Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Guides

How to Choose Between Mainnet, Testnet, and Localnet for Development

A practical framework for selecting the right blockchain environment. Compare cost, data authenticity, speed, and security for each development phase.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTS

How to Choose Between Mainnet, Testnet, and Localnet for Development

Selecting the right blockchain environment is a foundational decision that impacts your development workflow, cost, and risk profile. This guide explains the trade-offs between mainnet, testnet, and localnet.

Blockchain development requires interacting with a network, but not all networks are the same. The three primary environments are mainnet, testnet, and localnet. Each serves a distinct purpose in the software development lifecycle. Mainnet is the live, production blockchain where transactions have real economic value and are immutable. Testnet is a public, parallel network that mimics mainnet but uses valueless tokens, designed for public testing. A localnet is a private blockchain instance you run on your own machine, offering complete control and isolation.

Use a localnet (like a local Hardhat or Anvil node) for the initial development phase. It provides instant transaction finality, zero gas costs, and the ability to mine blocks on demand, which is ideal for rapid iteration and unit testing your smart contracts. You can reset the chain state at any time, deploy complex setups with scripts, and debug transactions without waiting for block confirmations. Tools like Foundry's anvil or Hardhat Network are standard for this environment.

Once your contracts are tested locally, move to a public testnet such as Sepolia, Goerli, or Holesky for Ethereum. Testnets simulate the mainnet environment with external validators and real network latency. This stage is crucial for testing integrations with external protocols, frontend applications, and wallet interactions using valueless faucet tokens. It exposes your dApp to a more realistic, adversarial environment than a localnet.

Deploying to mainnet is the final step, involving real cryptocurrency (ETH, MATIC, etc.) for gas fees and creating permanent, on-chain contracts. This should only be done after extensive testing on testnets and, ideally, a security audit. Mainnet deployments require careful planning for gas optimization, contract upgradeability, and emergency procedures. A common practice is to use a staging mainnet deployment with minimal funds before a full production launch.

Your choice affects tooling and configuration. Development frameworks like Hardhat, Foundry, and Truffle use configuration files (e.g., hardhat.config.js) to define networks. You'll specify different RPC URLs, accounts, and chain IDs for each environment. For example, the chain ID for Ethereum Mainnet is 1, while Sepolia testnet uses 11155111. Always verify your contract addresses and transaction hashes on the appropriate block explorer, like Etherscan.

In summary, follow a progressive path: 1) Develop and unit test on a localnet. 2) Integrate and test publicly on a testnet. 3) Deploy cautiously to mainnet. This structured approach minimizes risk, manages cost, and ensures your application is robust across different network conditions before handling real value.

prerequisites
PREREQUISITES

How to Choose Between Mainnet, Testnet, and Localnet for Development

Selecting the right blockchain environment is a foundational decision that impacts your development workflow, cost, and testing strategy.

Blockchain development environments are categorized into three primary types: mainnet, testnet, and localnet. Each serves a distinct purpose in the software lifecycle. The mainnet is the live, public blockchain where transactions have real economic value (e.g., Ethereum Mainnet, Solana Mainnet Beta). Deploying here is permanent and costly. Testnets are public, parallel networks that mimic mainnet behavior but use valueless tokens (e.g., Sepolia, Goerli, Solana Devnet). Localnets are private, isolated blockchains you run on your own machine, like a Hardhat network or Anvil instance, offering complete control and instant finality.

Your choice dictates your development workflow. Start with a localnet for initial development and unit testing. It provides deterministic results, zero latency, and free transactions, allowing you to rapidly iterate on smart contract logic and run automated tests. Tools like Foundry's Anvil or Hardhat Network let you mine blocks on demand and impersonate any account, which is invaluable for debugging complex transaction flows in a controlled setting before introducing network variables.

Once your contracts are stable locally, graduate to a testnet. This is the critical integration testing phase. Testnets simulate the live environment's consensus, gas mechanics, and block times. You must acquire testnet ETH or SOL from faucets. Deploying here validates interactions with real-world conditions like mempool dynamics, external oracles (e.g., Chainlink testnet feeds), and cross-contract calls on a public ledger. It's the only way to test frontend integration and wallet connectivity properly before mainnet.

The mainnet is for final deployment and should be treated with extreme caution. Every transaction consumes real cryptocurrency and is immutable. Best practices include deploying to a testnet first, conducting thorough audits, and using a phased rollout with upgradeable proxy patterns where possible. For protocols involving substantial value, consider a mainnet fork—using a service like Alchemy's Tenderly or Foundry's forge to simulate the mainnet state locally for final, high-fidelity testing without risk.

Consider your project's needs: Are you testing a simple ERC-20 token? A localnet may suffice. Building a complex DeFi protocol interacting with live price feeds? A testnet is essential. Conducting a security audit? Use a mainnet fork. The key is to progress through these environments methodically: develop on localnet, integrate on testnet, and deploy to mainnet. This layered approach minimizes cost, maximizes testing coverage, and significantly reduces the risk of catastrophic mainnet failures.

key-concepts-text
DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTS

Key Concepts: Mainnet, Testnet, and Localnet

Choosing the right blockchain environment is the first critical decision for any Web3 developer. This guide explains the purpose, trade-offs, and ideal use cases for mainnets, testnets, and localnets.

A mainnet is the live, production blockchain where transactions have real-world consequences. Tokens have monetary value, smart contracts handle real user funds, and every transaction consumes gas paid in the native cryptocurrency (e.g., ETH on Ethereum, SOL on Solana). Deploying to a mainnet is the final step, reserved for thoroughly audited and tested applications. The primary considerations are cost (gas fees) and permanence; once a contract is deployed, it is typically immutable and mistakes can be catastrophic.

Testnets are public, shared networks that mimic mainnet behavior but use valueless tokens. Examples include Sepolia and Holesky for Ethereum, and Devnet for Solana. They are essential for integration testing, allowing developers to interact with other live contracts (like existing DeFi protocols) in a realistic environment without financial risk. You can obtain free test tokens from faucets. The key limitation is that testnets are shared resources; they can be reset, may have unreliable uptime, and your transactions compete with other developers' for block space, which can sometimes cause delays.

A localnet (or local development network) is a blockchain instance running entirely on your machine, using clients like Hardhat Network, Anvil from Foundry, or a local Solana validator. It provides instant transaction finality, unlimited free ETH/SOL, and complete control over the chain state (you can mine blocks on demand). This environment is perfect for the inner development loop: rapid unit testing, debugging with console logs, and experimenting with contract logic in isolation before integrating with external systems.

Your development workflow should progress through these environments. Start by writing and compiling your smart contracts. Then, run unit and integration tests on a localnet for speed and control. Next, deploy to a testnet for staging and end-to-end testing with frontends and other protocols. Finally, after security audits and final verification, deploy the production build to the mainnet. Using tools like Hardhat or Foundry, you can often switch between these environments by simply changing the network configuration in your hardhat.config.js or foundry.toml file.

Consider a practical example: developing a new ERC-20 token. On your localnet, you would rapidly iterate on the contract's minting and transfer logic. On Goerli testnet, you would test how your token interacts with a live Uniswap pool. Only after this would you execute the final, verified deployment to Ethereum mainnet, using a multisig wallet for the deployer address to enhance security. This layered approach minimizes risk and cost while maximizing testing fidelity.

NETWORK TYPES

Development Environment Comparison

Key characteristics of mainnet, testnet, and localnet environments for smart contract development.

FeatureMainnetPublic TestnetLocalnet (e.g., Anvil, Hardhat)

Real Value at Risk

Gas Cost

Native token (e.g., ETH)

Free faucet tokens

Free (simulated)

Network Latency

Variable (2-12 sec)

Variable (2-12 sec)

< 1 sec

State Persistence

Permanent

Periodic resets

Ephemeral

Third-Party Dependencies

Live oracles, bridges

Mock or test services

Fully controlled mocks

Transaction Finality

~12-15 min (PoW) / ~12 sec (PoS)

Same as mainnet consensus

Instant

Primary Use Case

Production deployment

Pre-production testing

Local development & debugging

DEVELOPMENT WORKFLOW

When to Use Each Environment

Rapid Prototyping and Unit Testing

Use a local development network (like Hardhat Network, Ganache, or Anvil) for initial smart contract development and isolated testing. This environment provides instant transaction finality, deterministic state, and zero gas costs, enabling rapid iteration cycles.

Key Use Cases:

  • Writing and compiling new smart contracts.
  • Running unit tests for contract logic in a controlled setting.
  • Debugging contract interactions with a local forked state.
  • Developing and testing frontend integrations without external dependencies.

Example: Deploy a new ERC-20 token contract to Hardhat Network to test minting and transfer functions before any on-chain deployment.

mainnet-forking-guide
DEVELOPER WORKFLOW

How to Fork a Mainnet for Local Development

Learn how to create a local, isolated copy of a live blockchain for testing smart contracts and dApps with real-world state.

A mainnet fork is a local, sandboxed replica of a public blockchain's state at a specific block. Tools like Hardhat, Foundry, and Ganache allow you to spin up a local node that mirrors the exact state of Ethereum Mainnet, Arbitrum, or Polygon at a chosen block height. This is distinct from using a public testnet (like Sepolia or Goerli) or a fresh localnet (an empty local chain). The key advantage is that you can test your code against real contract addresses, token balances, and DeFi protocols without spending real ETH or interacting with the live network.

Choosing the right environment depends on your development stage. Use a mainnet fork for integration testing, protocol simulations, and debugging complex interactions with existing DeFi infrastructure. It's ideal for testing flash loan arbitrage strategies or how your new vault interacts with live Uniswap pools. Use a public testnet for broader, multi-user testing and dry runs of deployment scripts, as they mimic mainnet conditions with free faucet ETH. A fresh localnet is best for rapid unit testing and initial development cycles where you don't need external state.

To fork Ethereum Mainnet using Hardhat, first install the required packages: npm install --save-dev hardhat @nomicfoundation/hardhat-toolbox. Then, configure your hardhat.config.js to use a forking node provider like Alchemy or Infura. A basic configuration looks like this:

javascript
module.exports = {
  networks: {
    hardhat: {
      forking: {
        url: "https://eth-mainnet.g.alchemy.com/v2/YOUR_API_KEY",
        blockNumber: 18950000 // Optional: fork from a specific block
      }
    }
  }
};

Running npx hardhat node will now start a local node synced to the forked chain.

When your forked node is running, you can interact with mainnet contracts directly in your tests. For example, you can fetch the real DAI balance of an address or call functions on the live Uniswap V3 router. This allows you to write tests that assert your contract correctly swaps tokens or deposits into a yield vault using the actual, deployed contract logic. Remember that any state changes (like minting tokens or altering balances) only persist locally in your fork and do not affect the real network.

While powerful, mainnet forks have limitations. They require a reliable RPC provider connection and can be slower than a localnet due to initial state fetching. The forked state is also static by default; it won't include new blocks mined after the fork point unless you use tools like Hardhat's hardhat_reset RPC method to re-fork. For the most accurate simulation of pending transactions or mempool behavior, you may need more advanced tooling like Foundry's cheatcodes or Tenderly's forking environment.

Integrate forking into your CI/CD pipeline by using services that provide persistent forked nodes or by scripting a local fork setup in your test suite. This ensures your protocol's integration with external systems is validated before each deployment. The optimal workflow often involves a mix: unit tests on a localnet, integration tests on a mainnet fork, and final staging deployments on a testnet. This layered approach minimizes risk and provides confidence that your dApp will behave as expected when it goes live.

testnet-workflow
DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTS

Setting Up a Public Testnet Workflow

Choosing the right network environment is a foundational decision for any Web3 developer. This guide explains the core differences between mainnet, public testnets, and localnets, helping you establish a safe and efficient development workflow.

Blockchain development requires testing in environments that mirror real-world conditions without risking real assets. The three primary environments are mainnet, public testnet, and localnet (or local development network). Mainnets like Ethereum and Solana are the live, production blockchains where transactions have real economic consequences. Public testnets such as Sepolia, Goerli (for Ethereum), and Devnet (for Solana) are parallel networks that simulate mainnet behavior using valueless test tokens. A localnet is a blockchain instance you run on your own machine, typically using tools like Hardhat Network, Anvil, or a local Solana validator.

Your choice depends on the development stage. Start with a localnet for initial unit testing and rapid iteration. It offers instant block production, zero latency, and complete control over the chain state (you can mine blocks on demand). This is ideal for testing smart contract logic, debugging reverts, and running your test suite thousands of times quickly. Tools like Foundry's anvil or Hardhat Network allow you to fork a mainnet state locally, enabling you to interact with deployed protocols in a controlled setting.

Once your contracts work locally, graduate to a public testnet. This introduces real network latency, live consensus, and gas mechanics. It's the critical step for testing integrations with other protocols, frontend interactions, and gas estimation. You'll need testnet ETH or SOL from faucets. The key is to use the testnet that matches your target mainnet's EVM version and features; for example, use Sepolia for post-Merge Ethereum development. This stage often uncovers issues related to transaction ordering and external dependencies.

Finally, use mainnet for final validation and production deployment. Some teams perform a mainnet dry-run on a small scale or use a mainnet fork in a localnet for the most accurate simulation. The mainnet is for live audits, security reviews, and monitoring tools. Never deploy untested code directly to mainnet. A robust workflow iterates through these environments: write and test on a localnet, integrate on a public testnet, and deploy with confidence to mainnet.

PUBLIC TESTNETS

Ethereum Testnet Reference

Comparison of active Ethereum testnets for smart contract deployment and testing.

FeatureGoerli (Deprecated)SepoliaHolesky

Status

Deprecated (Jan 2024)

Active

Active

Consensus

PoA (Clique)

PoS

PoS

Primary Use

General testing

Application testing

Infrastructure/Staking testing

Native Token Faucet

Limited (requires auth)

Abundant

Block Time

~15 sec

~12 sec

~12 sec

Network ID

5
11155111
17000

Gas Cost

Moderate

Low

Very Low

Recommended For

Legacy migration testing

New dApp development

Validator/node testing

DEVELOPER NETWORKS

Frequently Asked Questions

Choosing the right network environment is a foundational decision for any Web3 project. This guide answers common questions about the trade-offs between mainnet, testnet, and localnet.

The core difference lies in the network's purpose, cost, and state.

  • Mainnet is the live, public blockchain where transactions have real economic value (e.g., Ethereum Mainnet). It uses real ETH and interacts with real user funds.
  • Testnet is a public, developer-focused replica of a mainnet (e.g., Sepolia, Goerli). It uses valueless "faucet" tokens and is used for staging and public testing.
  • Localnet (or local development chain) is a private blockchain instance running on your machine, like Hardhat Network or Anvil. It provides instant mining, deterministic state, and full control for unit testing.

Choosing one depends on your development stage: localnet for initial builds, testnet for integration, and mainnet for final deployment.

conclusion
DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT DECISION

Conclusion and Next Steps

Choosing the right network for your Web3 development is a foundational decision that impacts your workflow, costs, and final deployment. This guide outlines a clear decision framework.

Your choice between a mainnet, testnet, and localnet should be driven by your project's current phase. For initial smart contract development and unit testing, a localnet like Hardhat Network or Anvil is ideal. It provides instant feedback, deterministic state, and zero gas costs, allowing you to iterate rapidly on logic without external dependencies. Use this phase to write and run comprehensive tests for all your contract functions.

Once your contracts pass local tests, move to a public testnet (e.g., Sepolia, Goerli, Holesky). This environment introduces real-world variables: live network latency, actual gas mechanics, and interactions with other deployed protocols like oracles or DEXes. It's the critical stage for integration testing, frontend dApp connectivity, and simulating user interactions. Always use testnet faucets to fund your development wallets with the network's native test token.

For the final stage, mainnet deployment requires rigorous preparation. Before deploying, conduct a security audit, finalize all contract parameters, and have a verified upgrade path if using proxies. Use a mainnet fork in your localnet to simulate the deployment and initial interactions with real on-chain data. When ready, deploy to a staging environment on a layer 2 like Arbitrum Sepolia or Optimism Goerli to validate performance under realistic but lower-cost conditions before the final mainnet launch.

Adopt a multi-network verification strategy. Key steps include: verifying your contract source code on block explorers like Etherscan, testing upgrade procedures on testnets, and running a scripted dry-run of your deployment pipeline. Tools like Tenderly or OpenZeppelin Defender can simulate mainnet transactions to catch errors pre-deployment. This layered approach minimizes risk and ensures your application behaves as expected in production.

Your development cycle should fluidly move between these environments. A typical workflow is: 1) Code & Unit Test (Localnet) → 2) Integrate & UI Test (Testnet) → 3) Security Audit & Dry-Run (Mainnet Fork) → 4) Deploy (Mainnet or L2). Establish this pipeline early using frameworks like Foundry or Hardhat to automate testing across different networks, ensuring consistency and saving significant time throughout your project's lifecycle.

How to Choose Mainnet, Testnet, or Localnet for Development | ChainScore Guides