In blockchain infrastructure, Health Checks are automated, periodic probes sent to a node or service endpoint to assess its liveness, readiness, and correctness. A typical check involves querying a node's RPC endpoint for basic information like the latest block height or network ID. A successful response, often within a defined timeout, confirms the service is operational. These checks are fundamental for maintaining high availability and are a core component of load balancers and service discovery systems, ensuring traffic is only routed to healthy nodes.
LABS
Glossary
Health Checks
Health checks are automated routines that monitor a smart contract's operational state, gas usage, and external dependencies to ensure security and uptime.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
BLOCKCHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE
What is Health Checks?
A systematic monitoring process that verifies the operational status and performance of blockchain nodes, APIs, and network services.
The implementation of health checks involves defining specific probes. Common types include a liveness probe, which determines if a service is running, and a readiness probe, which assesses if a service is ready to accept traffic (e.g., fully synced with the network). For blockchain nodes, advanced checks might verify peer count, sync status, or the validity of the chain ID. Tools like Kubernetes use these probes to manage container lifecycles, automatically restarting failed pods or taking nodes out of rotation.
For developers and node operators, health checks are critical for incident detection and automated recovery. They provide the first line of defense against downtime by triggering alerts when a node falls behind its peers or stops responding. This is essential for applications relying on real-time data, such as DeFi protocols or cross-chain bridges, where a single unhealthy RPC endpoint can cause transaction failures or inaccurate pricing data, directly impacting user experience and protocol security.
Integrating health checks into a devops pipeline allows for proactive maintenance. By monitoring metrics like response latency, error rates, and block propagation time, teams can identify performance degradation before it leads to an outage. This data feeds into dashboards and alerting systems (e.g., Prometheus, Grafana), creating a comprehensive view of network health. For public RPC providers, exposing a dedicated health check endpoint is a standard practice, allowing downstream consumers to verify service status independently.
Ultimately, a robust health check strategy transforms reactive node management into a predictive and resilient operational model. It ensures that the underlying infrastructure supporting wallets, explorers, and dApps remains reliable, forming the invisible yet essential backbone of user-facing blockchain applications. Without systematic health monitoring, maintaining the service-level agreements (SLAs) required for enterprise and institutional adoption would be impractical.
how-it-works
MECHANISM
How Health Checks Work
A technical breakdown of the automated monitoring process that assesses the operational status of a blockchain node or service.
A health check is an automated diagnostic request sent to a node's API endpoint—typically /health or /status—to verify its operational state and readiness to handle requests. The node responds with a structured payload containing key metrics such as its sync status, peer count, and database connectivity. A successful response, often an HTTP 200 OK status with a {"status": "ok"} body, signals the node is healthy. Conversely, failure codes or missing metrics indicate an unhealthy state, triggering alerts or automated remediation in orchestration systems like Kubernetes.
The core metrics evaluated define a node's health. Critical checks include block height synchronization (is the node within an acceptable number of blocks of the network tip?), peer connectivity (does it have sufficient active peers to receive new transactions and blocks?), and internal system health (are the RPC server, database, and memory within operational limits?). Advanced checks may also validate chain ID, validator signing status for consensus nodes, and gas price estimations. These checks collectively determine if a node can reliably participate in network consensus and serve data.
Health checks are executed on a configurable interval, creating a heartbeat for continuous monitoring. Orchestration tools use liveness probes to determine if a container needs restarting and readiness probes to know when it can accept traffic. In blockchain infrastructure, this automation is crucial for maintaining high availability and reliability in staking pools, RPC provider networks, and exchange backends. By automatically cycling out unhealthy nodes, these systems ensure consistent performance and minimize downtime or slashing risks for validators.
Implementing effective health checks requires balancing sensitivity with stability. Overly strict checks can cause unnecessary flapping (rapid cycling between healthy/unhealthy states), while lenient checks might miss gradual degradations. Best practices involve setting appropriate timeouts, defining failure thresholds based on historical data, and implementing grace periods after node restarts. The health endpoint itself must be lightweight to avoid becoming a resource drain, and its responses should be cached briefly to prevent it from being abused as a denial-of-service vector.
key-features
MONITORING
Key Features of Health Checks
Health checks are automated diagnostics that assess the operational status and security of a blockchain application. They provide continuous, programmatic verification of critical system components.
01
Automated Monitoring
Health checks perform continuous, scheduled verification of a system's components without manual intervention. This involves:
- Polling endpoints (e.g., RPC nodes, APIs) at regular intervals.
- Executing test transactions to verify smart contract functionality.
- Checking data availability from oracles and indexers. Automation ensures 24/7 coverage and immediate detection of failures.
02
Multi-Layer Diagnostics
A comprehensive health check evaluates multiple layers of the blockchain stack:
- Infrastructure Layer: RPC node latency, sync status, and peer count.
- Smart Contract Layer: Contract bytecode verification, function call success, and state consistency.
- Financial Layer: Wallet balance sufficiency, gas price economics, and slippage tolerance.
- Data Layer: Oracle price feed freshness and decentralization.
03
Condition-Based Alerts
Health checks trigger real-time alerts when predefined conditions or thresholds are breached. Common alert triggers include:
- High Latency: RPC response time exceeding a set limit (e.g., > 2 seconds).
- State Mismatch: Discrepancy between expected and actual on-chain data.
- Financial Risk: Collateralization ratio falling below a safe minimum. Alerts are routed via Slack, Discord, PagerDuty, or webhooks for immediate incident response.
04
Uptime & Performance Metrics
Beyond binary pass/fail status, health checks generate quantifiable performance metrics for analysis and SLAs. Key metrics include:
- Uptime Percentage: The proportion of successful checks over time.
- Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR): How quickly a service returns to health after a failure.
- P95/P99 Latency: The response time experienced by 95% or 99% of requests. These metrics are crucial for service-level agreements (SLAs) and capacity planning.
05
Security & Integrity Verification
Health checks act as a first line of defense against exploits and integrity failures by verifying:
- Code Immutability: Ensuring smart contract code has not been maliciously upgraded or self-destructed.
- Admin Key Changes: Monitoring for unexpected changes to privileged addresses (e.g., owners, governors).
- Oracle Manipulation: Detecting significant deviations in price feeds from other reliable sources. This proactive verification helps prevent financial loss from hacks or governance attacks.
06
Integration with DevOps Pipelines
Health checks are integrated into CI/CD pipelines and infrastructure-as-code practices. They are used to:
- Pre-deployment Validation: Verify testnet state and dependencies before mainnet deployment.
- Canary Deployments: Monitor new releases in a staged rollout to a subset of users.
- Infrastructure Drift Detection: Ensure provisioned cloud resources (nodes, databases) match their defined configuration. This ensures reliability is baked into the development lifecycle.
common-check-types
MONITORING PRIMITIVES
Common Types of Health Checks
Health checks are automated probes that verify the operational status of a system component. Different types target specific layers of the stack, from network connectivity to application logic.
02
TCP Socket Check
A lower-level check that attempts to establish a TCP connection to a specified host and port. It verifies basic network reachability and port availability without application-layer logic.
Primary Use Cases:
- Database servers (e.g., PostgreSQL on port 5432)
- Message brokers (e.g., Redis on port 6379)
- Custom protocol services
Fails if the connection is refused or times out.
03
ICMP Ping Check
A fundamental network-layer check that sends ICMP Echo Request packets to a host's IP address. It measures basic network connectivity and round-trip latency.
Limitations:
- Often blocked by firewalls or cloud security groups.
- Does not guarantee the application on the host is functional.
Core metric is packet loss percentage and average latency.
05
Script-Based Check
A customizable check that executes a script (e.g., Bash, Python) on the monitoring server or agent. It can perform complex, application-specific logic and return a success/failure status.
Common Script Actions:
- Query a database and validate results.
- Check disk space or memory usage.
- Verify a file exists or contains specific data.
- Integrate with proprietary systems.
Provides maximum flexibility for business logic health.
06
DNS Resolution Check
Verifies that a domain name resolves to one or more expected IP addresses via DNS lookup. It ensures DNS configuration is correct and can detect propagation issues or misconfigurations.
Checks Performed:
- Record Type (A, AAAA, CNAME, MX)
- Response Time of the DNS query
- Answer Accuracy (IP addresses match expected values)
A critical check for services reliant on dynamic DNS or failover configurations.
ecosystem-usage
HEALTH CHECKS
Ecosystem Usage & Protocols
Health checks are automated diagnostics that assess the operational status and financial soundness of blockchain protocols and user positions, ensuring system stability and user safety.
