A Liquid Staking Token (LST) Bridge is a cross-chain interoperability protocol designed to facilitate the trust-minimized transfer of liquid staking derivatives across disparate blockchain ecosystems. Unlike a simple asset bridge that mints a wrapped representation, an LST bridge must also synchronize reward accrual and maintain the token's core functionalities—such as staking, collateralization, and governance—on the destination chain. This is achieved through sophisticated messaging layers (e.g., LayerZero, Wormhole, Axelar) and canonical representations that ensure the bridged asset remains fully composable within the new network's DeFi landscape.
LABS
Glossary
Liquid Staking Tokens (Bridge)
Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) in a bridge context are derivative tokens issued to represent assets staked within a cross-chain bridge's security or validation mechanism, unlocking liquidity and DeFi utility while earning staking rewards.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
CROSS-CHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE
What is a Liquid Staking Token (LST) Bridge?
A Liquid Staking Token (LST) Bridge is a specialized cross-chain messaging protocol that enables the transfer of liquid staking tokens, like Lido's stETH or Rocket Pool's rETH, between different blockchain networks while preserving their underlying staking rewards and utility.
The primary technical challenge these bridges solve is the portability of yield. Since an LST's value continuously increases from staking rewards on its native chain (e.g., Ethereum), the bridge must accurately reflect this accrued value on the destination chain. Common mechanisms include using oracle networks to periodically attest to the updated exchange rate between the LST and its underlying asset or employing canonical token standards that allow the bridged token to be burned and redeemed for the original, yield-bearing asset on the source chain. This ensures users do not forfeit rewards while utilizing their capital elsewhere.
Key examples in practice include Lido's wstETH bridges to Layer 2s and alternative Layer 1s, which allow stETH to be used as collateral on Aave on Arbitrum or for trading on decentralized exchanges on Polygon. Similarly, Rocket Pool's rETH is bridged via protocols like Across and Synapse. The security model is paramount, often relying on the underlying bridge's validation mechanism—be it a multi-signature federation, a proof-of-stake validator set, or optimistic verification—to prevent the minting of illegitimate, non-yield-bearing tokens on the destination chain.
For developers and users, LST bridges unlock significant capital efficiency and DeFi composability. They allow staked assets, traditionally locked and illiquid on a single chain, to be leveraged across the multi-chain ecosystem. This creates unified liquidity pools, enables cross-chain collateralization for loans, and fosters the development of cross-chain staking strategies. However, users must assess the bridge's security assumptions and the inherent smart contract risks associated with the wrapped token representation on the destination network.
how-it-works
MECHANICS
How Do Bridge Liquid Staking Tokens Work?
Bridge Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) are derivative assets that represent staked assets from a foreign blockchain, enabling cross-chain liquidity and yield generation.
A Bridge Liquid Staking Token (Bridge LST) is a derivative token minted on a destination blockchain (e.g., Ethereum, Arbitrum) that represents a user's stake in a proof-of-stake asset from a foreign origin chain (e.g., Solana, Cosmos). The core mechanism involves a bridging protocol that locks or delegates the native tokens on their home chain and mints a corresponding synthetic token on the target chain. This token, the Bridge LST, accrues staking rewards from the origin chain's consensus mechanism, with its value increasing relative to the underlying asset to reflect accrued yield.
The operational flow typically follows a three-step process. First, a user deposits a native staking asset like SOL into a smart contract or with a designated validator on the Solana network. Second, a bridge validator or relayer attests to this lock-up event, triggering the minting of a corresponding token, such as bSOL (bridged SOL), on Ethereum. Finally, this bSOL functions as a liquid, yield-bearing asset within the Ethereum DeFi ecosystem, usable as collateral in lending protocols, liquidity pools, or for further leveraged staking strategies, all while the underlying SOL continues to secure its native chain.
This architecture introduces distinct technical considerations. Bridge LSTs rely on a secure cross-chain messaging protocol (like IBC, Wormhole, or LayerZero) to communicate staking actions and proof-of-lock. They also require oracles or reward accumulators on the destination chain to accurately track and update the exchange rate between the Bridge LST and the native asset, ensuring the token's value properly reflects accrued staking rewards. The security model is therefore a composite of the origin chain's consensus, the bridge's validation, and the destination chain's smart contract integrity.
Key examples in the ecosystem include Lido's stSOL on Solana (a native LST) versus a bridged version like Wormhole-wrapped stSOL (wstSOL) on Ethereum, and pSTAKE, which issues stkATOM on Ethereum for staked Cosmos ATOM. These tokens solve the liquidity fragmentation problem by allowing staked capital, traditionally illiquid and chain-bound, to be utilized across the broader multi-chain DeFi landscape, creating new composability and efficiency for cross-chain capital.
key-features
LIQUID STAKING TOKENS (BRIDGE)
Key Features of Bridge LSTs
Bridge LSTs are a specialized class of liquid staking tokens designed to represent staked assets from one blockchain on another, enabling cross-chain liquidity and DeFi composability.
01
Cross-Chain Liquidity
Bridge LSTs unlock staked value from its native chain (e.g., staked ETH on Ethereum) and make it usable as a productive asset on other chains (e.g., as collateral on Avalanche or Arbitrum). This solves the problem of capital inefficiency where billions in staked assets are otherwise locked and illiquid across ecosystems.
02
Canonical Bridging Mechanism
These tokens are typically minted via a canonical bridge or a dedicated staking bridge protocol. The process involves:
- Locking the native LST (e.g., stETH) in a vault on the source chain.
- Minting a wrapped, canonical representation (e.g., wstETH) on the destination chain.
- This ensures the bridge LST is trust-minimized and recognized as the official cross-chain version by the underlying protocol (like Lido).
03
Yield-Bearing Collateral
A primary use case is using bridge LSTs as yield-generating collateral in cross-chain DeFi. For example, wstETH on Arbitrum can be supplied to Aave to borrow stablecoins, allowing users to earn staking rewards while simultaneously accessing liquidity. This creates a double yield strategy from staking and lending.
04
Underlying Asset Security
The value of a bridge LST is directly pegged to the value and yield of the underlying native LST. Its security depends on:
- The validity of the bridge (e.g., LayerZero, Axelar, canonical rollup bridge).
- The security of the underlying staking protocol (e.g., Lido, Rocket Pool).
- There is no additional slashing risk on the destination chain; slashing only affects validators on the native chain.
05
Protocol Examples
Real-world implementations include:
- wstETH (Wrapped Staked ETH): The canonical bridge version of Lido's stETH, available on Layer 2s and alt-L1s like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Polygon.
- rETH (Rocket Pool ETH): Often bridged via protocols like Across or official bridges to be used on other chains.
- cbETH (Coinbase Wrapped Staked ETH): A bridgable representation of Coinbase's staked ETH.
06
Composability & Risk Stack
Using bridge LSTs introduces a risk stack:
- Staking Protocol Risk: Slashing or governance failure of the native protocol (e.g., Lido).
- Bridge Risk: Exploit or failure of the cross-chain messaging layer.
- Smart Contract Risk: Vulnerabilities in the wrapper contract on the destination chain.
- DeFi Integration Risk: Issues with the lending or AMM protocol where the bridge LST is used.
examples
LIQUID STAKING TOKENS
Protocol Examples & Implementations
Liquid staking protocols unlock the value of staked assets by issuing derivative tokens, enabling participation in DeFi while securing Proof-of-Stake networks. This section details the leading implementations and their core mechanisms.
PROTOCOL ARCHITECTURE
Native LST vs. Bridge LST: A Comparison
This table compares the core technical and trust characteristics of Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) issued natively on their source chain versus those created via a cross-chain bridge.
| Feature / Metric | Native LST | Bridge LST |
|---|---|---|
Issuance & Governance | Governed by the native chain's staking protocol (e.g., Lido, Rocket Pool) | Governed by the bridging protocol (e.g., LayerZero, Wormhole) and the destination chain |
Underlying Asset Custody | Staked assets (e.g., ETH) held in native chain smart contracts | Staked assets remain on source chain; wrapped representation minted on destination |
Primary Security Model | Native chain consensus + staking protocol slashing | Bridge validator set security + potential additional slashing on source chain |
Canonical Yield Source | Directly from native chain staking rewards | Bridged yield, subject to bridge relay and mint/burn mechanics |
Settlement Finality | Native chain finality (e.g., Ethereum ~15 min) | Source chain finality + bridge attestation delay (< 1 hour typical) |
Redemption Complexity | Direct unstaking via native protocol | Burn on destination, unlock on source, then native unstaking |
Bridge Dependency Risk | None | High; subject to bridge halts, exploits, or governance attacks |
Typical Use Case | DeFi on the native chain (e.g., Ethereum L1/L2) | DeFi and collateral on alternative ecosystems (e.g., Solana, Avalanche) |
ecosystem-usage
ECOSYSTEM USAGE & UTILITY
Liquid Staking Tokens
Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) are derivative tokens representing staked assets, enabling participation in Proof-of-Stake consensus while maintaining liquidity. This section details their core functions and applications across the DeFi ecosystem.
01
Core Function: Liquidity & Yield
Liquid Staking Tokens solve the capital inefficiency of traditional staking by unlocking the value of locked assets. Holders receive a tokenized claim on their staked principal and accrued rewards, which can be freely traded or used as collateral while the underlying assets secure the network and generate staking yield.
- Primary Benefit: Enables simultaneous staking yield and DeFi participation.
- Mechanism: 1:1 minting of LSTs for deposited assets (e.g., deposit 32 ETH, receive 32 stETH).
02
DeFi Collateral & Composability
LSTs are foundational collateral assets across decentralized finance. Their value, backed by staked assets and yield accrual, makes them high-quality collateral for lending protocols (Aave, Compound) and money markets.
- Use Cases: Borrowing stablecoins, leveraging yield positions, providing liquidity in Automated Market Makers (AMMs).
- Composability: LSTs integrate into complex DeFi strategies, enabling yield stacking and structured products.
03
Governance & Protocol Integration
LSTs often confer governance rights within their native protocols (e.g., LDO for Lido, RPL for Rocket Pool). Furthermore, they are integrated into other protocols' treasury management and incentive systems.
- Protocol-Owned Liquidity: DAOs use LSTs for yield-generating treasuries.
- Incentive Alignment: Protocols may distribute rewards or voting power based on LST holdings to align stakeholders.
04
Cross-Chain Bridges & Interoperability
LSTs are frequently bridged to other blockchain networks to expand their utility. This creates wrapped liquid staking tokens (e.g., stETH on Arbitrum, wstETH on Base) that can be used in foreign ecosystems.
- Purpose: Extends yield-bearing collateral to Layer 2s and alternative Layer 1s.
- Consideration: Introduces bridge risk but significantly increases LST liquidity and application scope.
05
Risk Considerations
Using LSTs involves specific risks beyond standard token ownership:
- Slashing Risk: Potential loss of staked principal due to validator misbehavior, though often mitigated by provider insurance.
- Derivatives Risk: LST value depends on the solvency and proper operation of the issuing protocol.
- Depeg Risk: Temporary deviations from the underlying asset's price, especially during high network stress or withdrawal queues.
06
Examples & Market Leaders
Prominent implementations demonstrate varied models:
- Lido Finance (stETH): Largest provider, uses a pooled validator model.
- Rocket Pool (rETH): Decentralized, permissionless node operator network.
- Coinbase (cbETH): Centralized exchange-issued LST.
- Frax Finance (sfrxETH): LST that accrues yield via the Frax ecosystem.
security-considerations
LIQUID STAKING TOKENS (LSTs)
Security & Risk Considerations
Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) are derivative assets representing staked cryptocurrency, enabling liquidity while earning staking rewards. This section details the core security models and inherent risks associated with their issuance and use.
01
Smart Contract Risk
The primary risk vector for any LST is the security of its underlying smart contracts. Vulnerabilities in the minting, staking, or reward distribution logic can lead to catastrophic loss of funds. This risk is amplified by the Total Value Locked (TVL) in the protocol. Audits, bug bounties, and formal verification are critical mitigations, but residual risk remains.
02
Validator Slashing Risk
LSTs derive their value from the performance of the underlying validator nodes. If these validators are slashed (penalized) for downtime or malicious behavior, the value of the corresponding LST can be diluted. Users must assess the staking provider's validator selection, performance history, and slashing insurance mechanisms.
03
Centralization & Custodial Risk
Many LST protocols rely on a centralized entity or a limited set of node operators. This creates several risks:
- Censorship Risk: Operators could be compelled to censor transactions.
- Key Management Risk: Custody of validator signing keys introduces a single point of failure.
- Governance Risk: Control over protocol upgrades may be concentrated. Decentralized staking pools aim to mitigate these concerns.
04
Bridge & Wrapping Risk
LSTs often rely on cross-chain bridges to move between ecosystems (e.g., stETH on Ethereum to stETH on Arbitrum). These bridges are frequent attack targets, as seen in exploits like the Wormhole and Nomad hacks. Holding a bridged LST adds the bridge's security model as a dependency, separate from the original staking protocol's risks.
05
Oracle & Peg Risk
LSTs must maintain a stable peg to the underlying staked asset (e.g., 1 stETH ≈ 1 ETH). This relies on oracles and redemption mechanisms. During market stress or liquidity crises (e.g., the Lido stETH "depeg" event in 2022), the token can trade at a significant discount, creating losses for holders who need to sell. The strength of the redemption right is key.
06
Protocol & Governance Risk
LST protocols are governed by decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) or core teams. Changes to fee structures, validator sets, or supported networks are enacted via governance. This introduces risks from:
- Voter apathy leading to low participation.
- Governance attacks or proposal spam.
- Treasury management of protocol fees and insurance funds.
LIQUID STAKING TOKENS
Common Misconceptions
Liquid staking tokens (LSTs) are a foundational DeFi primitive, but their mechanics and risks are often misunderstood. This section clarifies frequent points of confusion regarding their operation, security, and relationship to the underlying blockchain.
No, a liquid staking token (LST) is not a bridge asset. The core misconception is confusing the staking derivative with an interoperability bridge. When you stake ETH via a protocol like Lido to receive stETH, your ETH is deposited into the Ethereum consensus layer's validator set, not sent across a bridge to another chain. The stETH token is a receipt representing your claim on that staked ETH and its future rewards, native to Ethereum. Its use in DeFi on other chains (e.g., via a wrapped version on Arbitrum) involves a separate, subsequent bridging action, which is distinct from the fundamental staking mechanism.
LIQUID STAKING
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Common questions about Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs), the mechanisms that unlock staked assets, and the bridges that connect them across blockchains.
A Liquid Staking Token (LST) is a derivative token that represents a claim on staked cryptocurrency, such as ETH, SOL, or ATOM, and the rewards it accrues. When you stake your tokens with a liquid staking protocol (e.g., Lido, Rocket Pool, Marinade), you receive an equivalent amount of LSTs (e.g., stETH, rETH, mSOL). These LSTs are liquid, meaning they can be traded, used as collateral in DeFi protocols, or transferred while the underlying assets remain staked and securing the network. This solves the traditional staking problem of capital lock-up and illiquidity.
Key Mechanism:
- You deposit 1 ETH into a staking pool.
- You receive 1 stETH (or a dynamically rebasing amount).
- Your 1 ETH is delegated to validators.
- You can use the stETH in DeFi (e.g., lending on Aave, providing liquidity on Curve).
- The LST's value accrues relative to the base asset through staking rewards.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall