Validator MEV Soft-Slashing Risk Assessment

We conduct a deep-dive audit of your validator's execution and consensus client configurations, network connectivity, and MEV-boost relay selection to identify systemic vulnerabilities.

We analyze 30+ days of on-chain performance data—including attestation efficiency, block proposal history, and slashing event proximity—to establish a behavioral baseline.

Using custom tooling, we simulate real-world MEV extraction and soft-slashing scenarios (e.g., proposer timing attacks, relay failures) to stress-test your validator's resilience.

Findings are quantified into a clear, weighted risk score (Critical/High/Medium/Low) with prioritized remediation steps, enabling efficient resource allocation for your team.

We benchmark your setup against industry security standards and consensus-layer best practices from leading staking providers and client teams.

Receive two tailored reports: a high-level executive summary for stakeholders and a detailed technical dossier for your engineering team, complete with code snippets and config examples.

Receive a detailed, data-driven risk scorecard identifying your validator's specific vulnerabilities to MEV extraction, sandwich attacks, and frontrunning. We map attack vectors to potential financial impact.

Go beyond identification with a prioritized list of technical and operational countermeasures. Includes configuration changes for clients like Prysm/Lighthouse, and MEV-boost relay selection strategies.

We model historical and hypothetical MEV attack scenarios against your validator setup, providing a clear forecast of potential slashing penalties and missed rewards under stress conditions.

Gain institutional-grade reporting for stakeholders and auditors. Track your validator's MEV risk posture over time with clear metrics on slashing avoidance and reward preservation.