In a Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) system, token holders do not all participate in validation directly. Instead, they use their staked tokens to vote for a select group of delegates or validators. These elected entities are then responsible for the core consensus tasks: producing new blocks, validating transactions, and maintaining the blockchain's state. This model is designed to be more scalable and energy-efficient than traditional Proof-of-Work, as it reduces the number of participating nodes required to reach consensus.
LABS
Glossary
Delegated Validator
A delegated validator is a node in a Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) network that is elected by token holders to produce blocks and validate transactions on their behalf.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
BLOCKCHAIN CONSENSUS
What is a Delegated Validator?
A delegated validator is a node in a Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) or similar consensus system that is elected by token holders to produce blocks and secure the network on their behalf.
The role of a delegated validator involves significant responsibility and is typically incentivized. Validators earn block rewards and transaction fees for their service, which are often shared with the delegators who voted for them through a process called staking rewards. To ensure honesty, validators are required to post a security deposit or "bond" in the form of staked tokens, which can be slashed (partially destroyed) if they act maliciously or fail to perform their duties, such as by double-signing blocks or going offline.
Prominent blockchain networks that utilize delegated validators include EOS, TRON, and Cosmos Hub. In Cosmos, for example, the top 175 validator candidates by total delegated stake become the active validator set. This creates a competitive ecosystem where validators must maintain robust infrastructure and a positive reputation to attract delegations, while delegators must assess validator performance, commission rates, and uptime to optimize their staking returns.
The delegation process creates a distinct governance layer. Since voting power is proportional to staked tokens, large token holders and staking pools have significant influence over which validators are elected. This has led to discussions about centralization risks, as the validator set can become concentrated among a few well-known entities. However, mechanisms like vote decay and limits on validator size are sometimes implemented to promote a more decentralized and competitive validator landscape.
For a token holder, delegating to a validator is a primary method of participating in network security and earning passive income. The holder retains ownership of their tokens but transfers the validation rights to their chosen candidate. This separates the roles of capital provision and technical operation, allowing users without the expertise or resources to run a node to still contribute to and benefit from the network's Proof-of-Stake security model.
how-it-works
PROOF-OF-STAKE MECHANICS
How Delegated Validators Work
A technical breakdown of the delegation mechanism that allows token holders to participate in blockchain consensus without running infrastructure.
A delegated validator is a node operator in a proof-of-stake (PoS) or delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS) blockchain network that secures the chain by processing transactions and creating new blocks, using voting power delegated to it by other token holders. This system separates the roles of capital provision (delegators) and infrastructure operation (validators), enabling broader network participation. Delegators "stake" their tokens by bonding them to a chosen validator's node, contributing to that validator's total stake and, consequently, its probability of being selected to propose the next block.
The operational mechanics involve a continuous cycle. Validators run high-availability, correctly configured software to participate in consensus protocols like Tendermint or Ethereum's beacon chain. Their performance is measured by uptime and correct behavior; successful block proposals and attestations earn block rewards and transaction fees. These rewards are automatically shared with delegators according to a pre-set commission rate, typically ranging from 0% to 20%, which the validator deducts as an operational fee. Poor performance or malicious actions can lead to slashing, where a portion of the staked tokens (both the validator's and its delegators') is permanently burned.
For token holders, the delegation process is typically managed through the blockchain's native wallet or a dedicated staking dashboard. Key considerations when choosing a validator include its commission rate, self-bonded stake (the operator's own skin in the game), uptime history, and governance participation. Centralization risks emerge if too much stake concentrates with a few large validators, which is why many protocols incentivize delegation to smaller, reputable operators. This model underpins major networks like Cosmos, Polkadot (via nominated proof-of-stake), and Solana.
The economic and security model creates aligned incentives. Validators are financially motivated to maintain reliable nodes to attract more delegation and maximize rewards, while delegators earn yield on idle assets and contribute to network security. This is distinct from a solo validator, where an entity must provide the full minimum stake and operate the node itself. Delegation thus lowers the barrier to entry for securing the network, promoting a more distributed and resilient validator set while allowing passive token holders to participate in consensus.
key-features
MECHANISMS
Key Features of Delegated Validators
Delegated validators are specialized nodes in a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchain that are entrusted with block production and consensus by token holders who delegate their stake to them. This system separates the roles of capital provision and technical operation.
01
Stake Delegation
The core mechanism where token holders (delegators) lock their native tokens to a chosen validator node without transferring custody. This grants the validator increased voting power in the consensus process. Key aspects include:
- Non-Custodial: Delegators retain ownership of their staked assets.
- Slashing Risk: Delegated stake can be penalized if the validator misbehaves.
- Reward Sharing: Validators typically take a commission (e.g., 5-10%) from the block rewards before distributing the rest to delegators.
02
Validator Selection & Consensus
Delegated validators participate in the blockchain's consensus algorithm (e.g., Tendermint, Casper). The protocol selects the active validator set, often based on the total delegated stake. Their responsibilities include:
- Block Proposal: Creating new blocks of transactions.
- Block Validation: Voting to confirm proposed blocks are valid.
- Finality: Achieving irreversible transaction confirmation after a sufficient number of votes.
03
Economic Security & Slashing
The security model is enforced through cryptoeconomic incentives. Validators and their delegators have a portion of their staked tokens slashed (burned) for malicious actions (e.g., double-signing) or liveness faults (e.g., prolonged downtime). This aligns the cost of attack with the value of the staked capital, making attacks prohibitively expensive.
04
Rewards & Commission Structure
Delegated validators earn block rewards and transaction fees for their service. They automatically deduct a commission (a percentage of the rewards) as their fee before distributing the remainder to delegators. This creates a competitive market where validators balance high performance with attractive commission rates to attract stake.
05
Key Differentiator: Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS)
Delegated Proof-of-Stake is a specific variant where a small, fixed number of validators (e.g., 21 on EOS, 100 on Cosmos Hub) are elected by token holders. This is distinct from broader PoS networks with larger, permissionless validator sets. DPoS emphasizes speed and efficiency through a known, accountable set of block producers.
examples
IMPLEMENTATIONS
Examples of Delegated Validator Networks
Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) and its variants are implemented across major blockchain ecosystems, each with unique governance and reward structures.
VALIDATOR ARCHITECTURE
Delegated Validator vs. Other Validator Types
A comparison of key operational and economic characteristics across different validator models in Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) blockchains.
| Feature | Delegated Validator (DPoS) | Solo Validator (PoS) | Pooled Validator (Staking Pool) |
|---|---|---|---|
Capital Requirement | Low (Delegator-funded) | High (Full stake solo) | Low (Pooled funds) |
Node Operation | Professional operator | Individual operator | Professional operator |
Voting/Governance | Delegators vote for Validator | Validator votes directly | Pool operator votes on behalf |
Slashing Risk | Borne by operator & delegators | Borne solely by operator | Borne by pool participants |
Reward Distribution | Operator commission + delegator share | 100% to operator | Pool commission + participant share |
Typical Payout Frequency | Daily | Epoch-based (e.g., days/weeks) | Daily to weekly |
Protocol Examples | EOS, TRON, Cosmos (Hub) | Ethereum, Cardano, Solana | Ethereum (Rocket Pool), Cardano (ADA Pools) |
responsibilities
DELEGATED VALIDATOR
Core Responsibilities & Incentives
A delegated validator is a node operator in a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchain that secures the network by processing transactions and creating new blocks, using stake delegated to it by token holders who do not run their own validator software.
01
Primary Responsibilities
A delegated validator's core duties are to maintain network security and consensus. This includes:
- Proposing new blocks when selected by the protocol.
- Participating in consensus by attesting to the validity of proposed blocks.
- Executing transactions and updating the blockchain state.
- Maintaining high uptime and a secure, correctly configured node. Failure to perform these duties can result in slashing penalties or loss of rewards.
02
Staking & Delegation Mechanics
Validators require a minimum amount of bonded stake (e.g., 32 ETH on Ethereum) to be activated. Token holders can delegate their tokens to a validator, adding to its voting power without running infrastructure. The validator's total stake influences its probability of being selected to propose a block. This creates a delegator-validator relationship where the validator acts on behalf of its stakers.
03
Reward Structure
Validators earn block rewards and transaction fees for their service. Rewards are typically proportional to the amount of stake they have, including delegated stake. The validator first takes a commission fee (a percentage of the rewards), then distributes the remaining rewards to delegators based on their stake share. This incentivizes validators to perform well and attract more delegation.
04
Slashing & Penalties
To ensure honest behavior, validators face slashing, a punitive mechanism that burns a portion of their (and their delegators') staked tokens. Slashing is triggered for actions that harm consensus, such as:
- Double signing (equivocation).
- Downtime or being offline during critical duties.
- Surrounding votes (violating Casper FFG rules). Slashing protects the network from malicious or negligent actors.
05
Key Examples
Delegated validation is central to many major PoS networks:
- Cosmos (ATOM): Uses the Tendermint BFT engine with validators and delegators.
- Solana (SOL): Validators earn rewards and fees, with stake delegated to them.
- Polygon (MATIC): A sidechain where validators secure the network with delegated stake.
- Avalanche (AVAX): Validators in its Primary Network secure multiple chains via delegation.
06
Delegator's Role & Risks
Delegators choose a validator and bond their tokens to it, but they do not control the validator's keys or operations. Their main risks include:
- Slashing risk: Delegated stake can be penalized for validator misbehavior.
- Commission changes: The validator can adjust its fee.
- Downtime risk: If the validator is offline, rewards decrease. Delegators must perform due diligence on a validator's performance, reputation, and security practices.
security-considerations
DELEGATED VALIDATOR
Security Considerations & Trade-offs
Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) and similar models introduce a distinct security model where token holders delegate their staking power to professional validators, creating a set of unique risks and incentives.
01
Validator Centralization Risk
A core trade-off of delegation is the tendency for stake to concentrate among a small number of professional validators. This creates a centralization vector where a few entities control the majority of the network's consensus power. While this can increase efficiency, it reduces the censorship-resistance and decentralization goals of the blockchain. The network's security becomes dependent on the integrity and operational security of these few nodes.
02
Slashing & Delegator Liability
Delegators share in the penalties, or slashing, incurred by their chosen validator for malicious behavior (e.g., double-signing) or downtime. This creates a principal-agent problem where the delegator's funds are at risk based on the validator's actions. Key mechanisms include:
- Full Slashing: Delegators lose a portion of their stake.
- Reputation Systems: Validators with slashing history lose future delegations.
- Insurance Pools: Some networks offer optional slashing protection for a fee.
03
Voter Apathy & Governance
In delegated systems, governance power is often proportional to stake. When many token holders delegate and become passive, effective voting power is ceded to validators. This can lead to governance capture, where validator cartels control protocol upgrades and treasury funds. The security of the network's evolutionary path depends on an informed and active delegator base, which is often difficult to sustain.
04
Custodial vs. Non-Custodial Staking
Delegators must choose between custodial services (exchanges, staking pools) and non-custodial delegation. Custodial staking often offers simplicity and slashing insurance but introduces counterparty risk and removes the user's governance rights. Non-custodial delegation (via a personal wallet) retains control and voting power but requires the user to actively manage validator selection and assume direct slashing risk.
05
Validator Performance & Incentives
Network security relies on validators maintaining high uptime and proper infrastructure. Delegators must assess:
- Commission Rates: The fee validators take from rewards.
- Self-Bonded Stake: A validator's own stake ("skin in the game") aligns incentives.
- Infrastructure: Geographic distribution and hardware redundancy mitigate downtime risk. Poor performance reduces rewards for delegators and can lead to jailing, temporarily removing the validator from the active set.
06
Example: Cosmos Hub & Interchain Security
The Cosmos ecosystem illustrates advanced trade-offs. The Cosmos Hub uses a DPoS system with ~180 validators. Its Interchain Security feature allows consumer chains to lease the Hub's validator set. This provides strong security for new chains but creates a shared security dependency—a critical bug or coordinated attack on the Hub could impact all secured chains. It trades maximum sovereignty for shared security.
DELEGATED VALIDATORS
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Common questions about the process, risks, and rewards of delegating cryptocurrency to a validator on a Proof-of-Stake blockchain.
A delegated validator is a node operator on a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchain who validates transactions and creates new blocks using stake delegated to them by other token holders. The process works through a delegation mechanism: token holders (delegators) lock their funds with a chosen validator, increasing that validator's voting power. The validator performs the consensus work, and in return, shares a portion of the earned block rewards and transaction fees with their delegators, minus a commission fee. This system allows users to participate in network security and earn rewards without running their own node.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall