Move-based Governance Framework Assessment

In-depth review of Move modules governing proposals, voting, treasury management, and upgrades. We identify vulnerabilities like reentrancy, access control flaws, and logic errors specific to the Move VM.

Evaluation of tokenomics, voting power distribution, delegation mechanics, and slashing conditions. We model attack vectors for vote buying, whale dominance, and governance stagnation.

Assessment of timelock controllers, multi-sig configurations, and emergency pause mechanisms. We verify no single point of failure exists and provide a secure key management roadmap.

Security review of the user interface, wallet integrations, and API endpoints that interact with the governance contracts. We check for signature spoofing, phishing risks, and data integrity.

For critical modules, we employ Move Prover to mathematically verify the correctness of contract invariants and business logic, providing the highest level of assurance.

Receive a prioritized list of vulnerabilities with severity ratings (Critical/High/Medium/Low), detailed exploit scenarios, and step-by-step remediation guidance for your engineering team.

We identify risks generic auditors miss: resource-oriented exploits, module upgrade pitfalls, and custom type safety violations unique to the Move VM. Protect your DAO's core logic from novel attack vectors.

Deep audit of proposal execution, voting weight calculations, and treasury fund flows. Ensures no single proposal can drain assets or permanently alter governance without explicit, intended consensus.

Apply mathematical proof techniques to your DAO's most critical invariants—like quorum requirements and treasury withdrawal limits. Provides the highest assurance level for rule enforcement.

DAO governance must evolve. We audit the safety of your upgrade mechanisms—ensuring migration scripts are correct and new modules don't introduce regressions or centralization risks.