Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Glossary

Metadata Standard

A metadata standard is a predefined schema that specifies the structure and attributes of data describing an on-chain asset, such as an NFT, ensuring interoperability and provenance.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
DATA INTEROPERABILITY

What is a Metadata Standard?

A formal specification that defines the structure, format, and meaning of descriptive data attached to digital assets, enabling consistent interpretation across different systems.

A metadata standard is a formal specification that defines the structure, format, and meaning of descriptive data attached to digital assets, enabling consistent interpretation across different systems and applications. In blockchain contexts, these standards are crucial for representing non-fungible tokens (NFTs), decentralized identifiers (DIDs), and verifiable credentials. They provide a common language, ensuring that attributes like name, description, image, and custom properties are universally understood by wallets, marketplaces, and explorers. Without such standards, data becomes siloed and incompatible, hindering interoperability.

Prominent examples in web3 include the ERC-721 and ERC-1155 token standards with their associated metadata JSON schemas, which define core properties for NFTs. The ERC-721 Metadata JSON Schema is a foundational standard specifying fields like name, description, and image. For more complex, extensible metadata, standards like ERC-1155 and ERC-6909 allow for richer, updatable data structures. Off-chain, the IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) protocol is often specified within these standards as the canonical method for storing and referencing metadata files in a decentralized manner, ensuring persistence and immutability.

The adoption of a metadata standard directly impacts interoperability, discoverability, and utility. A well-defined schema allows a digital artwork minted on one platform to be correctly displayed and traded on another. It enables advanced functionalities like trait-based filtering in marketplaces or the execution of smart contract logic based on specific metadata attributes. Furthermore, standards facilitate the creation of cross-chain and cross-protocol applications by providing a predictable data layer upon which developers can build without worrying about proprietary formats.

how-it-works
TECHNICAL PRIMER

How a Metadata Standard Works

A metadata standard is a formal specification that defines the structure, format, and semantics for describing digital assets, enabling interoperability and automated processing across different systems and applications.

A metadata standard functions as a shared rulebook for data about data. It prescribes specific fields (like name, description, image), their data types (string, integer, URI), and often their allowed values. This structured schema allows disparate software—wallets, marketplaces, explorers—to reliably parse, display, and index asset information. For example, the widely adopted ERC-721 Metadata Standard dictates a JSON schema that any compliant NFT contract can implement, ensuring a predictable tokenURI returns a standardized description of the token.

The operational workflow begins when an asset is minted. The smart contract stores a reference, typically a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), pointing to the metadata file. This file, hosted on decentralized storage like IPFS or Arweave, contains the actual descriptive data structured according to the standard. When an application needs to display the asset, it fetches this JSON file from the URI. The standard ensures the application knows exactly where to find the asset's image URL, its attributes, and other defined properties, enabling a consistent user experience.

Key components of a robust standard include extensibility through custom fields or sub-standards, backwards compatibility to prevent breaking existing applications, and decentralized persistence to ensure metadata availability aligns with the asset's longevity. Advanced implementations may use on-chain registries or Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) to attach and update metadata dynamically. By providing this common framework, metadata standards are foundational to creating discoverable, verifiable, and composable digital ecosystems beyond simple token transfers.

key-features
FOUNDATIONAL COMPONENTS

Key Features of a Metadata Standard

A metadata standard defines the structure and rules for describing digital assets, ensuring consistency, interoperability, and automated processing across different systems and applications.

01

Schema Definition

The core of any metadata standard is its schema, which acts as a blueprint. It defines the required and optional fields, their data types (string, integer, array), and their semantic meaning. A well-defined schema prevents ambiguity, enabling reliable parsing and validation by wallets, marketplaces, and indexers. For example, a schema might mandate a name field as a string and an image field as a URI.

02

Interoperability

A primary goal is to enable cross-platform compatibility. Assets adhering to a standard can be understood by any compliant application—wallets, explorers, games—without custom integration. This is achieved through shared vocabularies and consistent data structures. The ERC-721 and ERC-1155 token standards, for instance, include metadata extensions that allow any NFT marketplace to display assets uniformly.

03

Extensibility

Standards must balance structure with flexibility to accommodate future innovation. Extensibility is provided through mechanisms like:

  • Custom fields: Allowing projects to add unique attributes (e.g., rarity_score, game_stats).
  • Schema versioning: Supporting updates without breaking existing implementations.
  • Nested objects: Enabling complex, structured data within a field. This allows standards like IPFS's IPLD to describe hierarchical content.
04

Decentralized Storage & Referencing

Metadata is typically stored off-chain for efficiency and richness. The standard defines how to reference this data immutably. The common pattern is a URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) field (like tokenURI) pointing to a JSON file. Best practices emphasize using content-addressed storage like IPFS (e.g., ipfs://Qm...) or Arweave, ensuring the data is persistent and verifiable, independent of any centralized server.

05

Composability & Programmability

Machine-readable metadata unlocks programmable utility. Smart contracts and off-chain services can read and react to standardized attributes. This enables:

  • Dynamic NFTs: Traits that change based on external data (oracles).
  • Automated royalty enforcement: Reading seller_fee_basis_points fields.
  • On-chain logic: Using metadata attributes as inputs for game mechanics or financial logic, a concept central to autonomous worlds and DeFi NFTs.
06

Verification & Provenance

Standards facilitate trust by enabling cryptographic verification. The link between an on-chain token ID and its off-chain metadata must be tamper-evident. This is achieved by storing the metadata URI or its content hash (like an IPFS CID) on-chain. Tools can then verify that the displayed metadata matches the hash committed at minting, providing provenance and combating fraud. This is a key feature of standards like EIP-4885 for composable on-chain SVG NFTs.

examples
INTEROPERABILITY FRAMEWORKS

Examples of Metadata Standards

Metadata standards provide structured schemas for describing digital assets, enabling interoperability across wallets, marketplaces, and applications. These frameworks define the required and optional fields for attributes, properties, and media.

STORAGE LOCATION COMPARISON

On-Chain vs. Off-Chain Metadata

A comparison of the two primary methods for storing and linking metadata to digital assets like NFTs, focusing on data persistence, cost, and flexibility.

FeatureOn-Chain MetadataOff-Chain Metadata (Centralized)Off-Chain Metadata (Decentralized)

Data Location

Stored directly within the smart contract or transaction data on the blockchain.

Stored on a traditional web server or cloud provider (e.g., AWS, Google Cloud).

Stored on a decentralized storage network (e.g., IPFS, Arweave).

Permanence & Immutability

Storage Cost

High (gas fees for contract storage)

Low to moderate (recurring hosting fees)

Low one-time fee or incentivized storage

Mutability / Updatability

Immutable after deployment

Fully mutable by the server owner

Typically immutable; can be versioned via content-addressing

Censorship Resistance

Data Size Limit

Severely constrained by block gas limits

Virtually unlimited

Virtually unlimited

Access Speed

Slow (requires blockchain query)

Fast (standard HTTP request)

Variable (depends on network and pinning)

Primary Risk

High upfront cost and complexity

Link rot (HTTP 404) and centralized control

Reliance on persistence of decentralized network

ecosystem-usage
METADATA STANDARD

Ecosystem Usage & Dependencies

A metadata standard is a formal specification that defines the structure, format, and semantics of descriptive data (metadata) for digital assets, enabling interoperability across wallets, marketplaces, and applications.

01

ERC-721 & ERC-1155 Metadata

The ERC-721 and ERC-1155 token standards include a tokenURI function that returns a URI (Uniform Resource Identifier) pointing to a JSON file containing the asset's metadata. This JSON file must follow a specific schema, including fields like name, description, and image. This decouples the on-chain token ID from its rich, off-chain data, allowing for updates and complex media.

02

IPFS & Decentralized Storage

To ensure permanence and censorship-resistance, metadata JSON files and associated media (images, videos) are typically stored on decentralized storage networks like IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) or Arweave. The tokenURI then points to a content identifier (CID) like ipfs://Qm.... This prevents reliance on centralized servers that could go offline, altering or breaking the asset's presentation.

03

Interoperability with Wallets & Marketplaces

Standardized metadata is the common language that allows wallets (e.g., MetaMask), marketplaces (e.g., OpenSea, Blur), and explorers to uniformly display digital assets. They fetch the metadata from the tokenURI to show the correct name, image, attributes, and other properties. Without a shared standard, each platform would interpret asset data differently, fragmenting the ecosystem.

04

Extended Metadata & Traits

Beyond basic fields, metadata standards support extensible attributes or properties arrays. This is crucial for Generative PFP collections and gaming assets, where traits (e.g., Background: "Blue", Hat: "Cap") define rarity and utility. Platforms use this structured data to build filters, rarity calculators, and trait-based discovery systems, driving collector engagement.

05

On-Chain vs. Off-Chain Metadata

  • Off-Chain Metadata: The prevalent model. Only a URI hash is stored on-chain; the JSON file lives off-chain (IPFS). It's flexible and gas-efficient but depends on external availability.
  • On-Chain Metadata: The JSON data is stored entirely within the smart contract, often encoded in Base64 or SSTORE2. This guarantees permanence and atomicity with the token but incurs high gas costs and limits complexity.
06

Evolving Standards (ERC-7511 & ERC-7521)

New proposals aim to address limitations of early standards. ERC-7511 (Dynamic NFTs) standardizes metadata updates and versioning. ERC-7521 (Intellectual Property NFTs) defines a richer schema for legal and commercial rights. These evolutions show the metadata standard's role as a foundational layer for increasingly complex on-chain asset types.

security-considerations
METADATA STANDARD

Security & Integrity Considerations

A metadata standard defines a structured format for describing digital assets, crucial for ensuring data authenticity, preventing tampering, and enabling secure interoperability across platforms.

01

Immutable Provenance & Tamper Evidence

A robust metadata standard anchors data to an immutable ledger (like a blockchain), creating a cryptographic proof of origin and history. Any unauthorized alteration to the metadata breaks this link, providing clear tamper evidence. This is fundamental for verifying the authenticity of assets like NFTs, where the metadata contains the link to the image or other media.

02

Centralized vs. Decentralized Storage

Where metadata is stored is a critical security decision.

  • Centralized Storage (e.g., AWS S3): Vulnerable to single points of failure, censorship, and link rot if the server goes down.
  • Decentralized Storage (e.g., IPFS, Arweave): Uses content-addressing (CIDs) and distributed networks, making data resilient and verifiable. The integrity of the data is cryptographically guaranteed by its hash.
03

Schema Validation & Data Integrity

A defined schema (like JSON Schema) enforces structure and data types for metadata fields. Validation ensures:

  • Consistency: All entries follow the same format.
  • Prevention of Malicious Data: Blocks injection of invalid or harmful code.
  • Reliable Parsing: Applications can reliably read and display the metadata without errors, maintaining system integrity.
04

On-Chain vs. Off-Chain Metadata

This trade-off balances security, cost, and flexibility.

  • On-Chain Metadata: Stored directly on the blockchain. Maximizes immutability and decentralization but is extremely expensive for large data (like images).
  • Off-Chain Metadata: Stored externally (e.g., IPFS). More practical and cost-effective, but introduces a trust assumption in the storage layer and the integrity of the referenced link.
05

Verifiable Credentials & Attestations

Metadata standards can incorporate verifiable credentials—cryptographically signed statements from issuers (e.g., a university, certification body). These attestations, stored within the asset's metadata, provide a trust layer for properties like:

  • Proof of ownership history (provenance).
  • Authenticity certificates.
  • Compliance status (e.g., KYC/AML).
06

Interoperability & Standard Compliance

Adherence to widely adopted standards (like ERC-721 or ERC-1155 for NFTs) is a security feature. It ensures:

  • Predictable Behavior: Wallets, marketplaces, and explorers can interact with assets safely.
  • Reduced Attack Surface: Avoids proprietary implementations with unknown vulnerabilities.
  • Ecosystem Trust: Users and developers can rely on a common, audited foundation for asset integrity.
METADATA STANDARD

Common Misconceptions

Clarifying widespread misunderstandings about blockchain metadata standards, their technical implementation, and their role in the ecosystem.

No, the metadata (like images, descriptions, or attributes) for an NFT or token is almost never stored directly on-chain due to prohibitive gas costs and block space limitations. Instead, the blockchain stores a pointer, typically a URI (Uniform Resource Identifier), that links to the metadata file hosted elsewhere. This file is usually a JSON document following a standard schema (like ERC-721 Metadata or ERC-1155 Metadata URI) and is stored on decentralized storage networks like IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) or Arweave, or sometimes on centralized servers. The critical distinction is that the immutable on-chain token ID points to a mutable off-chain file, which introduces considerations for permanence and decentralization.

METADATA STANDARD

Technical Details: The JSON Schema

A JSON Schema is a declarative language for validating the structure and content of JSON data. In blockchain, it is the formal specification that defines the required fields, data types, and formats for metadata, ensuring interoperability across wallets, explorers, and marketplaces.

A JSON Schema is a vocabulary that allows you to annotate and validate JSON documents, defining the expected structure, required fields, and data types. For blockchain metadata—such as token information (ERC-721, ERC-1155), DAO proposals, or attestation formats—it provides a standardized blueprint. This ensures that data emitted by smart contracts is machine-readable, interoperable, and can be reliably parsed by wallets, indexers, and other off-chain services without ambiguity or parsing errors.

METADATA STANDARD

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Essential questions and answers about blockchain metadata standards, focusing on the ERC-721 and ERC-1155 specifications for NFTs and digital assets.

The ERC-721 metadata standard is a JSON schema defined in the ERC-721 specification that provides a structured way to describe a non-fungible token's (NFT) properties, such as its name, description, and image. It works by storing a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) in the token's smart contract, which points to a JSON file containing this descriptive data. This separation of on-chain token ID and off-chain metadata allows for rich, detailed asset descriptions without bloating the blockchain. The standard defines required fields (name, description, image) and suggests optional ones like attributes. Most NFT marketplaces and wallets rely on this standard to properly display digital collectibles and artwork.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Metadata Standard: Definition & Examples | ChainScore Glossary