Setting Up Rollup Fee Management

Rollup fee management is the system that determines the cost for users to submit transactions to the L2 and for the sequencer to post data to the L1. Unlike monolithic blockchains, rollups have a two-layer fee model: users pay for L2 execution and data availability, while the sequencer pays for L1 data posting. The primary components are the fee oracle (which provides current L1 gas price estimates), the transaction fee formula (which calculates the total cost), and the fee payment mechanism (how users submit payment, often in ETH or the rollup's native token).

The core calculation typically follows: L2 Fee = L2 Execution Fee + L2 Data Fee. The L2 Execution Fee covers the cost of processing the transaction's computational steps on the rollup's virtual machine, similar to Ethereum's gasUsed * gasPrice. The L2 Data Fee is more unique; it estimates the cost to post the transaction's calldata to Ethereum. This is calculated as (txDataGas * l1GasPrice) / l2ToL1FeeScalar, where the l2ToL1FeeScalar is a configurable parameter that scales L1 gas costs to the rollup's fee token economics.

Setting up this system requires configuring the Gas Price Oracle contract on L1, which the rollup's sequencer and nodes query. Protocols like Optimism use a GasPriceOracle contract that stores a dynamic l1BaseFee and overhead values. The sequencer must periodically update this oracle with the latest L1 gas info. On the client side (e.g., in a wallet or dApp), the fee is estimated by calling the estimateGas RPC method on the rollup node, which internally queries the oracle and runs the fee formula.

Here is a simplified code example of a client-side fee estimation function for an Optimism-like rollup using ethers.js:

javascriptCopy
async function estimateL2Fee(userTx) {
  // Fetch parameters from the L2 Gas Price Oracle
  const l1GasPrice = await gasPriceOracle.l1BaseFee();
  const overhead = await gasPriceOracle.overhead();
  const scalar = await gasPriceOracle.scalar();
  
  // Calculate data gas cost for the transaction calldata
  const dataGas = calculateDataGas(userTx.data);
  const l1DataFee = (dataGas + overhead) * l1GasPrice;
  const l2DataFee = l1DataFee * scalar / 1_000_000; // Scalar is a multiplier
  
  // Estimate L2 execution gas (simulate the transaction)
  const l2GasUsed = await l2Provider.estimateGas(userTx);
  const l2ExecutionFee = l2GasUsed * (await l2Provider.getGasPrice());
  
  return l2ExecutionFee + l2DataFee;
}

Effective fee management must also handle fee payment abstraction. Most rollups allow users to pay fees in ETH, but some, like Arbitrum, use their native token (ARB) for fee discounts. The system must correctly account for token decimals and exchange rates. Furthermore, priority fees (tips) can be implemented to incentivize sequencers to include transactions faster, adding another variable priorityFeePerGas to the total cost. This requires modifications to the transaction mempool ordering logic in the sequencer.

Finally, the collected fees are distributed. The sequencer keeps the L2 execution fee as revenue for providing compute resources. The L2 data fee, collected in the rollup's fee token, is used to reimburse the sequencer for its periodic L1 batch posting costs. Any surplus or deficit from this model affects the protocol's sustainability. Developers must monitor and occasionally adjust parameters like the scalar or overhead to ensure fees remain predictable and the sequencer remains economically incentivized to operate the chain.

Rollup fee management is a core component of any Layer 2 (L2) stack, responsible for calculating and collecting transaction fees paid by users. To work with this system, you need a solid understanding of the underlying execution environment. This includes proficiency with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and familiarity with core concepts like gas, opcodes, and calldata. You should also be comfortable with the architecture of the specific rollup you are using, such as Arbitrum Nitro, Optimism Bedrock, or a zkSync Era-compatible chain, as each has subtle differences in fee calculation and sequencer behavior.

Your local development setup must include specific software. You will need Node.js (version 18 or later) and a package manager like npm or yarn. Essential tools include Hardhat or Foundry for smart contract development and testing, and Git for version control. For interacting with rollup nodes, install the relevant CLI tools, such as the Arbitrum CLI (arbitrum) or Optimism packages (@eth-optimism/hardhat-deploy-config). A basic understanding of running a local L1 testnet (e.g., with Hardhat Network) and connecting it to a rollup node is required for end-to-end testing.

You must have access to a running rollup node instance. For development, you can run a local sequencer and validator using the rollup's official node software, like nitro for Arbitrum or op-node for Optimism. Alternatively, you can connect to a public testnet RPC endpoint provided by the rollup team or an infrastructure provider like Alchemy or Infura. Ensure you have test ETH on both the L1 (e.g., Sepolia) and the corresponding L2 testnet to pay for deployment and transaction costs. Managing these funded accounts via environment variables (.env file) is a standard practice.

