCap to a third-party service without risking their funds. In cross-contract interactions, a contract can pass a capability it holds to another contract, enabling complex workflows without exposing underlying private keys or granting blanket permissions. This is critical for building DeFi protocols where assets are pooled and managed by autonomous logic, as it minimizes the attack surface and contains the blast radius of a compromised component.
Implementations vary by blockchain. On Cosmos SDK-based chains, the model is often implemented via the x/capability module, which generates and tracks unique, in-memory capability references. In the Radix ledger, it's a first-class concept in its component-based Scrypto language. On Ethereum, while not natively enforced, the pattern is implemented by smart contract developers using unique bytes32 identifiers or signed delegations (like EIP-712 signatures). The key challenge is secure capability revocation, which typically requires designing the system so that capabilities expire, are tied to a nonce, or can be invalidated by the capability's original issuer.
key-features
SECURITY ARCHITECTURE
Key Features of Capability Invocation
Capability invocation is a security model that grants explicit, unforgeable permissions to perform specific actions on a resource. These features define how it enhances security and composability in decentralized systems.
01
Principle of Least Authority
A core tenet where a capability grants the minimum necessary authority to perform a task. Instead of giving a smart contract full control over a user's wallet, a capability might only allow it to spend up to 100 USDC. This drastically limits the impact of a compromised or malicious contract.
- Example: A DeFi lending protocol only receives a capability to withdraw the exact collateral amount for a loan, not the entire wallet balance.
- Contrasts with the all-or-nothing
approve()model in traditional token standards.
02
Object-Capability Model
The underlying security paradigm where authority is inseparable from the reference to an object. Possession of the capability is the proof of permission; there is no separate access control list to check.
- Unforgeable: Capabilities are created by the resource owner and cannot be fabricated by other parties.
- Delegatable: The holder of a capability can choose to pass it (or a derived, limited version) to another entity, enabling secure composability.
- Foundation for secure inter-contract communication in systems like the Cosmos SDK and Flow blockchain.
03
Composability Without Re-authorization
Once a user grants a capability to Contract A, Contract A can use that authority to call other contracts (B, C) on the user's behalf without requiring the user to sign new transactions. This enables complex, multi-step DeFi transactions (like a cross-protocol yield strategy) to be executed in a single atomic bundle.
- Efficiency: Reduces user friction and transaction count.
- Security Context: The downstream contracts (B, C) interact with the original capability, maintaining the chain of authority and the original permission scope.
04
Revocability & Expiry
Capabilities can be designed with time-bound validity or be revocable by the grantor. This provides fine-grained control over delegated permissions.
- Expiry: A capability to use an API key might be valid for only 24 hours.
- Revocation: The resource owner can invalidate a capability at any time, instantly removing the delegated authority. This is often implemented by having the target contract check a revocation registry or a nonce.
- Contrast with static ERC-20 allowances, which persist until explicitly set to zero.
05
Contrast with Allowance-Based Systems
Highlights the fundamental shift from identity-based to capability-based security.
- ERC-20
approve(): Grants permission to a specific address (identity) to spend tokens up to a limit. Any contract with that address can use the allowance. - Capability Invocation: Grants permission to a specific capability object. Only the holder of that exact object can exercise the permission, regardless of its address. This prevents confused deputy attacks and phishing risks associated with excessive allowances.
06
Implementation in Smart Contracts
In practice, a capability is often implemented as a signed message or a unique token (like an NFT or a session key) that a smart contract must present when calling a protected function.
- Signed Delegation: User signs a structured message authorizing specific actions, which a relayer contract verifies.
- Capability Tokens: An NFT minted to represent a permission; holding the NFT in the caller's context grants access. Burning the NFT revokes it.
- Frameworks: Used in Sealevel (Solana's parallel runtime), Cadence (Flow), and CosmWasm for secure cross-contract calls.
how-it-works
BLOCKCHAIN SECURITY PRIMITIVE
How Capability Invocation Works
Capability invocation is a security model where authority is derived from unforgeable tokens, enabling fine-grained, decentralized access control in blockchain systems.
Capability invocation is the process of exercising a right or permission by presenting a cryptographically secure, unforgeable token—a capability—to a resource. Unlike identity-based access control (e.g., "Alice can write"), which checks who you are, capability-based security authorizes based on what you hold. In blockchain contexts, a capability is often an on-chain object or a signed message that serves as a direct reference to a resource and the rights to interact with it, enabling principle of least privilege by design.
The core mechanism involves two phases: delegation and invocation. First, a resource owner or a higher-level capability creates and issues a new capability to a user, specifying precise permissions (e.g., can_update_value for a specific smart contract function). This capability token, which contains a unique identifier and the granted rights, is then stored in the user's wallet or account. To invoke the capability, the user includes it in a transaction, often as a cryptographic proof or a reference in a call, which the receiving smart contract validates before executing the authorized action.
This model is fundamental to several blockchain architectures. For example, the Flow blockchain uses capabilities for secure resource access in its Cadence language, where a capability is a typed reference to a stored object. In Cosmos SDK-based chains, Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) channels use capability modules to manage port ownership and channel creation rights. The key security benefit is composability without ambient authority: smart contracts can safely pass capabilities to others without fear of escalation, as the capability defines and limits all possible actions.
examples
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
Examples of Capability Invocation
Capability invocation enables secure, fine-grained access control in blockchain systems. These examples demonstrate how it's used to manage permissions for smart contracts, wallets, and cross-chain interactions.
02
Session Keys for Gaming
In blockchain gaming, capability invocation creates session keys. A user can grant a game client temporary, limited permissions—like the ability to move their NFT character or spend in-game tokens—for a set duration. This allows seamless gameplay without constant wallet pop-ups, while the underlying assets remain secure in the user's primary wallet. The capability automatically expires after the session.
03
Cross-Chain Asset Management
Capabilities enable secure cross-chain messaging. A user on Chain A can issue a capability authorizing a bridge or router contract on Chain B to mint a wrapped asset, with the capability serving as proof of locked collateral on the origin chain. The system uses cryptographic signatures or verifiable credentials to prove the holder is authorized to perform that specific minting action, without exposing private keys.
04
Delegated Voting in DAOs
In Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), token holders can delegate their voting power using capabilities. Instead of transferring tokens, a holder issues a capability to a delegate, granting them the right to vote on proposals for a specific period or topic. This is more secure than full token delegation, as the capability can be scope-limited (e.g., only for treasury proposals) and revoked instantly, mitigating misuse risk.
05
Secure Oracle Data Feeds
Oracles use capability invocation to provide authenticated data to smart contracts. A data provider signs a message (the capability) containing a specific price feed for a specific pair. The consuming contract verifies the signature and the capability's scope—checking the authorized data type, timestamp, and provider—before accepting the input. This prevents unauthorized or spoofed data from being injected into the contract's logic.
visual-explainer
CAPABILITY INVOCATION
Visualizing the Flow
A conceptual walkthrough of the capability invocation process, illustrating how authorized actions are performed within a decentralized system.
Capability invocation is the process by which a holder of a cryptographic capability token executes the specific, pre-authorized action it represents. This is the moment a capability, which is essentially a key, is used to unlock a function or access a resource on a blockchain or smart contract. The flow begins when a user, possessing a valid capability, submits a transaction that includes a reference to it, triggering the system to verify the capability's authenticity and permissions before executing the associated logic.
The core mechanism relies on cryptographic verification. When a capability is invoked, the underlying protocol checks the digital signature attached to the transaction against the public key or address that is authorized within the capability object itself. This process ensures that only the legitimate holder can use it, providing strong security guarantees without requiring the system to maintain global access control lists. This is a fundamental shift from traditional Identity-Based Access Control, where permissions are checked against a user's identity stored on a server.
To visualize a common flow: 1) A user receives a capability token granting permission to withdraw up to 100 tokens from a vault contract. 2) To execute, they construct a transaction calling the vault's withdraw function, embedding the capability as a parameter. 3) The vault contract's code validates the capability's signature and checks its internal permissions (e.g., amount, expiration). 4) If valid, the contract logic proceeds, transferring the specified tokens to the user's address, all within a single atomic operation.
This pattern enables powerful composability and least-privilege security. Developers can design systems where capabilities are passed between smart contracts, allowing for complex, multi-step transactions where each step carries only the minimal authority required. For example, a capability to 'swap token A for token B' could be safely given to a decentralized exchange router without also granting it permission to drain the user's entire wallet, a principle central to the object-capability model.
From an architectural perspective, visualizing this flow highlights the separation of concerns: the capability serves as a memoized proof of authorization. The resource (smart contract) does not need to know who the user is, only that they present a valid token granting a specific right. This reduces on-chain storage overhead and simplifies permission management, making systems more scalable and secure against certain classes of attack, such as reentrancy, by explicitly bounding the scope of what can be invoked.
ecosystem-usage
CAPABILITY INVOCATION
Ecosystem Usage & Standards
Capability Invocation is a security model for authorizing blockchain transactions, where permissions are granted for specific actions on specific resources, rather than granting broad account access.
01
Core Security Model
Capability Invocation replaces the all-or-nothing key-based authorization of traditional accounts with a least-privilege model. Instead of signing a transaction with a private key that grants full control, a user signs a capability object that explicitly authorizes a single, scoped action, such as 'spend 10 USDC from vault A' or 'delegate voting power for proposal #42'. This prevents malicious dApps from draining wallets or performing unauthorized actions.
02
Implementation: Signed CACAOs
The primary technical standard is the CACAO (CApability Object) format, often used with SIWE (Sign-In with Ethereum). A CACAO is a signed JSON payload containing:
iss(issuer): The user's decentralized identifier (DID).aud(audience): The resource or service being accessed.resources: An array of URIs specifying the exact resources and actions permitted (e.g.,ceramic://*for data streams). This signed object is presented to a resource server to invoke the granted capability.
03
Use Case: Secure DApp Sessions
DApps use capability invocation to create secure, session-based interactions without exposing private keys. For example:
- A user signs a CACAO granting a gaming dApp the capability to mint one NFT on their behalf.
- A DeFi user grants a time-limited capability to a router contract to swap tokens, with a defined slippage limit.
- A data platform receives a capability to write to a specific data stream on a decentralized network like Ceramic. This confines dApp permissions to the exact intended actions.
04
Related Standard: UCAN
The UCAN (User Controlled Authorization Networks) specification builds upon CACAOs to enable delegatable capabilities. A user (the origin) can issue a UCAN token to a service, which can then delegate a subset of that capability to another service, creating a verifiable chain of authorization. This enables complex, multi-service workflows (e.g., a backend service processing user data) while maintaining an audit trail back to the original user's intent.
05
Benefits Over Traditional Auth
Capability invocation offers key advantages:
- Reduced Attack Surface: Eliminates the risk of a malicious contract draining an entire wallet via an
approvetransaction. - User Intent Clarity: Signing requests are explicit about the action being authorized.
- Composability: Capabilities are self-contained tokens that can be passed between services.
- Revocability: Capabilities can be designed with expiry times or be invalidated by the issuer. This model is foundational for secure account abstraction and user-friendly wallets.
06
Ecosystem Adoption
This paradigm is being adopted by key infrastructure projects:
- WalletConnect: Uses capabilities for secure session authorization.
- Ceramic Network: Uses CACAOs for writing to decentralized data streams.
- EIP-5792: Proposes a standard for wallet capabilities on Ethereum, allowing wallets to expose specific functions to dApps.
- Fission Codes: Implements UCANs for serverless, user-controlled web apps. It represents a shift towards more granular and user-centric security across the Web3 stack.
security-considerations
CAPABILITY INVOCATION
Security Considerations
Capability invocation is a security model where access to resources is controlled by unforgeable tokens (capabilities) that must be explicitly presented. This section details the key security principles and potential risks associated with this paradigm.
01
Principle of Least Authority (POLA)
The core security benefit of capabilities. Each capability grants only the minimum permissions necessary for a specific task. This compartmentalizes risk, preventing a compromised component from accessing unrelated system resources. For example, a token swap contract would receive a capability to transfer only the specific tokens involved, not blanket access to a user's entire wallet.
02
Capability Confinement & Propagation
A critical risk is the uncontrolled propagation of capabilities. If a smart contract receives a powerful capability and can delegate it freely, the security model breaks. Mitigations include:
- Attenuation: Creating a derived capability with reduced rights.
- Restricting Delegation: Designing capabilities that are non-transferable or only delegatable under strict rules.
- Sandboxing: Ensuring received capabilities cannot be stored or passed on unintentionally.
03
Confused Deputy Problem
This classic security flaw occurs when a component with a capability (the deputy) is tricked by a less-privileged attacker into misusing that authority. In blockchain, a user might invoke a benign-seeming contract that then uses an attached capability maliciously. Defenses include ambient authority elimination (only capabilities grant access) and designating the invoker as part of the capability's authority check.
04
Revocation Challenges
Once granted, revoking a capability can be difficult in decentralized systems. Common patterns include:
- Expiring Capabilities: Time-bound or single-use tokens.
- Indirect Capabilities: Granting access via a proxy or manager contract that can update permissions.
- Capability Registries: A central on-chain record that can invalidate tokens, though this introduces a central point of control. The trade-off between flexibility and secure revocation is a key design decision.
05
Interface Safety & Type Enforcement
A capability must be invoked through a well-defined, safe interface. Security vulnerabilities arise if:
- The interface allows unexpected operations (interface confusion).
- The underlying resource's implementation changes, breaking the capability's assumed safety guarantees.
- Static type systems and formal verification of capability interfaces are used to prove that only authorized operations can be invoked.
06
Real-World Example: Solana's Program Derived Addresses (PDAs)
PDAs demonstrate capability-like security. A program generates a PDA that it alone can sign for, acting as a capability to control specific on-chain state. Security considerations include:
- Ensuring the PDA derivation is deterministic and collision-resistant.
- Carefully managing which programs are granted signing authority for a PDA.
- Preventing PDAs from being used to escalate privileges beyond their intended scope, such as accessing accounts they do not own.
ACCESS CONTROL MODELS
Capability Invocation vs. Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC)
A comparison of two fundamental access control paradigms, highlighting their core mechanisms, delegation models, and typical use cases in decentralized systems.
| Feature | Capability Invocation | Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) |
|---|---|---|
Core Mechanism | Possession of a cryptographically secure, unforgeable token (capability) | Evaluation of policies against subject, object, and environmental attributes |
Delegation Model | Direct and transitive; capabilities can be passed to other principals | Centralized; managed by policy administrators, not typically delegated by users |
Authorization Check | Local verification of token validity and permissions | Centralized Policy Decision Point (PDP) evaluates request against rules |
Default Access | Implicit deny; access only with a valid capability | Implicit deny; access only if policy evaluation grants it |
Revocation | Explicit, often requires token invalidation lists or short-lived tokens | Implicit and immediate via policy updates in the central authority |
Typical Architecture | Decentralized, object-centric | Centralized, policy-centric |
Primary Use Case | Decentralized applications, object-capability systems, secure sandboxing | Enterprise systems, role management, complex regulatory compliance |
CAPABILITY INVOCATION
Common Misconceptions
Clarifying frequent misunderstandings about capability-based security models in blockchain and smart contract development.
Capability invocation is a security model where authority is derived from unforgeable reference tokens (capabilities) held by a subject, rather than checking a subject's identity against an Access Control List (ACL). The key difference is in the locus of control: in an ACL system, a central authority maintains a list of who can do what; in a capability system, possession of the capability token itself is the proof of authority. This makes delegation and least-privilege design more natural, as you can pass a specific capability without granting broader permissions. On-chain, a capability can be implemented as a signed message, a specific object reference, or a token in a user's wallet that grants the right to call a particular function.
CAPABILITY INVOCATION
Technical Deep Dive
Capability invocation is a core security primitive in blockchain and smart contract systems, enabling fine-grained, object-oriented access control. This section explores its mechanics, applications, and key differences from traditional authorization models.
Capability invocation is a security model where authority is represented by unforgeable tokens (capabilities) that grant the holder a specific permission to interact with a resource. It works by decoupling identity from permission: instead of checking who is making a request, the system checks what capability token they possess. A capability is an object combining a reference to a resource (e.g., a smart contract function) with the rights to invoke it. The holder can pass this token to others, delegating the permission without involving a central authority.
Key Mechanism:
- Creation: A capability is minted by a resource's owner.
- Invocation: The holder presents the capability to the resource to perform an action.
- Delegation: The capability can be sent to another address, transferring the right.
CAPABILITY INVOCATION
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Capability invocation is a core security primitive in blockchain development. These questions address its purpose, mechanics, and practical applications.
Capability invocation is a security model where access to a resource or function is granted by possessing a unique, unforgeable token, rather than relying on the identity of the caller. It works by first creating a capability object—a cryptographically secure reference that encodes specific permissions. This object is then passed to an authorized entity, which can subsequently invoke or present it to the system to perform the allowed action. The system verifies only the capability itself, not who holds it, enforcing the principle of least privilege by default. This is a fundamental pattern in systems like the Internet Computer Protocol (ICP) and CosmWasm smart contracts.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall