Particle Network excels at providing a turnkey, multi-chain social login experience because it abstracts wallet management entirely. For example, its Modular Smart Wallet-as-a-Service leverages MPC-TSS technology to manage over 10 million user accounts, enabling familiar logins (Google, email) that generate non-custodial wallets. This approach delivers exceptional developer velocity and mainstream user experience, as seen in integrations with protocols like Aave and 1inch.
Particle Network vs Arcana Network: Web3 Auth Infrastructure
Introduction: The Web3 Authentication Landscape
A data-driven comparison of Particle Network and Arcana Network, two leading infrastructure providers for user onboarding and authentication.
Arcana Network takes a different approach by building a dedicated, app-chain layer-1 focused on privacy-preserving data storage and access control. This results in a trade-off: deeper, programmable privacy features (like encrypted storage and data sharing) but with a steeper integration curve compared to Particle's SDK-first model. Arcana's architecture is designed for applications where user data sovereignty is a core product requirement.
The key trade-off: If your priority is rapid user acquisition and seamless onboarding across EVM and non-EVM chains, choose Particle Network. If you prioritize granular, on-chain data privacy and access management for sensitive dApp data, choose Arcana Network.
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance.
Particle Network: Universal Account Abstraction
Core Advantage: A single, chain-agnostic smart account powered by MPC-TSS. This enables gasless transactions and social logins (Google, Apple, Discord) across 50+ EVM and non-EVM chains. This matters for mass-market dApps that need to abstract away blockchain complexity from end-users.
Particle Network: Integrated Data & Compute Layer
Core Advantage: Bundles Auth, Node RPC, and Data APIs (NFT, Token, Transaction) into one SDK. This reduces integration complexity and vendor lock-in. This matters for rapid prototyping and teams wanting a unified backend without managing multiple service providers.
Arcana Network: Decentralized Storage & Privacy
Core Advantage: Built on a decentralized storage layer with privacy-preserving data access control. User data is encrypted, sharded, and stored across a node network. This matters for high-security applications handling sensitive data (e.g., healthcare, enterprise, confidential DeFi).
Arcana Network: Granular Consent & Data Sovereignty
Core Advantage: Fine-grained, programmable data access policies managed on-chain. Users can grant/revoke permissions per application and data type. This matters for compliance-heavy use cases (GDPR, HIPAA) and protocols building a user-centric data economy.
Choose Particle Network For
- Consumer-Facing dApps & Games: Prioritizing seamless onboarding via social login.
- Multi-Chain Aggregators & Wallets: Needing a single user identity across many blockchains.
- Speed-to-Market Projects: Wanting a full-stack, managed Web3 backend service.
Choose Arcana Network For
- Data-Sensitive dApps: Handling medical records, enterprise documents, or private credentials.
- Compliance-First Platforms: Requiring auditable, user-controlled data consent logs.
- Storage-Centric Protocols: Where decentralized, encrypted file storage is a core requirement.
Particle Network vs Arcana Network: Web3 Auth Infrastructure
Direct comparison of key technical and commercial metrics for Web3 authentication and wallet infrastructure.
| Metric | Particle Network | Arcana Network |
|---|---|---|
Auth Model | MPC-TSS/AA Wallet Abstraction | MPC-TSS with Delegated Signing |
Gas Sponsorship (Paymaster) | ||
Avg. User Onboarding Time | < 30 sec | < 45 sec |
Supported Chains | 50+ EVM & non-EVM | EVM (Ethereum, Polygon, BNB) |
Native Social Login Providers | Google, Apple, X, Discord, etc. | Google, X, Discord, etc. |
Monthly Active Wallets (Est.) | 1.2M+ | 200K+ |
Pricing Model | Pay-as-you-go & Enterprise | Freemium & Enterprise |
Technical Deep Dive: Architecture & Security Models
A technical comparison of two leading Web3 authentication and wallet infrastructure providers, focusing on their underlying architectures, security models, and key trade-offs for enterprise adoption.
Particle Network uses a centralized MPC-TSS (Multi-Party Computation - Threshold Signature Scheme) architecture, where key shares are distributed between the user's device and Particle's nodes. Arcana Network is a decentralized storage and auth layer built on its own EVM-compatible blockchain, using a distributed network of nodes for key management and data storage. Particle's model prioritizes developer simplicity and low latency, while Arcana's emphasizes decentralization and data ownership via its blockchain.
Particle Network vs Arcana Network: Key Differentiators
A data-driven comparison of two leading MPC-TSS-based authentication providers. Evaluate strengths and trade-offs for enterprise-grade integration.
Particle Network: Superior Developer Experience
Full-stack abstraction: Offers a unified SDK for MPC-TSS wallets, social logins, and gas sponsorship via the Particle Auth Service. This reduces integration time from weeks to days for apps like StepN and Bybit Web3.
Key Metric: Supports 50+ EVM and non-EVM chains (Solana, TON, Bitcoin L2s) natively, providing broader chain coverage than most competitors.
Particle Network: Integrated Wallet & Gas Solution
Bundled gas sponsorship: Native paymaster integration allows projects to abstract gas fees completely, a critical feature for mainstream user onboarding.
Unified Account Abstraction: Combines MPC wallet management with ERC-4337 smart accounts, enabling features like social recovery and batch transactions without managing separate infrastructure.
Arcana Network: Decentralized Storage & Privacy Focus
Auth + Storage stack: Unlike pure auth providers, Arcana bundles decentralized storage and data privacy layers via its Arcana Store. This is ideal for dApps handling sensitive user data (e.g., health records, private documents).
Architecture: Operates its own validator set for the auth layer, appealing to teams prioritizing decentralization over pure SaaS convenience.
Arcana Network: Granular Data Access Control
Fine-grained permissions: Provides a programmable data access layer where users can grant/revoke app permissions at a granular level, auditable on-chain.
Use Case Fit: Best for enterprise B2B applications, credentialing platforms, and any dApp where data sovereignty and compliance (like GDPR) are non-negotiable requirements.
Arcana Network: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs for Web3 authentication infrastructure at a glance.
Particle Strength: Unified Multi-Chain SDK
Single integration for 30+ EVM and non-EVM chains: Particle's Smart Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) provides a unified SDK, enabling developers to deploy on Solana, Polygon, Arbitrum, and others without managing separate auth flows. This matters for rapid multi-chain deployment and reducing integration complexity.
Particle Strength: Programmable Session Keys
Gasless, policy-controlled user sessions: Particle's session keys allow users to pre-approve transactions for specific dApps and conditions (e.g., spending limits, time windows), enabling seamless UX for gaming and social apps. This matters for retaining non-crypto-native users by abstracting transaction confirmations.
Arcana Strength: Decentralized Key Management
Non-custodial, MPC-based private key distribution: Arcana uses a decentralized network of nodes for Distributed Key Generation (DKG) and threshold signatures, ensuring no single entity holds a complete key. This matters for enterprise and DeFi applications requiring maximum security and regulatory compliance.
Arcana Strength: Built-in Encrypted Storage
End-to-end encrypted decentralized storage layer: Arcana bundles secure, private data storage (via its own network) with its auth stack, enabling dApps to manage user data and preferences on-chain. This matters for privacy-first applications like healthcare or identity platforms that need persistent, encrypted user data.
Particle Trade-off: Centralized Relayer Dependency
Gas sponsorship relies on Particle's infrastructure: While user sessions are gasless, the initial gas fees are covered by Particle's centralized relayer, creating a potential point of failure and ongoing cost for the developer. This matters for protocols prioritizing maximum decentralization over UX optimization.
Arcana Trade-off: EVM-First Complexity
Primary deep integration is with Ethereum and Polygon: While multi-chain, Arcana's core security and storage modules are optimized for EVM environments, adding complexity for non-EVM chain integration compared to Particle's native SDKs. This matters for teams building primarily on Solana, Aptos, or Sui.
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Particle Network for DeFi & Enterprise
Verdict: The strategic choice for mainstream adoption and complex financial logic. Strengths: Particle's Modular Smart Wallet-as-a-Service excels in DeFi due to its ERC-4337 Account Abstraction standard compliance and Multi-Party Computation (MPC) for seamless, non-custodial onboarding. Its Universal Accounts work across 50+ EVM and non-EVM chains, crucial for cross-chain DeFi strategies. The platform provides gas sponsorship and batch transactions, reducing user friction significantly. For enterprises, its SOC 2 Type II compliance and audited SDKs are non-negotiable. Key Metric: Processes millions of daily transactions for protocols like QuickSwap and ApeSwap.
Arcana Network for DeFi & Enterprise
Verdict: A strong contender where data privacy and access control are the primary regulatory or product requirements. Strengths: Arcana's core differentiator is its decentralized data storage and access control layer, built on its own AuthChain. For DeFi apps handling sensitive KYC data or enterprises with strict data sovereignty needs, Arcana's encrypted, policy-based file storage is a unique advantage. Its auth is a feature of this broader data privacy stack. Trade-off: Less focus on wallet UX features like gas sponsorship; more focused on the data privacy paradigm.
Final Verdict and Recommendation
Choosing between Particle Network and Arcana Network hinges on your application's core requirements for user experience, data sovereignty, and architectural integration.
Particle Network excels at delivering a seamless, mainstream-ready user experience through its universal social logins (Google, Twitter, etc.) and embedded MPC-TSS wallet infrastructure. This results in onboarding times under 30 seconds and gasless transactions, making it ideal for consumer-facing dApps. For example, its Auth Core and Wallet-as-a-Service modules have been integrated by protocols like ApeSwap and Manta Network to drive user growth without compromising security.
Arcana Network takes a fundamentally different approach by prioritizing data privacy and sovereign storage. Its architecture is built around a decentralized storage layer with built-in access control, powered by its native XAR token. This results in a trade-off: while offering superior data privacy guarantees and compliance-ready features for sensitive data, it requires users to adopt a more Web3-native mindset, potentially increasing initial friction compared to Particle's social logins.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing user adoption and simplifying onboarding for a game or social dApp, choose Particle Network. Its SDK-first approach and managed infrastructure abstract away blockchain complexity. If you prioritize data privacy, decentralized storage, and programmable access control for an enterprise or DeFi application handling sensitive information, choose Arcana Network. Its Auth and Store SDKs provide a more granular, privacy-preserving foundation.
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.