Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a protocol design that formally separates the role of the block proposer (or block producer) from the block builder. In this model, the proposer is responsible for selecting and publishing the next block header, while specialized builders compete in an open market to construct the most valuable full block contents, including ordering transactions and maximizing Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). This separation is a core architectural response to the centralization pressures observed in proof-of-stake (PoS) networks like Ethereum, where validators who can access sophisticated MEV extraction techniques gain a significant economic advantage.
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS)
What is Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS)?
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a blockchain design paradigm that decouples the roles of block proposal and block construction to address centralization risks and improve network efficiency.
The primary mechanism enabling PBS is a commit-reveal scheme. Builders create blocks and submit cryptographic commitments (like blinded bids) to proposers. The proposer then selects the block with the highest attached bid without seeing its contents, preventing them from stealing the profitable transaction ordering. Only after the proposer commits to a header does the winning builder reveal the full block for validation. This process, often facilitated by a relay to prevent censorship, ensures the proposer's role is neutral and reduces their ability to manipulate the chain for personal gain.
PBS addresses critical ecosystem risks: it mitigates validator centralization by democratizing access to MEV profits, as even small validators can earn rewards by selling their block proposal rights. It also enhances chain quality by incentivizing builders to include the most economically optimal set of transactions. On Ethereum, PBS is implemented through mev-boost for the execution layer and is being formalized in-protocol with ePBS (enshrined PBS) as part of the roadmap. This evolution is fundamental to maintaining a credibly neutral and resilient blockchain infrastructure.
Etymology and Origin
The concept of Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) emerged as a direct response to the centralizing forces and economic inefficiencies inherent in the original Proof-of-Stake (PoS) block production model.
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a blockchain architectural pattern that formally divides the roles of block proposal and block construction into two distinct, specialized market participants: the proposer (or block proposer) and the block builder. This separation was conceived to address critical issues in permissionless blockchains, primarily the trend towards proposer centralization caused by Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). In a naive PoS system, the entity selected to propose the next block (the validator) also has the sole right and responsibility to construct its contents, creating a natural monopoly on MEV capture and leading to the rise of sophisticated, centralized searcher networks.
The intellectual and practical origins of PBS are deeply intertwined with the study of MEV. Researchers, notably from the Flashbots collective, identified that the competition to extract MEV was creating systemic risks, including network congestion, unfair transaction ordering, and the centralization of validator operations into a few large, MEV-specialized pools. The core insight was that by creating a competitive, transparent market for block space (the builder's role) separate from the role of attesting to chain consensus (the proposer's role), the negative externalities of MEV could be mitigated. This led to the development of PBS as a credible commitment mechanism, where proposers outsource block building to a specialized market.
The initial and most prominent implementation of PBS is mev-boost, an out-of-protocol (or "enshrined") middleware for Ethereum following its transition to PoS. mev-boost operates through a relay network, where builders submit complete, MEV-optimized blocks with a fee bid, and proposers simply select the highest-paying header. This design allows even small-scale validators to access sophisticated block production and capture MEV rewards, thereby promoting decentralization. The long-term vision for Ethereum, as outlined in its roadmap, is to enshrine PBS directly into the core protocol consensus layer, moving the functionality from an optional middleware to a mandatory, cryptographically enforced part of the blockchain's state transition rules.
Key Features and Principles
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a design paradigm that decouples the roles of block proposal and block construction to address centralization risks and MEV in proof-of-stake blockchains.
Core Architectural Split
PBS formally separates two critical functions:
- Block Proposer (Validator): The entity chosen by the consensus protocol to propose a block for a specific slot. Their role is to select the most valuable block from a competitive market.
- Block Builder (Builder): A specialized entity that constructs full blocks by aggregating transactions, optimizing order, and extracting Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). Builders compete in an auction to have their block chosen. This separation prevents validators from needing sophisticated MEV extraction capabilities, reducing centralization pressure.
MEV Auction Mechanism
The primary coordination mechanism in PBS is a sealed-bid auction. Builders create blocks and submit bids (a portion of the block's profits) to the proposer.
- Builders run complex algorithms to identify and capture arbitrage, liquidations, and other MEV opportunities.
- The proposer's job is simplified: they select the block with the highest accompanying bid, maximizing their rewards.
- This creates a competitive, efficient market for block space and MEV, theoretically leading to fairer value distribution.
