Selective disclosure for status is a core feature of Verifiable Credentials (VCs) and Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) systems. It enables a user (the holder) to prove a specific attribute or claim from a credential—such as being over 21 years old or holding a professional certification—to a verifier without exposing the underlying document, its issuer, or any other personal information contained within it. This is a fundamental shift from presenting an entire physical or digital document, which inherently leaks excess data.
Selective Disclosure for Status
What is Selective Disclosure for Status?
A privacy-preserving mechanism that allows a holder of a digital credential to prove a specific claim about their status without revealing the entire credential or other unrelated personal data.
The technical implementation often relies on cryptographic techniques like digital signatures, BBS+ signatures, or zk-SNARKs. For example, a university-issued digital diploma credential might contain fields for name, date of birth, degree, and graduation date. Using selective disclosure, a graduate could prove the single statement "I hold a Master's degree from University X" to a potential employer. The employer receives a cryptographically verifiable proof of this specific claim but learns nothing about the graduate's birth date or exact graduation year, preserving privacy.
This capability is critical for building user-centric digital identity systems. It empowers individuals with data minimization and control, aligning with regulations like GDPR. Use cases extend beyond identity to include proving membership status for a DAO, demonstrating financial standing for a loan without revealing full transaction history, or verifying age for age-gated services. The W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model standard provides a framework for implementing these selective disclosure patterns, ensuring interoperability across different platforms and issuers.
Key Features
Selective disclosure is a cryptographic technique that allows a user to prove a specific claim about their credentials or data without revealing the underlying information. It is a core privacy-enhancing feature of verifiable credentials.
Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs)
The cryptographic engine for selective disclosure. Zero-knowledge proofs allow a prover to convince a verifier that a statement is true without revealing any information beyond the validity of the statement itself. This enables proving attributes like "I am over 21" without disclosing your exact birth date.
- Types: Common implementations include zk-SNARKs and zk-STARKs.
- Use Case: Proving membership in a group or possession of a credential with specific properties.
Verifiable Credentials (VCs)
The data format that enables selective disclosure. A Verifiable Credential is a tamper-evident, cryptographically signed set of claims (e.g., a digital driver's license). The holder can present a Verifiable Presentation, which is a subset of the original credential's claims, often using ZKPs.
- Standard: Defined by the W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model.
- Components: Issuer, Holder, Verifier, and the credential itself.
Attribute-Based Credentials
A credential structure designed for granular disclosure. Unlike a monolithic credential, attribute-based credentials contain multiple independent attributes. The holder can selectively reveal only the necessary attributes (e.g., just a university degree type) while keeping others (like GPA or student ID) hidden.
- Example: Coconut credentials or U-Prove are protocols built for this purpose.
- Benefit: Minimizes data exposure and correlation risk.
Predicate Proofs
Proving statements about data without revealing the data. Predicate proofs allow a user to prove that a hidden attribute satisfies a certain condition. This is a specific application of ZKPs for selective disclosure.
- Common Predicates:
>,<,=,IN(set membership). - Real-world Example: Proving your income is greater than $50,000 for a loan application without revealing the exact figure.
Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs)
The foundation for identifier control. Decentralized Identifiers are a W3C standard for self-sovereign identity. They provide a persistent, verifiable identifier that is controlled by the holder, not a central authority. DIDs are often the subject of a Verifiable Credential.
- Role: Enables the holder to prove control over their identity when presenting credentials selectively.
- Format:
did:method:identifier(e.g.,did:ethr:0x...).
Minimal Disclosure & Correlation Resistance
The core privacy principles. Minimal disclosure means revealing the absolute minimum amount of information necessary for a transaction. Correlation resistance ensures that different presentations of credentials cannot be linked back to the same holder or to each other, preventing tracking across services.
- Threat Mitigation: Protects against identity linkage and profiling.
- Design Goal: A key objective of advanced selective disclosure systems like anonymous credentials.
How Selective Disclosure for Status Works
A technical overview of the cryptographic method that allows users to prove specific attributes from a credential without revealing the entire document.
Selective disclosure for status is a privacy-enhancing technique within verifiable credentials that enables a holder to prove a specific claim, such as being "over 21" or "a verified member," without revealing the entire credential or other unrelated personal data. This is achieved through cryptographic proofs like zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) or BBS+ signatures, which allow the verifier to confirm the truth of the disclosed statement while the remaining information stays encrypted and private. The core principle moves beyond the all-or-nothing model of traditional document sharing, granting users granular control over their digital identity.
The process typically involves three parties: the issuer (who creates the signed credential), the holder (who possesses it), and the verifier (who requests proof). The issuer signs a set of claims into a verifiable credential. When a verifier, such as a service requiring age verification, requests proof, the holder's wallet uses a selective disclosure protocol to generate a verifiable presentation. This presentation contains only the necessary disclosed claims and a cryptographic proof that they are valid and were issued by a trusted source, without leaking the credential's unique identifier or other attributes.
For example, a university-issued digital diploma credential may contain attributes for name, degree, graduation date, and GPA. Using selective disclosure, a graduate could prove to an employer that they hold a Bachelor's degree from XYZ University without revealing their exact GPA or student ID. The employer's verification system checks the cryptographic proof against the university's public key, confirming the claim's authenticity. This minimizes data exposure and reduces the risk of correlation and profiling across different service providers.
Implementing selective disclosure relies on specific cryptographic suites. BBS+ signatures are a prominent standard, allowing for the derivation of multiple unlinkable proofs from a single signature. Zero-knowledge Succinct Non-interactive Arguments of Knowledge (zk-SNARKs) offer another powerful method, enabling proofs for complex statements (e.g., "age > 21") without revealing the underlying birthdate. These tools are foundational to W3C Verifiable Credentials standards and decentralized identity frameworks, ensuring interoperability and strong security guarantees.
The primary benefits are enhanced user privacy and data minimization, which are core tenets of regulations like GDPR. It reduces the attack surface for data breaches, as credentials are never stored in full by verifiers. For developers and systems, it enables new trust models where services can request proof of compliance rather than possession of raw data, streamlining onboarding and KYC processes while fostering greater user trust and control over personal information in digital interactions.
Examples & Use Cases
Selective disclosure enables users to prove specific attributes from a credential without revealing the entire document. This section outlines practical applications where this privacy-preserving technique is critical.
Proof of Legal Age
A user can prove they are over 21 to access a service by generating a zero-knowledge proof from their government-issued ID. The verifier learns only the validity of the statement "age ≥ 21" without seeing the user's birth date, name, or address. This is a foundational use case for anonymous credentials in age-gated platforms.
Credit Score Verification
When applying for a loan, a user can selectively disclose that their credit score is above a lender's minimum threshold (e.g., >700) without revealing the exact score or their full credit history. This protects sensitive financial data while enabling trust in decentralized finance (DeFi) undercollateralized lending protocols.
Professional Accreditation
A software developer can prove they hold a valid certification from a specific institution (e.g., "Certified Ethereum Developer") without revealing their student ID, graduation date, or other personal details on the credential. This enables trust in DAO contributions or freelance work while minimizing data exposure.
Membership & Access Control
A user can prove membership in a specific organization (e.g., a university alumni group or a DAO) to gain access to gated content or physical spaces. The proof verifies membership status without revealing the user's internal member ID or join date, enhancing privacy in web3 social graphs and community platforms.
KYC/AML Compliance
Financial institutions can satisfy Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations by verifying a user is not on a sanctions list or is a resident of a permitted jurisdiction. Selective disclosure allows this verification without the institution ever seeing or storing the user's full identity document, a principle central to self-sovereign identity (SSI).
Selective Disclosure in zk-SNARKs
This is the core cryptographic primitive enabling selective disclosure. A zk-SNARK proof allows a prover to demonstrate knowledge of a secret (like a private key or credential) that satisfies a public statement (e.g., "balance > X") without revealing the secret itself. It's the engine behind private transactions on networks like Zcash and complex logic in zkRollups.
Comparison: Status Disclosure Methods
A comparison of technical methods for cryptographically proving specific claims about a user's status or credentials without revealing the underlying data.
| Feature / Metric | Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) | Verifiable Credentials (VCs) | Commitment Schemes |
|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic Basis | ZK-SNARKs, STARKs, Bulletproofs | JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), Linked Data Proofs | Pedersen Commitments, Hash-based |
Data Minimization | |||
Selective Disclosure Granularity | Per-attribute or complex predicates | Per-credential (all-or-nothing) | Per-commitment (pre-defined set) |
Proof Size | ~1-10 KB (SNARK) | ~1-5 KB (JWT) | < 100 bytes |
Verification Cost | High computational (SNARK) | Low computational (JWT) | Very low computational |
Revocation Mechanism | Nullifiers, accumulators | Status lists, registries | Reveal opening, timed commitments |
Trust Model | Trustless verification | Issuer-dependent trust | Trustless setup, trusted opener |
Primary Use Case | Private on-chain verification | Portable off-chain identity | Private voting, sealed-bid auctions |
Security & Privacy Considerations
Selective disclosure is a cryptographic technique that allows a user to prove a specific claim about their data without revealing the underlying data itself. This is fundamental for privacy-preserving verification in decentralized identity and credential systems.
Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs)
The core cryptographic primitive enabling selective disclosure. A Zero-Knowledge Proof allows a prover to convince a verifier that a statement is true without revealing any information beyond the validity of the statement itself. For example, proving you are over 18 from a credential without revealing your birth date.
- ZKP Types: Common implementations include zk-SNARKs (Succinct Non-interactive ARguments of Knowledge) and zk-STARKs (Scalable Transparent ARguments of Knowledge).
- Privacy Guarantee: Ensures data minimization, revealing only what is necessary for the transaction.
Verifiable Credentials (VCs)
The data format standard for selective disclosure. A Verifiable Credential is a tamper-evident digital credential whose issuer can be cryptographically verified. Holders can create Verifiable Presentations that selectively disclose specific claims from one or more VCs.
- W3C Standard: The model is defined by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).
- Selective Disclosure Mechanisms: VCs can support derived proofs (like BBS+ signatures) or be issued with blinded attributes to enable disclosure of only selected attributes.
Attribute-Based Signatures & BBS+
Specific signature schemes designed for selective disclosure. BBS+ Signatures (Boneh-Boyen-Shacham, with modifications) allow a user to sign a set of messages and later generate a proof that they possess a signature on a subset of those messages.
- Key Feature: The proof is unlinkable, meaning multiple presentations from the same credential cannot be linked together.
- Efficiency: Enables disclosure of a single attribute from a multi-attribute credential without revealing the master signature or other attributes.
Presentation Layer Attacks
Security risks that persist even with strong cryptography. Selective disclosure protects data in transit and in proof, but vulnerabilities can exist at the presentation layer.
- Correlation Attacks: If a user repeatedly discloses the same unique attribute (e.g., a specific DID), their activity can be correlated across sessions.
- Metadata Leakage: Timing of presentations, IP addresses, or the choice of verifier can leak contextual information.
- Verifier Collusion: Multiple verifiers could collude to combine partial disclosures to reconstruct a fuller profile.
Revocation & Freshness
Critical mechanisms for maintaining the integrity of selectively disclosed claims. A credential's status must be checkable without compromising privacy.
- Privacy-Preserving Revocation: Methods like accumulators (e.g., RSA, Merkle) or revocation lists with blinded indices allow a verifier to check if a credential is revoked without learning which specific credential is being presented.
- Freshness Proofs: Use of nonces or timestamps in the proof request to prevent replay attacks, where an old, possibly invalid proof is reused.
Trust Model & Issuer Assurance
The security of selective disclosure is bounded by the trust in the original data source. Garbage in, garbage out applies.
- Issuer Authentication: The cryptographic proof verifies the credential's origin, but not the truthfulness of the issued data. The verifier must trust the issuer's procedures (e.g., a government's KYC process).
- Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs): Used to identify issuers, holders, and verifiers in a decentralized manner, anchoring trust in a blockchain or distributed ledger.
Selective Disclosure for Status
This section details the cryptographic mechanisms and data structures that enable selective disclosure, a core privacy feature for verifiable credentials.
Selective disclosure is a cryptographic technique that allows a holder of a verifiable credential (VC) to prove specific claims from it—such as being over 21—without revealing the entire credential or other unrelated attributes. This is achieved through zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) or signature schemes like BBS+ (Boneh-Boyen-Shacham) signatures, which enable the creation of a derived, minimal proof from the original signed data. The core principle is data minimization, providing only the information strictly necessary for a given interaction, such as a verifier checking access rights.
The technical implementation typically involves three key components: the issuer's signature over a set of claims, the holder's presentation of a subset of those claims, and the verifier's verification of the proof's validity and the issuer's signature. For example, using BBS+ signatures, an issuer signs a cryptographic commitment to multiple attributes. The holder can then generate a zero-knowledge proof that convinces a verifier that they possess a valid signature on attributes satisfying a given predicate (e.g., birthdate > 2003-01-01), without disclosing the actual birthdate or other signed data.
Common implementation patterns include predicate proofs (proving a statement about a hidden attribute, like age > 18), equality proofs (proving the same hidden value is used across multiple credentials), and attribute non-disclosure (withholding specific attributes entirely). These are often built using zk-SNARKs or zk-STARKs for more complex logic. Frameworks like AnonCreds and W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Integrity with BBS+ signatures provide standardized ways to implement selective disclosure, ensuring interoperability across different decentralized identity systems and blockchain platforms.
Ecosystem Usage & Standards
Selective Disclosure is a cryptographic method that allows a user to prove specific claims from a credential without revealing the entire document. This section details its core standards and applications in decentralized identity and compliance.
Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs)
The cryptographic engine behind advanced selective disclosure. ZK-SNARKs and ZK-STARKs allow a user to generate a proof that a statement about their credentials is true (e.g., 'I am accredited' or 'my credit score > 700') without revealing the underlying data, enabling privacy-preserving verification.
Presentation Exchange
A protocol for requesting and submitting selective disclosures. A Verifier sends a Presentation Definition specifying required claims and proof types. The Holder uses a Presentation Submission to provide only the requested proofs, structuring the interaction flow for credential exchange.
Use Case: KYC/AML Compliance
Enables privacy-enhanced regulatory checks. A user can prove they have passed KYC with a licensed provider without revealing their full identity document. Specific attributes like citizenship or lack of sanctions list presence can be disclosed to a DeFi protocol, minimizing data exposure.
Use Case: Token-Gated Access
Facilitates granular access control based on token ownership. Instead of connecting a full wallet, a user can provide a zero-knowledge proof that they hold an NFT from a specific collection or a minimum token balance, granting access to a community or service while preserving financial privacy.
Common Misconceptions
Selective disclosure is a core privacy feature in zero-knowledge proofs, allowing users to reveal specific claims from a credential without exposing the entire document. This section clarifies frequent misunderstandings about its capabilities and limitations, particularly regarding the verification of statuses like age or membership.
No, selective disclosure is designed to reveal zero personal data beyond the specific, user-approved claim. When proving you are over 21, a zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) cryptographically demonstrates the truth of the statement "age > 21" without transmitting your birth date, name, or any other attribute from the credential. The verifier learns only the validity of the single claim, not the underlying data that proves it. This is a fundamental difference from redacting a PDF, where hidden data is still present and could be extracted.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Selective disclosure is a core privacy-enhancing technology in decentralized identity and verifiable credentials. These questions address its implementation, use cases, and technical foundations.
Selective disclosure is a cryptographic method that allows a holder of a verifiable credential to prove specific claims from it without revealing the entire credential or document. It works by using zero-knowledge proofs or cryptographic signatures that enable the prover to generate a proof for a subset of the signed data. For example, using BBS+ signatures or zk-SNARKs, a user can prove they are over 21 from a digital driver's license without revealing their exact birth date, name, or address. This mechanism separates data minimization from the initial issuance of the credential, providing both privacy and verifiable authenticity.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.