AppChain-Specific Token Economic Audits

We analyze staking, liquidity mining, and governance reward mechanisms for sustainability, identifying risks like hyperinflation, reward misalignment, and incentive-driven centralization.

We audit vesting schedules, unlock cliffs, treasury management, and initial distribution for centralization risks and sell-pressure events that could destabilize your token price.

We evaluate proposal thresholds, quorum requirements, and delegation mechanics to prevent governance attacks, voter apathy, and whale dominance in your DAO.

We simulate flash loan attacks, governance takeovers, liquidity drain scenarios, and oracle manipulations to stress-test your tokenomics under adversarial conditions.

For multi-chain AppChains, we audit bridge fee models, wrapped asset mint/burn mechanics, and liquidity pool incentives to prevent arbitrage-based economic drains.

We provide a high-level review of your token's design against key regulatory frameworks (e.g., Howey Test, MiCA) to identify potential security or utility classification risks.

We simulate extreme market conditions and adversarial user behavior to validate your token's inflation schedules, staking rewards, and governance voting power distribution under stress.

Deep technical review of token contract logic, mint/burn authorities, and cross-contract integrations to prevent reentrancy, flash loan attacks, and governance takeovers.

Evaluate participant rewards, validator/delegator economics, and treasury management to ensure long-term stakeholder alignment and prevent protocol death spirals.

We provide clear, auditable documentation for every model parameter (e.g., inflation rate, unlock cliff), justifying each choice with data and comparable protocol analysis.

Ongoing support for 30 days post-audit to answer team questions, review parameter adjustments, and monitor initial mainnet launch metrics against our projections.