In-Protocol vs. Out-of-Protocol
PBS can be implemented in two main ways:
- In-Protocol PBS: The separation is enforced by the core blockchain protocol (e.g., Ethereum's planned ePBS). This provides stronger guarantees and censorship resistance but is complex to implement.
- Out-of-Protocol PBS (MEV-Boost): A practical, interim solution where relayers facilitate a trusted auction market outside the consensus layer. Ethereum validators use this via MEV-Boost software to access builder blocks, though it introduces trust assumptions in relays.
Censorship Resistance
A major goal of PBS is to mitigate transaction censorship. Without PBS, a dominant validator could exclude transactions. PBS introduces economic incentives against censorship:
- Builders compete to include all profitable transactions to maximize their bid. Excluding valid transactions (e.g., for political reasons) reduces their potential profit and bid.
- In-protocol designs like crLists (censorship resistance lists) allow proposers to force builders to include certain transactions, providing a protocol-level backstop.
Relayer Role & Trust Assumptions
In out-of-protocol PBS (MEV-Boost), relayers are critical intermediaries that manage the auction:
- They receive block bids from builders and forward the highest one to the proposer.
- They ensure payload integrity, meaning the builder delivers the full block content corresponding to the winning header. This introduces a trust assumption: the proposer must trust the relayer not to censor or manipulate the auction. In-protocol PBS aims to eliminate this trusted third party.
Impact on Validator Economics
PBS significantly changes validator economics and infrastructure requirements:
- Reduced Complexity: Validators no longer need to run sophisticated MEV software; they can outsource block building and simply select the highest bid.
- Increased Revenue: Access to a competitive builder market typically increases validator rewards from MEV.
- New Centralization Vectors: Risk shifts from validator centralization to builder/relayer centralization. A few highly optimized builders could dominate the market, posing new ecosystem risks.
How Proposer-Builder Separation Works
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a design pattern that decouples the roles of block proposal and block construction in proof-of-stake consensus, primarily to address centralization risks in maximal extractable value (MEV).
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a blockchain architecture that formally separates the role of the block proposer (who chooses the next block) from the block builder (who constructs the block's contents). In this model, the proposer, typically a validator, does not create the block itself. Instead, it receives a complete, pre-built block from a specialized builder via a marketplace. The proposer's primary duty is to select the most profitable or otherwise optimal block from competing builders and attest to its validity, a process often facilitated by a relay to prevent manipulation. This separation is a direct response to the complexities and risks of Maximal Extractable Value (MEV).
The core mechanism enabling PBS is a commit-reveal scheme within a builder marketplace. Builders compete by constructing blocks that include user transactions and optimize for fee revenue and MEV opportunities (e.g., through arbitrage or liquidations). They then submit block bids—cryptographic commitments containing the block header and a bid amount—to a neutral relay. The relay presents these blinded bids to the proposer of the slot. The proposer selects the header with the highest associated bid, signs it, and returns it to the relay. The winning builder then reveals the full block body, which the proposer publishes to the network, ensuring they cannot steal the MEV strategies contained within.
PBS introduces several critical cryptoeconomic benefits. It democratizes access to MEV by allowing specialized, capital-efficient builders to compete, rather than requiring every validator to run sophisticated MEV-searching infrastructure. It also enhances network security by mitigating proposer centralization; validators no longer need vast resources to capture MEV, reducing the advantage of large staking pools. Furthermore, it can improve user experience by allowing builders to implement transaction ordering rules (like fair ordering) and offer services like transaction inclusion guarantees. Ethereum's roadmap implements PBS through ePBS (enshrined PBS), which aims to bake these mechanisms directly into the protocol's consensus layer for greater robustness and decentralization.
Visualizing the PBS Flow
A step-by-step breakdown of how Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) decouples block production from block proposal in Ethereum's consensus layer.
The Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) flow is a multi-stage auction mechanism designed to create a specialized market for block construction. It begins with builders—specialized nodes that compile transactions from the mempool, optimize them for maximum value (e.g., via MEV extraction), and cryptographically commit to a completed block. They then submit this block, along with a bid, to a relay, which acts as a trusted intermediary. The relay validates the block's correctness and the bid's attached payment, creating a block auction where the highest bid wins the right to have its block proposed.
In the next phase, a block proposer (a validator selected by the consensus protocol) connects to the relay to view the available bids. The proposer does not see the block's contents, only the associated bid value and a commitment hash. The proposer selects the highest bid and signs a builder commitment, which includes the block hash and the promised payment. This signature is returned to the winning builder via the relay. This separation ensures the proposer's role is limited to choosing the most valuable bid, insulating them from the complex and potentially risky process of block construction.
Finally, the winning builder reveals the full block data to the relay, which verifies it matches the earlier commitment. The relay then forwards the valid block to the proposer. The proposer simply publishes this pre-built block to the network, and the builder's promised payment is automatically distributed via the proposer payment mechanism, often a direct transfer to the proposer's fee recipient address. This entire flow—builder competition, blind bidding, and outsourced execution—enhances network efficiency, reduces centralization risks in validation, and transparently markets MEV value.
Ecosystem Implementation and Usage
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a design paradigm that decouples the roles of block proposal and block construction to address centralization risks in proof-of-stake networks. Its implementation varies across protocols and layers.
In-Protocol PBS (ePBS)
Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (ePBS) is the long-term goal of embedding PBS directly into Ethereum's consensus layer protocol. This aims to reduce reliance on trusted third-party relays and make the separation more secure and censorship-resistant. Key proposals involve new builder bids within consensus messages and a commit-reveal scheme to ensure proposers cannot steal builder work.
Builder Market & Centralization Risks
The builder role has led to a specialized market. Dominant builders like Flashbots, BloXroute, and Titan control significant block share, creating new centralization vectors. Risks include:
- Censorship: Builders can exclude certain transactions.
- Relay Trust: Proposers must trust relays to deliver blocks faithfully.
- Builder Collusion: A few large builders could manipulate the market. Monitoring builder market share is a key analytics activity.
PBS in Other L1s & L2s
Other chains adopt PBS-like mechanisms with different trade-offs:
- Solana: Uses a leader (proposer) schedule, but block construction is influenced by Jito's auction for MEV, creating a PBS-like dynamic.
- Cosmos (Tendermint): The proposer for a round is deterministic; MEV capture often happens via private mempools or skip mechanisms, not a formal builder market.
- Rollups (L2s): Sequencers act as combined proposer-builders, but designs like shared sequencers or based sequencing explore PBS concepts for decentralization.
Validator Economics & PBS
PBS fundamentally changes validator economics. Proposer rewards now consist of:
- Standard Consensus Rewards (base + attestations)
- Priority Fees (tips from users)
- MEV Rewards (the builder's winning bid) The MEV reward, delivered via the builder's bid, often constitutes the majority of a proposer's income. This makes block auction efficiency and relay selection critical operational decisions for validators.
Security Considerations and Trade-offs
Proposer-Builder Separation introduces new security dynamics by decoupling block production from block proposal. This section examines the core trade-offs and risks inherent to this architecture.
Censorship Resistance
A primary security concern in PBS is the potential for builder-level censorship. A dominant builder or cartel could exclude certain transactions (e.g., from sanctioned addresses or competing protocols) from blocks. While proposer commitments (like crLists) can mitigate this, they add complexity. The risk shifts from a single proposer's discretion to the economic incentives and potential collusion within the builder market.
MEV Centralization
PBS can inadvertently centralize Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) capture. Sophisticated builders with advanced algorithms and private orderflow access can outcompete smaller players, leading to a builder oligopoly. This centralizes both profit and the power to influence transaction ordering. MEV-Boost on Ethereum exemplifies this, where a small number of builders consistently win auctions.
Trust in Relays
In current implementations like MEV-Boost, proposers rely on trusted relays to honestly deliver the full block body promised by the winning builder. This introduces a new trust assumption:
- Relays must not censor or tamper with blocks.
- They must correctly validate block contents.
- A malicious relay could cause a proposer to miss their slot. In-protocol PBS aims to eliminate this external trust requirement.
Builder Collusion
Builders may collude to suppress auction prices, reducing the proposer payout (the bid). This is a form of auction manipulation that harms validator revenue. Detection is difficult without transparency into the builder market. The threat of new entrants can limit collusion, but barriers to entry (e.g., need for low-latency infrastructure) are high.
Complexity & Protocol Risk
PBS significantly increases protocol and implementation complexity. New components (builders, relays, auction mechanisms) each introduce new attack surfaces and potential bugs. In-protocol PBS designs (e.g., Ethereum's potential enshrined PBS) must be meticulously designed to avoid introducing systemic vulnerabilities that could compromise chain liveness or safety.
Proposer Sovereignty Trade-off
PBS involves a fundamental trade-off: proposers gain maximal revenue by outsourcing block construction, but they cede control over transaction inclusion and ordering. This reduces their ability to make altruistic or protocol-benefitting choices (like including certain transactions at a loss). The network's censorship resistance and ethical stance become dependent on the builder market's incentives.
PBS vs. Traditional Validator Model
A structural comparison of the Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) model against the integrated validator model common in early Proof-of-Stake blockchains.
| Feature | Traditional Validator Model | Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) |
|---|---|---|
Primary Role | Validator (Proposer + Builder) | Separate Proposer and Builder |
Block Construction | Performed by the selected validator | Performed by specialized builders |
MEV Capture | Integrated into validator role | Auctioned to builders via a marketplace |
Hardware Requirements | Standard validator node | Builders require high-performance infrastructure |
Censorship Resistance | Dependent on individual validator | Enhanced via commit-reveal schemes & inclusion lists |
Protocol Complexity | Lower | Higher (requires relay network, auction mechanism) |
Validator Revenue | Block rewards + MEV | Block rewards + builder bid (proposer payment) |
Evolution: From MEV-Boost to Enshrined PBS
This section traces the development of Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) on Ethereum, from its initial implementation as an out-of-protocol service to its planned integration as a core protocol feature.
MEV-Boost is the foundational, out-of-protocol implementation of Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) on Ethereum, introduced post-Merge to mitigate centralization risks from Maximal Extractable Value (MEV). It operates as a trusted, permissioned relay network where specialized block builders compete to construct the most profitable blocks, which are then proposed by validators via a relay. This separation allows validators to earn higher rewards without needing sophisticated MEV extraction capabilities, while builders optimize block content for profit. However, MEV-Boost's reliance on centralized relays and its off-chain nature introduced new trust assumptions and potential censorship vectors, highlighting the need for a more robust, in-protocol solution.
The limitations of MEV-Boost catalyzed the design of enshrined PBS, a planned upgrade to Ethereum's consensus layer that would bake PBS directly into the protocol. The core innovation is a two-step block proposal process using a commit-reveal scheme. First, a validator commits to a block header (containing the execution payload hash) without seeing the full block contents. Second, the validator reveals and attests to the full block body in a subsequent slot. This cryptoeconomic mechanism prevents validators from stealing or censoring transactions, as they are bound to the header they committed to. Enshrined PBS aims to eliminate the need for trusted relays, reduce centralization, and provide stronger anti-censorship guarantees at the protocol level.
Key technical components enabling enshrined PBS include builder-side proofs and a crList (censorship resistance list) mechanism. Builders may be required to provide cryptographic proofs (like a ZK-SNARK) that their block construction follows specific rules, such as including all transactions from the mempool. The crList allows proposers to force the inclusion of certain transactions, providing a backstop against builder censorship. The transition is a complex protocol change, requiring consensus (CL) and execution (EL) client upgrades, and is a central part of Ethereum's The Scourge roadmap, which focuses on mitigating MEV and centralization risks to create a more credibly neutral and resilient network.
Common Misconceptions About Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS)
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a critical architectural upgrade for Ethereum's consensus layer, but its design and implications are often misunderstood. This section addresses frequent points of confusion regarding its purpose, implementation, and impact on network participants.
No, PBS is not yet a native, protocol-enforced feature on the Ethereum mainnet. The full in-protocol PBS design, where the consensus protocol itself separates block proposal from block building, is a planned future upgrade. Today, a voluntary, off-chain PBS market exists, where validators (proposers) outsource block construction to specialized block builders via a trusted third-party relay. This is facilitated by the builder API in execution clients and is the dominant model for MEV-Boost users, but validators can still choose to build blocks locally.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Essential questions and answers about Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS), the architectural design that separates the roles of block building and block proposing in Ethereum and other blockchains.
Proposer-Builder Separation (PBS) is a blockchain architecture that decouples the role of the block proposer (who chooses the next block) from the block builder (who assembles the block's transactions). It works through a two-phase, auction-like process: specialized builders compete to create the most profitable block by including transactions and MEV (Maximal Extractable Value), then proposers (often validators) select the block with the highest bid from a public marketplace, receiving the bid as payment. This separation aims to democratize access to MEV and reduce the centralizing pressure on validators who lack sophisticated block-building capabilities.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.