Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Guides

Launching a Reg D 506(c) Offering on the Blockchain

A developer-focused guide to implementing a compliant public security token offering under SEC Regulation D Rule 506(c). Covers smart contract logic for whitelisting, KYC/AML, and accredited investor verification workflows.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
SECURITIES COMPLIANCE

Introduction to Reg D 506(c) Blockchain Offerings

A technical guide to structuring and launching a private securities offering under SEC Regulation D Rule 506(c) using blockchain infrastructure for investor accreditation, token issuance, and compliance.

Regulation D Rule 506(c) is a securities exemption that allows issuers to raise an unlimited amount of capital from an unlimited number of accredited investors, provided they take reasonable steps to verify each investor's accredited status. Unlike traditional 506(b) offerings, 506(c) permits general solicitation—advertising the offering publicly—which aligns well with the discoverability of blockchain-based assets. The core compliance challenge shifts from restricting marketing to rigorously proving investor eligibility through documentation, a process increasingly automated by on-chain verification protocols and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs).

The blockchain component introduces a security token—a digital asset representing an equity stake, debt, or other financial right. This token is typically issued as an ERC-1400 or ERC-3643 standard smart contract on Ethereum or other EVM-compatible chains, embedding transfer restrictions and investor whitelists directly into the code. The smart contract acts as the single source of truth for the cap table, automating compliance logic such as enforcing holding periods, blocking unauthorized transfers, and integrating with on-chain accreditation verification services from providers like VerifyInvestor or Accredify.

A typical technical architecture involves a three-step flow: First, potential investors connect their wallet to a dedicated portal and submit accreditation documents. Second, a verification oracle attests to their status on-chain, often via a signed message or a verifiable credential. Third, upon successful verification and payment (in stablecoins like USDC), the smart contract mints the security tokens to the investor's verified wallet address. This creates an immutable, auditable record of all verifications and issuances, significantly reducing administrative overhead and audit costs.

Key legal and technical considerations include ensuring the token smart contract is audited by firms like OpenZeppelin or Quantstamp, integrating with a transfer agent for manual override capabilities, and structuring the token's economics to comply with state Blue Sky laws. The offering documents—the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and Subscription Agreement—must be digitally signed and linked to the on-chain transaction, often using platforms like DocuSign with blockchain notarization via Ethereum's AttestationStation or EAS.

For developers, the primary work is in the issuance smart contract and investor portal. The contract must implement functions for verifyInvestor(address investor, bytes32 proof), mintToVerified(address investor, uint256 amount), and enforceTransferRestrictions(address from, address to, uint256 value). The front-end portal interacts with wallet providers (MetaMask, WalletConnect), KYC/AML services, and stablecoin payment rails. Open-source frameworks like TokenSoft or Polymath provide foundational templates, but custom logic for specific equity or debt terms is often required.

The final, critical phase is post-issuance compliance. The blockchain ledger provides real-time transparency for regulators and auditors. Smart contracts can be programmed to handle corporate actions like dividends (distributed as tokens or stablecoins), voting (via snapshot.org or on-chain governance), and liquidity events. By leveraging blockchain's programmability, a Reg D 506(c) offering transitions from a manually intensive, document-heavy process to a streamlined, automated, and transparent financial primitive.

prerequisites
COMPLIANCE

Prerequisites and Legal Foundation

Before writing a single line of smart contract code, establishing a compliant legal structure is the non-negotiable first step for any blockchain-based Reg D 506(c) offering.

A Regulation D 506(c) offering allows companies to raise an unlimited amount of capital from accredited investors by publicly advertising the offering, provided all purchasers are verified as accredited. This exemption from SEC registration is governed by the Securities Act of 1933. The core legal requirement is that the issuer must take reasonable steps to verify each investor's accredited status, which cannot be satisfied by a simple self-certification checkbox. Common verification methods include reviewing tax returns, bank statements, or obtaining written confirmation from a qualified third party like a registered broker-dealer, lawyer, or CPA.

The legal entity issuing the security tokens is critical. Most projects use a Delaware C-Corporation or LLC for its well-established legal precedent, corporate governance flexibility, and familiarity to institutional investors. This entity creates the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM), the foundational legal document detailing the offering terms, risk factors, business plan, and use of proceeds. The PPM, along with the subscription agreement, forms the binding contract between the issuer and investor. On-chain, the smart contract must be architected to enforce the terms encoded in these legal documents, such as transfer restrictions and investor accreditation locks.

Engaging specialized legal counsel is mandatory. You need a law firm experienced in both securities law and digital assets. They will draft the PPM, ensure compliance with 506(c) rules, and advise on structuring the token's economic rights (e.g., profit share, dividends, governance) to align with securities regulations. Simultaneously, you must plan for the technical integration: the legal entity's details, tax ID (EIN), and compliance officer information will need to be embedded or referenced by the smart contract system for a seamless link between legal obligation and on-chain execution.

Finally, prepare for the Form D filing with the SEC. After the first sale of securities in the offering, you must file Form D electronically via the SEC's EDGAR system no later than 15 days afterward. This notice filing includes basic information about the company and the offering. Most states also require a blue sky filing and payment of a fee for offerings sold to residents within that state. Failure to file Form D can result in loss of the Reg D exemption, so this administrative step is a crucial capstone to the legal foundation before the offering goes live on-chain.

compliance-workflow-overview
COMPLIANCE WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE

Launching a Reg D 506(c) Offering on the Blockchain

This guide details the technical architecture for automating a Regulation D 506(c) securities offering using blockchain infrastructure, focusing on investor accreditation verification and compliant fund distribution.

A blockchain-based Reg D 506(c) workflow automates key compliance steps while leveraging the transparency and immutability of distributed ledger technology. The core requirement is verifying that all investors are accredited, as defined by the SEC. The architecture typically involves three integrated layers: a front-end application for investor onboarding, a smart contract layer on a compliant blockchain like Ethereum or Polygon, and secure connections to third-party verification services. This system replaces manual, paper-based processes with a programmable, auditable workflow where each step is recorded on-chain.

The investor journey begins with a secure application portal. Here, prospective investors connect a digital wallet (e.g., MetaMask) and submit required personal information. Crucially, this data is not stored on-chain for privacy. Instead, the front-end application uses a signed message from the investor's wallet to initiate an off-chain API call to a licensed verification service like Accredd or VerifyInvestor. The service returns a cryptographically signed attestation of accreditation status, which is then submitted back to the smart contract as proof.

The governing smart contract is the system's compliance engine. It receives and validates the signed accreditation attestation. Upon successful verification, the contract updates an on-chain registry, minting a non-transferable security token (often an ERC-721 or ERC-1155) to the investor's wallet address. This token acts as a permission key, granting the holder the right to participate in the specific offering. The contract's logic enforces rules such as investment minimums, maximum investor counts (35 non-accredited investors in a 506(b), zero in a 506(c)), and contribution deadlines, all immutable once deployed.

For the capital raise, the smart contract manages a secure escrow mechanism. Approved investors can send funds (in ETH, USDC, or other approved stablecoins) directly to the contract address. The contract will only accept deposits from wallet addresses that hold the required permission token. Funds are held in escrow until the offering's conclusion or a specific milestone is met, at which point the contract logic can automatically distribute funds to the issuer's treasury wallet. This eliminates intermediary custody risk and provides a transparent, real-time view of the raise's progress for all permissioned parties.

Post-close, the blockchain provides a permanent, tamper-proof audit trail. Regulators or auditors can independently verify every accreditation check, token mint, and financial transaction by inspecting the public contract state and event logs. This architecture significantly reduces administrative overhead and audit costs. For ongoing compliance, the security tokens can be programmed with transfer restrictions to prevent secondary trading on unregulated platforms, and can interface with cap table management tools like Vertalo or Securitize for shareholder governance.

key-components
IMPLEMENTATION STACK

Key Technical Components

Launching a compliant blockchain-based Reg D 506(c) offering requires integrating specific technical components for investor verification, token issuance, and regulatory reporting.

03

KYC/AML Identity Layer

Beyond accreditation, a robust identity layer is needed for Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks. This often involves:

  • Integrating with identity verification providers that perform ID document checks and liveness detection.
  • Minting a verifiable credential or soulbound token (SBT) to the investor's wallet, proving their identity status.
  • This credential is separate from the accreditation proof and is used by the security token's transfer rules to ensure all regulatory checks are satisfied before any token movement.
04

Regulatory Reporting & Audit Trail

506(c) offerings require maintaining detailed records of all investor communications and verification steps. A blockchain-native system should:

  • Log all verification events (submission, approval, denial) as immutable on-chain transactions.
  • Use IPFS or Arweave to store hashed copies of investor documents and signed attestations off-chain, with the content hash stored on-chain.
  • Generate automated reports for Form D filings with the SEC, which must be submitted within 15 days of the first sale.
  • Provide a transparent, immutable audit trail for regulators and internal compliance teams.
05

Secondary Trading Compliance

Planning for potential secondary trading on Alternative Trading Systems (ATS) requires upfront technical design. Key considerations include:

  • Ensuring the token contract's transfer restriction logic is compatible with ATS smart contracts.
  • Implementing investor lock-up periods and vesting schedules programmatically within the token.
  • Configuring rules for geographic restrictions (e.g., blocking transfers to wallets in prohibited jurisdictions).
  • Using compliance oracles that can update token contract rules based on real-world regulatory changes or corporate actions.
06

Issuance Platform & Wallet Integration

The investor-facing interface must securely connect to the compliance backend. This involves:

  • Building or using an issuance platform that guides investors through wallet connection (via MetaMask, WalletConnect).
  • A seamless flow for submitting verification documents and paying for the security tokens, often via stablecoin.
  • Ensuring the platform can correctly interpret on-chain verification credentials to gate access to the purchase function.
  • Post-issuance, the platform should provide investors with a dashboard to view their token balance, vesting schedule, and relevant corporate communications.
smart-contract-logic
SECURITIES OFFERING

Smart Contract Logic for Whitelisting and Sales

This guide details the smart contract architecture required to execute a Regulation D 506(c) securities offering on-chain, focusing on investor accreditation verification and compliant sale mechanics.

A Regulation D 506(c) offering allows issuers to raise capital from an unlimited number of accredited investors through general solicitation, provided they take reasonable steps to verify investor status. On-chain implementation requires a smart contract that enforces these rules programmatically. The core logic revolves around two main phases: a whitelisting period for verified accreditation and a subsequent sale period where only whitelisted addresses can participate. This structure ensures compliance is baked into the fundraising mechanism itself, creating an immutable record of verification and participation.

The whitelisting function is the gatekeeper. Before the sale opens, investors must submit verification through a designated process, often handled off-chain by a licensed third-party service. Upon successful verification, the issuer (or an authorized admin wallet) calls a function like addToWhitelist(address investor) to grant the investor's Ethereum address permission to purchase. The contract stores this permission in a mapping: mapping(address => bool) public isWhitelisted. This creates a permissioned list that the sale logic will check against, ensuring only pre-vetted parties can transact.

During the sale, the purchase function must enforce whitelist checks. A typical purchaseTokens(uint256 amount) function will start with require(isWhitelisted[msg.sender], "Not whitelisted");. This require statement acts as a hard stop for any unverified address. The contract should also enforce other 506(c) requirements, such as individual investment minimums and a hard cap on the total raise. Implementing a purchaseCap per investor can also help prevent disproportionate allocation and is considered a good practice for compliance.

Security and finalization are critical. The contract should include timelock-controlled functions to pause the sale in case of issues and to permanently close it once the cap is reached or the duration ends. After the sale concludes, a finalizeSale function should lock further purchases and likely transfer raised funds (in ETH or stablecoins like USDC) to a designated treasury wallet. All these actions are transparently recorded on the blockchain, providing a clear audit trail for regulators and investors regarding who was verified, when they invested, and how much they contributed.

Developers must remember that the smart contract handles the on-chain enforcement of rules based on whitelist input. The actual accreditation verification is a separate, crucial process that must meet SEC "reasonable steps" standards, such as reviewing tax forms, bank statements, or using a verified third-party service like Accredited or VerifyInvestor. The contract's role is to trust the whitelist input from the authorized admin. Therefore, securing the admin keys and potentially using a multi-signature wallet for whitelist operations is paramount to the system's integrity.

COMPLIANCE TOOLS

Accredited Investor Verification Providers

Comparison of third-party services for verifying accredited investor status under Rule 506(c).

Verification MethodAccredifyVerifyInvestorOnChain Compliance

SEC-Certified Third-Party Review

Income Verification (IRS Forms)

Net Worth Verification

Professional License Check (Series 7, 65, etc.)

Blockchain/Native Digital Asset Valuation

API Integration for On-Chain Platforms

Average Verification Time

24-48 hours

1-3 business days

< 1 hour

Base Verification Fee

$50-100 per check

$75-150 per check

$20-40 per check

TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions and troubleshooting for developers building a Regulation D 506(c) securities offering on-chain.

Regulation D Rule 506(c) is a U.S. securities exemption allowing issuers to raise unlimited capital from accredited investors while engaging in general solicitation. On-chain implementation tokenizes the security (e.g., as an ERC-1400/ERC-3643 standard token) and automates compliance.

Key on-chain components:

  • Accredited Investor Verification: Integration with KYC/AML providers (e.g., Chainalysis, Veriff) via oracle or API to attest investor status before token minting.
  • Restricted Token: A smart contract that enforces transfer restrictions, preventing sales to non-accredited wallets and locking tokens during the mandated one-year holding period.
  • Offering Materials: Immutable storage of the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) and subscription agreements on IPFS or Arweave, with hashes recorded on-chain for auditability.

The smart contract acts as the single source of truth for the cap table, investor eligibility, and distribution rules, replacing manual, paper-based processes.

conclusion
IMPLEMENTATION

Conclusion and Next Steps

After completing the technical setup for your blockchain-based Reg D 506(c) offering, the final steps involve operational execution, compliance maintenance, and exploring advanced integrations.

Your offering is now technically live. The next critical phase is investor onboarding and capital formation. You must verify each accredited investor's status using a reasonable steps methodology, which can be enhanced by your blockchain's identity verification module. All subscription agreements and funds should be processed through the smart contract's designated functions, creating an immutable, auditable record of each transaction. This process replaces traditional paper-based subscriptions and manual wire tracking.

Ongoing compliance is managed programmatically. Your ComplianceOracle smart contract must be kept updated with any changes to SEC rules or investor accreditation standards. For a 506(c) offering, you are required to file a Form D with the SEC within 15 days of the first sale. Furthermore, you must take steps to avoid general solicitation, ensuring all marketing materials are directed solely to verified accredited investors through your platform's gated access, not public channels.

Looking ahead, you can leverage the blockchain foundation for future capabilities. Consider tokenizing the issued securities as ERC-3643 or ERC-1400 security tokens to enable compliant secondary trading on regulated platforms. You could also integrate with decentralized identity protocols like Polygon ID or Verite for reusable, privacy-preserving KYC/AML credentials. For fund management, explore integrating on-chain treasury tools from protocols like Syndicate or Sablier for streaming distributions.

Finally, continuously monitor the regulatory landscape. The SEC's stance on digital assets and blockchain-based securities is evolving. Engage with legal counsel familiar with both securities law and blockchain technology. Resources like the SEC's official guidance and analysis from groups like the Digital Asset Compliance & Market Integrity (DACMI) Consortium are essential for staying compliant as you scale your fundraising and investor relations on-chain.

How to Launch a Reg D 506(c) Security Token Offering | ChainScore Guides