We architect and deploy audit-ready smart contracts that power your core business logic. Our development process is built on Solana, EVM, and Move-based chains using battle-tested patterns from OpenZeppelin and Anchor. > Deliver a secure, gas-optimized MVP in as little as 2 weeks.
LABS
Services
Anti-Collusion Voting System Design
Architect and implement zero-knowledge voting mechanisms with cryptographic safeguards to prevent voter collusion, bribery, and vote-buying in your decentralized organization.
Chainscore © 2026
overview
CORE SERVICE
Smart Contract Development
Secure, production-ready smart contracts built for scale and compliance.
- Custom Tokenomics & DeFi Logic:
ERC-20,ERC-721, staking systems, liquidity pools, and governance modules. - Security-First Development: Formal verification, unit/integration testing, and pre-audit code reviews.
- Full Lifecycle Support: From initial spec and development to mainnet deployment and post-launch upgrades.
key-features-cards
ENTERPRISE-GRADE SECURITY
Core Cryptographic Safeguards We Implement
Our anti-collusion voting systems are built on a foundation of battle-tested cryptographic primitives, ensuring the integrity of every vote and the privacy of every voter. We deliver mathematically-proven security that meets institutional standards.
05
Resistance to Coercion & Vote-Buying
We implement receipt-freeness and coercion-resistance techniques, such as re-randomizable encryption or deniable decryption proofs. This allows voters to plausibly deny their actual vote, protecting them from external pressure.
benefits
DELIVERABLES & GUARANTEES
Business Outcomes for Your Organization
Our anti-collusion voting system design delivers measurable security and operational improvements, moving beyond theoretical promises to verifiable results.
01
Formal Verification & Audited Security
We deliver formally verified smart contracts for your voting mechanism, backed by a comprehensive audit report from a top-tier firm like Trail of Bits or Quantstamp. This eliminates logic errors and provides a public trust signal for your governance participants.
0 Critical
Audit Findings
100%
Logic Coverage
02
Sybil-Resistant Voter Identity
Implement a custom identity layer using zero-knowledge proofs or token-gated credentials to prevent ballot stuffing. We ensure one-person-one-vote integrity without compromising user privacy, a critical differentiator for DAOs and community grants.
>99%
Sybil Attack Prevention
< 1 sec
ZK Proof Verify
03
Real-Time Threat Monitoring
Get a live dashboard and alert system that detects collusion patterns, whale manipulation, and voting anomalies. Our monitoring provides actionable intelligence to intervene before governance attacks succeed.
< 5 min
Anomaly Detection
24/7
Active Monitoring
04
Gas-Optimized Contract Suite
Deploy a custom voting contract architecture that reduces gas costs for voters by up to 40% compared to standard implementations. Lower participation costs lead to higher voter turnout and more legitimate outcomes.
~40%
Gas Reduction
ERC-6372
Standards Compliant
06
Post-Vote Analysis & Reporting
Receive detailed forensic reports after each voting round, analyzing voter behavior, delegation patterns, and potential manipulation attempts. This data is crucial for iterating on governance parameters and proving system legitimacy to stakeholders.
24h
Report Delivery
API Access
Raw Data
Architectural Comparison
ZK Anti-Collusion vs. Traditional On-Chain Voting
Key technical and operational differences between privacy-preserving ZK-based voting and conventional on-chain systems.
| Feature | Traditional On-Chain Voting | ZK Anti-Collusion Voting |
|---|---|---|
Voter Privacy | ||
Collusion Resistance | Low (votes public) | High (votes private) |
On-Chain Gas Cost | High (per-vote transaction) | Low (batch verification) |
Time to Finality | Immediate (on-chain) | Minutes (ZK proof generation) |
Sybil Attack Resistance | Requires separate ID system | Native via proof-of-personhood |
Implementation Complexity | Medium (standard contracts) | High (ZK circuits, trusted setup) |
Audit & Security Surface | Smart contract logic only | Contracts + ZK circuits + cryptography |
Typical Use Case | DAO governance, transparent polls | Token sales, private elections, salary voting |
Development Timeline | 4-8 weeks | 12-20 weeks |
Infrastructure Cost (First Year) | $30K - $80K | $120K - $300K+ |
how-we-deliver
STRUCTURED APPROACH
Our Implementation Process: From Design to Deployment
We deliver production-ready, secure anti-collusion voting systems through a proven, four-phase methodology. This ensures your governance platform is built on a robust, audited foundation from day one.
01
Architecture & Threat Modeling
We define your system's security boundaries, identify potential collusion vectors (e.g., bribery, sybil attacks), and design mitigation strategies using formal models like game theory and mechanism design.
1-2 weeks
Design Phase
10+ Models
Threat Vectors Analyzed
02
Smart Contract Development
Implementation of custom voting logic (e.g., quadratic, conviction, token-curated) in Solidity/Vyper. Includes gas optimization, upgradeability patterns, and integration with oracles for real-world data.
Solidity 0.8+
Language
OpenZeppelin
Security Base
03
Security Audits & Formal Verification
Rigorous multi-layered review, including automated analysis (Slither), manual expert review, and formal verification of critical properties to eliminate vulnerabilities before mainnet deployment.
2+ Audits
Minimum
0 Critical
Guarantee Post-Audit
04
Deployment & Monitoring
Secure mainnet deployment with multi-sig controls, followed by 24/7 monitoring for anomalous voting patterns, gas spikes, and contract health to ensure ongoing system integrity.
99.9% Uptime
SLA
< 5 min
Anomaly Alert
use-cases
ENTERPRISE-GRADE SECURITY
Designed for High-Stakes Decentralized Governance
Our anti-collusion voting systems are engineered for protocols managing billions in assets, where governance integrity is non-negotiable. We deliver audited, battle-tested solutions that prevent manipulation and ensure fair outcomes.
05
Real-Time Threat Monitoring
Get 24/7 monitoring for voting anomalies, proposal spam, and cartel formation using Chainscore's analytics. Receive alerts for suspicious voting patterns before they impact outcomes.
< 5 min
Alert Latency
99.9%
Detection Accuracy
Technical & Commercial Insights
Frequently Asked Questions on ZK Anti-Collusion Systems
Get clear, specific answers to the most common questions CTOs and founders ask when evaluating a custom anti-collusion voting system.
Timeline: A production-ready system for a DAO or DeFi protocol typically takes 6-10 weeks from design to audit-ready delivery. This includes threat modeling, circuit design, smart contract development, and integration support.
Pricing: We provide fixed-price proposals based on scope. Standard deployments for a single voting mechanism (e.g., quadratic funding with ZK proofs) range from $80,000 to $150,000. Complex multi-mechanism systems or those requiring novel cryptographic research start at $200,000+. All quotes include a comprehensive security review.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall