Setting Up a Verifiable Credentials Framework for Patient Identities

Verifiable Credentials (VCs) are a W3C standard for creating tamper-proof digital credentials. In healthcare, they enable patients to own and control their medical data, sharing it selectively with providers, insurers, or researchers. A VC framework replaces centralized identity databases with a decentralized model, where credentials are issued by trusted entities (like hospitals), held by the patient in a digital wallet, and verified by any service. This shifts control from institutions to individuals, enhancing privacy and enabling seamless, interoperable health data exchange across different systems.

The core technical components are the Issuer, Holder, and Verifier. An issuer (e.g., a clinic's EHR system) creates a signed credential containing claims (like a vaccination record). The holder (the patient's mobile wallet) stores it securely. A verifier (a pharmacy app) requests proof, and the holder presents a Verifiable Presentation. This interaction relies on Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs)—cryptographically verifiable identifiers not tied to a central registry. Common implementations use the did:key or did:web method, with signatures from Ed25519 or secp256k1 keys.

To set up a basic framework, start by defining your credential schema. Use a JSON-LD or JWT format specifying required fields like issuanceDate, credentialSubject.id, and specific claims. For example, a schema for a lab result might include testName, resultValue, and referenceRange. Tools like Microsoft's Verifiable Credentials SDK or the Trinsic platform can streamline issuance. Here's a minimal JWT VC structure:

jsonCopy
{
  "iss": "did:web:example-hospital.com",
  "sub": "patient-did:key:z6Mk...",
  "vc": {
    "@context": ["https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1"],
    "type": ["VerifiableCredential", "LabResultCredential"],
    "credentialSubject": {
      "testName": "HbA1c",
      "value": "5.6",
      "unit": "%"
    }
  }
}

The patient's wallet is crucial. Implement or integrate a wallet capable of storing VCs and private keys, and generating presentations. For development, consider Sphereon's SSI-SDK or Trinsic's mobile SDKs. The wallet must support Selective Disclosure, allowing patients to share only necessary data (e.g., proving they are over 18 without revealing their birthdate). This is often achieved with BBS+ signatures or zero-knowledge proofs. The verification process involves checking the issuer's DID on a ledger (like Indy Node or a permissioned blockchain), validating the cryptographic signature, and ensuring the credential hasn't been revoked via a status list.

For production, address key challenges: interoperability through shared schemas, credential revocation using status list 2021, and user experience for key management. Pilot with a specific use case like patient check-in or prescription verification. The framework's success hinges on establishing trust among participants—issuers must be accredited, and verifiers must recognize their DIDs. This architecture lays the foundation for portable health records, streamlined clinical trials, and patient-controlled data monetization, moving beyond fragmented EHR silos.

A verifiable credentials (VC) framework for healthcare requires a robust technical stack. At a minimum, you need a Node.js runtime (v18 LTS or later) and a package manager like npm or yarn. For local development and testing, a tool like Docker is essential for running decentralized identity components, such as a local Hyperledger Aries cloud agent or an Indy Node ledger pool. You should also have a code editor (e.g., VS Code) and be comfortable using a command-line interface for running scripts and managing dependencies.

Core to this system are the W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model and Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) specifications. You must understand the roles of issuer, holder, and verifier. The issuer (e.g., a hospital) creates and signs credentials, the holder (patient) stores them in a digital wallet, and the verifier (e.g., a pharmacy) requests and validates proofs. Familiarity with JSON-LD or JWT credential formats and cryptographic signatures (Ed25519, ES256K) is necessary for working with VC libraries.

For development, you will interact with key libraries and SDKs. The Veramo Framework is a popular TypeScript-based toolkit for creating and managing DIDs and VCs. For Python developers, Aries Cloudagent Python (ACA-Py) provides a robust agent implementation. You'll also need to choose a DID method; did:ethr (Ethereum) or did:key are common for development, while did:indy is used for Hyperledger Indy networks. Initialize a project and install core packages, for example: npm install @veramo/core @veramo/data-store @veramo/did-provider-ethr.

A critical prerequisite is setting up a secure storage layer. Verifiable credentials and private keys must be stored securely. This involves configuring a database (SQLite for development, PostgreSQL for production) for Veramo's data store and understanding key management strategies. Never store raw private keys in application code or environment files. Use hardware security modules (HSMs) or cloud key management services (e.g., AWS KMS, Azure Key Vault) in production to sign credentials and perform cryptographic operations.

Finally, you must establish a testing strategy. Start with a local resolver for your chosen DID method to resolve DIDs to their DID Documents. Use test networks like the Indy Sandbox or Ethereum Sepolia testnet to avoid real transaction costs. Write unit tests for credential issuance and verification flows using frameworks like Jest or Mocha. Plan for GDPR and HIPAA compliance from the outset, ensuring your architecture supports data minimization, patient consent, and the right to revoke credentials.

In a verifiable credentials framework, the schema defines the structure and semantics of the data being attested to. For patient identities, this isn't just a name and date of birth. A well-designed schema must capture essential identity attributes while enabling selective disclosure and future extensibility. Core fields often include a unique identifier (like a DID), legal name, date of birth, and a cryptographic hash of a government ID. The schema acts as a contract between the issuer (e.g., a hospital) and the verifier (e.g., a pharmacy), ensuring all parties understand the data's meaning.

Adopting existing standards is crucial for interoperability. The W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model provides the foundational grammar, but for healthcare-specific data, you should layer on established clinical standards. The FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) Patient resource is the industry benchmark for representing patient demographics. Mapping your schema fields to FHIR elements (e.g., Patient.name, Patient.birthDate) ensures your credentials can be understood by other healthcare systems globally, reducing vendor lock-in and fragmentation.

Design your schema with privacy-by-design principles. Instead of a monolithic schema containing all possible health data, create modular, purpose-specific schemas. For example, a "Patient Identity" schema for basic KYC and a separate "Immunization Record" schema for vaccine history. This allows patients to share only the credential relevant to a given context. Furthermore, use selective disclosure techniques. With cryptographic schemes like BBS+, a patient can prove they are over 18 from a birthdate credential without revealing the actual date, minimizing data exposure.

Here is a simplified example of a JSON-LD schema definition for a basic patient identity credential, incorporating W3C and FHIR contexts. This schema would be published to a trusted registry, such as a blockchain or a decentralized web node, so verifiers can resolve its structure.

jsonCopy
{
  "@context": [
    "https://www.w3.org/ns/credentials/v2",
    "https://hl7.org/fhir/r4/patient-definitions.jsonld"
  ],
  "type": ["VerifiableCredential", "PatientIdentityCredential"],
  "credentialSchema": {
    "id": "did:example:health-schemas/patient-identity-v1",
    "type": "JsonSchema"
  },
  "credentialSubject": {
    "id": "did:example:patient123",
    "givenName": { "type": "string" },
    "familyName": { "type": "string" },
    "birthDate": { "type": "string", "format": "date" },
    "idDocumentHash": { "type": "string" }
  }
}

Finally, consider the lifecycle of your schema. Versioning is essential; any change to the field structure requires a new schema ID (e.g., /patient-identity-v2). This prevents breaking existing issued credentials. Document your schema thoroughly, specifying the data type, format, and whether each field is mandatory or optional. Publish this documentation alongside the schema ID. A well-documented, standards-based schema is the foundation upon which trusted, usable, and privacy-preserving patient identities are built.

The issuance flow begins when a patient authenticates with your system, typically via OAuth2 or a similar protocol. Upon successful verification of their identity (e.g., against an Electronic Health Record), your backend must generate a Verifiable Credential Data Model. This is a JSON-LD document containing the credential's core claims, such as "givenName", "dateOfBirth", and a unique patient identifier like a "medicalRecordNumber". The VC must include essential metadata: the "issuer" (your organization's DID), the "issuanceDate", and the credential "type" (e.g., ["VerifiableCredential", "PatientIdentityCredential"]).

Next, you must cryptographically sign this credential. Using the private key associated with your issuer DID, you create a Verifiable Data Integrity Proof. For Ethereum-based DIDs, this often involves creating a EIP712Signature or using the eth_signTypedData method. The signed proof is attached to the credential, resulting in a complete Verifiable Credential. Libraries like did-jwt-vc (for JWT VCs) or jsonld-signatures can abstract this complexity. The final VC payload is then prepared for delivery to the patient's digital wallet.

Delivery is typically handled via a Credential Offer Endpoint. Your application generates a deep link or a QR code containing a URL like https://your-api.example/offer?credential_id=<uuid>. When scanned by a wallet (e.g., Spruce ID's credible or ssi-sdk), the wallet calls this endpoint to fetch the signed VC. For a seamless user experience, implement the OpenID for Verifiable Credential Issuance (OID4VCI) protocol, which standardizes this API interaction between issuers and wallets.

A critical security step is credential binding. The VC must be cryptographically bound to the holder—the patient. The most common method is requiring the patient to sign a challenge with the private key of their wallet DID during the issuance process. This signature is embedded in the proof, ensuring only the intended holder can possess and use the credential. Without this binding, the VC could be intercepted and used by anyone.

Finally, your system should log the issuance event on a verifiable data registry, which could be a permissioned blockchain (e.g., Hyperledger Indy, Polygon ID) or a more centralized transparency log. This provides a public, immutable record of the credential's issuance id and issuer, enabling any verifier to check the credential's provenance without contacting your systems directly, enhancing trust and interoperability across different healthcare networks.

A patient wallet is a digital application that allows individuals to store, manage, and present their Verifiable Credentials (VCs), such as vaccination records or medical summaries. Unlike traditional logins, it operates on the principle of self-sovereign identity (SSI), giving the patient full control over their data. The wallet does not store the credential data itself on-chain; instead, it holds the cryptographic proofs and signed VCs issued by trusted entities like hospitals. Core functionalities include secure key management, credential storage, and the ability to generate Verifiable Presentations (VPs) for sharing selective information with verifiers.

The technical stack for a basic web wallet typically involves a frontend framework (like React or Vue), a Decentralized Identifier (DID) library such as did-jwt-vc or ethr-did, and a secure storage solution. For Ethereum-based identities, ethr-did allows you to create a DID linked to an Ethereum address (e.g., did:ethr:0x...). The private key for this DID is the most critical asset and must be secured, often using the Web Crypto API for in-browser key generation and storage or integrating with hardware wallets via the W3C WebAuthn standard for higher security.

Below is a simplified code snippet demonstrating the core flow of creating a DID and receiving a signed credential using the ethr-did and did-jwt-vc libraries. This example runs in a Node.js environment.

javascriptCopy
import { EthrDID } from 'ethr-did';
import { createVerifiableCredentialJwt } from 'did-jwt-vc';

// 1. Patient Wallet: Create a DID
const patientKeyPair = EthrDID.createKeyPair();
const patientDID = new EthrDID({ ...patientKeyPair, chainNameOrId: 'mainnet' });
console.log('Patient DID:', patientDID.did);

// 2. Issuer (e.g., Hospital) creates a Verifiable Credential
const issuerKeyPair = EthrDID.createKeyPair();
const issuerDID = new EthrDID({ ...issuerKeyPair, chainNameOrId: 'mainnet' });

const vcPayload = {
  sub: patientDID.did,
  vc: {
    '@context': ['https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1'],
    type: ['VerifiableCredential', 'MedicalClearanceCredential'],
    credentialSubject: {
      id: patientDID.did,
      clearedForProcedure: true,
      expirationDate: '2025-12-31'
    }
  }
};

// 3. Issuer signs the VC into a JWT
const vcJwt = await createVerifiableCredentialJwt(vcPayload, issuerDID);
console.log('Issued VC JWT:', vcJwt);

// The `vcJwt` is now sent to the patient's wallet for storage.

Once the wallet receives the vcJwt, it must store it securely. Options include encrypted local storage (e.g., localForage) or dedicated secure elements. When a patient needs to share their credential, the wallet creates a Verifiable Presentation. This involves packaging the relevant VC JWT(s) and signing the presentation with the patient's DID key to prove ownership, without revealing the underlying private key. The verifier (like a clinic's check-in system) can then cryptographically verify the signatures of both the issuer and the holder using public DID methods.

Key security considerations for production wallets include implementing key rotation and recovery schemes (e.g., using smart contract controllers for DIDs), ensuring all operations occur in a secure, isolated context (like a Web Worker), and rigorously validating the structure and issuer of incoming VCs. The wallet should also support standard interfaces like the W3C Credential Handler API (CHAPI) to enable seamless credential exchange with browsers and verifier sites, improving the user experience beyond simple copy-paste of JWT tokens.

This architecture forms the foundation for patient-controlled health data. The next steps involve integrating with issuer backend systems for credential issuance and building verifier interfaces that can request and validate presentations. By using open W3C standards, this wallet can interoperate with a growing ecosystem of SSI tools and healthcare networks, moving away from fragmented, institution-held records to a portable, patient-centric model.

The core integration involves configuring your provider system to act as a verifier within the SSI ecosystem. This requires establishing a secure connection to a trust registry—a decentralized list of trusted credential issuers (e.g., government IDs, medical boards). Your system must query this registry to confirm the cryptographic signatures on a patient's Verifiable Credential (VC) are from an authorized issuer. This step replaces the need for manual document checks with automated, cryptographic proof of authenticity.

For a practical implementation, you need a verification library. Using the popular veramo framework in a Node.js backend, you can set up a verification agent. First, resolve the Decentralized Identifier (DID) of the credential's issuer from its DID Document, often hosted on a blockchain or the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS). Then, use the agent to verify the credential's cryptographic proof (e.g., a JWT or JSON-LD signature). The library handles the complex cryptography, allowing you to focus on the business logic.

Here is a simplified code example for verifying a credential with Veramo:

javascriptCopy
import { createAgent } from '@veramo/core';
import { CredentialPlugin } from '@veramo/credential-w3c';

const agent = createAgent({
  plugins: [
    new CredentialPlugin()
  ],
});

async function verifyCredential(credentialJWT) {
  const verificationResult = await agent.verifyCredential({
    credential: credentialJWT,
  });
  
  if (verificationResult.verified) {
    console.log('Credential is valid. Issuer:', verificationResult.issuer);
    // Proceed with patient onboarding
  } else {
    console.log('Verification failed:', verificationResult.error);
    // Request alternative verification
  }
}

After successful verification, your Electronic Health Record (EHR) or practice management system should bind the verified identity to a new or existing patient record. This is typically done by extracting and storing the patient's DID or a unique identifier from the VC's credentialSubject.id field. This creates a persistent, privacy-preserving link. Future interactions can then request only specific, necessary claims (like proof of age over 18) without exposing the patient's full credential, adhering to data minimization principles.

Finally, design the user experience. The patient presents their verifiable presentation (VP)—often a QR code from their digital wallet. Your provider's portal or kiosk scans this code, triggers the backend verification process, and returns a clear status. Log the verification event's timestamp and issuer DID for audit purposes, but avoid storing the actual credential data to reduce liability. This integration shifts identity verification from a manual, error-prone process to a secure, standardized, and automated workflow.

The core challenge is establishing a secure, standards-based bridge between your new Verifiable Credentials framework and the existing EHR API. This integration acts as a middleware layer, translating between the FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) data format used by most modern EHRs and the W3C Verifiable Credentials data model. The primary goals are to issue VCs from EHR data (e.g., creating a vaccination credential from an immunization record) and to verify presented VCs to populate or authorize EHR access, all while maintaining strict audit logs.

A typical integration uses a dedicated Credential Issuance Service that sits within the healthcare provider's secure network. This service queries the EHR via its FHIR API (e.g., GET /Immunization?patient=123), transforms the retrieved JSON bundle into a verifiable credential JSON-LD structure, and then signs it using the institution's Decentralized Identifier (DID) and private key. For example, an Epic or Cerner system would expose patient data through a FHIR server, which your service consumes to generate a signed credential payload.

Key Integration Components

• FHIR Client: Authenticates with the EHR system (often using OAuth 2.0).
• Data Mapper: Transforms FHIR resources to W3C VC claims.
• Signing Module: Uses the institution's DID key pair to create the cryptographic proof.

For the verification flow, your application needs a Credential Verification Service. When a patient presents a VC (e.g., via a QR code at registration), this service validates the cryptographic signature against the issuer's DID documented in a DID registry like the ION network or a private Sidetree node. Upon successful verification, the service can execute two actions: it can push verified data back into the EHR as a new FHIR resource, or it can return an access token that grants the patient-specific permissions within the EHR system, enabling a patient-mediated data sharing model.

Implementing this requires careful error handling and auditing. Every credential issuance and verification attempt must be logged with immutable metadata to the EHR's audit trail, satisfying HIPAA requirements. Furthermore, you must manage credential status through a revocation registry (like a W3C Status List 2021) to instantly invalidate VCs if a record is amended or a key is compromised. The code snippet below shows a simplified Node.js function for issuing a credential from a FHIR Immunization resource, using the did-jwt-vc library.

javascriptCopy
async function issueVaccineCredential(fhirImmunization, issuerDid, privateKey) {
  const vcPayload = {
    '@context': ['https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1'],
    type: ['VerifiableCredential', 'ImmunizationCredential'],
    issuer: issuerDid,
    issuanceDate: new Date().toISOString(),
    credentialSubject: {
      id: fhirImmunization.patient.reference,
      vaccineCode: fhirImmunization.vaccineCode.coding[0].code,
      lotNumber: fhirImmunization.lotNumber,
      occurrenceDateTime: fhirImmunization.occurrenceDateTime
    }
  };
  return createVerifiableCredentialJwt(vcPayload, {
    issuer: issuerDid,
    signer: createSigner(privateKey)
  });
}

Finally, consider the deployment topology. The issuance service is typically deployed inside the healthcare provider's firewall, communicating directly with the on-premise EHR. The verification service can be cloud-hosted for public accessibility. Use API gateways and strict CORS policies to control access. This hybrid architecture ensures sensitive patient data never leaves the internal network during issuance, while allowing external parties (like other clinics or pharmacies) to verify credentials presented to them. Successful integration turns a static EHR into an active participant in a patient-centric, interoperable health data ecosystem.

This guide walked through the core components of a Verifiable Credentials (VC) framework: creating a Decentralized Identifier (DID) for your healthcare provider, defining a credential schema for patient data, issuing signed credentials, and building a verifier to check credential validity. The primary goal is to give patients self-sovereign control over their identity data, allowing them to present proofs—like their vaccination status or medical history—without revealing unnecessary personal information or relying on a central database.

For production deployment, several critical next steps are required. First, key management must be hardened; the private keys used for signing credentials should be stored in a Hardware Security Module (HSM) or a managed cloud service like AWS KMS or Azure Key Vault. Second, you must integrate with a DID method suitable for your governance model, such as did:ethr for Ethereum-based systems or did:web for simpler, web-hosted identifiers. Third, design a secure holder wallet application, either a mobile app or browser extension, where patients can store and present their credentials.

To extend the system's functionality, consider implementing Selective Disclosure using Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs), allowing a patient to prove they are over 18 without revealing their birthdate. Explore revocation mechanisms like status lists or smart contract-based registries. For interoperability, ensure your schemas align with emerging healthcare standards like FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources). Finally, conduct a thorough security audit of the entire stack, focusing on the credential issuance flow, signature verification, and the privacy guarantees of the data exchange protocols.