Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Glossary

Liquidity Token (LP Token)

A fungible token minted upon depositing assets into an Automated Market Maker (AMM) liquidity pool, representing a provider's proportional share and claim on trading fees.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
DEFINITION

What is a Liquidity Token (LP Token)?

A technical definition of the token that represents a liquidity provider's share in an automated market maker (AMM) pool.

A Liquidity Token (LP Token) is a blockchain-based token that represents a liquidity provider's share of a pooled asset reserve in a Decentralized Exchange (DEX). It is a receipt or proof of deposit, minted when a user contributes an equal value of two assets (e.g., ETH and USDC) to an Automated Market Maker (AMM) liquidity pool like Uniswap or Curve. Holding the LP token entitles the provider to a proportional share of the pool's trading fees and the right to reclaim their underlying assets, minus any impermanent loss, by burning the token.

The primary function of an LP token is to enable non-custodial ownership of pool shares. Unlike traditional finance, where a central entity records ownership, the LP token itself is the record. Its value is derived from the total value locked (TVL) in the underlying pool. As trades occur and fees accumulate, the value of the pool's assets changes, which is reflected in the exchange rate between the LP token and its underlying assets. This mechanism allows for the seamless transfer or use of liquidity positions across different DeFi protocols.

LP tokens are foundational to DeFi composability. They can be used as collateral for borrowing on lending platforms like Aave, deposited into yield aggregators to earn additional rewards, or staked in a protocol's governance system to earn emissions of a native token. For example, providing liquidity to a Uniswap V3 ETH/USDC pool yields UNI-V3-POS NFTs, a non-fungible variant of an LP token representing a specific price range, which can then be deposited elsewhere to compound returns.

The economics of providing liquidity are governed by the LP token. Providers earn a portion of all trading fees, typically ranging from 0.01% to 1% per trade, proportional to their share. However, they are exposed to impermanent loss—a divergence in asset prices that can make providing liquidity less profitable than simply holding the assets. The LP token's value automatically accounts for both accrued fees and this price divergence, representing the net position of the liquidity provider at any time.

Technically, LP tokens are often implemented as ERC-20 tokens (or ERC-721 for concentrated liquidity), with a smart contract that calculates each holder's share. When a user burns their LP tokens, the contract calculates their current proportional claim and transfers the corresponding amounts of the two underlying assets back to their wallet. This design ensures transparent, verifiable, and permissionless liquidity provision, forming the core infrastructure for decentralized trading and yield generation.

key-features
LIQUIDITY PROVISION

Key Features of LP Tokens

Liquidity Provider (LP) tokens are proof-of-stake receipts issued by Automated Market Makers (AMMs) to users who deposit assets into a liquidity pool.

01

Proof of Deposit

An LP token is a fungible token (often an ERC-20) that acts as a verifiable receipt for a user's contribution to a liquidity pool. It is minted upon deposit and burned upon withdrawal, with the quantity representing the user's proportional share of the pool. This mechanism is fundamental to the accounting of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap and Curve.

02

Proportional Ownership

The number of LP tokens a user holds represents their ownership share of the entire liquidity pool. For example, if you deposit assets representing 1% of a pool's total value, you receive 1% of the total LP token supply. When you redeem your tokens, you are entitled to withdraw 1% of the pool's current reserves of each asset, plus accrued fees.

03

Fee Accrual & Yield

LP tokens passively accrue value from trading fees. Every swap on the AMM incurs a fee (e.g., 0.3% on Uniswap V2), which is added to the pool's reserves. Since LP tokens represent a share of the pool, their underlying value increases as fees accumulate. This is the primary source of yield, or liquidity mining rewards, for liquidity providers.

04

Composability & DeFi Legos

LP tokens are composable financial primitives. They can be used as collateral across the DeFi ecosystem, enabling complex financial strategies. Common uses include:

  • Collateral for borrowing on lending protocols like Aave.
  • Staking in yield aggregators (e.g., Yearn) for optimized returns.
  • Depositing into farm contracts to earn additional governance token rewards.
05

Impermanent Loss Exposure

Holding LP tokens exposes the provider to impermanent loss (divergence loss). This is not a direct fee but an opportunity cost that occurs when the price ratio of the pooled assets changes compared to holding them separately. The loss is 'impermanent' because it is only realized upon withdrawal; if prices return to the original ratio, the loss is eliminated.

06

Governance & Utility

For some protocols, LP tokens confer governance rights. Holding them may allow voting on protocol parameters like fee structures or pool weights. Furthermore, LP tokens are often the required stake for liquidity gauges in decentralized governance systems (e.g., Curve's veCRV model), where locked tokens determine vote weight for directing token emissions.

how-it-works
MECHANICS

How LP Tokens Work: The Minting and Burning Cycle

A technical breakdown of the lifecycle of a liquidity provider token, from its creation through a deposit to its redemption via a withdrawal.

A Liquidity Provider (LP) Token is a blockchain-based receipt token minted by an Automated Market Maker (AMM) to represent a user's proportional share of a pooled liquidity reserve. When a user deposits assets into a liquidity pool—such as pairing ETH and USDC—the protocol mints and sends LP tokens to the depositor's wallet. These tokens are fungible and transferable, acting as both a claim on the underlying assets and a record of ownership. The quantity minted is calculated based on the depositor's contribution relative to the existing pool reserves, ensuring the token's value is directly pegged to the pool's total value.

The minting process is the first half of the cycle, initiated by a user's deposit transaction. The AMM's smart contract calculates the amount of LP tokens to issue using a formula like LP_tokens_minted = (deposit_amount / total_pool_supply) * existing_LP_token_supply. This ensures new tokens are issued without diluting the value of existing holders' shares. These tokens then accrue trading fees generated by the pool, which are automatically added to the underlying reserves, increasing the value each LP token represents. Holding the token is passive; fee accrual happens at the protocol level.

The burning process is the reverse operation, where a user redeems their LP tokens to withdraw their share of the pooled assets, plus any accumulated fees. By sending their LP tokens back to the pool's smart contract in a withdrawal transaction, the contract burns (permanently destroys) the tokens and releases the corresponding proportion of each asset in the pool to the user. The amount of each asset returned is calculated based on the current pool ratios, which may differ from the initial deposit due to price movements and accrued fees, resulting in impermanent loss.

This mint-and-burn cycle is fundamental to decentralized finance (DeFi) liquidity. It enables non-custodial, programmable ownership of pool shares. LP tokens themselves can often be used as collateral in other DeFi protocols for lending or yield farming, creating complex financial strategies. The entire mechanism is enforced by smart contract code, ensuring transparency and eliminating the need for a trusted intermediary to custody the assets or manage the ledger of ownership.

ecosystem-usage
LIQUIDITY TOKEN (LP TOKEN)

Ecosystem Usage and Protocol Examples

Liquidity Provider (LP) tokens are fungible, transferable receipts that represent a user's share of a pooled asset pair in an Automated Market Maker (AMM). They are a foundational primitive for DeFi yield generation and protocol governance.

01

Proof of Deposit & Share Calculation

An LP token is a verifiable on-chain record of a user's contribution to a liquidity pool. Its minted quantity is proportional to the user's share of the total pool. For example, if you deposit 1 ETH and 3,000 USDC into a pool containing 100 ETH and 300,000 USDC, you receive LP tokens representing a 1% share. The token's value is derived from the underlying assets, plus accrued trading fees.

02

Yield Generation Mechanism

LP tokens accrue value through swap fees generated by the AMM. When a user swaps assets in the pool, a fee (e.g., 0.3% on Uniswap V2) is added to the pool's reserves, increasing the value of each LP token. To claim rewards, users burn their LP tokens to withdraw their now-larger share of the underlying assets. Some protocols also offer yield farming, where staking LP tokens earns additional protocol tokens.

03

Composability & Money Legos

LP tokens are composable financial primitives that can be used as collateral across DeFi. Key integrations include:

  • Lending Protocols: Deposit LP tokens (e.g., ETH/USDC) as collateral to borrow other assets on Aave or Compound.
  • Yield Aggregators: Protocols like Yearn.finance auto-compound LP token rewards for optimized yields.
  • Liquidity Gauges: In Curve Finance, depositing LP tokens into a gauge directs emissions of the CRV governance token.
04

Protocol Governance & Voting

Many decentralized exchanges use LP tokens for on-chain governance. Holding LP tokens often grants voting rights on protocol parameters. For instance:

  • Uniswap: UNI token holders govern the protocol, but earlier versions used LP tokens for fee switch votes.
  • Curve Finance: The veCRV model requires locking CRV tokens, which are often acquired by providing liquidity and staking LP tokens.
  • Balancer: BAL token emissions are distributed to users who stake their LP tokens, aligning incentives.
05

Impermanent Loss & Risk Vector

LP tokens represent a claim on a pool's current ratio of assets, not the original deposit amount. This exposes holders to impermanent loss—a divergence loss compared to simply holding the assets. If the price ratio of the paired assets changes significantly, the value of the LP token may be less than the value of the initial deposit, even with earned fees. This risk is fundamental to providing liquidity.

06

Examples Across Major AMMs

Different AMMs implement LP tokens with unique characteristics:

  • Uniswap V2: Standard ERC-20 LP token (e.g., UNI-V2).
  • Uniswap V3: Non-fungible LP position (an NFT) due to concentrated liquidity.
  • Curve Finance: LP tokens (e.g., 3poolCRV) for stablecoin/pegged-asset pools with low slippage.
  • Balancer: LP tokens for pools that can contain up to 8 assets with customizable weights.
  • PancakeSwap: LP tokens on BNB Chain, often used in extensive farming programs.
security-considerations
LIQUIDITY TOKEN (LP TOKEN)

Security Considerations and Risks

While LP tokens represent ownership in a liquidity pool, they are not risk-free assets. Holders are exposed to several distinct financial and technical risks inherent to automated market makers (AMMs).

01

Impermanent Loss

The primary financial risk for liquidity providers. It occurs when the price ratio of the deposited assets changes after you provide liquidity, resulting in a lower dollar value compared to simply holding the assets. The loss is 'impermanent' only if prices return to their original ratio.

  • Mechanism: Caused by the AMM's constant product formula (x * y = k) automatically rebalancing the pool.
  • Severity: Losses are magnified with higher volatility. Providing liquidity for correlated assets (e.g., stablecoin pairs) reduces this risk.
02

Smart Contract Risk

LP tokens are issued by and interact with smart contracts that may contain bugs or vulnerabilities. A flaw in the pool's contract, the underlying token contracts, or the DEX router can lead to a total loss of funds.

  • Exploit Vectors: Includes reentrancy attacks, logic errors, and oracle manipulation.
  • Mitigation: Use well-audited, time-tested protocols (e.g., Uniswap V2/V3, Curve). The value of an LP token is ultimately dependent on the security of its underlying contracts.
03

Composability & Approval Risks

LP tokens are often used as collateral in DeFi lending protocols or deposited into yield aggregators. This introduces additional layers of risk.

  • Protocol Risk: The failure of a lending platform or aggregator can trap or devalue your LP tokens.
  • Infinite Approval Risk: Granting unlimited token approval to a malicious or buggy contract can lead to complete drainage of the LP position.
  • Always audit the entire stack of protocols interacting with your LP tokens.
04

Centralization & Admin Key Risk

Many liquidity pools, especially on newer or niche chains, may have admin controls or upgradeable proxies. This introduces trust assumptions.

  • Rug Pulls: Malicious developers can use mint/burn functions or upgrade mechanisms to steal funds.
  • Fee Manipulation: Admin keys might be used to change pool parameters, like swap fees, to the detriment of LPs.
  • Due Diligence: Always verify if a pool's contracts are immutable and if admin keys are timelocked or renounced.
05

Oracle Manipulation & MEV

The pricing within an AMM pool can be targeted by miners/validators and bots for profit, impacting LPs.

  • Oracle Manipulation: If a protocol uses the AMM pool's price as an oracle, attackers can drain funds from other protocols by manipulating the pool's price in a flash loan attack, causing losses for LPs.
  • Maximal Extractable Value (MEV): Bots can perform sandwich attacks, placing trades before and after a user's large trade, effectively stealing value from both the trader and the LPs through worsened slippage.
06

Liquidity Provider Token Dilution

In pools with liquidity mining incentives, the emission of new LP tokens as rewards can lead to inflationary dilution.

