Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Glossary

Wrapped Asset

A wrapped asset is a token on one blockchain that represents a native asset from another blockchain, typically issued via a lock-and-mint bridge mechanism.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
BLOCKCHAIN INTEROPERABILITY

What is a Wrapped Asset?

A technical overview of tokenized representations of assets on foreign blockchains.

A wrapped asset is a tokenized representation of a native cryptocurrency or digital asset that is issued on a different blockchain, enabling it to be used within that foreign ecosystem's applications and protocols. The most prominent example is Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC), an ERC-20 token on Ethereum that represents Bitcoin, allowing BTC to be utilized in DeFi applications like lending and decentralized exchanges. This process involves locking or depositing the original asset with a trusted custodian or a decentralized network, which then mints an equivalent amount of the wrapped token on the target chain. The wrapped token is pegged 1:1 to the value of the underlying asset, which remains securely held in reserve.

The primary purpose of wrapping is to overcome blockchain interoperability limitations. Different blockchains operate with distinct protocols, consensus mechanisms, and smart contract languages, making direct asset transfers impossible. Wrapping acts as a bridge, unlocking liquidity and functionality. For instance, by wrapping Bitcoin as WBTC, users can earn yield through Ethereum-based lending pools or provide liquidity in automated market makers (AMMs) like Uniswap, activities that are not natively possible on the Bitcoin network. This mechanism effectively imports the liquidity and utility of one blockchain into another.

The security and trust model of a wrapped asset depends on its custodial or decentralized design. Most early wrappers, like WBTC, rely on a centralized consortium of merchants and custodians to hold the underlying assets and mint/burn tokens—a model requiring significant trust. Newer, decentralized solutions use cryptoeconomic security models, such as leveraging a network of validators or over-collateralized smart contracts to custody assets, reducing reliance on single entities. The choice of model involves a trade-off between security assumptions, capital efficiency, and speed of the wrapping/unwrapping process.

Beyond cryptocurrencies, the concept extends to real-world assets (RWAs) like stocks, bonds, or commodities. These can be tokenized on a blockchain and then wrapped to move across different decentralized finance ecosystems. For developers, interacting with wrapped assets typically involves the same standards (like ERC-20) and tools as any other native token on that chain, but they must be aware of the specific bridge's audit history, governance, and redemption process. The integrity of the entire system hinges on the verifiable proof that the reserve backing the tokens is fully collateralized and secure.

how-it-works
MECHANICS

How a Wrapped Asset Works

A technical breakdown of the custodial, issuance, and redemption processes that enable native blockchain assets to operate on foreign networks.

A wrapped asset is a tokenized representation of a native blockchain asset, locked in a secure custodial contract or by a trusted entity, allowing it to be used on a different blockchain network. The core mechanism is a lock-mint model: the original asset (e.g., Bitcoin) is deposited and verifiably locked in a vault, triggering the minting of an equivalent amount of the wrapped version (e.g., Wrapped Bitcoin or WBTC) on the destination chain. This process creates a 1:1 pegged derivative whose value is fully backed by the locked collateral.

The custody model is central to a wrapped asset's security and defines its trust assumptions. Custodial wraps like WBTC rely on a decentralized group of merchants and a multi-signature vault. Non-custodial, trust-minimized wraps use cross-chain messaging protocols and cryptographic proofs, where assets are locked in a smart contract on the origin chain. The wrapping entity—whether a DAO, a bridge protocol, or a custodian—is responsible for auditing reserves, managing the mint/burn functions, and publishing proof-of-reserves to ensure full collateralization.

Users interact with wrapped assets through a defined issuance and redemption lifecycle. To create a wrapped token, a user sends the native asset to the custodian, who, after verification, mints the wrapped tokens on the target chain. Redemption involves burning the wrapped tokens, which signals the custodian to release the original asset from the vault. This mint-and-burn mechanism enforces the peg, as the total supply of the wrapped token always corresponds to the verifiable collateral held in reserve.

