Secure, production-ready smart contracts built by experts for your Web3 application.
We deliver audited, gas-optimized smart contracts that power your product's core logic. Our development process ensures security and reliability from day one.
Solidity 0.8+ contracts for DeFi, NFTs, DAOs, and more.OpenZeppelin libraries and patterns, followed by comprehensive audits.From initial architecture to mainnet deployment, we handle the entire lifecycle with precision.
Our deliverables include fully documented source code, deployment scripts, and a security audit report. We specialize in complex systems like automated market makers (AMMs), staking pools, and multi-signature wallets, ensuring your foundation is robust and scalable.
We apply a rigorous, multi-stage formal verification process to mathematically prove the correctness and security of your cross-chain protocol's core logic, eliminating entire classes of vulnerabilities.
Formal verification is more than a security check—it's a strategic investment that delivers measurable business value. Our rigorous mathematical proofs translate directly into operational efficiency, market trust, and accelerated growth for your cross-chain protocol.
Our formal methods mathematically prove the absence of critical bugs like reentrancy, logic flaws, and bridge exploits before deployment. This prevents catastrophic financial losses and protects your protocol's treasury and user funds.
Integrate formal verification into your CI/CD pipeline to automate security proofs. This reduces manual audit cycles, prevents last-minute rewrites, and allows you to launch new features and chain integrations weeks faster with investor and user confidence.
A formally verified protocol is a demonstrably secure asset. This significantly lowers premiums from on-chain insurance providers like Nexus Mutual and reduces the scope and cost of recurring manual audits, directly improving your bottom line.
Provide verifiable, mathematical proof of security to users, liquidity providers, and institutional partners. This trust is a defensible moat, driving higher TVL, better partnerships, and a stronger brand reputation in a risk-averse market.
Formal proofs create an immutable, auditable trail of security diligence. This documentation is critical for engaging with regulated financial institutions, navigating evolving global frameworks like MiCA, and securing necessary operational licenses.
Formally verify upgrade paths and governance mechanisms to ensure new code preserves all critical security properties. This enables safe, rapid iteration and prevents regression bugs that could compromise a live, high-value system.
A technical comparison of security assurance methodologies for cross-chain protocols, highlighting the depth, rigor, and outcomes of formal verification versus traditional manual audits.
| Security Aspect | Traditional Security Audit | Formal Verification (Chainscore) |
|---|---|---|
Methodology | Manual code review, heuristic testing, and automated scanning | Mathematical proof of correctness against a formal specification |
Coverage | Sample-based; examines a subset of possible states and inputs | Exhaustive; verifies all possible execution paths and states |
Guarantee | Probabilistic; finds bugs that exist | Deterministic; proves the absence of specific bug classes |
Output | Vulnerability report with severity ratings and recommendations | Mathematical proof certificate and a verified specification document |
Focus | Finding known vulnerabilities (reentrancy, overflow) and gas optimizations | Proving adherence to critical invariants (fund safety, liveness, protocol logic) |
Time to Completion | 2-4 weeks for initial report | 4-8 weeks for full verification project |
Ideal For | Standard DeFi applications, initial security screening | Cross-chain bridges, complex DeFi protocols, and systems where failure is catastrophic |
Cost Range | $15K - $50K (one-time) | $50K - $200K+ (project-based) |
Ongoing Value | Snapshot of security at audit time; requires re-audits for changes | Living specification; proofs can be re-verified automatically after minor updates |
We apply a systematic, multi-layered approach to mathematically prove the correctness and security of your cross-chain protocol. This process eliminates critical vulnerabilities before deployment, ensuring your bridge or interoperability solution is resilient against exploits.
We begin by formally defining your protocol's intended behavior using TLA+ or Coq. This creates an unambiguous mathematical model that serves as the single source of truth for all security properties, from atomic cross-chain swaps to slashing conditions.
Our experts translate your Solidity/Vyper code into a verifiable model. Using tools like Certora Prover or K-Framework, we run automated theorem proving to mathematically verify the code adheres to the formal specifications, catching subtle logic flaws static analysis misses.
We construct and verify formal models of network adversaries (Byzantine validators, MEV bots, delayed relays). This phase stress-tests assumptions about liveness, censorship resistance, and economic security under worst-case scenarios.
Secure, gas-optimized smart contracts built for production by expert Solidity engineers.
We architect and deploy production-grade smart contracts that are secure, efficient, and maintainable. Our process delivers audit-ready code from day one, reducing deployment risk and technical debt.
ERC-20, ERC-721, ERC-1155, DeFi protocols, DAOs, and bespoke logic.Solidity is optimized for minimum transaction costs and maximum network efficiency.We deliver a fully tested, documented, and deployable contract suite in 2-4 weeks for a standard MVP, with 99.9% uptime reliability post-launch.
Common questions from CTOs and Lead Architects evaluating formal verification for cross-chain protocols. Get specific answers on process, timeline, and security guarantees.
We employ a rigorous, multi-layered methodology:
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.