The fee system is governed by smart contracts on both layers. On L1, you will interact with the rollup's Inbox or Bridge contract for depositing funds and the Gas Price Oracle for fee data. On L2, the key contract is the FeeVault or a custom fee recipient contract where sequencer fees accumulate. Your setup should allow you to compile and deploy Solidity contracts (version 0.8.x) to both networks. Understanding the EIP-1559 fee market is crucial, as most modern rollups implement a similar model for base fees and priority tips (sequencer fees) on L2.

Finally, prepare for debugging and monitoring. Use tools like a block explorer for your rollup (e.g., Arbiscan for Arbitrum), and set up logging for your node to track fee-related events. Familiarize yourself with the specific RPC methods the rollup exposes, which may include custom endpoints for estimating L1 data cost. With these prerequisites in place, you can proceed to configure fee parameters, customize the fee logic, and integrate the management system into your rollup's operation.

Rollup fee management is a critical component that determines the economic security and user experience of a Layer 2 network. Unlike monolithic blockchains, a rollup's fee flow is split between two layers: the execution environment on the rollup itself and the data availability/settlement layer on Ethereum L1. Users pay a single fee for their transaction, which is then decomposed to cover L2 execution gas and the cost of publishing the transaction's data to L1. The architecture must handle fee collection, market dynamics for L1 data, and revenue distribution to network operators.

The core architecture typically involves three key actors and their associated smart contracts. The Sequencer is the primary fee collector, batching user transactions and submitting compressed data to an L1 BatchInbox contract. An L1 FeeVault or Protocol Treasury contract receives the portion of fees earmarked for covering L1 data publication costs. Finally, a system of EIP-1559-like fee markets often operates on L2 to manage network congestion and provide predictable pricing for users, with base fees potentially being burned or redistributed.

Setting up this system requires deploying several smart contracts. On L1, you need a BatchInbox for data, a FeeVault to accumulate ETH for data costs, and a Bridge contract for message passing. On L2, the FeeManager or GasPriceOracle contract is essential. This L2 contract calculates the breakdown of the user's fee, determining the L2 execution cost and the current L1 data cost, which fluctuates based on Ethereum's gas prices. It serves as the canonical price oracle for the network.

Here is a simplified conceptual flow for a user transaction: 1. User signs a tx with a maxFeePerGas on L2. 2. The Sequencer includes it, using the GasPriceOracle to compute the L1 cost. 3. The user's fee is split: L2 portion stays with Sequencer, L1 portion is sent to the L1 FeeVault. 4. The Sequencer later submits a batch, paying the L1 data gas bill from the vault's balance. This separation ensures the Sequencer is always reimbursed for its L1 costs, preventing insolvency.

Advanced architectures introduce more sophistication. Shared sequencer networks may require fee-sharing logic between multiple operators. Validium or optimistic chains with alternative data availability layers need to account for the cost of that external DA. Furthermore, protocols may implement MEV redistribution or staker rewards directly from the fee stream. The design choices directly impact the rollup's security model, token economics, and ability to sustainably scale.

A sequencer's fee collection system is the economic engine of a rollup. It determines how users pay for transaction inclusion and how those fees are distributed between network operators (sequencers/proposers) and the base layer for data availability and settlement. The core components are a fee market algorithm (often an EIP-1559 style mechanism), a fee vault contract on L1 to hold collected fees, and logic within the sequencer's block-building process to validate and prioritize transactions based on their attached fees. Unlike L1, rollups can implement custom fee token policies, such as accepting only the rollup's native gas token or specific ERC-20 tokens.

The implementation begins with defining the fee structure. A transaction's total cost typically comprises two parts: the L2 execution fee, compensating the sequencer for computation and state updates, and the L1 data publication fee, which covers the cost of posting transaction data to Ethereum (or another DA layer). The sequencer must estimate the L1 fee dynamically based on current base layer gas prices and the calldata size of the batched transactions. Popular rollup stacks like the OP Stack provide a GasPriceOracle precompile for this estimation. The sequencer rejects transactions where the user's provided fee is insufficient to cover this estimated total cost.

Here is a simplified pseudocode logic for the sequencer's mempool and block building:

pythonCopy
def process_transaction(tx):
    estimated_l1_fee = gas_price_oracle.get_l1_fee(tx.calldata)
    estimated_l2_fee = l2_gas_price * tx.gas_limit
    total_required_fee = estimated_l1_fee + estimated_l2_fee
    
    if tx.max_fee_per_gas * tx.gas_limit < total_required_fee:
        reject_transaction("Insufficient fee")
    else:
        # Prioritize by effective gas price (fee per gas)
        add_to_mempool(tx)

def build_block():
    selected_txs = select_highest_bid_txs_from_mempool()
    batch_calldata = encode_batch(selected_txs)
    l1_cost = submit_batch_to_l1(batch_calldata)
    # Distribute fees: L1 cost is paid from vault, remainder is sequencer profit
    distribute_fees(selected_txs, l1_cost)

Fee distribution is handled post-submission. After the sequencer submits a batch of transactions to L1, it must reconcile the collected fees. The L1 data publication fee portion is withdrawn from the sequencer's on-chain vault to pay for the batch submission. The remaining balance constitutes the sequencer's profit for L2 execution. This vault is usually a smart contract on L1 that holds fees accrued on L2. Security here is critical; the vault must have robust access controls, typically allowing only a whitelisted fee recipient address (managed by the sequencer operator or a decentralized protocol) to withdraw funds, often with a timelock or multi-sig for added safety.

Advanced implementations may incorporate priority fees (tips) for faster inclusion, fee rebates for periods of low congestion, or MEV-aware ordering that can share captured value. Furthermore, some designs, inspired by EIP-4844 blob transactions, aim to decouple the fee market for data publication from L1 execution gas, creating a more predictable cost structure. When implementing, thorough testing with forked L1 environments is essential to simulate real gas price volatility and ensure the system remains solvent—meaning collected fees always cover the actual L1 settlement costs under all network conditions.

Rollup fee management is the process of collecting transaction fees from users on the Layer 2 (L2) and periodically settling them on the Layer 1 (L1). This is a core economic and security function. Users pay fees in the rollup's native gas token (often ETH or a custom token) to compensate sequencers for ordering transactions and verifiers (provers) for generating validity proofs. The system must reliably bridge these fees from L2 to L1, where they are ultimately distributed to network participants. A well-designed fee settlement contract prevents fund loss and ensures the rollup's economic sustainability.

The architecture typically involves two main smart contracts on L1: a Fee Vault and a Distributor. The Fee Vault, deployed on L1, is the destination for settled fees. The rollup's bridge or output root proposer periodically calls a function like settleFees(uint256 amount) to transfer the accumulated fee balance from an L1 escrow. The amount is often proven via a Merkle root included in the L2 state root that gets posted to L1. Security here is paramount; the settlement must be trust-minimized and only executable with a valid state transition proof.

Once fees are settled on L1 in the Fee Vault, the Distributor contract handles allocation. A common distribution model might split fees between: - Sequencers (e.g., 80%) for transaction ordering and availability, - Provers (e.g., 15%) for proof generation, and - A treasury (e.g., 5%) for protocol development. The Distributor contract allows authorized addresses (often governed by a multisig or DAO) to claim their share. For example, a sequencer could call claimSequencerRewards() to withdraw its portion of the vault's balance, with amounts calculated based on a pre-defined ratio or a more complex reward schedule.

Implementation requires careful smart contract design. The L1 Fee Vault should inherit from security patterns like OpenZeppelin's Ownable or AccessControl to restrict settlement calls to the official bridge/proposer. Reentrancy guards are essential. The settlement function should emit an event like FeesSettled(address indexed settler, uint256 amount, uint256 timestamp) for off-chain monitoring. On the L2 side, the sequencer or a system contract must track cumulative fees and include them in the state data submitted to L1. Rollups like Optimism and Arbitrum implement variations of this pattern, which you can study on their GitHub repositories (e.g., Optimism Bedrock).

When configuring parameters, you must decide on the settlement frequency (e.g., every 100 L2 blocks or 1 hour) and the minimum fee threshold to trigger a settlement to optimize gas costs. You also need to choose the fee token; while ETH is simple, using a custom ERC-20 adds complexity for bridging and L1 swaps. Thoroughly test the entire flow on a testnet: simulate fee accumulation on L2, execute the settlement via the bridge, and verify the Distributor allocations. This end-to-end testing is critical to prevent logic errors that could lock protocol revenue.

This guide walked through the core components of a rollup fee system. You implemented a FeeVault smart contract to securely collect fees, a Distributor contract to allocate them between sequencers and a treasury, and integrated a withdrawal mechanism for users. The system uses a pull-based architecture for security and gas efficiency, ensuring funds are only transferred when explicitly requested by authorized parties. Key security practices like access control, reentrancy guards, and event emission for off-chain monitoring are now in place.

To extend this system, consider implementing more sophisticated fee logic. You could add dynamic fee pricing based on network congestion using an oracle like Chainlink, or introduce a staking mechanism where fee shares are distributed to ERC-20 token stakers. For L2-specific optimizations, explore using custom precompiles or native asset handling if your rollup stack supports it. Always test upgrades thoroughly on a testnet; use tools like Foundry's forge test with invariant testing to ensure fee accounting remains accurate under all conditions.

Your next step is to integrate this fee management system with your rollup's core transaction processing. Ensure your sequencer or batch poster contract correctly calls the FeeVault.deposit function. Then, build the off-chain components: a service for the sequencer to withdraw its share, and a dashboard to track vault balances and distributions. Finally, document the fee withdrawal process for end-users. For further learning, review the fee mechanisms in production rollups like Arbitrum's Gas Fee Wallet or Optimism's Fee Vault design.