Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Glossary

Bitstring Status List

A W3C-standardized method for checking Verifiable Credential revocation status using compressed bit arrays for efficient, privacy-preserving verification.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
VERIFIABLE CREDENTIALS

What is a Bitstring Status List?

A Bitstring Status List is a W3C-standardized mechanism for encoding the revocation or suspension status of Verifiable Credentials using a compressed, space-efficient bitstring.

A Bitstring Status List is a W3C Verifiable Credentials standard that uses a compact bitstring—a sequence of 0s and 1s—to represent the revocation or suspension status of a batch of credentials. Each credential is mapped to a specific bit position within the string, where a 0 typically indicates the credential is valid, and a 1 indicates it is revoked or suspended. This method provides a highly efficient, privacy-preserving way for verifiers to check credential status without revealing which specific credential is being queried, as the entire list is fetched and the relevant bit is checked locally.

The core innovation is its space efficiency and scalability. Instead of managing individual revocation entries for thousands of credentials, an issuer maintains a single, compressed bitstring. This bitstring is published at a stable URL, often as a Verifiable Credential itself, containing metadata like the statusPurpose (e.g., revocation or suspension), the encodedList (a base64-encoded GZIP-compressed bitstring), and the cryptographic proof of its integrity. This design drastically reduces bandwidth and storage requirements compared to traditional certificate revocation lists (CRLs).

For a verifier to check a credential's status, they follow the credentialStatus property embedded in the credential, which points to the status list's URL and specifies the credential's unique index within the bitstring. The verifier downloads the list, decompresses it, and checks the bit at the given index. This process is cryptographically verifiable, ensuring the list hasn't been tampered with, and is privacy-enhancing because the issuer only sees a request for the entire list, not the index of the credential being verified.

The standard defines two primary list types: a StatusList2021 for general-purpose status tracking and a BitstringStatusListEntry as the corresponding entry in a credential. Key technical parameters include the statusListIndex (the bit position), statusListCredential (the URL of the list VC), and the compression algorithm. This approach is foundational for building scalable, interoperable decentralized identity systems where credential revocation must be efficient, trustworthy, and privacy-respecting.

how-it-works
TECHNICAL DEEP DIVE

How a Bitstring Status List Works

A technical breakdown of the compact, verifiable data structure used to manage statuses like credential revocation.

A Bitstring Status List is a verifiable data structure that uses a string of bits—where each bit represents the binary status (e.g., 0 for valid, 1 for revoked) of a corresponding item in a list—enabling highly efficient and scalable status checks for systems like Verifiable Credentials. This mechanism, defined in the W3C Status List 2021 specification, compresses what would be a large list of individual status entries into a single, compact bitstring, dramatically reducing the data payload required for status dissemination and verification.

The core operation involves indexing and bitwise operations. Each verifiable item, such as a credential, is assigned a unique, stable index number. To check its status, a verifier retrieves the shared bitstring and checks the value of the bit at that specific index. A 1 typically indicates a revoked or suspended status, while a 0 indicates valid. This check is performed using a simple bitwise AND operation against a bitmask, making it computationally trivial and extremely fast, even for lists containing millions of entries.

Integrity and trust are ensured by anchoring the bitstring within a Verifiable Credential itself, known as a Status List Credential. This credential is cryptographically signed by the issuer. The bitstring is encoded, often using Base64 (e.g., "H4sIAAAAAAAA_-3BMQEAAADCoPVPbQwfoAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIC3AYbSVKsAQAAA"), and included in the credential's payload. Verifiers must fetch this credential and verify its signature to trust the status list, ensuring the bitstring has not been tampered with by any intermediary.

The primary advantages are efficiency and privacy. Unlike querying a centralized revocation registry for each credential, a static bitstring can be cached and distributed via content-addressable networks like IPFS. This reduces latency, avoids issuer-side query bottlenecks, and enhances scalability. From a privacy perspective, checking a single bit reveals no information about other entries in the list, unlike some schemes that might leak the total number of revoked items.

Practical implementation requires careful management. Issuers must maintain the mapping between credentials and their immutable index positions. Updates to the status list—such as revoking a credential—require issuing a new version of the Status List Credential with the appropriate bit flipped from 0 to 1, and potentially distributing its new identifier to verifiers. This trade-off favors simplicity and verifiability over real-time, sub-second status updates, making it ideal for use cases where immediate revocation is not critical.

key-features
MECHANICAL BREAKDOWN

Key Features of Bitstring Status Lists

A Bitstring Status List is a W3C Verifiable Credentials standard that uses a compact bitstring to encode the status (e.g., valid, suspended, revoked) of a large set of items. This section details its core operational features.

01

Compact Bitstring Encoding

The core data structure is a bitstring, where each bit represents the status of a single, uniquely indexed credential or item. A 0 typically indicates a 'valid' or 'active' status, while a 1 indicates 'revoked' or 'suspended'. This provides extreme data density, allowing millions of statuses to be represented in a single, small file (e.g., a 125KB file can hold the status for 1 million items).

02

Deterministic Indexing via `statusListIndex`

Each verifiable credential links to its specific status bit using a statusListIndex claim. This integer points to the exact bit position within the shared bitstring. The binding is cryptographically secured, ensuring the status check is for the intended credential and cannot be spoofed by referencing a different bit.

03

Cryptographic Integrity & Non-Repudiation

The status list bitstring itself is published as a Verifiable Credential signed by the issuer. This means:

  • The bitstring's content is tamper-evident; any change breaks the signature.
  • The issuer's identity is cryptographically bound to the status declarations.
  • Verifiers check the signature to ensure the status list is authentic and authoritative.
04

Efficient Batch Revocation & Updates

Issuers can revoke or suspend many credentials simultaneously by publishing a single updated status list. This is far more efficient than traditional methods requiring individual revocation entries or OCSP checks. The entire list is versioned, and verifiers fetch the latest signed version to check current status.

05

Decentralized & Portable Storage

The status list credential can be stored anywhere accessible via HTTP(S), including decentralized storage networks (e.g., IPFS, Arweave) or traditional web servers. This decouples status management from the credential's issuance protocol, enhancing portability and resilience compared to centralized revocation registries.

06

Selective Disclosure & Privacy

When combined with zero-knowledge proofs, a holder can prove their credential's status bit is 0 (valid) without revealing the statusListIndex or the identities of other credentials on the same list. This enables privacy-preserving verification, a significant advantage over transparent blockchain-based revocation methods.

examples
IMPLEMENTATIONS

Examples & Ecosystem Usage

Bitstring Status Lists are a foundational standard enabling efficient credential revocation and state management across decentralized identity, supply chain, and DeFi applications.

02

W3C Standardization

EXPLORE
03

Supply Chain Provenance

In supply chain tracking, a status list can represent the state of individual items or batches as they move through a process.

  • Each bit corresponds to a specific item (e.g., a pallet or shipment).
  • Bits can be toggled to indicate states like "in-transit", "inspected", "delivered", or "recalled".
  • This provides a lightweight, auditable ledger of state changes without requiring a full transaction for each update.
04

DeFi & Compliance Lists

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocols use status lists for sanctions compliance and risk management.

  • A sanctions list can be published as a bitstring, where each bit represents a specific wallet address.
  • Protocols can efficiently check if an interacting address is flagged by verifying its index in the list.
  • This enables real-time compliance checks without exposing the entire list of addresses to the public verifier.
05

Credential Issuer Implementation

An issuer implementing a status list must:

  1. Generate the List: Create a bitstring (e.g., 16KB for 131,072 credentials) and host it at a persistent URI.
  2. Embed the Index: Include the statusListIndex and statusListCredential URL in each issued VC.
  3. Update the List: To revoke a credential, flip the corresponding bit from 0 (valid) to 1 (revoked) and publish a new version of the status list credential.

Tools like Trinsic and Spruce ID provide SDKs for this workflow.

06

Verifier's Check Process

When a verifier receives a VC, the status check process is:

  • Parse Metadata: Extract the statusListCredential URI and the statusListIndex from the VC.
  • Fetch List: Retrieve the status list credential from the URI and verify its own cryptographic signature.
  • Decode & Check: Decode the base64url-encoded encodedList into a bitstring. Check the bit at the provided index.
  • Interpret: A 0 bit means active/valid. A 1 bit means revoked/suspended.

This entire process is defined by the W3C specification for consistent results.

REVOCATION MECHANISMS

Comparison: Bitstring Status List vs. Other Revocation Methods

A technical comparison of credential revocation approaches based on scalability, privacy, and operational complexity.

Feature / MetricBitstring Status List (W3C)Revocation Registry (Indy/AnonCreds)OCSP (X.509 PKI)

Data Structure

Compressed bitstring

Accumulator / cryptographic registry

Signed response payload

Status Check Privacy

Passive (list download)

Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP)

Active (query to issuer)

Verifier Workload

Low (cache & parse list)

High (compute ZKP)

Medium (request & validate signature)

Issuer Workload Per Revocation

Low (bit flip)

High (registry update & proof gen)

Medium (update CA DB)

Scalability (List Size)

~8 KB per 64k credentials

Grows with revocations

Per-request, no bulk list

Decentralization Potential

High (list can be hosted anywhere)

Medium (requires registry consensus)

Low (centralized CA)

W3C VC Data Integrity Compliant

Real-Time Status Guarantee

security-considerations
BITSTRING STATUS LIST

Security & Privacy Considerations

Bitstring status lists enable efficient credential revocation but introduce unique security and privacy trade-offs that must be carefully managed.

01

Credential Integrity & Tampering

The integrity of a status list is paramount. A compromised list can falsely revoke valid credentials or falsely validate revoked ones. Protection relies on:

  • Cryptographic anchoring (e.g., to a blockchain or a signed Merkle tree) to make tampering detectable.
  • Publisher authenticity via verifiable signatures to ensure the list originates from the trusted issuer.
  • Immutable storage or append-only logs to prevent historical revision.
02

Privacy Leakage via Correlation

Sharing a status list index can enable correlation and profiling. Risks include:

  • Holder identification: If a verifier knows which bit index a holder uses, they can track that holder across different interactions.
  • Credential linkage: Using the same index for multiple credentials from the same issuer links those credentials together.
  • Mitigations include using encrypted status lists or privacy-preserving bitstring proofs that allow verification without revealing the specific index.
03

Availability & Denial-of-Service

A status list is a critical dependency for verification. If it becomes unavailable, verification fails, causing a denial-of-service. Key considerations:

  • Decentralized hosting (e.g., IPFS, blockchain storage) to avoid single points of failure.
  • Caching strategies and reasonable time-to-live (TTL) for list copies to ensure resilience.
  • Grace periods in verification logic to handle temporary unavailability without automatically failing checks.
04

Revocation Granularity & Scope

The bitstring format forces design choices about revocation scope, impacting security and privacy.

  • Coarse-grained (one list per issuer) is simple but leaks more information (all credentials from that issuer share a list).
  • Fine-grained (one list per credential type or per holder) improves privacy but increases management complexity and list size.
  • Selective disclosure mechanisms are needed to prove a credential's status without revealing other list entries.
05

Key Management for List Updates

The ability to update a status list (flip bits from 0 to 1) is a powerful privilege that must be securely controlled.

  • Requires robust issuer key management to prevent unauthorized revocation.
  • Should follow the principle of least privilege, potentially separating keys for issuance and revocation.
  • Update mechanisms must be auditable, with a verifiable record of all changes to the list's state over time.
06

Implementation & Specification Risks

Adherence to the W3C VC Status List 2021 specification is critical for interoperability, but implementation flaws create risks.

  • Bit indexing errors (0-indexed vs 1-indexed) can cause incorrect status checks.
  • Compression (like GZIP) of the bitstring must be handled correctly to avoid parsing vulnerabilities.
  • Clock skew and synchronization issues can arise when checking the statusListCredential's issuance date against the list's validity period.
technical-details
BITSTRING STATUS LIST

Technical Details: The StatusList2021 Entry

This section details the core technical specification of a StatusList2021 entry, which is a compact, verifiable data structure for encoding the status of multiple credentials.

A StatusList2021 entry is a bitstring—a sequence of bits (0s and 1s)—where each bit represents the status (e.g., revoked or valid) of a corresponding Verifiable Credential. The bitstring is encoded in Base64 format for efficient transmission and storage within a credential's credentialStatus property. The position of a bit within the string, known as its index, is used to look up the status of a specific credential, enabling a single list to manage the status of thousands of credentials with minimal data overhead.

The mechanism is defined by the StatusList2021 specification, a W3C Community Group standard. A credential issuer creates a single, centralized bitstring list and publishes its cryptographic digest (e.g., as a statusPurpose and statusListIndex) within each issued credential. To check a credential's status, a verifier uses the index to locate the relevant bit in the published list. A bit value of 1 typically indicates a revoked or suspended status, while 0 indicates the credential is valid, though the specific semantics are defined by the statusPurpose field.

The integrity and authenticity of the status list are guaranteed because the list's URI points to a verifiable credential itself—the StatusList2021Credential. This credential contains the encoded bitstring and is signed by the issuer. Therefore, a verifier must fetch and verify this status list credential just like any other, ensuring the status information is tamper-evident and originates from the trusted issuer. This design separates the status information from the credential payload, enabling efficient, scalable revocation without altering the original credential.

BITSTRING STATUS LIST

Common Misconceptions

Clarifying widespread misunderstandings about the technical implementation and purpose of the Bitstring Status List, a core component of the W3C Verifiable Credentials ecosystem.

No, a Bitstring Status List is not a blockchain. It is a compact data structure, typically a simple string of bits (0s and 1s), where each bit represents the status (e.g., valid or revoked) of a corresponding Verifiable Credential. While it can be published to and referenced from a blockchain for immutability and decentralized trust, the list itself is a static, centralized file. The blockchain acts as a tamper-evident anchor for the list's location and integrity, not as the storage medium for the bits themselves.

BITSTRING STATUS LIST

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Common questions about the W3C Verifiable Credentials Bitstring Status List specification, a compact method for managing credential revocation and suspension.

A Bitstring Status List is a W3C standard that uses a compressed bitstring to represent the revocation or suspension status of a large set of Verifiable Credentials. It works by assigning each credential a unique index position within a long binary string (the bitstring), where a 0 typically means the credential is valid and a 1 means it is revoked. The entire list is encoded into a highly compressed format, such as Base64 GZIP, and published at a stable URL. A verifier checks a credential's status by fetching this list, decompressing it, and inspecting the bit at the credential's specific index. This method is vastly more efficient than managing individual revocation entries for each credential.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Bitstring Status List: W3C Credential Revocation Method | ChainScore Glossary