Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Glossary

Liquid Restaking Token (LRT)

A Liquid Restaking Token (LRT) is a tradable token representing staked assets in a restaking protocol, enabling DeFi yield while securing multiple networks.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
DEFINITION

What is a Liquid Restaking Token (LRT)?

A Liquid Restaking Token (LRT) is a derivative token that represents a user's restaked assets within a restaking protocol, providing liquidity for otherwise locked capital.

A Liquid Restaking Token (LRT) is a derivative token that represents a user's restaked assets within a restaking protocol, providing liquidity for otherwise locked capital. It is the primary innovation that enables liquid restaking, a process where staked assets like ETH or Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) are re-delegated to secure additional networks or services (like Actively Validated Services (AVS)) while generating a tradable, yield-bearing token. This solves the core liquidity problem of traditional restaking, where assets are typically locked and illiquid for extended periods.

The mechanism works as follows: a user deposits a base asset (e.g., stETH or ETH) into a restaking protocol. The protocol then restakes these assets on their behalf to one or more Actively Validated Services (AVS). In return, the user receives newly minted LRTs (e.g., ezETH, rsETH) in a 1:1 ratio to the value of their deposit. These LRTs accrue the combined yield from the underlying staking and restaking activities. Crucially, the holder can freely trade, transfer, or use these LRTs as collateral in DeFi applications while the underlying assets continue to secure external networks.

LRTs unlock significant capital efficiency and new yield strategies. Holders can engage in a restaking flywheel: using LRTs as collateral to borrow assets, which can then be restaked again to mint more LRTs. This creates leveraged exposure to restaking yields. Furthermore, LRTs are foundational to the restaking ecosystem, as they allow Actively Validated Services (AVS) to bootstrap security by attracting liquidity from a shared pool of restaked assets, rather than requiring their own dedicated stake.

Key technical considerations for LRTs include depeg risk (the potential for the LRT's market price to deviate from its net asset value), slashing risk (potential loss of underlying value due to validator misbehavior on secured AVSs), and oracle dependency (relying on price feeds to accurately value the basket of underlying assets and rewards). Protocols mitigate these through mechanisms like redemption queues, slashing insurance, and over-collateralization in DeFi integrations.

how-it-works
MECHANISM

How Does a Liquid Restaking Token (LRT) Work?

A technical breakdown of the operational flow and economic incentives behind Liquid Restaking Tokens, which unlock liquidity from staked assets.

A Liquid Restaking Token (LRT) is a derivative token that represents a user's restaked position, enabling them to provide security to multiple Actively Validated Services (AVS) while maintaining liquidity. The core mechanism begins when a user deposits a liquid staking token (e.g., stETH, rETH) or native ETH into an LRT protocol. The protocol's smart contracts then restake these assets via EigenLayer's restaking middleware, delegating them to one or more chosen node operators who run the software for various AVSs. In return for locking this capital, the user receives newly minted LRTs (e.g., ezETH, rsETH) in a 1:1 ratio to the value of their deposit, which they can freely trade, use as collateral, or deploy in other DeFi protocols.

The node operators are the active participants who run the validation software for the AVSs, such as new consensus layers, data availability layers, or oracle networks. They earn fees and rewards from these services. A portion of these rewards, after protocol fees, is accrued to the underlying value of the LRT. This creates a yield-bearing asset whose value is backed by the initial staked principal plus accumulated restaking rewards. The LRT protocol's role is to manage the technical complexity of operator selection, reward distribution, and slashing risk management, abstracting it away from the end-user.

Liquidity is the defining feature. Unlike natively restaked assets which are locked and non-transferable, LRTs are ERC-20 tokens that can be seamlessly integrated into the broader DeFi ecosystem. Holders can provide liquidity in Automated Market Makers (AMMs), use them as collateral to borrow on lending platforms, or engage in yield farming strategies—all while their underlying assets continue to secure multiple networks and generate rewards. This creates a capital efficiency feedback loop, where the same base capital secures additional services and simultaneously fuels decentralized finance applications.

The system incorporates critical risk management mechanisms. Slashing penalties for operator misbehavior are enforced by the underlying restaking layer (e.g., EigenLayer's slashing conditions). In such an event, the value of the corresponding LRTs can be reduced to cover the penalty, protecting the integrity of the secured services. LRT protocols often implement strategies like operator diversification (spreading stake across multiple operators) and AVS reward weighting to optimize for risk-adjusted returns. Users must assess the protocol's operator set, its governance, and the specific AVSs it supports, as these factors directly influence the security and yield profile of the LRT.

In practice, the workflow is: Deposit LST/ETH → Receive LRT → Underlying assets are restaked to operators → Operators validate AVSs → Rewards accrue to LRT value → User trades or uses LRT in DeFi. This mechanism decouples security provisioning from capital utility, solving a fundamental liquidity problem in proof-of-stake ecosystems. It allows the base security of Ethereum to be leveraged as a reusable trust layer for a new generation of decentralized infrastructure, with LRTs serving as the liquid, tradable representation of that economic commitment.

key-features
MECHANICS & UTILITY

Key Features of Liquid Restaking Tokens

Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs) are derivative assets that represent a user's staked position in a restaking protocol, unlocking liquidity and composability for staked assets.

01

Liquidity Unlocking

An LRT converts a non-transferable, locked staking position into a fungible ERC-20 token. This allows users to trade, lend, or use their staked assets as collateral in DeFi protocols while still earning staking and restaking rewards. It solves the capital inefficiency of traditional staking.

02

Yield Aggregation

LRTs automatically compound multiple reward streams into a single token. Holders earn:

  • Base staking rewards from the underlying consensus layer (e.g., Ethereum).
  • Additional rewards from providing cryptoeconomic security to Actively Validated Services (AVS) like rollups, oracles, and bridges.
  • Potential protocol incentive tokens from the restaking platform.
03

Automated Restaking Operations

The underlying protocol handles the complex operational logic, including:

  • AVS selection and delegation to node operators.
  • Slashing risk management across multiple services.
  • Reward claiming and distribution to LRT holders. This abstracts away technical complexity, making restaking accessible.
04

Composability & DeFi Integration

As a standard ERC-20, LRTs are composable building blocks for decentralized finance. Common integrations include:

  • Collateral in lending markets (e.g., Aave, Compound).
  • Liquidity Pairs in Automated Market Makers (e.g., Uniswap, Curve).
  • Yield strategies in vaults and aggregators. This creates a leveraged yield loop, amplifying capital efficiency.
05

Risk Diversification

By restaking across multiple Actively Validated Services (AVS), LRTs can distribute slashing and technical risk. However, this introduces new risk vectors:

  • AVS-specific slashing for faulty performance.
  • Smart contract risk in the restaking protocol.
  • Liquidity risk if the LRT's market price deviates from its underlying value.
06

Examples & Ecosystem

Prominent LRT implementations include:

  • EigenLayer's LSTs: ezETH (Renzo), eETH (Ether.fi), pufETH (Puffer Finance).
  • Babylon's Bitcoin LRTs: Tokens representing restaked Bitcoin security. Each LRT is tied to a specific restaking strategy and operator set chosen by the issuing protocol.
ecosystem-usage
LIQUID RESTAKING TOKEN

LRT Ecosystem & Protocols

Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs) are derivative assets that represent a user's restaked ETH position, unlocking liquidity and enabling participation in multiple decentralized validation services simultaneously.

01

Core Mechanism

An LRT is minted when a user deposits an Ethereum staking derivative (like stETH or rETH) into a restaking protocol. The protocol then delegates this staked capital to one or more Actively Validated Services (AVSs), such as rollups, oracles, or bridges. The LRT tokenizes this complex position, representing both the underlying staked ETH and the accrued rewards from the AVSs.

02

Primary Use Cases

LRTs serve several key functions within DeFi:

  • Liquidity Provision: Enables trading, lending, or collateralization of a restaked position without unbonding.
  • Yield Aggregation: Automatically compounds rewards from the base Ethereum staking yield and additional AVS rewards.
  • DeFi Integration: Can be used as collateral in money markets (e.g., Aave, Compound) or within liquidity pools (e.g., Curve, Balancer).
04

Associated Risks

Using LRTs introduces risks beyond standard staking:

  • Smart Contract Risk: Vulnerabilities in the LRT or underlying restaking protocol.
  • Slashing Risk: Potential loss of funds if a delegated AVS misbehaves and incurs penalties.
  • Liquidity Risk: The LRT's market price may deviate from its underlying asset value.
  • Centralization Risk: Concentration of restaked capital in a few dominant operators or AVSs.
05

Technical Components

An LRT system relies on several interconnected components:

  • Deposit Pool: Smart contract that accepts staking derivatives and mints LRTs.
  • Operator Network: Node operators who run software for the delegated AVSs.
  • Delegation Manager: Handles the logic for allocating stake to operators and AVSs.
  • Withdrawal Queue: Manages the process for users to redeem their LRT for the underlying assets, which may involve an unbonding period.
06

Economic & Market Impact

LRTs significantly alter crypto-economic security:

  • Security as a Service: Allows new protocols (AVSs) to rent economic security from Ethereum stakers.
  • Capital Efficiency: Maximizes utility of staked ETH by securing multiple networks.
  • Yield Competition: Drives innovation in staking yields, creating a market for AVS rewards.
  • Total Value Locked (TVL): LRT protocols have rapidly become a major component of Ethereum's DeFi TVL, attracting billions in capital.
examples
PROTOCOL EXAMPLES

Examples of Liquid Restaking Tokens

Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs) are issued by protocols that accept and restake user-deposited ETH or LSTs, providing liquidity and yield. Below are prominent examples in the ecosystem.

COMPARISON MATRIX

LRT vs. LST vs. Native Staking

A technical comparison of three primary methods for earning staking rewards, highlighting key differences in liquidity, yield sources, and risk profiles.

Feature / MetricLiquid Restaking Token (LRT)Liquid Staking Token (LST)Native Staking

Primary Function

Tokenizes restaked assets for additional yield from Actively Validated Services (AVS)

Tokenizes natively staked assets to provide liquidity

Direct participation in a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) network's consensus

Yield Sources

PoS staking rewards + AVS rewards

PoS staking rewards

PoS staking rewards

Liquidity

Fungible token tradable on secondary markets

Fungible token tradable on secondary markets

Assets are locked and illiquid during the unbonding period

Capital Efficiency

High (capital earns from multiple services simultaneously)

High (capital is liquid while staked)

Low (capital is locked and illiquid)

Technical Complexity for User

High (involves smart contract and AVS risk assessment)

Low (simple staking derivative)

Medium (requires node operation or delegation knowledge)

Unbonding / Withdrawal Period

Varies by platform and underlying LST; typically 1-7+ days

Varies by platform; typically 1-7+ days

Network-defined; typically 7-28 days

Primary Risk Exposure

Smart contract risk, AVS slashing/censorship risk, underlying LST risk

Smart contract risk, validator slashing risk

Validator slashing risk, illiquidity risk

Custodial Model

Non-custodial (via smart contracts)

Non-custodial (via smart contracts)

Non-custodial (self-custody of keys)

security-considerations
LIQUID RESTAKING TOKEN (LRT)

Security Considerations & Risks

While LRTs enhance capital efficiency, they introduce unique security vectors beyond standard staking, primarily through increased protocol complexity and smart contract dependencies.

01

Smart Contract Risk

LRTs inherit all risks from the underlying restaking protocol (e.g., EigenLayer) and the LRT issuer's contracts. This creates a multi-layered dependency where a critical bug or exploit in any layer can compromise user funds. Unlike native staking, funds pass through several smart contracts before being deployed to Actively Validated Services (AVSs).

02

Slashing & Penalty Propagation

If an operator on the underlying restaking network is slashed for malicious behavior or downtime, those penalties are propagated to LRT holders. The LRT's value can be diluted to cover slashing events. The specific slashing conditions and how losses are socialized across token holders are critical protocol parameters.

03

Oracle & Pricing Risk

LRT protocols rely on oracles to value the basket of restaked assets and reward streams backing the token. An oracle failure or manipulation could lead to incorrect minting, redemption, or collateral valuation. This is distinct from liquid staking tokens (LSTs) which track a single underlying asset.

04

Centralization & Operator Risk

LRT value depends on the performance and security of the node operators selected by the restaking protocol. Over-reliance on a small set of operators creates systemic risk. Users must trust the LRT issuer's operator selection and monitoring processes, which adds a layer of custodial-like risk in a non-custodial system.

05

Liquidity & Depeg Risk

While designed to be liquid, LRTs can depeg from their net asset value (NAV) during market stress, smart contract issues, or liquidity crises. Withdrawals are often subject to unstaking delays (e.g., Ethereum's withdrawal queue) and potential redemption queues if the underlying assets are illiquid.

06

AVS & Systemic Risk

LRTs amplify systemic risk within the restaking ecosystem. A failure or coordinated attack on a major Actively Validated Service (AVS) could trigger cascading slashing across many operators, impacting all LRTs built on that restaking layer. This creates interconnected failure modes not present in isolated staking.

LIQUID RESTAKING TOKENS

Common Misconceptions About LRTs

Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs) are complex financial primitives that are often misunderstood. This section clarifies the most frequent technical and economic misconceptions developers and analysts encounter.

No, Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs) are a distinct financial primitive that builds upon but fundamentally differs from Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs). An LST (like stETH or rETH) represents a claim on a validator's staked ETH and its base consensus layer rewards. An LRT represents a claim on a validator's staked ETH that has been restaked into one or more Actively Validated Services (AVS) on EigenLayer. This means the underlying capital is simultaneously securing the Ethereum Beacon Chain and providing economic security (slashing risk) to external systems like rollups, oracles, or bridges. The LRT's value accrual is therefore a composite of Ethereum staking rewards plus rewards (and risks) from the AVSs it secures.

LIQUID RESTAKING TOKEN (LRT)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Essential questions and answers about Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs), a key innovation in decentralized finance that unlocks additional utility for staked assets.

A Liquid Restaking Token (LRT) is a derivative token that represents a user's restaked ETH or other assets, providing liquidity and enabling participation in multiple decentralized networks simultaneously. The process works by first depositing a Liquid Staking Token (LST), like stETH, into a restaking protocol such as EigenLayer. The protocol then stakes these assets on behalf of Actively Validated Services (AVSs)—which can include new blockchains, oracles, or data availability layers. In return, the user receives an LRT (e.g., ezETH, rsETH) that represents their restaked position and accrues rewards from these additional services, all while remaining a liquid, tradeable asset.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Liquid Restaking Token (LRT) | Chainscore Glossary | ChainScore Glossary