Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Guides

Setting Up a Multi-Chain User Acquisition Strategy

A technical guide for developers to structure user growth across multiple blockchain ecosystems, from selecting target chains to deploying contracts and implementing unified state.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
GUIDE

Setting Up a Multi-Chain User Acquisition Strategy

A tactical framework for attracting and onboarding users across multiple blockchain ecosystems, moving beyond single-chain limitations.

A multi-chain user acquisition strategy is a systematic approach to attract, onboard, and retain users across different blockchain networks. Unlike single-chain strategies, it accounts for the fragmented liquidity, diverse tooling, and varying user preferences inherent in today's Web3 landscape. The core objective is to build a user base that is not dependent on the success or failure of a single chain, thereby reducing platform risk and tapping into broader market opportunities. This requires understanding chain-specific dynamics, from Ethereum's established developer ecosystem to Solana's high throughput and emerging Layer 2 networks like Arbitrum and Base.

The foundation of any effective strategy is chain selection. This involves analyzing key metrics: Total Value Locked (TVL), daily active addresses, developer activity, and the availability of critical infrastructure like oracles and cross-chain bridges. For example, a DeFi protocol might prioritize Ethereum for its deep liquidity, Polygon for low-cost user onboarding, and Arbitrum for scaling Ethereum-native users. The selection should align with your product's technical requirements and target user demographics. Tools like DeFi Llama for chain analytics and Dune Analytics for user behavior dashboards are essential for this research phase.

Once target chains are identified, the next step is technical implementation for multi-chain presence. This typically involves deploying your application's smart contracts on each selected network. For EVM-compatible chains, this can be as straightforward as re-deploying with a different RPC endpoint using frameworks like Hardhat or Foundry. For non-EVM chains (e.g., Solana, Cosmos), a separate codebase or integration using tools like the Chainlink CCIP may be necessary. A critical technical component is a unified front-end that can detect a user's connected wallet and network, then seamlessly direct them to the correct contract deployment, often using libraries like wagmi or Web3Modal.

User acquisition channels differ per chain. On Ethereum and its L2s, leveraging existing DeFi composability—integrating with major DEXs, lending protocols, and yield aggregators—is highly effective. On chains like Solana or Sui, engaging with native NFT communities and meme coin traders can drive early adoption. Airdrops remain a powerful tool but must be carefully structured; targeting users based on on-chain activity (e.g., transaction volume, specific protocol interactions) rather than simple wallet listings yields higher-quality entrants. Smart contract-based quest platforms like Galxe or Layer3 can automate and verify these multi-chain engagement campaigns.

Finally, analytics and iteration are non-negotiable. You must track user flow from acquisition source to on-chain action across each chain. Key performance indicators (KPIs) include cost-per-acquired user (CPA) per chain, cross-chain user retention rates, and lifetime value (LTV). This data informs where to double down on marketing spend and which chain integrations are underperforming. The multi-chain landscape evolves rapidly; a successful strategy is not a one-time plan but a continuous cycle of deployment, measurement, and optimization based on real-time on-chain data.

prerequisites
PREREQUISITES AND PLANNING

Setting Up a Multi-Chain User Acquisition Strategy

A successful multi-chain strategy requires a clear understanding of your target users, the technical landscape, and the metrics that define success. This guide outlines the foundational planning steps.

Before writing a line of code, define your acquisition goals. Are you targeting existing DeFi power users on Ethereum, onboarding new users from a high-growth L2 like Base, or bridging communities from a specific ecosystem like Solana? Each chain has distinct user demographics, tooling, and behavioral patterns. Your primary goal dictates your technical approach, from which wallet providers (e.g., MetaMask, Phantom) to support first, to which cross-chain messaging protocols (e.g., LayerZero, Axelar, Wormhole) are most suitable for your target chains.

Technical prerequisites are non-negotiable. Your team needs proficiency with EVM-compatible development (Solidity, Hardhat/Foundry) for chains like Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Polygon, and potentially Rust for Solana or Cosmos-based chains. You must also understand the nuances of gas economics and transaction finality times across networks, as these directly impact user experience. Setting up a robust development and testing environment with tools like Tenderly for simulation and Chainlink Functions or Pyth for multi-chain price feeds is a critical first step.

A detailed chain selection framework is essential. Evaluate potential networks based on: - Active Addresses & TVL: Gauges existing liquidity and user activity. - Developer Ecosystem: Availability of SDKs, indexers (The Graph), and oracle support. - Cost Structure: Average transaction fees for user actions. - Security Model: The trade-offs between shared security (Ethereum L2s) and independent validation. For example, launching on Arbitrum Nova might prioritize low-cost social transactions, while a mainnet Ethereum deployment targets high-value, security-conscious users.

Finally, establish your tracking and analytics infrastructure from day one. You cannot optimize what you cannot measure. Integrate analytics platforms like Dune Analytics or Flipside Crypto to create custom dashboards for user flow across chains. Implement precise event tracking for on-chain actions (e.g., contract interactions via Ethers.js Log parsing) and correlate them with off-chain marketing campaigns. Define your core North Star metric—whether it's cost-per-acquired wallet, cross-chain transaction volume, or protocol-specific actions—and ensure your data pipeline can track it per chain and in aggregate.

EVALUATION MATRIX

Chain Selection Criteria for User Acquisition

Key metrics and features to compare when selecting blockchains for user growth campaigns.

Metric / FeatureEthereum MainnetArbitrumBaseSolana

Avg. Transaction Fee

$5-50

$0.10-0.50

$0.01-0.05

< $0.01

Transaction Finality

~5-15 min

~1-3 min

~2 sec

~400 ms

Active Wallet Addresses (Monthly)

~10M

~2.5M

~1.8M

~12M

Developer Tooling Maturity

Native Account Abstraction Support

Avg. Bridge Withdrawal Time

N/A

~8 days

~7 days

N/A

Native Stablecoin Liquidity (USDC)

Gas Sponsorship Feasibility

technical-deployment-workflow
TECHNICAL DEPLOYMENT WORKFLOW

Setting Up a Multi-Chain User Acquisition Strategy

A systematic guide for developers to deploy and measure user acquisition campaigns across multiple blockchain ecosystems.

A multi-chain user acquisition strategy moves beyond deploying a single smart contract. It involves a coordinated technical workflow to launch, track, and optimize campaigns across different Layer 1 and Layer 2 networks. The core components are a deployment manager (like Hardhat or Foundry), a cross-chain messaging layer (such as Axelar or LayerZero), and on-chain analytics tools (like Dune Analytics or Goldsky). Your first step is to define the target chains based on your product's fit—considering factors like transaction costs, user base, and existing DeFi liquidity. For example, you might target Arbitrum for low-cost interactions, Solana for high throughput, and Base for its growing retail user ecosystem.

The deployment process begins with configuring your development environment for multi-chain support. Using Hardhat, you would set up a hardhat.config.js file with network configurations for each chain, including RPC endpoints and private key management for deployer accounts. A critical best practice is to use a deterministic deployment proxy (like the CREATE2 opcode via a factory contract) to ensure your core contract has the same address on every network. This simplifies user experience and security verification. Your deployment scripts should handle contract verification on block explorers like Etherscan or Sourcify programmatically, often using plugins like @nomiclabs/hardhat-etherscan.

To unify the user experience across chains, implement a cross-chain messaging protocol. This allows actions or state changes on one chain to trigger events on another. For instance, using Axelar's General Message Passing (GMP), you can build a function that, when a user completes an on-ramp transaction on Polygon, automatically mints a commemorative NFT for them on Ethereum. The code snippet below shows a simplified Axelar GMP call from a source chain contract:

solidity
// Send a message via Axelar
function sendMessage(string calldata destinationChain, string calldata destinationAddress) external payable {
    string memory payload = abi.encode("UserAcquired", msg.sender);
    axelarGateway.callContract(destinationChain, destinationAddress, payload);
}

Always budget for cross-chain gas fees, which are paid in the source chain's native token.

Tracking acquisition requires embedding on-chain analytics from day one. Deploy unique, chain-specific referral or campaign contracts, or use event signatures that include a campaignId. Tools like Dune Analytics allow you to create dashboards that aggregate this data across chains by querying multiple blockchain datasets. For example, you can write a Dune SQL query that joins data from ethereum.transactions, polygon.transactions, and optimism.transactions where the to address is your deployed contract and the input data decodes to a specific function. Measure key metrics: cost per acquired wallet (total gas spent by users / new unique addresses), user retention across chains, and the primary chain for initial onboarding versus secondary chain activity.

Finally, automate and iterate. Use a CI/CD pipeline (e.g., GitHub Actions) to run tests on forked networks of each chain and execute deployments upon tagging a release. Monitor deployment success and initial user interactions with alerting tools like Tenderly. Based on the on-chain analytics, you can iterate your strategy—adjusting gas subsidies on certain chains, deploying new campaign smart contracts, or even deprioritizing networks with poor engagement. The technical workflow is cyclical: deploy, measure with on-chain data, analyze cross-chain user flow, and optimize the smart contract logic and network focus for the next campaign wave.

IMPLEMENTATION PATTERNS

Deployment Examples by Platform

Deploying on EVM Chains

For Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, and Polygon, use a single contract factory with a chain-aware router. This pattern allows you to deploy a canonical contract on each chain while managing state and logic centrally.

Key Components:

  • Factory Contract: Deploys a minimal proxy (ERC-1167) to each target chain.
  • Cross-Chain Messaging: Uses LayerZero, Axelar, or Wormhole to relay deployment calls and initial configuration.
  • Registry: Maintains a mapping of chainId -> contractAddress on a mainnet hub (e.g., Ethereum).

Example Flow:

  1. User initiates a campaign on the mainnet dashboard.
  2. Factory contract emits an event with the new contract's bytecode and constructor arguments.
  3. An off-chain relayer (or oracle network) picks up the event.
  4. The relayer calls the deployOnChain(uint256 chainId, bytes calldata payload) function on the pre-deployed factory on the target chain (e.g., Arbitrum).
  5. The new contract is deployed, and its address is sent back to the mainnet registry.

Tools: Foundry for scripting deployments, OpenZeppelin's CrossChainEnabled abstractions, and Gelato Network for automating relayed transactions.

cross-chain-state-management
IMPLEMENTING CROSS-CHAIN STATE

Setting Up a Multi-Chain User Acquisition Strategy

A practical guide to acquiring and retaining users across multiple blockchain ecosystems by leveraging cross-chain state and messaging protocols.

A multi-chain user acquisition strategy moves beyond simple token bridging to create a seamless, unified experience across different blockchains. The core challenge is maintaining user state—like profile data, achievements, or loyalty points—as users interact with your application on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, and other networks. Instead of siloed deployments, you can use cross-chain messaging protocols like LayerZero, Axelar, or Wormhole to synchronize this state. This allows a user to start a transaction on one chain and complete it on another without losing progress or context, fundamentally improving onboarding and retention.

The technical implementation involves designing omnichain smart contracts. Your core application logic resides on a primary 'home' chain, while lightweight 'satellite' contracts are deployed on target chains. When a user performs an action on a satellite chain, it sends a cross-chain message via your chosen protocol to update the central state. For example, a user completing a tutorial on Polygon could trigger a message that mints an NFT badge for them on Ethereum. Here's a simplified snippet using a hypothetical cross-chain messenger:

solidity
// Satellite contract on Polygon
function completeTutorial(address user) external {
    // ... local logic
    bytes memory payload = abi.encode(user, "TUTORIAL_COMPLETE");
    crossChainMessenger.sendMessage(homeChainId, payload);
}

To execute this strategy, follow a clear development workflow. First, map user journeys to identify which actions and states need to be chain-agnostic. Second, select a cross-chain protocol based on security, supported chains, and cost—Axelar General Message Passing (GMP) is popular for arbitrary data. Third, architect your contracts with upgradability and security in mind, as cross-chain calls introduce new attack vectors. Finally, implement frontend logic using SDKs like the AxelarJS SDK to track message status and update the UI. Tools like Chainscore can monitor the performance and reliability of these cross-chain message flows in production.

Key metrics for a multi-chain strategy differ from single-chain. Monitor cross-chain user retention (do users return on a different chain?), message success rate (percentage of cross-chain calls that finalize), and cost-per-acquisition per chain. Successful implementations, like Stargate Finance for liquidity or LayerZero's Omnichain Fungible Tokens (OFT), show that abstracting chain complexity for users leads to greater reach. By making your application's state portable, you tap into liquidity and communities across the entire ecosystem, turning fragmentation into a growth advantage.

chain-specific-marketing-tactics
USER ACQUISITION

Chain-Specific Marketing and Community Tactics

Effective growth requires tailored strategies for each blockchain's unique culture, tooling, and user base. This guide covers actionable tactics for Ethereum, Solana, and emerging L2 ecosystems.

05

Analytics: Measuring Chain-Specific Campaign ROI

Track success with chain-native analytics platforms. Vanity metrics like Twitter followers are less important than on-chain engagement.

  • Dune Dashboards: Create public dashboards to track unique active wallets (UAW), retention, and TVL.
  • Flipside Crypto & Goldsky: Use these for deeper SQL-based analysis of user cohorts and lifecycle.
  • Key Metrics:
    • Cost Per Acquired User (CPA): Total spend / new on-chain interacting addresses.
    • User Retention Rate: % of users performing a second transaction after 7 and 30 days.
    • Protocol-Specific Data: Track votes on Snapshot (Ethereum) or cNFT mints (Solana).
06

Avoiding Common Multi-Chain Pitfalls

A fragmented strategy can dilute resources. Maintain consistent branding with chain-adapted execution.

  • Don't copy-paste content: A meme that works on Solana Discord may fail in Ethereum's more formal forums.
  • Budget for chain-specific gas: Airdrop and engagement costs vary wildly (e.g., $0.001 on Solana vs. $5+ on Ethereum Mainnet).
  • Secure chain-specific audits: An audit for Ethereum's EVM does not cover Solana's Rust or zkSync's zkEVM.
  • Avoid "spray and pray": It's better to dominate one relevant community than to be invisible across five chains. Start with your core user's home chain.
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

Multi-Chain Growth Metrics Dashboard

Essential metrics to track user acquisition and engagement across different blockchain ecosystems.

MetricEthereum L1Arbitrum L2Polygon PoSBase L2

Daily Active Addresses (DAA)

400k

250k

350k

150k

New Unique Addresses (7d Avg)

~45k

~65k

~80k

~55k

Average Transaction Cost (USD)

$5-15

$0.10-0.50

$0.01-0.10

$0.01-0.05

TVL (Total Value Locked)

$55B+

$2.5B+

$1B+

$1.5B+

Contract Interaction Success Rate

99.5%

99.8%

99.7%

99.9%

Avg. Time to Finality

~5 min

~1 min

~2 sec

~2 sec

Monthly User Retention Rate

25-30%

35-40%

30-35%

40-45%

Cross-Chain Bridging Volume (30d)

$1.2B

$850M

$700M

$500M

MULTI-CHAIN STRATEGY

Frequently Asked Questions

Common technical questions and solutions for developers implementing a multi-chain user acquisition strategy.

The primary challenge is state fragmentation. User data, assets, and transaction history are siloed on individual chains. A user on Arbitrum is a different address than on Base, even if they control the same private key. This prevents a unified view of user activity and makes cross-chain engagement campaigns difficult. Solutions involve using account abstraction for consistent smart contract wallets, indexing services like The Graph to aggregate on-chain data, and message-passing protocols (e.g., LayerZero, Axelar) to synchronize state or rewards across chains.

conclusion
IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP

Conclusion and Next Steps

A multi-chain strategy is not a one-time setup but an ongoing process of measurement, optimization, and adaptation. This section outlines the critical next steps to operationalize your plan.

Begin by instrumenting your analytics to track the key performance indicators (KPIs) you defined. Use tools like Dune Analytics for on-chain metrics (e.g., unique wallets, transaction volume per chain) and integrate them with your traditional web analytics platform. Establish a single dashboard to view user acquisition cost, retention, and lifetime value segmented by chain. This data-driven foundation is essential for identifying which chains deliver the most valuable users and where your messaging resonates.

Next, implement and iterate on your technical integrations. Start with the core chains identified in your audit—likely Ethereum L2s like Arbitrum or Optimism and a high-throughput chain like Solana or Polygon. Use account abstraction SDKs (e.g., Safe{Core}, Biconomy) and wallet connection libraries (e.g., Wagmi, Ethers.js) to ensure a seamless onboarding flow. Deploy your smart contracts or deployable frontends using infrastructure providers like Alchemy, Infura, or QuickNode for reliable multi-chain RPC access. Test gas sponsorship mechanics and cross-chain messaging with protocols like LayerZero or Axelar.

With your stack live, launch targeted pilot campaigns. Execute the content and community initiatives planned for your primary chain. For example, deploy a liquidity incentive program on Arbitrum, partner with a key Discord community on Solana, and run an educational Twitter thread series about your app's use on Base. Keep initial campaigns scoped to gather qualitative feedback and quantitative data without overextending resources.

Analyze the pilot results to refine your approach. Compare the cost-per-acquired-user (CPA) and retention rates across chains. You may find that users from zkSync Era have higher engagement but those from Avalanche convert at a lower cost. Use these insights to reallocate your budget and developer resources. This cycle of launch-measure-optimize should become a continuous feedback loop, allowing you to adapt to new chains, shifting user behavior, and emerging narratives in the ecosystem.

Finally, plan for scalability and composability. As you grow, consider how your multi-chain presence enables new product features. Can you leverage cross-chain states for novel gameplay or DeFi strategies? Document your integration patterns and stakeholder processes to streamline adding the next chain. The goal is to build a resilient, data-informed acquisition engine that grows with the multi-chain landscape, turning fragmentation from a challenge into your core strategic advantage.

How to Set Up a Multi-Chain User Acquisition Strategy | ChainScore Guides