Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
LABS
Glossary

Operation Submission

Operation Submission is the process in ERC-4337 where a Bundler submits a validated UserOperation to the EntryPoint smart contract for on-chain execution.
Chainscore © 2026
definition
BLOCKCHAIN TRANSACTION PROCESS

What is Operation Submission?

Operation Submission is the fundamental process of broadcasting a signed transaction or message to a blockchain network for inclusion in a block.

In blockchain systems, Operation Submission is the act of a client—such as a wallet or a decentralized application (dApp)—sending a signed transaction or message to the network's peer-to-peer (P2P) layer. This operation, often called a tx or op, contains all necessary data for execution, including the sender's signature, the recipient's address, the amount of value to transfer, any smart contract function calls, and the offered gas fee. The submission is typically made to a node (full or light client) which then propagates it across the network.

The technical flow involves several key steps. First, the user's software constructs the operation, specifying parameters like nonce (a unique sequence number) and gas limit. It is then cryptographically signed with the user's private key to prove authorization. The signed payload is serialized into a standard format (e.g., RLP for Ethereum) and transmitted via protocols like JSON-RPC to a node. This node validates the operation's basic syntax and signature before gossiping it to its peers, entering the operation into the network's mempool or transaction pool, where it awaits block proposal by a validator or miner.

Successful submission does not guarantee execution; it only means the operation is queued for processing. The final outcome depends on consensus rules and network conditions. Validators select operations from the mempool based on factors like fee priority. If the gas fee is too low during times of congestion, the operation may stall or be dropped. Developers must handle potential failures, such as nonce gaps or insufficient funds, by monitoring submission receipts and implementing retry logic with updated parameters.

From an architectural perspective, operation submission is a critical interface between the external world and the blockchain's state machine. It is the point where user intent is translated into a state transition request. In systems like Ethereum, this is managed through core JSON-RPC methods like eth_sendRawTransaction. Layer 2 solutions and other scaling protocols have their own submission mechanisms—such as submitting batches to a rollup sequencer—but the core principle of broadcasting a signed data packet for inclusion remains consistent across most decentralized networks.

how-it-works
BLOCKCHAIN CORE MECHANISM

How Operation Submission Works

Operation submission is the fundamental process by which a user or client initiates a transaction or state change on a blockchain network, beginning its journey through the consensus and validation pipeline.

In blockchain systems, an operation—also commonly called a transaction—is a digitally signed instruction that requests a change to the network's shared state, such as transferring tokens or executing a smart contract function. The submission process begins when a user's wallet or decentralized application (dApp) constructs this operation, including details like the recipient address, amount, and a cryptographic signature proving ownership. This signed operation is then broadcast to the network's peer-to-peer (P2P) layer, typically by sending it to one or more connected nodes, which act as the entry point to the system.

Once a node receives an operation, it performs initial validation checks before propagating it further. This mempool validation includes verifying the digital signature's authenticity, checking that the sender has sufficient funds (or gas) for the proposed action and its associated fee, and ensuring the operation adheres to the network's basic protocol rules (e.g., correct format, nonce sequence). Invalid operations are discarded immediately. Valid operations are stored in the node's local mempool (memory pool), a temporary holding area for pending, unconfirmed operations, and are then gossiped to its peer nodes, flooding the network.

The final and most critical stage is inclusion in a block. Network validators (e.g., miners in Proof-of-Work, validators in Proof-of-Stake) select operations from their mempools to include in the next block they propose. Selection is often influenced by the transaction fee or gas price attached, with higher fees incentivizing priority inclusion. Once the validator successfully mines or proposes a block containing the operation, and that block is accepted by the network consensus, the operation is considered confirmed. The state change it encodes becomes a permanent, immutable part of the blockchain ledger, completing the submission lifecycle from user intent to finalized execution.

key-features
BLOCKCHAIN GLOSSARY

Key Features of Operation Submission

Operation submission is the fundamental process of broadcasting a transaction or a bundle of transactions to a blockchain network for execution and inclusion in a block.

01

Transaction Lifecycle Initiation

Operation submission marks the start of a transaction's lifecycle, moving it from a local wallet or client to the public mempool. This involves:

  • Serialization: Converting the transaction data into a standardized format (e.g., RLP for Ethereum).
  • Signing: Cryptographically signing the transaction with the sender's private key to prove authorization.
  • Propagation: Broadcasting the signed transaction to network nodes via peer-to-peer (P2P) gossip protocol.
02

Fee Market Dynamics

Submitting an operation requires specifying a fee (e.g., gas price, priority fee) to incentivize network validators. This creates a competitive fee market where:

  • Higher fees increase the priority for block inclusion.
  • Users can submit operations with fee estimation tools to optimize cost versus speed.
  • Networks like Ethereum use an EIP-1559 model with a base fee and tip, making fee prediction more reliable.
03

Mempool Propagation & Validation

Upon submission, the operation enters the mempool (transaction pool), where it awaits block inclusion. Nodes perform initial validation checks:

  • Signature Verification: Confirms the transaction is properly signed.
  • Nonce Check: Ensures the transaction nonce is correct to prevent replay attacks.
  • Sufficient Balance: Validates the sender has enough funds to cover the transaction value and gas fees. Invalid transactions are rejected at this stage.
04

Submission Endpoints (RPC)

Operations are typically submitted via a JSON-RPC call to a node. Common methods include:

  • eth_sendRawTransaction: Submits a signed, serialized transaction string.
  • eth_sendTransaction: Used by clients to sign and submit (requires unlocked account).
  • Providers like Infura, Alchemy, and QuickNode offer reliable, load-balanced RPC endpoints for submission, abstracting node management for developers.
05

Failure Modes & Error Handling

Submission can fail due to several technical or economic reasons:

  • Insufficient Funds: The account balance cannot cover the value + gas fee.
  • Nonce Mismatch: A previous transaction with the same nonce is pending.
  • Network Congestion: The fee is too low for current market conditions, causing the transaction to stall in the mempool.
  • RPC Node Issues: The submission endpoint may be rate-limited or offline. Robust clients implement retry logic and fee bumping.
06

Advanced Submission: Bundles & Private Mempools

For advanced use cases like MEV protection or guaranteed inclusion, operations can be submitted via specialized channels:

  • Transaction Bundles: Groups of transactions submitted as a single unit to block builders (e.g., via Flashbots Protect RPC).
  • Private Mempools (Submarines): Transactions are sent directly to builders, avoiding the public mempool to prevent front-running.
  • Direct-to-Validator Submission: In PoS networks, transactions can be submitted directly to a known validator for inclusion.
entrypoint-role
OPERATION SUBMISSION

The Role of the EntryPoint Contract

The EntryPoint contract is the central, singleton, and immutable contract that acts as the exclusive gateway for submitting and validating UserOperations in the ERC-4337 account abstraction standard.

In the ERC-4337 architecture, the EntryPoint is the single, trusted contract through which all UserOperations (UserOps) must be submitted for execution. Its primary role is to orchestrate the entire validation and execution flow, ensuring that only operations from valid smart contract accounts are processed. This design creates a standardized security checkpoint, preventing malicious or malformed transactions from entering the system and allowing for global rule enforcement, such as anti-replay protection and paymaster sponsorship logic.

The submission process begins when a Bundler calls the EntryPoint's handleOps() or handleAggregatedOps() function with a batch of UserOperations. The EntryPoint then validates each operation in a strict, step-by-step manner: first verifying the signature and nonce, then executing the account's validation logic, and finally checking any attached paymaster validation. This phased approach ensures that any operation failing validation reverts before gas is spent on execution, protecting Bundlers from wasting resources.

A critical security feature of the EntryPoint is its atomic execution and reversion model. If any single UserOperation in a batch fails its validation or execution phase, the entire batch is reverted, maintaining system integrity. However, Bundlers are protected from losing gas on failed validation by the EntryPoint's requirement that accounts or paymasters prepay for gas or stake deposits, which are used to compensate the Bundler for validation work, even on failed ops.

The EntryPoint also manages the gas economics of the system. It acts as a central clearinghouse, holding gas payments from paymasters and accounts in its deposit vault. After successful execution, it compensates the Bundler, refunds any unused gas to the account, and pays the base fee to the block builder. This centralized accounting simplifies gas abstraction and enables complex sponsorship models without modifying the underlying Ethereum protocol.

Because the EntryPoint is a singleton (a single contract address used by all ERC-4337 applications), it benefits from network effects in security auditing and tooling. Its immutability and widespread adoption create a stable foundation for the account abstraction ecosystem. Developers integrate with this single contract, rather than building custom transaction processors, ensuring interoperability and leveraging collective security scrutiny.

submission-components
OPERATION SUBMISSION

Core Components in Submission

An operation submission is a signed data packet containing a user's intent and proof of work, which is broadcast to the network for inclusion in the next block.

01

Transaction Payload

The core data of the submission, specifying the user's intent. This includes:

  • Sender/Recipient Addresses
  • Asset Amount being transferred
  • Smart Contract Function Calls with encoded parameters
  • Gas Parameters (limit, priority fee) for execution resource allocation
02

Digital Signature

A cryptographic proof generated using the sender's private key that authorizes the transaction. It verifies:

  • Authenticity: The transaction was created by the rightful owner of the sending address.
  • Integrity: The transaction data has not been altered after signing.
  • Non-Repudiation: The sender cannot deny having authorized the transaction.
03

Nonce

A sequential number unique to the sender's account that prevents replay attacks and ensures transaction order.

  • Purpose: Each transaction from an address must have a nonce one greater than the last confirmed one.
  • Example: If the last confirmed nonce is 5, the next valid transaction must have nonce 6.
  • Consequence: Transactions with incorrect nonces are rejected by the network.
04

Network Propagation

The process of broadcasting the signed submission to peer nodes. Key mechanisms include:

  • Gossip Protocol: Nodes relay the transaction to their connected peers, flooding the network.
  • Mempool: Valid transactions are held in a node's pending transaction pool (mempool) awaiting block inclusion.
  • Propagation Time: The speed at which a transaction reaches the majority of network validators.
05

Fee Market Dynamics

The economic layer determining transaction priority and inclusion speed, primarily through gas fees. Components include:

  • Base Fee: A network-determined, algorithmically adjusted fee burned with each block (EIP-1559).
  • Priority Fee (Tip): An optional extra payment to the block proposer for faster inclusion.
  • Gas Limit: The maximum computational work units the sender allocates for the transaction's execution.
06

Submission Finality

The point at which a submitted transaction is considered irreversible. This varies by consensus mechanism:

  • Probabilistic Finality (Proof-of-Work): Confidence increases with each subsequent block. A common standard is 6 confirmations.
  • Absolute Finality (Proof-of-Stake): Transactions are finalized after a specific checkpoint, often within one or two epochs (e.g., ~12.8 minutes on Ethereum).
ARCHITECTURAL COMPARISON

Operation Submission vs. Traditional Transaction Submission

A technical comparison of the operation submission pattern, which decouples intent from execution, against the traditional atomic transaction model.

Feature / CharacteristicOperation SubmissionTraditional Transaction Submission

Atomic Unit

Intent (Operation)

Signed Transaction

Execution Model

Asynchronous, decoupled

Synchronous, atomic

Gas Sponsorship

Separate from user (sponsor pays)

Paid by user (msg.sender)

User Experience (UX)

Gasless, single signature

Requires gas token and signature per action

Composability Scope

Cross-application, session-based

Single transaction, contract-call limited

Failure Handling

Partial success possible; operations can be batched and retried

All-or-nothing revert; entire transaction fails

Typical Use Case

Multi-step dApp interactions, account abstraction

Simple token transfers, single contract calls

ecosystem-usage
OPERATION SUBMISSION

Ecosystem Implementation

Operation submission is the process by which a user or decentralized application (dApp) initiates a transaction or a bundle of actions on a blockchain network. This section details the key components and concepts involved in constructing and submitting these operations.

01

Transaction Lifecycle

The journey of an operation from creation to finality. It begins with transaction construction, where parameters like recipient, amount, and gas are defined. The transaction is then signed with a private key to prove authorization. After submission to a node, it enters the mempool (transaction pool) before being validated, executed, and confirmed in a block. Understanding this flow is critical for debugging and optimizing dApp performance.

02

Gas & Fee Markets

Gas is the unit measuring computational work required for an operation. Users must pay a fee, calculated as Gas Units * Gas Price. In networks like Ethereum, a priority fee (tip) can be added to incentivize faster inclusion. This creates a fee market where users bid for block space. Key strategies include:

  • Setting appropriate gas limits to avoid failed transactions.
  • Using EIP-1559 type fee estimation for predictable costs.
  • Monitoring network congestion to time submissions.
03

Nonce Management

A nonce (number used once) is a sequential counter attached to every transaction from an account, ensuring order and preventing replay attacks. Each new transaction must have a nonce one greater than the last confirmed one. Proper nonce management is essential to avoid stuck transactions. Wallets and dApp backends must track the pending nonce accurately, especially when submitting multiple transactions in rapid succession or from different services.

05

Error Handling & Simulation

Failed transactions waste gas and degrade user experience. Key practices include:

  • Using eth_estimateGas to pre-check for failures.
  • Simulating transactions via tools like Tenderly or built-in eth_call to preview state changes without broadcasting.
  • Implementing robust frontend logic to parse common revert reasons (e.g., "insufficient funds", "reverted by EVM").
  • Setting sensible timeout and retry logic for network issues.
06

Batch & Multicall Transactions

Submitting multiple operations as a single batch improves efficiency and user experience. Multicall contracts (like the one from MakerDAO) allow aggregating multiple view or write calls into one RPC request, reducing latency and cost. Layer 2 networks and some L1s natively support submitting batched transactions. This is fundamental for complex dApp interactions, such as executing a swap and a staking action atomically in a single user approval.

security-considerations
OPERATION SUBMISSION

Security Considerations

Submitting operations to a blockchain involves critical security decisions that directly impact fund safety and transaction integrity. These considerations span from key management to network-level validation.

01

Private Key Management

The private key is the ultimate authority for signing and submitting operations. Its security is paramount.

  • Cold Storage: Keys generated and stored offline (hardware wallets, air-gapped machines) are safest for high-value accounts.
  • Key Separation: Use different keys for different purposes (e.g., a hot wallet for frequent transactions, a cold wallet for treasury).
  • Compromise Risk: A leaked private key means irrevocable loss of control; there is no 'password reset' on-chain.
02

Transaction Replay & Nonce Management

A nonce (number used once) prevents transaction replay attacks. Mismanagement can lead to failed or maliciously repeated transactions.

  • Sequential Requirement: In Ethereum, each transaction from an account must have a sequentially increasing nonce.
  • Replay Attack: A signed transaction broadcast on one network (e.g., Mainnet) could be re-broadcast on a fork (e.g., a testnet) if chain IDs are not properly set.
  • Stuck Transactions: A pending transaction with a low gas price can block all subsequent transactions until it is replaced or mined.
03

Front-Running & MEV

Miner Extractable Value (MEV) refers to profit miners/validators can extract by reordering, inserting, or censoring transactions in a block.

  • Front-Running: A bot sees a pending transaction (e.g., a large DEX swap) and submits its own transaction with a higher gas fee to execute first, profiting from the price impact.
  • Security Impact: Can lead to worse execution prices for users and destabilize protocol mechanics.
  • Mitigations: Use commit-reveal schemes, private transaction pools, or fair sequencing services.
04

Gas Estimation & Fee Management

Incorrect gas parameters can cause transactions to fail, get stuck, or be excessively expensive.

  • Out of Gas: A transaction that runs out of gas is reverted, but the gas used is not refunded.
  • Gas Price Auction: In fee markets (EIP-1559), users compete with maxPriorityFee and maxFeePerGas. Setting these too low can cause indefinite delays.
  • Simulation: Always simulate transactions via eth_call or eth_estimateGas before signing and broadcasting to catch reverts.
05

Smart Contract Interaction Risks

Submitting a transaction to a smart contract introduces unique risks beyond simple asset transfers.

  • Reentrancy: A malicious contract can call back into the calling function before the first invocation finishes, potentially draining funds.
  • Approval Exploits: An unlimited ERC-20 approval to a malicious or compromised contract can lead to total token theft.
  • Delegatecall: Using delegatecall incorrectly can give a foreign contract control over the caller's storage, a common attack vector in proxy upgrades.
06

Network & Node Security

The security of the node or RPC endpoint used to submit the transaction is critical.

  • RPC Endpoint Trust: A malicious RPC provider can censor, modify, or leak your transactions. Use trusted providers or run your own node.
  • Eclipse Attacks: An attacker can surround a node with malicious peers to feed it false blockchain data, leading to incorrect state views.
  • Chain Finality: Understand the finality rules of your chain. On some chains (e.g., Ethereum post-merge), transactions are not instantly irreversible.
OPERATION SUBMISSION

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about submitting operations to a blockchain network, covering transaction lifecycle, mempool mechanics, and fee strategies.

A mempool (memory pool) is a network node's temporary holding area for unconfirmed transactions that have been broadcast but not yet included in a block. When a user submits a transaction, it is propagated peer-to-peer across the network and lands in each validating node's mempool. Miners or validators then select transactions from this pool, typically prioritizing those with the highest gas fees or priority fees, to include in the next block. The mempool's state is dynamic—transactions can be replaced, dropped if fees are too low, or remain in a pending state during network congestion. Monitoring the mempool provides insight into network demand and helps users estimate appropriate fees for timely confirmation.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected direct pipeline
Operation Submission in Account Abstraction | ChainScore Glossary