  • Reward Token Inflation: The market may not absorb the sell pressure from yield farmers, decreasing the value of the reward token and the overall APR.
  • Mercenary Capital: Liquidity can be highly transient, fleeing to the next highest-yielding pool, which increases volatility and impermanent loss risk for remaining LPs.
  • Assess tokenomics and emission schedules of farm rewards critically.
technical-details
LIQUIDITY TOKEN MECHANICS

Technical Details: Value Calculation and Smart Contract Interaction

This section details the computational and programmatic foundations of Liquidity Provider (LP) tokens, explaining how their value is derived and how they interact with Automated Market Maker (AMM) smart contracts.

The value of an LP token is not a simple price but a direct claim on the underlying liquidity pool's reserves, calculated as the product of the quantities of the two paired assets. In a constant product AMM like Uniswap V2, the token's value is derived from the formula k = x * y, where x and y are the reserve balances. The total supply of LP tokens represents 100% ownership of the pool; therefore, the value of a single LP token is (value_of_x + value_of_y) / total_LP_token_supply. This value fluctuates with every trade, fee accrual, and impermanent loss within the pool.

LP tokens are non-fungible representations of a fungible position, minted and burned exclusively by the pool's smart contract. When a user adds liquidity, the contract mints new LP tokens proportional to their contribution to the reserves. Conversely, burning the tokens redeems the user's share. This mint/burn mechanism is governed by the contract's logic to maintain the invariant k. The tokens themselves are typically ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum or equivalent standards on other chains, enabling them to be transferred, staked in yield farms, or used as collateral in other DeFi protocols.

Smart contract interaction with LP tokens is central to DeFi composability. Protocols do not directly manage the underlying assets; they interact with the LP token contract. Key functions include mint() (deposit liquidity), burn() (withdraw liquidity), and sync() (update reserve balances). When a user stakes LP tokens in a yield farming contract, they are granting that contract temporary custody, allowing it to claim the trading fees accrued to that portion of the pool. This separation of custody (LP token) from the base assets enables complex, layered financial applications built on a foundation of programmable liquidity.

DISTRIBUTION MECHANISMS

LP Token vs. Related Concepts

A comparison of on-chain tokens that represent a claim on assets or value, highlighting the distinct purpose and mechanics of Liquidity Provider (LP) tokens.

FeatureLP Token (e.g., Uniswap V2)Wrapped Token (e.g., WETH)Governance Token (e.g., UNI)Staking Derivative (e.g., stETH)

Primary Function

Proof of liquidity deposit in an AMM pool

ERC-20 representation of a native asset

Voting rights and protocol governance

Liquid representation of staked assets

Underlying Asset(s)

Pooled asset pair (e.g., ETH/USDC)

Single native asset (e.g., ETH)

Protocol utility and fee claims

Staked ETH + accrued rewards

Value Accrual

Trading fees + Impermanent Loss

1:1 peg to underlying asset

Speculative + potential fee revenue

Staking rewards (yield-bearing)

Burn/Mint Control

Automated by AMM contract upon deposit/withdrawal

Controlled by user via wrap/unwrap

Controlled by governance/issuance schedule

Controlled by staking protocol smart contracts

Typical Use Case

Providing liquidity, farming rewards

Interoperability in DeFi applications

Voting on proposals, speculation

Earning staking yield while maintaining liquidity

Risk of Depeg

Yes (via Impermanent Loss)

No (maintains 1:1 peg)

High (market volatility)

Low (backed 1:1 by staked ETH + rewards)

Examples

UNI-V2, CAKE-LP

WETH, WBTC

UNI, COMP, AAVE

stETH, rETH

LIQUIDITY TOKENS

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Essential questions and answers about Liquidity Provider (LP) tokens, the core mechanism for decentralized trading and yield generation.

A Liquidity Provider (LP) token is a blockchain-based receipt token issued to users who deposit assets into a decentralized exchange (DEX) liquidity pool. It functions as a proof of ownership and a claim on a proportional share of the pooled assets and the accumulated trading fees. When you add liquidity, the protocol mints LP tokens and sends them to your wallet; when you withdraw your share, you burn the LP tokens to reclaim your underlying assets plus your portion of the fees.

For example, depositing equal value of ETH and USDC into a Uniswap V2 pool yields UNI-V2 LP tokens. The number of tokens you receive represents your percentage of the total pool. The token's value is derived from the total value locked (TVL) in the pool and the accrued fees.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Liquidity Token (LP Token) Definition & Role in DeFi | ChainScore Glossary