Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Guides

Launching an AI-Enhanced Oracle Network for Real-World Asset Tokenization

A technical guide for developers on building an oracle system that integrates AI for asset valuation, legal compliance, and reliable data sourcing for illiquid RWAs.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
ARCHITECTURE GUIDE

Launching an AI-Enhanced Oracle Network for Real-World Asset Tokenization

A technical guide to designing and deploying oracle infrastructure that uses AI to verify and price tokenized real-world assets (RWAs).

Real-world asset (RWA) tokenization requires a new class of oracle. Unlike price feeds for volatile crypto assets, RWA oracles must verify the existence, legal status, and valuation of off-chain assets like real estate, invoices, or commodities. A traditional oracle fetching a single data point is insufficient. An AI-enhanced oracle network aggregates, analyzes, and validates disparate data streams—including IoT sensor data, legal registry APIs, and satellite imagery—to generate a tamper-proof attestation of an asset's state and value on-chain.

The core architecture involves multiple specialized nodes. Data ingestion nodes pull raw data from authorized sources, such as property title registries or corporate ERP systems. AI validation nodes then process this data: computer vision models can analyze maintenance reports for equipment, while natural language processing can parse legal documents for encumbrances. A consensus layer, often using a proof-of-stake or attested proof-of-authority model, aggregates these validated inputs to produce a final, signed data point for the blockchain. This multi-layered approach mitigates single points of failure and data manipulation.

Smart contracts interact with these oracles via standard interfaces like Chainlink's Functions or a custom-built adapter. A tokenization contract for a commercial building, for instance, would request a valuation update. The oracle network would execute its workflow off-chain and post the result, triggering contract logic for loan-to-value ratios or dividend distributions. Key considerations for developers include data source attestation (proving the data came from a legitimate API), privacy-preserving computation (using zero-knowledge proofs or secure multi-party computation for sensitive data), and slashing conditions for nodes that provide faulty attestations.

Implementing a basic AI oracle node involves setting up a server to perform specific validation tasks. Below is a simplified Python example using a hypothetical framework to check invoice data against a known database, a common RWA use case. The node fetches data, runs a consistency check, and signs the result.

python
import hashlib
import json
from web3 import Web3
from ai_validator import InvoiceValidator

class RWAOracleNode:
    def __init__(self, private_key, rpc_url):
        self.w3 = Web3(Web3.HTTPProvider(rpc_url))
        self.account = self.w3.eth.account.from_key(private_key)
        self.validator = InvoiceValidator()

    def fetch_and_attest(self, invoice_id, source_api_url):
        # 1. Fetch raw invoice data from the authorized source
        raw_data = requests.get(f"{source_api_url}/{invoice_id}").json()
        
        # 2. AI-powered validation (e.g., check amounts, dates, counterparty)
        is_valid, processed_value = self.validator.validate(raw_data)
        
        if not is_valid:
            raise ValueError("Invoice validation failed")
        
        # 3. Create a deterministic hash of the validated data
        data_to_attest = json.dumps(processed_value, sort_keys=True)
        data_hash = hashlib.sha256(data_to_attest.encode()).hexdigest()
        
        # 4. Sign the hash with the node's private key
        signed_message = self.w3.eth.account.signHash(data_hash, private_key=self.account.key)
        
        # 5. Return the value and proof for the consensus layer
        return {
            "value": processed_value,
            "signature": signed_message.signature.hex(),
            "hash": data_hash
        }

Security and regulatory compliance are paramount. The oracle network must be designed with legal enforceability in mind; data sources should be court-admissible. Furthermore, the network's governance should define clear liability frameworks and dispute resolution mechanisms, potentially encoded as smart contract upgrade paths or decentralized arbitration (e.g., using Kleros). For high-value assets, a hybrid oracle model combining decentralized AI validation with periodic audits by licensed, off-chain appraisers creates a robust trust layer. This balances the efficiency of automation with the legal recognition of traditional finance.

The future of RWA tokenization depends on reliable bridges to the physical world. By building AI-enhanced oracle networks that focus on verifiable data integrity, multi-source consensus, and regulatory-aware design, developers can create the foundational infrastructure for trillions of dollars in assets to move on-chain. The next step is to prototype with specific asset classes, starting with simpler, highly digital RWAs like trade finance invoices before progressing to complex physical assets.

prerequisites
FOUNDATION

Prerequisites and System Requirements

Before deploying an AI-enhanced oracle for real-world assets, you must establish a robust technical and operational foundation. This guide details the essential hardware, software, and knowledge prerequisites.

Launching an AI-enhanced oracle network for Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization requires a hybrid skill set. You need expertise in blockchain development, machine learning operations (MLOps), and traditional finance data pipelines. Core technical prerequisites include proficiency with a smart contract language like Solidity or Rust (for on-chain components), Python for data processing and model training, and experience with cloud infrastructure (AWS, GCP, or Azure). Familiarity with oracle protocols such as Chainlink, Pyth, or custom designs is crucial for understanding the data delivery mechanism.

The system's hardware and infrastructure demands are significant. For development and testing, a machine with at least 16GB RAM, a multi-core CPU, and 50GB of free storage is recommended. For production node deployment, you will need reliable, high-availability servers or cloud instances. Key requirements include: dedicated VPS/cloud instances for node operation, secure key management systems (HSMs or cloud KMS), and redundant data feeds from primary sources (e.g., Bloomberg, Refinitiv) and secondary APIs. Network latency and uptime are critical for oracle reliability.

Software dependencies form the operational backbone. Your stack will likely include: a blockchain client (e.g., Geth, Erigon for Ethereum; Solana validator client), containerization (Docker), orchestration (Kubernetes for scaling node clusters), and monitoring tools (Prometheus, Grafana). For the AI component, you'll need frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch, and libraries for time-series analysis and anomaly detection. All components must be integrated via a message queue (e.g., Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ) to handle data flow between off-chain computation and on-chain submission.

Data sourcing and legal compliance are non-negotiable for RWAs. You must secure licensed access to verifiable data feeds for assets like real estate valuations, commodity prices, or corporate bond yields. This involves establishing relationships with data providers and implementing cryptographic proof of data origin. Furthermore, you must design a legal framework for data usage rights and understand the regulatory implications of tokenizing specific asset classes in your target jurisdictions, which may require legal counsel.

Finally, establish a rigorous testing and security protocol. Develop a local testnet (using Foundry Anvil or Hardhat) to simulate oracle behavior and RWA smart contracts. Implement continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines for automated testing of both ML models and smart contract updates. Security audits are mandatory; budget for professional audits of your smart contracts, oracle node software, and the data integrity mechanisms that bridge off-chain AI with on-chain state.

key-concepts
BUILDING BLOCKS

Core Architectural Components

Essential technical components for designing a secure and reliable AI-enhanced oracle network to power real-world asset (RWA) tokenization.

01

Data Source Integration Layer

The foundation for reliable data ingestion. This layer connects to primary data sources like financial APIs (Bloomberg, Refinitiv), IoT sensor feeds, and enterprise databases. It must handle:

  • Secure API authentication and key management
  • Data normalization into a standard schema
  • Redundancy by aggregating multiple sources for the same data point
  • Rate limiting and fault tolerance to handle source downtime Example: An oracle for tokenized real estate might pull from MLS listings, county assessor APIs, and IoT occupancy sensors.
02

AI/ML Computation Engine

Processes raw data into actionable insights. This component applies machine learning models for tasks critical to RWA valuation and risk assessment.

  • Time-series forecasting for commodity or revenue stream prices
  • Anomaly detection to flag outlier data or potential manipulation
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP) to parse legal documents or news sentiment
  • On-chain/off-chain data fusion to create composite indices Models must be verifiably executed (e.g., using zkML proofs) to ensure the integrity of the computed result before it is published on-chain.
03

Decentralized Consensus Mechanism

Ensures data integrity and liveness without a single point of failure. This is the core oracle protocol that aggregates responses from a network of nodes.

  • Node staking and slashing to incentivize honest reporting
  • Multi-signature or threshold signature schemes (e.g., Schnorr, BLS) to aggregate data attestations
  • Reputation systems that weight node responses based on historical accuracy
  • Dispute resolution and challenge periods for data validity Protocols like Chainlink's Off-Chain Reporting (OCR) or Pyth's pull-oracle model provide architectural blueprints for this layer.
04

On-Chain Delivery & Smart Contract Interface

The final bridge to blockchain applications. This component formats and writes the verified data to the target chain.

  • Gas-efficient data structures (e.g., storing price as a uint256 with a timestamp)
  • Multi-chain compatibility via cross-chain messaging protocols (CCIP, IBC, LayerZero)
  • Upkeep automation for regular data updates using keepers or cron services
  • Standardized interfaces like Chainlink Data Feeds or custom Solidity/EVM-compatible consumer contracts This allows DeFi protocols to securely query tokenized asset prices, loan-to-value ratios, or insurance trigger events.
05

Cryptographic Attestation & Proof System

Provides cryptographic guarantees for data provenance and computation integrity. This builds trust for high-value RWA data.

  • Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) to verify ML model execution without revealing the model itself (zkML)
  • Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) attestations (e.g., using Intel SGX or AMD SEV) for confidential computation
  • Data signing with node operator keys, creating an auditable trail
  • Timestamp proofs via decentralized networks (e.g., Chainlink Proof of Reserve timestamps) or blockchain headers This layer is critical for regulatory compliance and auditing of the oracle's outputs.
06

Monitoring, Governance & Upgrades

Operational systems to maintain network health and evolve the protocol.

  • Node monitoring dashboards tracking uptime, latency, and data accuracy
  • Decentralized governance for parameter updates (staking requirements, fee changes) via token voting
  • Secure upgrade mechanisms (e.g., transparent proxy patterns) for the oracle smart contracts
  • Bug bounty programs and security audits conducted by firms like Trail of Bits or OpenZeppelin This ensures the network remains secure, efficient, and adaptable to new RWA use cases over time.
architecture-overview
AI-ENHANCED ORACLE NETWORK

System Architecture and Data Flow

This guide details the technical architecture and data flow for launching an oracle network that verifies and tokenizes real-world assets (RWAs) using AI agents.

An AI-enhanced oracle network for RWA tokenization is a multi-layered system designed to bridge off-chain asset data with on-chain smart contracts. The core components are the Data Ingestion Layer, which collects raw data from sources like IoT sensors, APIs, and legal registries; the AI Processing Layer, where machine learning models analyze and verify this data for authenticity and risk; and the Consensus & Settlement Layer, where a decentralized network of node operators reaches consensus on the verified data before it is published on-chain. This architecture ensures the data feeding into tokenized assets is tamper-resistant, transparent, and auditable.

The data flow begins with source attestation. Each data source, such as a warehouse IoT sensor tracking a commodity, must be cryptographically signed and registered on-chain. Data is streamed to off-chain AI Agent Nodes. These nodes run specialized models—for example, computer vision to verify physical asset condition or NLP to parse legal documents—to generate an attestation. The output is a standardized data payload containing the verified value, a confidence score, and proof of the AI's analysis. This prevents a single point of failure and introduces automated, objective verification into the pipeline.

Consensus among node operators is critical for trust. Using a commit-reveal scheme or threshold signature scheme, a committee of nodes independently processes the AI-verified payload. They must reach a supermajority agreement on the data's validity before a cryptographic proof is generated. This proof, along with the final data point, is then submitted to an on-chain smart contract, typically a custom Oracle.sol contract. The contract validates the multi-signature proof and updates the state of the RWA token (e.g., an ERC-20 representing the asset) or triggers a specific function in a lending or trading protocol.

Security is enforced through cryptographic proofs and economic incentives. Node operators stake the network's native token as a bond, which can be slashed for malicious behavior or consistent inaccuracy. The use of zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) is emerging, allowing nodes to prove the correctness of their AI model's execution without revealing the proprietary model itself. This enables verifiable computation and preserves commercial IP. The entire flow—from raw data to on-chain state update—is recorded in an immutable audit trail, providing transparency for regulators and auditors.

To implement this, developers can build on oracle frameworks like Chainlink Functions for custom computation or Pyth Network for high-frequency data. A reference architecture might use a Cosmos SDK-based blockchain for the consensus layer, TensorFlow Serving for AI inference, and IPFS for storing verifiable data logs. The final on-chain contract must include functions to request data updates, verify oracle signatures, and manage the tokenized asset's state based on the incoming verified data, creating a complete loop for RWA tokenization.

ORACLE DATA PIPELINE

Implementation by Asset Class

Real Estate Data Integration

Real estate assets require a multi-source oracle pipeline to verify off-chain data. The primary data sources include:

  • Automated Valuation Models (AVMs): Integrate with providers like CoreLogic or HouseCanary via API feeds. Oracles aggregate multiple AVM estimates to mitigate single-source risk.
  • Title & Registry Feeds: Pull data from county recorder APIs or services like First American Data & Analytics to verify ownership and lien status.
  • IoT Sensor Data: For commercial properties, integrate sensor data streams for occupancy rates, energy usage, and maintenance status.

Implementation Example: An oracle contract for a tokenized office building would query a decentralized oracle network (e.g., Chainlink) to fetch a time-weighted average price (TWAP) from three AVM providers, cross-reference it with a title registry check, and only update the on-chain value if consensus is reached and data freshness is under 24 hours.

building-ai-valuation-model
DATA PIPELINE

Step 1: Building the AI Valuation Model

The foundation of a reliable AI-enhanced oracle is a robust valuation model. This step focuses on constructing a data pipeline and machine learning system to process and analyze real-world asset data for on-chain use.

An AI valuation model for real-world assets (RWAs) must ingest and process diverse, often unstructured, off-chain data. The core data pipeline typically sources information from: - Structured APIs (financial market data, property records, commodity prices) - Unstructured data (news articles, regulatory filings, satellite imagery) - On-chain data (historical price feeds, liquidity metrics from DeFi protocols). This data is cleaned, normalized, and timestamped to create a unified dataset for model training. Tools like Apache Airflow or Prefect are commonly used to orchestrate these ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) workflows, ensuring data freshness and reliability.

The processed data feeds into a machine learning model designed for valuation. For many RWAs, ensemble methods like Gradient Boosting (XGBoost, LightGBM) or Random Forests are effective starting points due to their handling of heterogeneous data and robustness. The model's objective is to predict a fair market value or risk score. For instance, a model for tokenized real estate might use features like square footage, location encodings, interest rates, and comparable sales data. It's critical to backtest the model extensively on historical data to evaluate metrics like Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and ensure it generalizes well to unseen market conditions.

Once trained, the model must be packaged for production. This involves creating a scoring API using a framework like FastAPI or Flask. The API endpoint takes relevant input parameters (e.g., asset identifiers, current market indices) and returns the model's valuation output. The entire system, including the data pipeline and API, should be containerized using Docker for consistency and deployed on a scalable cloud service (AWS SageMaker, Google Cloud AI Platform). This setup allows for continuous retraining as new data arrives and provides the reliable, automated valuation service that the oracle network will query.

Security and auditability are paramount. The model's code, training data provenance, and version history should be managed with Git. Consider using MLflow or Weights & Biases to track experiments, log model performance, and manage model registry. For transparency, you can publish the model's schema and a description of its key features. This documented, reproducible pipeline forms the trusted off-chain computation layer that will supply value assertions to the subsequent on-chain components of the oracle network.

integrating-llm-compliance
ARCHITECTURE

Integrating LLMs for Legal and Compliance Checks

This section details how to implement Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the validation of legal documents and compliance frameworks within an RWA tokenization oracle.

The core function of the legal LLM module is to parse and analyze complex legal documents—such as prospectuses, custody agreements, and regulatory filings—to extract and verify key compliance parameters. These parameters are then formatted into structured data that the oracle's smart contracts can consume. For instance, an LLM can be prompted to check a document for clauses related to transfer restrictions, accredited investor requirements, or jurisdictional limitations. The output is a standardized JSON object containing verified fields like isTransferRestricted: boolean or allowedJurisdictions: string[].

Implementation typically involves a two-step process: retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and structured output generation. First, a RAG pipeline retrieves relevant text chunks from uploaded PDFs or databases using vector similarity search against a knowledge base of regulatory frameworks (e.g., SEC regulations, MiCA). Second, a fine-tuned or carefully prompted LLM (like GPT-4, Claude 3, or an open-source model such as Llama 3) is used to perform the analysis with a system prompt enforcing strict, deterministic output formats. A basic conceptual flow in pseudocode might look like:

python
# Pseudo-code for compliance check
document_text = load_pdf("loan_agreement.pdf")
relevant_context = vector_db.search(document_text, query="governing_law")
prompt = f"""Analyze text for governing law clause. Return JSON: {{"jurisdiction": "string", "is_enforceable": bool}}"""
compliance_data = llm.generate(prompt, context=relevant_context)
oracle_submit(compliance_data) # On-chain submission

Key technical considerations include model choice, cost, and auditability. While closed-source APIs offer ease of use, using a locally hosted open-source LLM (via Ollama or vLLM) provides greater data privacy and control, crucial for sensitive financial documents. All LLM inferences must generate cryptographically verifiable proofs or be executed within a trusted execution environment (TEE) to ensure the oracle's output is tamper-proof. Furthermore, the system should implement a human-in-the-loop fallback, where ambiguous or high-risk classifications are flagged for manual review by legal experts, creating a hybrid verification system.

For real-world asset tokenization, specific compliance checks are paramount. The LLM can be tasked to continuously monitor for regulatory updates and re-score existing assets. For example, if a new ESG disclosure rule is enacted, the LLM can scan all asset documentation for compliance, triggering an oracle update if a discrepancy is found. This transforms the oracle from a static data feed into a dynamic compliance monitoring system. Integrating with legal data providers like LexisNexis or Westlaw via their APIs can further enhance the RAG system's knowledge base with the most current statutes and case law.

The final step is on-chain integration. The structured JSON output from the LLM module is sent to a dedicated verification smart contract on the oracle network. This contract validates the data format and the attestation signature from the trusted node running the LLM. Once verified, the compliance status becomes part of the asset's immutable on-chain profile, accessible by DeFi protocols for permissioned lending, trading, or insurance. This creates a transparent and auditable trail from the original legal document to an on-chain actionable data point, significantly reducing the manual due diligence burden in RWA finance.

deploying-oracle-contracts
IMPLEMENTATION

Step 3: Deploying the On-Chain Oracle Smart Contracts

This step involves compiling and deploying the core smart contracts that will form the on-chain component of your AI-enhanced oracle network for real-world asset (RWA) data.

Before deployment, you must finalize your contract architecture. For an RWA oracle, this typically includes a primary Aggregator contract that receives and validates data, a Data Feed Registry to manage authorized data sources and their weights, and a Staking/Reputation contract to secure the network. These contracts are often written in Solidity and should be thoroughly tested using frameworks like Hardhat or Foundry. Ensure your contracts implement critical functions like submitValue(uint256 _value, bytes memory _signature) for data submission and getLatestValue() for data retrieval by other protocols.

The deployment process requires configuring your development environment. You'll need a .env file with your private key and RPC endpoints for your target networks (e.g., Ethereum Mainnet, Arbitrum, Base). Using Hardhat, your deployment script (deploy.js or deploy.s.sol) will handle contract compilation and transaction sending. A key step is setting the initial parameters, such as the decimals for your RWA price feed, the initialAnswer, and the addresses of the initial validators or data providers who are permissioned to submit data in the network's early stages.

After deploying the contracts, you must verify and publish the source code on a block explorer like Etherscan. This is crucial for transparency and security audits. Use the hardhat-etherscan plugin with your API key to run the verification command. Once verified, you will initialize the contracts by calling setup functions, such as adding the first set of data sources to the registry and setting the staking requirements. This on-chain deployment creates the immutable, trust-minimized foundation that your off-chain AI agents will interact with to post verified RWA data.

oracle-node-operator
OPERATOR DEPLOYMENT

Step 4: Setting Up an Oracle Node Operator

This guide details the technical steps to deploy and configure a node operator for an AI-enhanced oracle network, focusing on the infrastructure required for real-world asset (RWA) data verification.

Before deploying your node, you must provision the necessary infrastructure. A robust oracle node requires a dedicated server with reliable uptime. Recommended specifications include a minimum of 4 CPU cores, 8GB RAM, and 100GB SSD storage. You can use a cloud provider like AWS EC2, Google Cloud Compute Engine, or a bare-metal server. Ensure the server is configured with a static public IP address and has ports open for the oracle client's P2P communication (e.g., port 9651 for a Chainlink node). Security is paramount; configure a firewall and use SSH key-based authentication.

Next, install and configure the oracle node software. For networks like Chainlink, this involves pulling the official Docker image (smartcontract/chainlink:latest) and setting up environment variables. You must define critical parameters in your .env file, including your node's ETH_URL (connection to an Ethereum RPC provider like Infura or Alchemy), DATABASE_URL (for a local PostgreSQL instance), and CHAINLINK_TLS_PORT. For AI-enhanced oracles, you may also need to configure a separate service or plugin to run your machine learning models for RWA data validation, which the node will query internally.

A core operational task is funding your node with the network's native token (e.g., LINK for Chainlink) to pay for transaction gas fees and, if applicable, to serve as a stake in a proof-of-stake oracle system. You must also register your node's address with the oracle network's on-chain registry contract. This is typically done by calling a function like registerOracleNode(address operator, bytes32 publicKey) on the manager contract. Your node's on-chain identity is now established, allowing it to receive data requests.

The final configuration step involves defining jobs. A job is a pipeline that defines how your node fetches, processes, and delivers data. You create a job specification (job spec) in JSON or TOML format. For RWA data, a job might first fetch an off-chain price feed from a traditional API (like Bloomberg or Reuters), run it through a pre-trained AI model to detect anomalies, and then submit the validated result on-chain. The job spec defines the adapters (external adapters for AI processing are common) and the target blockchain and contract address for the data delivery.

Once configured, start your node with docker-compose up or a similar command. Monitor its logs closely for the first few hours. Your node should connect to the peer-to-peer network, sync with the blockchain, and begin listening for job assignments. Use the node's administrative UI (often on port 6688) to check its health, balance, and active jobs. Successful operation is confirmed when your node completes a job and broadcasts a transaction containing the verified RWA data to the designated smart contract on the supported blockchain.

ARCHITECTURE

AI Oracle vs. Traditional Oracle: Feature Comparison

Key technical and operational differences between AI-enhanced and traditional oracle designs for RWA data feeds.

Feature / MetricAI-Enhanced OracleTraditional Oracle (e.g., Chainlink)

Data Processing Capability

Predictive analytics, anomaly detection, pattern recognition

Basic aggregation and validation

Latency for Complex Queries

< 2 seconds

5-30 seconds

Adaptive Data Sourcing

Gas Cost per Update (Avg.)

$8-15

$3-8

Attack Surface (Sybil/Manipulation)

Reduced via ML anomaly detection

Relies on node reputation & stake

Off-Chain Computation

Heavy (ML model inference)

Light (data fetching & signing)

Initial Setup Complexity

High (requires model training/data pipelines)

Moderate (node deployment & configuration)

Best For

Dynamic pricing, credit scoring, predictive RWA metrics

Static price feeds, verifiable event outcomes

DEVELOPER TROUBLESHOOTING

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Common technical questions and solutions for developers building with AI-enhanced oracles for real-world asset tokenization.

This typically indicates a mismatch between your model's inference and the aggregated result from other validators. Common causes include:

  • Data source divergence: Your model may be pulling from an API endpoint that has stale or differing data compared to the network's primary sources. Verify your data ingestion pipeline against the reference feeds listed in the oracle's documentation.
  • Model staleness: If you haven't retrained or fine-tuned your model with recent market data, its predictions can drift. Implement a scheduled retraining cycle based on the asset's volatility.
  • Consensus configuration: The network may require a supermajority (e.g., 2/3 of validators). Check the ConsensusParams in the smart contract to understand the required threshold and quorum.

To debug, first compare your raw input data and model output against a public testnet validator to isolate the issue.

How to Build an AI Oracle for Real-World Asset Tokenization | ChainScore Guides