01
Protocol Health Metrics
Protocol-level health checks monitor the overall state of a DeFi application, evaluating key metrics such as Total Value Locked (TVL), collateralization ratios, and liquidity depth. These automated diagnostics trigger alerts or circuit breakers if critical thresholds are breached, protecting the system from insolvency or manipulation. For example, a lending protocol continuously checks that its overall loan-to-value ratio remains sustainable.
02
Position Health & Liquidation
This is the most common user-facing health check, calculating the risk level of a collateralized debt position (e.g., in lending or perpetual futures). It uses a health factor or margin ratio formula:
- Health Factor = (Collateral Value * Liquidation Threshold) / Borrowed Value If this factor falls below 1.0, the position becomes undercollateralized and is subject to liquidation to repay the debt, protecting the protocol from bad debt.
03
Node & Network Monitoring
Health checks for blockchain infrastructure ensure network reliability. Validators and RPC node operators run continuous checks on peer connections, block production/synchronization status, and hardware resource usage (CPU, memory, disk). Services like Grafana dashboards and Prometheus alerts are used to monitor these metrics, preventing downtime and ensuring the node remains in good standing within the network consensus.
04
Smart Contract State Verification
These checks audit the runtime state and configuration of deployed smart contracts. They verify that contract admins are not maliciously set, protocol parameters (like fees or rewards) are within expected bounds, and that no pause functions have been incorrectly activated. Tools and bots perform these checks by reading on-chain data and comparing it against known-safe baselines or community governance decisions.
05
Cross-Chain Bridge Security
For bridges and cross-chain messaging protocols, health checks are critical for security. They monitor the balance of custodial wallets or validator set signatures, verify the finality of transactions on connected chains, and watch for anomalies in message volume or value. A drop in validator participation or a sudden large withdrawal request can trigger a security alert or pause the bridge to prevent fund loss.
06
Oracle Price Feed Integrity
Decentralized applications rely on oracles for external data. Health checks here validate the freshness (how recent the data is), deviation (if a price differs significantly from other sources), and availability of price feeds. A heartbeat function often confirms the feed is alive. If a feed is stale or shows extreme volatility, protocols may halt certain functions (like new loans) to prevent exploits based on inaccurate data.
security-considerations
BLOCKCHAIN HEALTH CHECKS
Security Considerations & Risks
A blockchain health check is a systematic evaluation of a network's operational integrity, security posture, and economic stability, designed to identify vulnerabilities and ensure long-term viability.
01
Consensus Security & Finality
Health checks assess the robustness of the consensus mechanism (e.g., Proof-of-Work, Proof-of-Stake) against attacks like 51% attacks, long-range attacks, or nothing-at-stake problems. Key metrics include:
- Finality time: How long until a transaction is irreversible.
- Validator decentralization: Distribution of voting power among nodes.
- Slashing conditions: Penalties for malicious validator behavior that secure the network.
02
Network & Node Health
This involves monitoring the peer-to-peer network and individual node performance. Critical risks include:
- Network partitions: Splits that can cause chain reorganizations or double-spends.
- Node synchronization failures: Out-of-sync nodes serving incorrect chain data.
- Resource exhaustion: High memory/CPU usage leading to node crashes. Health checks validate block propagation times, peer count, and API endpoint availability.
03
Economic & Incentive Analysis
Evaluates the cryptoeconomic model to ensure long-term security. Key risks are validator/miner profitability collapse or tokenomics failure. Checks analyze:
- Staking yields vs. inflation: Ensuring rewards adequately compensate for risk.
- Transaction fee market: Sustainability during low block space demand.
- Total Value Locked (TVL) security ratios: The cost to attack the network relative to its secured value.
04
Smart Contract & State Risks
For smart contract platforms, health checks extend to the execution layer. This includes:
- State bloat: Unbounded growth of the blockchain database impacting node performance.
- Gas economics: Ensuring fee mechanisms prevent denial-of-service attacks.
- Upgrade risks: Centralization and failure risks associated with governance proposals and hard forks. Regular audits of core protocol contracts are essential.
05
Client & Implementation Diversity
A critical but often overlooked risk is client monoculture, where most network nodes run the same software client. A bug in that client could crash the entire network. Health checks measure:
- Client distribution: Percentage of nodes using each major implementation (e.g., Geth, Erigon, Nethermind for Ethereum).
- Synchronization compatibility: Ensuring different clients interpret consensus rules identically to avoid forks.
06
External Dependencies & Oracles
Blockchains often rely on external data feeds (oracles) and cross-chain bridges. These are major attack vectors. Health checks evaluate:
- Oracle decentralization and security: The risk of manipulated price feeds.
- Bridge security models: Assessing the trust assumptions of lock-and-mint vs. liquidity network bridges.
- Relayer health: For networks using external parties to submit transactions or data.
MONITORING METHODOLOGIES
Health Checks vs. Other Monitoring
A comparison of health checks with other common blockchain monitoring approaches, highlighting their primary focus and operational characteristics.
| Feature / Metric | Health Checks | Comprehensive Monitoring | Alerting & Incident Response |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Objective | Validate liveness & basic functionality | Collect & analyze all operational data | Detect & notify on specific failures |
Data Scope | Synthetic transactions & endpoint status | Logs, metrics, traces (full telemetry) | Anomalies & threshold breaches |
Execution Cadence | Scheduled (e.g., every 30 sec) | Continuous, real-time stream | Event-driven, on-criteria breach |
Result Granularity | Binary (Pass/Fail, Degraded) | Multi-dimensional metrics & trends | Alert severity (Critical, Warning) |
Typical Use Case | Load balancer routing, uptime dashboards | Performance debugging, capacity planning | PagerDuty/Slack notifications for SREs |
Proactive vs. Reactive | Proactive (tests before user impact) | Both (proactive analysis, reactive forensics) | Reactive (triggered by an issue) |
Implementation Complexity | Low (define endpoints & thresholds) | High (data pipelines, storage, visualization) | Medium (define alert rules & routing) |
Example Tools | Chainscore Health Endpoints, Pingdom | Prometheus, Grafana, DataDog | PagerDuty, Opsgenie, CloudWatch Alarms |
implementation-patterns
IMPLEMENTATION PATTERNS
Health Checks
A systematic approach to monitoring the operational status and performance of a distributed system or service.
A health check is a lightweight, automated probe—typically an HTTP endpoint or a simple function call—that a system exposes to report its operational status, signaling whether it is ready to accept traffic and perform its intended functions. This pattern is fundamental for service discovery, load balancing, and orchestration platforms like Kubernetes, which rely on these signals to route requests only to healthy instances. The response is often a simple HTTP status code (e.g., 200 OK for healthy, 503 for unhealthy) or a structured JSON payload containing detailed metrics about the service's dependencies, such as database connectivity or cache status.
Implementing effective health checks involves defining clear liveness and readiness probes. A liveness probe determines if the service process is running and not in a deadlocked state; a failure typically triggers a container restart. A readiness probe assesses whether the service is fully initialized and can handle requests, such as having completed database migrations or loaded critical configuration; a failure tells the load balancer to stop sending traffic. For blockchain nodes, these checks are critical and may verify peer connectivity, sync status, and the responsiveness of the JSON-RPC API.
Beyond basic uptime, advanced health checks form the backbone of observability and incident response. They can be layered to create a dependency health graph, where a service's status is contingent on its critical downstream services (e.g., a smart contract listener's health depends on an Ethereum node and a database). Implementing degraded mode signaling—where a service returns a "degraded" status instead of "unhealthy" when non-critical dependencies fail—allows for more graceful failure handling. Tools like Prometheus for metrics collection and Grafana for visualization are commonly used to aggregate and alert on health check data across microservices architectures.
HEALTH CHECKS
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Common questions about blockchain health checks, a critical process for monitoring the performance, security, and reliability of nodes and networks.
A blockchain health check is a systematic diagnostic process that evaluates the operational status, performance, and security of a node or network by querying key metrics and APIs. It works by programmatically connecting to a node's RPC (Remote Procedure Call) endpoint and checking a series of vital signs, such as block height synchronization, peer connectivity, gas price accuracy, and memory usage. The process typically involves sending specific queries (e.g., eth_blockNumber, net_peerCount) and validating the responses against expected benchmarks or network-wide data. Results are compiled into a report, often with a simple pass/fail or degraded status, allowing node operators and developers to identify issues like stalled synchronization, low peer count, or incorrect chain ID before they impact applications.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall