Builder reputation is a trust score assigned to a block builder based on its past behavior in a network employing Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS). This reputation is built on objective, on-chain data such as the frequency of delivering promised blocks, the timeliness of submissions, the inclusion of high-value transactions, and adherence to censorship-resistance norms. A high reputation signals to block proposers (validators) that a builder is reliable and likely to produce a profitable, valid block, making its bids more attractive.
LABS
Glossary
Builder Reputation
Builder Reputation is a track record associated with a block builder, based on historical performance, reliability, and block profitability, which influences its success in future validator auctions.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
MEV & PROPOSER-BUILDER SEPARATION
What is Builder Reputation?
A quantifiable metric within blockchain networks that measures the historical performance and reliability of a block builder, primarily within the context of Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS).
The primary mechanism for establishing reputation is through consistent participation in the block auction process. Builders compete by submitting sealed bids containing a block and a fee to the proposer. A builder's reputation is enhanced by repeatedly winning auctions and having its blocks accepted into the chain without issues like reorgs or invalid transactions. Conversely, failing to deliver a promised block (builder default) or submitting invalid blocks severely damages reputation, as proposers will avoid unreliable builders to maximize their rewards and maintain network stability.
Reputation systems are crucial for mitigating risks in PBS ecosystems like Ethereum. They protect proposers from malicious or incompetent builders who might waste a slot by submitting an invalid block, causing the proposer to miss their attestation and forfeit rewards. Reputation acts as a decentralized, economic incentive for good behavior, reducing the need for centralized block builder lists or strict whitelists. Projects like mev-boost and mev-relay often incorporate reputation scoring to help proposers filter and select from available builders.
The concept extends beyond simple reliability to include MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) extraction efficiency and ethical considerations. A builder with a reputation for sophisticated arbitrage and liquidations may command higher fees, but builders can also build reputation for credible neutrality by avoiding transaction censorship. Emerging systems may formalize reputation through soulbound tokens or verifiable credentials, creating a portable, on-chain record of a builder's performance that is transparent and resistant to sybil attacks.
how-it-works
MECHANICS
How Builder Reputation Works
Builder reputation is a quantifiable metric that assesses the historical performance and reliability of a block builder within a proposer-builder separation (PBS) architecture, directly influencing its ability to win block auctions.
In a proposer-builder separation (PBS) model, builders compete in an auction to have their block accepted by a validator (the proposer). A builder's reputation is a critical, non-financial signal derived from its past behavior. This score is typically calculated by the relay or the proposer's software and evaluates factors like the builder's historical inclusion rate (how often its blocks are accepted), timeliness in delivering blocks, and the economic value of its past submissions. A high reputation signals reliability and increases the builder's chances of winning future auctions, even if its bid is not the absolute highest.
The reputation system is designed to mitigate risks for validators. A builder with a poor reputation—perhaps due to frequently submitting invalid blocks, censoring transactions, or failing to deliver blocks on time—poses a slashing risk and represents lost revenue for the proposer. Therefore, proposers often use reputation as a filter or weighting mechanism. For instance, a relay might only forward blocks from builders above a certain reputation threshold, or a proposer might probabilistically favor a reputable builder's slightly lower bid over a higher bid from an unknown entity. This creates a trust economy that rewards long-term, honest participation.
Reputation is inherently local and subjective; there is no single, global builder reputation score. Each relay (like the Flashbots Relay) or validator client may implement its own scoring algorithm based on private or shared data. Common metrics include: blocks_proposed, blocks_missed, average_bid_value, and latency_percentiles. This decentralized scoring prevents reputation from becoming a centralized point of failure or manipulation. Builders must therefore maintain consistent performance across the network to sustain their standing.
For the ecosystem, builder reputation enhances network stability and censorship resistance. It disincentivizes malicious behavior by making it costly—a builder that acts against the network's interests will see its reputation degrade, locking it out of future revenue. Furthermore, by allowing proposers to select builders based on more than just bid price, the system can subtly favor builders with pro-social behavior, such as including OFAC-compliant but non-censoring transaction bundles, thereby preserving credible neutrality.
key-features
MECHANICAL COMPONENTS
Key Features of Builder Reputation
Builder Reputation is a quantifiable metric derived from a validator's historical on-chain performance, measuring reliability and trustworthiness in the block production process.
01
Performance Metrics
Reputation is calculated from objective, on-chain data points. Key metrics include:
- Proposal Success Rate: Percentage of successfully proposed blocks.
- Attestation Efficiency: Speed and accuracy of attesting to the canonical chain.
- Slashing History: Record of penalties for protocol violations.
- Uptime: Consistency in being active and responsive.
02
Sybil Resistance
The system is designed to be Sybil-resistant, meaning a single entity cannot artificially inflate its reputation by creating multiple identities (Sybils). Reputation is intrinsically tied to a validator's unique cryptographic identity and the capital (stake) at risk, making fake reputations economically impractical.
03
Dynamic & Contextual Scoring
Reputation is not static; it updates continuously based on new blocks and attestations. It can also be contextual, weighted differently for specific use cases. For example, a relay might prioritize builders with high success rates in high-value blocks, while a staking pool may value consistent long-term uptime.
04
Use in MEV Supply Chain
Builder reputation is a critical trust signal in the Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) supply chain. Searchers and Relays use it to select which builders receive transaction bundles, preferring those with a proven history of including bundles and proposing blocks reliably, which maximizes profit and network stability.
05
Stake-Weighted Influence
While related, reputation is distinct from a validator's stake. However, the two are often correlated. A highly reputable builder with significant stake has greater influence, as their proposals carry more weight in consensus. Reputation provides a quality signal beyond raw capital.
06
Transparency & Verifiability
All inputs for reputation scores are derived from public blockchain data, making the scoring process transparent and independently verifiable. Anyone can audit a builder's historical performance, ensuring the system is credibly neutral and not based on opaque, off-chain criteria.
reputation-metrics
BUILDER REPUTATION
Core Reputation Metrics
Builder Reputation quantifies the historical performance and reliability of a protocol's development team, providing a data-driven assessment of their ability to deliver secure, functional, and sustainable code.
01
Code Quality & Security Score
This metric aggregates signals from static analysis tools (like Slither), audit history, and vulnerability disclosures to assess the robustness of a protocol's codebase. Key indicators include:
- Audit coverage and the reputation of auditing firms.
- Time to fix critical vulnerabilities.
- Frequency and severity of post-deployment bugs.
02
Delivery & Update Cadence
Measures the development team's consistency and productivity through on-chain activity. It tracks:
- Frequency of protocol upgrades and mainnet deployments.
- Responsiveness to forks and security patches.
- The volume and substance of commits to the project's public repositories (e.g., GitHub).
03
Governance Participation
Evaluates the team's engagement with the protocol's decentralized governance system. A high score indicates:
- Active proposal creation and detailed technical rationale.
- Transparent communication of development roadmaps.
- Successful execution of passed governance proposals.
04
Incident Response History
Analyzes the team's performance during crises, such as exploits, oracle failures, or economic attacks. This is a critical trust signal based on:
- Speed and transparency of incident reports.
- Effectiveness of mitigation and remediation steps.
- Historical record of protecting user funds.
05
Economic Design Contribution
Assesses the team's role in designing and maintaining the protocol's tokenomics and incentive structures. This includes:
- Analysis of emission schedules and vesting.
- Design of staking, fee distribution, and reward mechanisms.
- Adjustments made in response to economic stress tests.
06
Related Concepts
Builder Reputation is a component of a broader trust framework. Key related terms include:
- Protocol Reputation: The overall score of the protocol itself.
- Time-Weighted Activity: Prioritizing recent, sustained contributions.
- On-Chain Identity: Linking developer wallets to real-world entities via services like Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS).
ecosystem-usage
STAKEHOLDERS
Who Uses Builder Reputation?
Builder reputation is a critical data layer consumed by different participants in the blockchain ecosystem to manage risk, optimize performance, and ensure network security.
01
Relay Operators & PBS Infrastructure
Relays use builder reputation to filter and rank incoming blocks from builders before proposing them to validators. This is essential for censorship resistance and MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) mitigation. High-reputation builders are prioritized, while those with a history of missed slots or malicious behavior are penalized or excluded.
- Key Use: Filtering block proposals to validators.
- Example: A relay might reject blocks from a builder with a high rate of uncle rates or withheld blocks.
02
Validators & Staking Pools
Validators rely on reputation scores when selecting which relay to connect to for block proposals. Choosing a relay that uses robust builder reputation protects validator rewards and upholds chain health. It helps avoid:
- Missed slot penalties from unreliable builders.
- Censored transactions that could lead to regulatory or social risk.
- Malicious MEV extraction that harms end-users.
03
Block Builders & MEV Searchers
Builders and searchers monitor their own reputation as a key performance indicator (KPI). A high score grants preferential access to relays and validators, directly impacting profitability. They analyze metrics like:
- Inclusion rate: Percentage of bids that win the auction.
- Payment to proposer: Consistency and competitiveness of payments.
- Execution correctness: Ensuring proposed blocks are valid.
04
Protocol Developers & Researchers
Core protocol teams and researchers analyze aggregate builder reputation data to understand network-level trends and propose protocol improvements. This data informs decisions on PBS (Proposer-Builder Separation) design, cr lists (censorship resistance lists), and anti-collusion mechanisms.
- Use Case: Identifying systemic risks like builder centralization or new MEV attack vectors.
05
Application & dApp Developers
Developers building DeFi protocols, wallets, and user-facing applications use reputation data to provide better user experiences and manage risk. For example:
- A lending protocol might adjust liquidation parameters based on the reputation of the dominant block builder.
- A wallet could show users the reputation score of the builder that included their transaction for transparency.
06
Analysts & Data Platforms
Data platforms and on-chain analysts consume builder reputation feeds to create dashboards, reports, and real-time alerts. This serves institutional clients, researchers, and the public who need to track:
- Builder market share and concentration.
- Relay performance and filtering effectiveness.
- Historical trends in network health and censorship.
BUILDER SELECTION CRITERIA
Reputation vs. Other Auction Factors
A comparison of how builder reputation interacts with other key factors in block production auctions.
| Auction Factor | Reputation-Based Selection | Payment (MEV) Based Selection | Neutral / Random Selection |
|---|---|---|---|
Primary Selection Driver | Historical performance & reliability | Maximal extractable value (MEV) bid | Randomized or round-robin |
Proposer Benefit | Predictable, high-quality blocks | Maximum immediate revenue | Censorship resistance |
Network Security Impact | Incentivizes stable, honest builders | May incentivize time-bandit attacks | Reduces centralization risk |
Builder Entry Barrier | High (requires track record) | Low (anyone can bid) | None |
Block Quality Consistency | High | Variable | Low |
Resistance to Censorship | Medium (if reputational cost is high) | Low (driven by profit) | High |
Typical Use Case | Mainnet, high-value chains | MEV-rich environments | Testnets, permissioned chains |
security-considerations
BUILDER REPUTATION
Security & Trust Considerations
Builder Reputation is a decentralized trust system that scores and ranks block builders based on their historical performance and reliability, crucial for mitigating MEV-related risks and ensuring network security.
01
Core Mechanism: The Reputation Score
A builder's reputation is a quantifiable score derived from its on-chain history. Key metrics include:
- Proposal Success Rate: Percentage of valid blocks delivered on time.
- MEV Extraction Patterns: Analysis of whether extracted value is returned to users via MEV-Boost relays.
- Censorship Resistance: Track record of including all valid transactions, not filtering based on origin.
- Slashing History: Any penalties incurred for malicious or faulty behavior. This score is calculated by reputation oracles and is often public, allowing proposers (validators) to make informed selections.
02
Primary Security Benefit: Mitigating Trusted Relayer Risk
In a permissionless builder market, reputation reduces reliance on trusting a single relay or builder. It enables proposer-builder separation (PBS) by allowing validators to:
- Select builders based on objective performance data, not just promises.
- Avoid builders with a history of block withholding, time-bandit attacks, or sandwich attacks that harm users.
- Diversify across multiple high-reputation builders, decentralizing block production power and increasing network resilience.
03
Economic & Game-Theoretic Incentives
Reputation creates powerful economic incentives for honest behavior:
- Skin in the Game: Builders invest in infrastructure; a high reputation is a valuable asset they are incentivized to protect.
- Long-Term Value vs. Short-Term Gain: A builder engaging in a profitable but detectable attack (e.g., transaction reordering for maximal extractable value) risks reputation loss and future revenue.
- Market Competition: Reputation fosters a competitive market where builders are rewarded for reliability and fair value distribution, not just raw profit maximization.
04
Implementation & Data Sources
Reputation systems are not natively enforced by the protocol but built by external entities. Key data sources include:
- MEV-Boost Relay APIs: Data on blocks received, delivered, and withheld.
- On-Chain Analysis: Auditing the contents of built blocks for censorship or harmful MEV.
- Bundles & Private Order Flow: While private, a builder's public output reveals patterns. Projects like EigenLayer's EigenDA or specialized oracles (e.g., EigenRep) aim to provide decentralized attestations of builder behavior.
05
Limitations & Attack Vectors
Builder reputation is not a perfect security solution. Key limitations include:
- Sybil Attacks: A malicious actor can create many low-reputation builders, sacrificing them for attacks.
- Data Availability & Manipulation: Reliance on relay data creates a trusted data source problem.
- Collusion: Cartels of builders could manipulate scores or engage in MEV cartelization.
- New Entrant Barrier: It can be difficult for new, honest builders to establish reputation, potentially centralizing power among incumbents.
- Off-Chain Agreements: Reputation systems cannot see private, off-chain deals between builders and searchers.
06
Related Concepts & The Future
Builder reputation interacts with several key trust mechanisms in the modular stack:
- Enshrined PBS: A future protocol-level implementation could include a native reputation system.
- EigenLayer & Restaking: Actively Validated Services (AVS) could operate reputation oracles, with restakers slashed for providing false data.
- SUAVE: A shared sequencer/block builder aims to decentralize and standardize block building, altering the reputation landscape.
- Reputation Tokens: Experimental systems where reputation is tokenized and tradable, aligning economic and operational incentives.
FAQ
Common Misconceptions About Builder Reputation
Builder reputation is a critical but often misunderstood component of Ethereum's PBS ecosystem. This section clarifies prevalent myths and provides precise definitions for developers and researchers.
Builder reputation is a quantitative score that assesses a block builder's historical performance and reliability within a proposer-builder separation (PBS) framework. It is not a single, universal metric but is calculated by different entities—like relays, searchers, or data platforms—using proprietary algorithms. These algorithms typically analyze on-chain data such as bid submission consistency, block inclusion rate, MEV capture efficiency, and censorship resistance. For example, a high reputation often correlates with a builder consistently submitting profitable, valid blocks that win auctions. The calculation is a continuous process, with scores dynamically updated based on the builder's most recent performance in the block building market.
BUILDER REPUTATION
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Builder Reputation is a critical concept in Ethereum's post-Merge landscape, quantifying a block builder's historical performance and reliability. This FAQ addresses common questions about its mechanics, measurement, and impact on the network.
Builder Reputation is a quantifiable score that reflects a block builder's historical performance, reliability, and adherence to network rules within a Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) framework. It is important because it allows validators (proposers) to select the most trustworthy builders for including their blocks, which directly impacts network security, censorship resistance, and validator rewards. A high reputation signals consistent delivery of valid, profitable blocks, while a poor reputation can lead to proposers ignoring a builder's bids, effectively sidelining them from the network.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall