An audit report is the primary deliverable of a smart contract audit, a systematic review conducted by specialized cybersecurity firms like ChainSecurity, OpenZeppelin, or Trail of Bits. It details the methodology used—typically a combination of manual code review, static analysis, and dynamic testing—and presents a categorized list of findings. These findings are usually ranked by severity, such as Critical, High, Medium, and Low, or Informational, providing developers with a clear, actionable roadmap for remediation before a protocol's mainnet deployment.
LABS
Glossary
Audit Report
An audit report is a formal document detailing the findings, vulnerabilities, and recommendations from a professional security review of a smart contract or blockchain protocol.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
BLOCKCHAIN SECURITY
What is an Audit Report?
A formal document produced by a third-party security firm that assesses the code, architecture, and logic of a smart contract or blockchain protocol for vulnerabilities and design flaws.
The report's core components include an executive summary for high-level stakeholders, a detailed technical analysis of each vulnerability, and specific recommendations for fixes. Common issues identified range from critical reentrancy attacks and logic errors to medium-severity gas inefficiencies and centralization risks. A quality audit report does not guarantee absolute security but significantly reduces risk by providing an independent, expert assessment, which is often a prerequisite for institutional investment, exchange listings, and user trust in the DeFi and NFT ecosystems.
Following the audit, projects typically undergo a remediation phase where they address the flagged issues. Auditors then perform a verification review to ensure the fixes are correctly implemented, often resulting in a final report or seal of approval. It is crucial to distinguish between a one-time audit and continuous auditing or bug bounty programs, which provide ongoing security monitoring. While an audit report is a vital snapshot of code quality at a point in time, it is not a substitute for robust internal development practices, comprehensive testing, and layered security measures throughout a project's lifecycle.
how-it-works
PROCESS
How an Audit Report is Created
A smart contract audit is a systematic, multi-stage process where security experts analyze code to identify vulnerabilities before deployment. This structured workflow transforms raw source code into a formal, actionable security document.
The audit process begins with scoping and preparation, where the auditing firm and client define the objectives, deliverables, and timeline. The client provides the complete codebase, technical documentation, and any specific areas of concern. Auditors then set up a local testing environment, often using tools like Hardhat or Foundry, to compile and run the contracts. This initial phase ensures both parties are aligned and the auditors have all necessary artifacts to begin a thorough examination.
The core of the audit is the manual and automated review. Auditors employ a combination of static analysis tools (like Slither or MythX) to scan for common vulnerability patterns and in-depth manual code review. The manual review is critical for uncovering complex logical flaws, business logic errors, and subtle integration issues that automated tools miss. During this phase, findings are logged in a preliminary report, typically categorized by severity (e.g., Critical, High, Medium, Low, Informational) and accompanied by code snippets and proof-of-concept exploit scenarios.
Following the initial review, a remediation and verification phase occurs. The development team addresses the identified issues, and auditors re-examine the fixed code to ensure vulnerabilities are properly resolved without introducing new ones. This iterative process may involve several rounds of review until all critical and high-severity issues are closed. The final step is the compilation of the formal audit report, which details the scope, methodology, findings with severity ratings, and the final code commit hash that was verified, providing a snapshot of the project's security posture at the time of delivery.
key-components
STRUCTURE
Key Components of an Audit Report
A professional audit report is a structured document that systematically details the findings, methodology, and conclusions of a security assessment. These core components provide transparency and actionable insights for developers and stakeholders.
01
Executive Summary
A high-level overview that provides the critical findings and overall risk assessment for non-technical stakeholders. It includes the audit scope, key dates, a summary of severity levels (Critical, High, Medium, Low), and the auditor's final conclusion on the security posture of the codebase.
02
Scope & Methodology
Defines the exact boundaries of the audit, specifying the commit hashes, contract addresses, and file directories reviewed. It details the methodology used, such as manual code review, static analysis with tools like Slither or Mythril, dynamic analysis, and any specific test scenarios or assumptions made during the assessment.
03
Findings & Vulnerabilities
The core technical section listing all discovered issues. Each finding is categorized by:
- Severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low, Informational)
- Title and concise description
- Code location (file and line numbers)
- Impact of the vulnerability
- Proof of Concept or exploit scenario
- Recommendation for a fix
04
Test Coverage Analysis
An assessment of the project's existing test suite, evaluating its completeness and effectiveness. This section often reports on code coverage metrics (line, branch, function) and identifies critical logic paths or edge cases that lack adequate testing, which is a key indicator of potential undiscovered bugs.
05
Gas Optimization Findings
A dedicated section for recommendations to reduce gas consumption and improve contract efficiency. These are typically informational findings that suggest optimizations for storage operations, loop structures, data types, and external calls, which can lead to significant cost savings for users.
06
Conclusion & Appendix
The Conclusion restates the overall security assessment and may include a disclaimer about the audit's limitations (e.g., it is not a guarantee). The Appendix contains supplementary material like the auditor's toolchain, classification system for severities, and a summary table of all findings for quick reference.
SEVERITY CLASSIFICATION
Common Vulnerability Severity Levels
A standardized framework for categorizing the criticality and impact of security vulnerabilities identified during a smart contract audit.
| Severity Level | Impact | Likelihood | Typical CVSS Score | Remediation Urgency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Critical | Direct loss of funds, total protocol shutdown, or irreversible state corruption. | High | 9.0 - 10.0 | Immediate, before deployment or mainnet upgrade. |
High | Significant fund leakage, privilege escalation, or permanent denial of service. | Medium-High | 7.0 - 8.9 | High priority, must be fixed before mainnet release. |
Medium | Theft of yield, temporary disruption, or violation of core business logic. | Medium | 4.0 - 6.9 | Should be addressed in a timely manner, may block release. |
Low | Minor inefficiencies, gas optimizations, or edge-case state inconsistencies with minimal impact. | Low | 0.1 - 3.9 | Recommended fix, often addressed post-launch. |
Informational | Code style deviations, lack of inline comments, or general best practice suggestions with no direct security impact. | N/A | 0.0 | Optional, for code quality improvement. |
audit-types
CLASSIFICATION
Types of Audit Reports
Smart contract audit reports are categorized by their scope, methodology, and purpose. Understanding these types helps stakeholders select the appropriate level of security assurance.
01
Comprehensive Audit Report
A full-scope security assessment that examines a smart contract's entire codebase, architecture, and logic. This is the most rigorous type, involving:
- Manual code review by senior security engineers.
- Automated analysis using static and dynamic testing tools.
- Formal verification for critical components (where applicable).
- Detailed analysis of access controls, economic incentives, and centralization risks.
It results in a final report with a severity-graded list of findings, recommendations, and often a formal attestation.
02
Incremental Audit Report
A targeted review focusing on new code changes or specific modules since a previous comprehensive audit. This is common for protocol upgrades or bug fixes.
Key characteristics include:
- Delta analysis comparing the new code against the previously audited baseline.
- Verification that fixes for prior vulnerabilities were implemented correctly.
- Assessment of how new code interacts with the existing, audited system.
This approach is cost-effective for maintaining security during continuous development.
03
Gas Optimization Report
A specialized analysis focused exclusively on transaction cost efficiency. While not a security audit, it is a critical report for dApp performance and user experience.
It typically includes:
- Identification of gas-intensive operations and storage patterns.
- Recommendations for opcode-level optimizations and efficient data structures.
- Benchmarking gas costs for core functions.
These reports help reduce operational costs, especially for functions expected to be called frequently.
04
Architecture Review Report
A high-level assessment conducted before significant code is written. It evaluates the proposed system design, tokenomics, and threat model.
This report focuses on:
- Conceptual flaws in the protocol's mechanics and incentives.
- Systemic risks like oracle dependencies, upgrade mechanisms, and governance models.
- Attack vector identification at the design stage.
The goal is to prevent fundamental security issues before development resources are committed.
05
Automated Scan Report
A preliminary report generated by automated analysis tools like Slither, MythX, or Securify. It provides a fast, broad sweep for common vulnerabilities.
These reports are characterized by:
- High recall but lower precision—they catch many issues but include false positives.
- Detection of well-known vulnerability patterns (e.g., reentrancy, integer overflows).
- Lack of contextual understanding of business logic.
Used as a first pass in a security workflow, not a substitute for manual review.
06
Remediation Verification Report
A follow-up report issued after a client has addressed findings from a prior audit. Its sole purpose is to verify the correctness and completeness of the fixes.
The process involves:
- Re-auditing only the specific code changes made to remediate each finding.
- Confirming that vulnerabilities are fully resolved and no new issues were introduced.
- Often results in an updated audit status or a clean final attestation.
This closes the audit loop and provides assurance that the system is now secure.
ecosystem-usage
KEY STAKEHOLDERS
Who Uses Audit Reports?
Smart contract audit reports are critical documents used by a diverse range of stakeholders to assess risk, ensure compliance, and make informed decisions in the blockchain ecosystem.
01
Protocol & DApp Developers
Development teams use audit reports to validate their code's security posture before mainnet deployment. The report provides an external, expert review to identify critical vulnerabilities, logical errors, and gas inefficiencies. It serves as a roadmap for fixing issues and a benchmark for internal security practices. Post-audit, developers often publish the report to build user trust.
02
Security Researchers & Whitehats
Researchers analyze public audit reports to understand a protocol's attack surface and security maturity. They use them to:
- Track common vulnerability patterns across the ecosystem.
- Perform secondary reviews to find issues the primary audit may have missed.
- Inform bug bounty programs by focusing on complex, unaudited code paths.
03
Institutional Investors & VCs
Investment firms treat audit reports as a mandatory due diligence artifact. They assess the auditor's reputation, the severity of findings, and the team's responsiveness to fixes. A clean report from a top firm (e.g., Trail of Bits, OpenZeppelin) is often a prerequisite for funding, as it mitigates technical risk in their portfolio.
04
DeFi Users & Liquidity Providers
Sophisticated users review audit reports to evaluate the risk of depositing funds into a protocol. They look for:
- Audit scope: Was the full codebase reviewed?
- Issue resolution: Are all critical/high findings marked as fixed?
- Auditor pedigree: Is the firm known for rigorous work? This analysis is part of their risk management strategy before interacting with smart contracts.
05
Insurance & Risk Protocols
Protocols like Nexus Mutual or Sherlock use audit reports as a core input for underwriting smart contract coverage. The findings and the auditor's score influence premium pricing and coverage limits. A protocol with no audit or a poor audit report may be uninsurable or face prohibitively high premiums.
06
Regulators & Compliance Officers
In evolving regulatory environments, audit reports demonstrate a project's commitment to security best practices and operational diligence. They can be part of evidence for regulatory compliance, showing proactive steps to protect users and secure assets, which is increasingly relevant with frameworks like MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets).
DEBUNKED
Common Misconceptions About Audit Reports
Audit reports are critical for blockchain security, but their purpose and limitations are often misunderstood. This section clarifies what audits can and cannot guarantee.
No, a clean audit report does not guarantee a project is 100% safe or free from vulnerabilities. An audit is a professional review, not an exhaustive mathematical proof. It provides a snapshot of the code's security at a specific point in time, based on the scope, methodology, and time allocated. Auditors can miss issues, especially novel attack vectors or logic errors in complex business rules. A clean report indicates that no critical vulnerabilities were found within the defined scope, but it cannot account for future code changes, integration risks, or economic model flaws. Security is an ongoing process, not a one-time event certified by an audit.
AUDIT REPORTS
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Essential questions and answers about blockchain smart contract security audits, their process, and their value for developers and projects.
A smart contract audit is a comprehensive, manual and automated security review of a blockchain application's source code to identify vulnerabilities, logic errors, and inefficiencies before deployment. It is critically important because smart contracts often manage significant value and, once deployed, are typically immutable; a single bug can lead to irreversible loss of funds. Audits provide an independent assessment of code quality, help prevent exploits like reentrancy or integer overflows, and build trust with users and investors by demonstrating a commitment to security. While not a guarantee of perfect security, a professional audit is a fundamental due diligence step for any serious DeFi, NFT, or blockchain project.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall