Fork-Resistant Voting Audit | Chainscore Labs

overview

FULL-STACK ENGINEERING

Custom Blockchain Development

End-to-end blockchain solutions built for scale, security, and speed to market.

We architect and build custom blockchain infrastructure tailored to your specific business logic. From private consortium chains for enterprises to high-performance L2 solutions for DeFi, we deliver production-ready systems.

Layer 1 & 2 Development: Build on Substrate, Cosmos SDK, or custom EVM rollups.
Smart Contract Ecosystems: Design and deploy secure, gas-optimized contracts for ERC-20, ERC-721, and custom standards.
Node Infrastructure: Deploy and manage high-availability validator nodes with 99.9% uptime SLAs.

Our process delivers a minimum viable product (MVP) in 4-6 weeks, followed by iterative scaling. We focus on audit-ready code using OpenZeppelin libraries and formal verification patterns to mitigate risk.

We don't just write code; we engineer resilient systems that handle real-world volume and value.

key-features-cards

PROVEN FRAMEWORK

Our Fork-Resistant Audit Methodology

Our structured audit process is engineered to identify and mitigate the unique risks of on-chain governance, ensuring your protocol remains secure and functional through network forks.

Fork Simulation & State Analysis

We simulate mainnet fork scenarios (e.g., Ethereum Shanghai, Polygon hard forks) to test governance continuity, token snapshot integrity, and contract state resilience. This prevents voter disenfranchisement and treasury splits.

10+

Fork Scenarios Tested

100%

State Coverage

Voting Power & Slashing Logic Review

Deep audit of vote weighting, delegation mechanics, and slashing conditions to prevent manipulation during chain reorganizations. We verify that governance power accurately reflects the canonical chain's state.

Zero

Double-Spend Vectors

Gas-Optimized

Slashing Logic

Cross-Chain Governance Bridge Security

For protocols operating across multiple L2s or sidechains, we audit bridge contracts and message relays that facilitate governance, ensuring proposal execution is atomic and secure across all networks.

All Major L2s

Bridge Support

< 2 sec

Finality Check

Upgrade Pathway & Timelock Analysis

Comprehensive review of upgrade mechanisms (Proxy patterns, UUPS) and timelock controllers to ensure smooth, conflict-free migrations post-fork without introducing centralization risks or upgrade deadlocks.

48h Min.

Timelock Validation

Zero-Downtime

Upgrade Guarantee

Economic & Game Theory Modeling

We model voter incentives, proposal economics, and attack vectors (like proposal spam or vote buying) under forked conditions to ensure the system's economic security remains intact.

Final Report & Remediation Support

Receive a detailed audit report with CVSS-scored vulnerabilities, proof-of-concept exploits, and actionable remediation guidance. Our team provides direct support to implement fixes and verify security.

< 10 Days

Report Delivery

Guaranteed

Re-Audit

benefits

SECURITY FOUNDATION

Why a Fork-Resistant Audit is Critical

A standard audit isn't enough for on-chain governance. Our fork-resistant protocol audit ensures your voting system remains secure, fair, and functional even during the most disruptive network events.

Prevent Governance Capture

We identify and mitigate vulnerabilities that could allow attackers to manipulate voting outcomes by exploiting network forks, protecting your protocol's decentralized decision-making.

100%

Coverage of fork vectors

OWASP Top 10

Security Standard

Ensure Protocol Continuity

Guarantee your voting mechanism and treasury controls remain operational and unambiguous during chain reorganizations, preventing fund lock-ups or execution errors.

0 downtime

Post-fork SLA

EIP-3675

Compliance Verified

Mitigate Vote Replay Risks

Our audit rigorously tests for cross-chain and replay attack surfaces, ensuring votes cast on one chain cannot be maliciously replayed on another during a fork.

Zero instances

Replay flaws in audits

Chain ID & Nonce

Validation Checks

Protect Against Finality Attacks

We analyze consensus-level assumptions and time-lock dependencies to safeguard against long-range attacks that could invalidate settled governance decisions.

> 100 blocks

Finality depth analysis

PoS/PoW

Consensus Models Covered

Audit Economic Incentives

Beyond code, we audit the cryptoeconomic design for fork scenarios, ensuring slashing mechanisms and voter incentives remain aligned to preserve network integrity.

Game Theory

Analysis Included

Stake & Slash

Model Validation

Deliver Actionable Remediation

Receive a prioritized report with concrete fixes, test cases, and mitigation strategies, not just a list of vulnerabilities. We ensure your team can implement changes confidently.

< 72 hours

Critical fix review

Remediation Support

Included

Comprehensive Security Packages

Audit Scope & Deliverables

Our tiered audit packages are designed to provide the right level of security assurance and post-audit support for your fork-resistant voting protocol, from initial launch to enterprise-grade governance.

Audit Component	Starter	Professional	Enterprise
Smart Contract Security Audit
Gas Optimization Review
Fork-Resistance Logic Analysis
Centralization Risk Assessment
Formal Verification (Key Functions)
Deployment & Configuration Review
Post-Audit Remediation Support	1 round	Unlimited rounds	Unlimited rounds
Vulnerability Disclosure Period	30 days	90 days	180 days
Priority Response Time SLA	48 hours	24 hours	4 hours
Final Report & Public Attestation
Monitoring Dashboard Access
Quarterly Security Re-audit
Estimated Timeline	2-3 weeks	3-4 weeks	4-6 weeks
Starting Price	$15,000	$45,000	Custom Quote

process-walkthrough

FOUNDATION

Blockchain Infrastructure

Enterprise-grade node infrastructure with 99.9% uptime SLA for production applications.

We manage your core infrastructure so you can focus on product. Chainscore provides fully managed, multi-cloud RPC endpoints and dedicated archival nodes for EVM, Solana, and Cosmos chains. Our global network ensures sub-100ms latency and eliminates single points of failure.

Deploy with confidence using our battle-tested infrastructure, trusted by protocols securing over $500M in TVL.

Guaranteed Performance: 99.9% uptime SLA, real-time monitoring, and automatic failover.
Developer Experience: Seamless integration, comprehensive APIs, and WebSocket support.
Security & Compliance: SOC 2 Type II compliant, DDoS protection, and private endpoint options.

Why a specialized protocol demands a specialized audit

Audit Depth: Chainscore vs. Generic Review

A standard smart contract review checks for common vulnerabilities. Our Fork-Resistant Voting Protocol Audit is a bespoke security assessment designed to validate the core consensus logic and economic security of your governance system under adversarial conditions.

Audit Dimension	Generic Smart Contract Review	Chainscore Fork-Resistant Protocol Audit
Standard Vulnerability Checks (e.g., reentrancy, overflow)
Fork Scenario Analysis & Mitigation Validation
Economic & Game Theory Modeling of Voting Incentives
Adversarial Test Simulations (e.g., vote buying, griefing)
Gas Optimization for On-Chain Execution
Formal Verification of Critical State Transitions
Final Report with Actionable, Prioritized Findings	Basic	Executive Summary + Technical Deep Dive + Remediation Guide
Post-Audit Consultation & Re-Audit Support	Limited	Included (1 revision)
Typical Time to Completion	1-2 weeks	3-4 weeks
Typical Investment	$5K - $15K	$25K - $75K+

Technical Due Diligence

Fork-Resistant Voting Audit FAQ

Get clear answers on our specialized security audit process for governance protocols. We help you mitigate risks like vote manipulation, replay attacks, and consensus exploits before mainnet launch.

We employ a hybrid methodology combining manual expert review and automated analysis. Our process includes: 1) Specification & Threat Modeling to map attack vectors like vote replay across forks. 2) Line-by-line Code Review focusing on consensus logic, slashing conditions, and upgrade mechanisms. 3) Formal Verification of critical state transitions using tools like Certora and K-framework. 4) Integration Testing against simulated network forks (e.g., using Ganache or Anvil). This multi-layered approach has secured over $2B+ in governance assets across 30+ protocols.

Fork-Resistant Voting Protocol Audit

Custom Blockchain Development

Our Fork-Resistant Audit Methodology

Fork Simulation & State Analysis

Voting Power & Slashing Logic Review

Cross-Chain Governance Bridge Security

Upgrade Pathway & Timelock Analysis

Economic & Game Theory Modeling

Final Report & Remediation Support

Why a Fork-Resistant Audit is Critical

Prevent Governance Capture

Ensure Protocol Continuity

Mitigate Vote Replay Risks

Protect Against Finality Attacks

Audit Economic Incentives

Deliver Actionable Remediation

Audit Scope & Deliverables

Blockchain Infrastructure

Audit Depth: Chainscore vs. Generic Review

Fork-Resistant Voting Audit FAQ

Get a free quote.

Get In Touch
today.

Fork-Resistant Voting Protocol Audit

Custom Blockchain Development

Our Fork-Resistant Audit Methodology

Fork Simulation & State Analysis

Voting Power & Slashing Logic Review

Cross-Chain Governance Bridge Security

Upgrade Pathway & Timelock Analysis

Economic & Game Theory Modeling

Final Report & Remediation Support

Why a Fork-Resistant Audit is Critical

Prevent Governance Capture

Ensure Protocol Continuity

Mitigate Vote Replay Risks

Protect Against Finality Attacks

Audit Economic Incentives

Deliver Actionable Remediation

Audit Scope & Deliverables

Blockchain Infrastructure

Audit Depth: Chainscore vs. Generic Review

Fork-Resistant Voting Audit FAQ

Get In Touch today.

Get In Touch
today.