Fair Ordering Consensus Protocol Audit

We conduct a deep analysis of your protocol's whitepaper, architecture diagrams, and formal specifications to identify logical flaws, attack vectors, and fairness assumptions before code review begins.

Using tools like TLA+ and custom formal models, we verify critical liveness and safety properties of your ordering algorithm, proving correctness under adversarial network conditions.

Manual and automated review of the protocol's core smart contracts and off-chain components (Rust, Go, Solidity) for vulnerabilities, gas inefficiencies, and concurrency issues.

We design and execute bespoke simulations to test for censorship resistance, MEV resistance, and ordering bias under load, measuring deviation from the theoretical fairness guarantees.

Evaluation of the protocol's tokenomics, slashing conditions, and validator incentive structures to ensure long-term security and honest participation alignment.

Delivery of a detailed technical report with severity-ranked findings, proof-of-concept exploits, and actionable remediation guidance, followed by re-audit verification.

We analyze your unique consensus logic for vulnerabilities like front-running, liveness attacks, and validator collusion, not just generic smart contract bugs.

Mathematically prove the correctness of your ordering rules and slashing conditions using tools like Certora and K-framework to eliminate logical flaws.

Benchmark latency, throughput, and gas efficiency under adversarial network conditions. Receive guaranteed metrics for your whitepaper and investor materials.

Our audit serves as a quality gate before engaging expensive third-party firms, ensuring their time is spent on deep review, not basic fixes.

We provide monitoring dashboards and incident response playbooks for the first 90 days post-launch, ensuring a smooth transition to mainnet.

Receive a certified audit report and security attestation designed to meet the due diligence requirements of top-tier VCs and centralized exchanges.