Wrapped assets unlock critical cross-chain functionality, including decentralized finance (DeFi) participation, by providing liquidity in the form of major assets like BTC or ETH on chains like Ethereum, Avalanche, or Solana. They enable use cases such as lending BTC on Aave, providing WBTC-ETH liquidity on Uniswap, or using it as collateral in yield-bearing strategies. However, they introduce bridging risks, such as custodian compromise, smart contract vulnerabilities in the wrapping protocol, or governance attacks on the minting authority.

The ecosystem features prominent examples that illustrate different models. WBTC is the leading custodial Bitcoin wrapper on Ethereum. Wrapped Ether (WETH) is a special case—a standardized ERC-20 wrapper for native ETH on its own chain, essential for compatibility with DeFi applications. Cross-chain bridge wrappers, like Multichain's anyBTC or Wormhole's Wrapped Asset (Wormhole BTC), use lock-and-mint models powered by their respective messaging networks, offering alternatives to centralized custody.

key-features
MECHANICS & UTILITY

Key Features of Wrapped Assets

Wrapped assets are tokenized representations of an underlying asset, enabling it to be used on a different blockchain network than its native one. This process unlocks liquidity and functionality across ecosystems.

01

Cross-Chain Interoperability

The core function of a wrapped asset is to enable an asset to move between blockchains. A custodian or smart contract locks the original asset (e.g., Bitcoin) on its native chain and mints a pegged representation (e.g., WBTC) on a destination chain (e.g., Ethereum). This allows assets to be used in DeFi protocols, DEXs, and other applications on the foreign chain.

02

Collateralization & Custody Models

Wrapped assets are backed 1:1 by the underlying asset, secured through different trust models:

  • Custodial (Centralized): A single entity (e.g., BitGo for WBTC) holds the locked assets. Users rely on the custodian's integrity and proof-of-reserves.
  • Non-Custodial (Decentralized): The underlying asset is locked in a multi-signature or DAO-controlled smart contract, reducing single points of failure.
  • Over-Collateralized: Some synthetic or wrapped assets use excess collateral (e.g., 150%) to maintain the peg, managed by algorithms.
03

Smart Contract Programmability

By representing a native asset as a standard token (like an ERC-20 on Ethereum), it inherits the programmability of that chain. This enables:

  • Integration into automated market makers (AMMs) like Uniswap.
  • Use as collateral in lending protocols like Aave or Compound.
  • Inclusion in yield farming strategies and structured products.
  • Composability with thousands of other smart contracts in the ecosystem.
04

Peg Stability Mechanisms

Maintaining a 1:1 peg with the underlying asset is critical. Mechanisms include:

  • Arbitrage: If the wrapped asset trades below peg, arbitrageurs can buy it and redeem it for the underlying asset, driving the price up.
  • Mint/Redeem Fees: Fees can be adjusted to incentivize minting or burning to correct price deviations.
  • Oracle Price Feeds: Decentralized applications rely on oracles to verify the value of the underlying asset for accurate pricing and liquidation.
05

Common Examples & Standards

Prominent examples illustrate different approaches:

  • WBTC (Wrapped Bitcoin): The largest wrapped asset, an ERC-20 token backed 1:1 by Bitcoin held by custodians.
  • WETH (Wrapped ETH): A wrapper for native Ethereum, converting it to the ERC-20 standard for use in dApps.
  • bridged Assets: Tokens like USDC.e (bridged from Ethereum to Avalanche) are a form of wrapped asset created by cross-chain bridges.
  • Synthetics: Assets like sBTC (Synthetix) are synthetic representations, not directly backed 1:1 but by a pool of collateral.
06

Risks & Considerations

Using wrapped assets introduces specific risks beyond the underlying asset's volatility:

  • Custodial Risk: The entity holding the underlying assets could be hacked or become insolvent.
  • Smart Contract Risk: Bugs in the minting/burning or bridge contracts could lead to fund loss.
  • Bridge Risk: Cross-chain bridges are frequent targets for exploits, potentially breaking the peg.
  • Regulatory Risk: The legal status of the wrapper or custodian may be unclear.
examples
WRAPPED ASSET

Prominent Examples

Wrapped assets are foundational to DeFi interoperability. These are the most significant examples that facilitate cross-chain liquidity and utility.

02

Wrapped Ether (WETH)

A wrapped version of native Ether (ETH) that conforms to the ERC-20 token standard. Unlike most wrapped assets, it bridges a native asset to its own ecosystem's token standard.

  • Purpose: ETH itself is not an ERC-20 token. WETH allows ETH to be seamlessly used in ERC-20 based applications like decentralized exchanges (e.g., Uniswap) and lending markets.
  • Mechanism: Users "wrap" ETH by depositing it into a public smart contract, which mints WETH.
De Facto Standard
On Ethereum
06

Wrapped Matic (WMATIC)

The ERC-20 wrapped version of Polygon's native MATIC token on the Ethereum mainnet. It is the canonical bridge representation for moving MATIC to and from the Polygon PoS chain.

  • Function: Serves as the primary liquidity representation of MATIC on Ethereum, allowing it to be traded on DEXs or used as collateral.
  • Process: Created when users bridge MATIC from the Polygon network to Ethereum via the Plasma or PoS Bridge.
Canonical Bridge
For Polygon
ecosystem-usage
WRAPPED ASSET

Ecosystem Usage

Wrapped assets are the foundational bridges connecting disparate blockchains, enabling liquidity and functionality to flow between ecosystems. Their primary use cases span DeFi, trading, and cross-chain interoperability.

02

Decentralized Exchange (DEX) Liquidity

Wrapped tokens are essential for creating deep, cross-chain liquidity pools on decentralized exchanges. They enable trading pairs that would otherwise be impossible, such as BTC/ETH or SOL/USDC on a single chain. This aggregation of liquidity improves price discovery and reduces slippage for traders across the ecosystem.

  • Example: The WBTC/ETH pool is consistently one of the largest on Uniswap.
  • Mechanism: Acts as the bridge asset in multi-chain trading routes.
03

Interoperability & Bridging Infrastructure

Wrapped assets are the output of cross-chain bridges and messaging protocols. They represent a claim on an asset locked in a vault or smart contract on the source chain. This mechanism is the backbone of interoperability, enabling asset portability between Layer 1s, Layer 2s, and sidechains.

  • Core Components: Custodial bridges (Wrapped BTC), decentralized bridges (Multichain, LayerZero).
  • Process: 1) Lock native asset on Chain A. 2) Mint wrapped representation on Chain B.
04

Yield Generation & Staking Derivatives

Wrapping enables the creation of yield-bearing or staked asset derivatives. For instance, stETH is a wrapped representation of staked Ether on Lido, which accrues staking rewards and remains liquid and tradable. Similarly, yield-bearing wrappers like cTokens (Compound) or aTokens (Aave) represent deposit positions that earn interest.

  • Function: Unlocks liquidity for otherwise locked assets (e.g., staked ETH).
  • Benefit: Enables "staking" while using the asset in other DeFi protocols.
05

Institutional & Custodial Services

Custodial wrapped assets like WBTC involve regulated entities (merchants, custodians) to manage the underlying collateral. This model provides a trusted on-ramp for institutional capital seeking exposure to DeFi while relying on known counter-party risk structures. It bridges traditional finance compliance with blockchain utility.

  • Key Players: Merchant networks (BitGo for WBTC).
  • Process: KYC/AML verification for minting and burning.
06

Synthetic Asset Creation

Wrapping is the first step in creating synthetic assets that track the price of real-world assets (RWAs) or other cryptocurrencies. A wrapped stablecoin like USDC.e on Avalanche is a bridge-based synthetic, while more complex synthetics use wrapped collateral as backing for minting assets like synthetic stocks or commodities on protocols like Synthetix.

  • Extension: Wrapped collateral backs synthetic issuances.
  • Goal: Bring off-chain asset exposure on-chain.
security-considerations
WRAPPED ASSET

Security Considerations & Risks

While wrapped assets unlock cross-chain liquidity, they introduce specific security dependencies and trust assumptions that users must understand.

02

Smart Contract Vulnerability

The smart contract that issues and manages the wrapped token (e.g., the WBTC or WETH contract on Ethereum) is a critical attack surface. Vulnerabilities such as reentrancy bugs, logic errors, or upgrade mechanism flaws can be exploited to steal funds or manipulate token balances. Users rely on the security of this single contract, which often holds billions in value.

03

Oracle & Pricing Risk

Many DeFi protocols that use wrapped assets depend on price oracles to determine their value for lending or trading. If an oracle provides incorrect data (e.g., due to manipulation or failure), it can trigger unjust liquidations or allow users to borrow excessively against artificially inflated collateral. This risk is compounded for wrapped assets on less liquid chains.

04

Liquidity & Peg Stability

A wrapped asset must maintain a 1:1 peg to its underlying asset. This peg can break if:

  • The bridge is exploited, creating unbacked supply.
  • Redeeming the underlying asset becomes impossible or costly.
  • A liquidity crisis occurs on the destination chain, causing the wrapped token to trade at a significant discount on decentralized exchanges (DEXs).
05

Regulatory & Centralization Risk

Centralized issuers (like the WBTC DAO) or bridge operators are subject to regulatory action, which could freeze mint/burn functions or blacklist addresses, rendering wrapped tokens non-transferable. This introduces counterparty risk that does not exist with the native, permissionless asset (e.g., native BTC).

06

Cross-Chain Message Verification

For native cross-chain wrapped assets (e.g., WETH on Arbitrum), security depends on the underlying cross-chain messaging protocol (e.g., Arbitrum's bridge). If the protocol's fraud proofs or validity proofs fail, or if its sequencer acts maliciously, messages to mint or burn tokens may be fraudulent, breaking the asset's backing.

TOKEN ARCHITECTURE

Wrapped Assets vs. Other Token Types

A comparison of the defining characteristics, mechanisms, and use cases for wrapped assets against common native and synthetic token types.

FeatureWrapped Asset (e.g., WETH, WBTC)Native Asset (e.g., ETH, BTC)Synthetic Asset (e.g., Synthetix sBTC)

Underlying Collateral

1:1 with original asset (custodial or over-collateralized)

None (the asset itself)

Diversified or algorithmic (e.g., SNX staking pool)

Issuance Mechanism

Lock/Mint via bridge or custodian

Network protocol (mining, staking, genesis)

Mint via synthetic protocol (staking debt)

Redemption Right

Direct (burn to unlock original)

Not applicable

Indirect (burn for protocol's collateral pool value)

Cross-Chain Functionality

Smart Contract Compatibility

Custodial Risk

Varies (Centralized Bridge, Decentralized Vault)

User-controlled (private key)

Protocol insolvency risk

Primary Use Case

Interoperability & DeFi liquidity

Base-layer settlement & value transfer

Exposure to non-blockchain assets (e.g., stocks, forex)

WRAPPED ASSETS

Common Misconceptions

Wrapped assets are fundamental to DeFi interoperability, but their mechanics and risks are often misunderstood. This section clarifies frequent points of confusion.

No, a wrapped token is a distinct blockchain representation, not the original asset. For example, Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) on Ethereum is an ERC-20 token that is custodied and backed 1:1 by actual Bitcoin held by a consortium of merchants. The value is pegged, but the underlying asset is held in reserve, and the token itself exists on a different blockchain with different properties (like gas fees and smart contract compatibility). The peg is maintained by a minting/burning process controlled by the custodian, not by a direct on-chain link to the original Bitcoin network.

WRAPPED ASSETS

Frequently Asked Questions

Wrapped assets are tokenized representations of one blockchain's native asset on another blockchain, enabling cross-chain liquidity and functionality. This section addresses common technical and operational questions.

A wrapped asset is a tokenized representation of a native blockchain asset (like Bitcoin or Ether) that exists on a different blockchain network, created through a process of locking the original asset in a secure custodial or non-custodial vault and minting an equivalent amount of the new token on the destination chain. The process typically involves a bridge protocol or a trusted entity. For example, to create Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) on Ethereum, a user sends BTC to a custodian, who then mints an equivalent amount of the ERC-20 WBTC token. This 1:1 peg is maintained by the promise that the underlying asset can be redeemed by burning the wrapped token. The wrapped token inherits the programmability of its new host chain, enabling use in DeFi applications like lending on Aave or providing liquidity on Uniswap.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team