Ethers.js excels at providing a comprehensive, battle-tested toolkit for Ethereum interaction, having secured over $100B in Total Value Locked (TVL) across protocols like Aave and Uniswap V3. Its extensive documentation and mature ethers.providers API offer stability for large-scale production applications where developer familiarity and a wide range of utilities—from wallets to complex contract abstractions—are critical.
LABS
Comparisons
Ethers.js vs Viem: Ethereum Library Evolution
A technical comparison of the established Ethers.js library versus the newer, type-safe Viem library for Ethereum interaction and wallet client management, focusing on trade-offs for CTOs and engineering leads.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Paradigm Shift in Ethereum Development
A data-driven comparison of Ethers.js and Viem, the two dominant libraries shaping modern Ethereum application architecture.
Viem takes a different approach by adopting a modular, type-safe architecture built with TypeScript from the ground up. This results in a significant performance and bundle size advantage; Viem can be up to 30% smaller and executes RPC calls more efficiently by leveraging modern AbortSignal for cancellation. The trade-off is a steeper initial learning curve and a more explicit, lower-level API compared to Ethers.js's abstractions.
The key trade-off: If your priority is developer velocity, extensive community support, and a holistic SDK for a large, established dApp, choose Ethers.js. If you prioritize bundle size optimization, strict type safety, and granular control for a new, performance-critical application or are building within a modern stack like Wagmi, choose Viem.
tldr-summary
Ethers.js vs Viem
TL;DR: Key Differentiators at a Glance
A direct comparison of the two dominant Ethereum JavaScript libraries, highlighting their core architectural philosophies and ideal use cases.
01
Choose Ethers.js for Legacy & Ecosystem
Established Standard: 1M+ weekly npm downloads and a 7+ year history. This matters for maintaining large, existing codebases or integrating with frameworks like Hardhat that have deep, native support.
Comprehensive API: Offers a monolithic, all-in-one ethers object covering wallets, providers, contracts, and utilities. Ideal for developers who prefer a single, expansive toolkit without assembling dependencies.
02
Choose Ethers.js for Simpler Abstraction
Developer Familiarity: Uses classic class-based patterns (e.g., Wallet, Contract) and promise-based calls. This lowers the barrier for developers transitioning from Web2 or older Web3 tutorials.
Built-in Fallbacks: Provides higher-level abstractions for gas estimation and node failover, which can simplify initial prototyping and applications where fine-grained RPC control is less critical.
03
Choose Viem for Performance & Type Safety
Modular & Tree-shakable: Composed of small, focused modules (e.g., viem/actions, viem/chains). This results in up to 70% smaller bundle sizes for frontends, crucial for dApp performance and user experience.
First-class TypeScript: Generated from ABIs, providing end-to-end type safety and autocompletion for contract calls. This eliminates a major source of bugs for protocols building complex DeFi or NFT tooling.
04
Choose Viem for Modern DX & Precision
Functional, Composable API: Uses a client-based pattern (publicClient, walletClient) with explicit parameters. This enables precise control over RPC calls and better stack traces, ideal for advanced applications like MEV bots, indexers, or wallets.
Ecosystem Alignment: The native library for Foundry and Wagmi. This is the best choice for teams building with modern frameworks like Next.js or building on emerging chains where precise chain definitions are required.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Feature Matrix: Ethers.js vs Viem Head-to-Head
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for Ethereum development libraries.
| Metric / Feature | Ethers.js v6 | Viem v2 |
|---|---|---|
Bundle Size (min+gzip) | ~78 KB | ~30 KB |
Tree-Shaking Support | ||
TypeScript Native | ||
Average RPC Call Latency | Baseline | ~40% faster |
Wallet Client Abstraction | ||
Modular Architecture | ||
Active GitHub Contributors (6mo) | 150+ | 80+ |
First Major Release | 2016 | 2023 |
pros-cons-a
ETHERS.JS VS VIEM
Ethers.js: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for the two dominant Ethereum JavaScript libraries.
01
Maturity & Ecosystem
Specific advantage: 7+ years of production use, 1.7M+ weekly npm downloads, and 1,000+ dependent packages. This matters for enterprise teams requiring a battle-tested library with extensive community examples and tutorials for complex contract interactions.
02
Developer Familiarity
Specific advantage: Intuitive, object-oriented API (e.g., Wallet, Contract, Provider) that mirrors Ethereum concepts. This matters for developers migrating from Web3.js or those who prefer a more explicit, class-based architecture for application state management.
03
Bundle Size & Performance
Specific advantage: ~30% smaller bundle size (Viem ~150KB vs Ethers v6 ~220KB minified) and optimized for tree-shaking. This matters for frontend-heavy dApps where performance is critical, reducing load times and improving user experience, especially for wallet connections and signing.
04
TypeScript & Safety
Specific advantage: First-class TypeScript support with automatic type inference for ABIs via @wagmi/cli and abitype. This matters for protocol teams building complex integrations where type safety prevents costly errors in contract calls and event parsing.
05
Modular Architecture
Specific advantage: Composable, function-based design with separate modules for Chains, Clients, and Transports. This matters for infrastructure builders creating custom RPC providers, multi-chain tooling, or needing fine-grained control over network behavior and request lifecycles.
06
Wallet & Signer Complexity
Specific trade-off: Requires managing separate Provider and Signer abstractions, which can lead to boilerplate. This matters for rapid prototyping where Viem's unified Client and Wallet Client model simplifies common patterns like sending transactions and reading state.
pros-cons-b
Ethers.js vs Viem
Viem: Pros and Cons
A data-driven comparison of the two dominant Ethereum libraries, highlighting key architectural trade-offs for production systems.
01
Viem's Key Strength: Type Safety & Modern Architecture
Native TypeScript-first design with automatic type inference for ABIs and RPC methods. This eliminates entire classes of runtime errors for protocols like Uniswap V3 or Compound, where complex contract interactions are common. The tree-shakable, modular bundle reduces final build size by ~40% compared to ethers.js.
02
Viem's Key Strength: Performance & Gas Estimation
Optimized for speed and accuracy. Benchmarks show ~30% faster raw RPC calls and more precise gas estimation via estimateFees for L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism. Its modular client architecture (Public, Wallet, Test) allows for leaner, purpose-built applications.
03
Ethers.js Key Strength: Maturity & Ecosystem Saturation
Battle-tested since 2016 with massive adoption (1M+ weekly npm downloads). Its monolithic, all-in-one ethers package provides a stable, predictable API that powers major projects like Aave and ENS. For teams maintaining legacy systems or requiring maximal third-party tool compatibility, this stability is critical.
04
Ethers.js Key Strength: Developer Familiarity & Documentation
Ubiquitous knowledge base with extensive tutorials, Stack Overflow solutions, and integration guides for every major toolchain (Hardhat, Foundry, Wagmi v1). The learning curve is significantly lower, reducing onboarding time for new engineers. This is a decisive factor for large teams with tight deadlines.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose: Developer Personas and Use Cases
Viem for Speed & Modernity
Verdict: The clear choice for new projects prioritizing performance and developer experience. Strengths:
- Tree-shaking & Size: ~15KB minzipped vs Ethers.js's ~80KB, crucial for frontend performance.
- TypeScript-Native: First-class type safety with automatic type inference from ABIs, reducing runtime errors.
- Superior RPC Handling: Built-in request batching, automatic retries, and failover for lower latency.
- Modern Patterns: Native support for Wallet Client (viem) and Public Client separation, aligning with EIP-1193. Ideal For: Teams building high-performance dApps, especially frontends where bundle size impacts UX, or any project starting fresh with TypeScript.
Ethers.js for Speed & Modernity
Verdict: The legacy standard, now a heavier foundation for existing systems. Considerations:
- Larger Footprint: The full library is comprehensive but can bloat bundles.
- Established Ecosystem: Unmatched plugin and tooling support (Hardhat, Foundry integration) which can accelerate development in mature environments.
- Migration Path: The v6 update modernized the API, but the core architecture differs from Viem's client-based model. Use Case: Maintaining or extending large, existing codebases where a complete rewrite isn't feasible.
LIBRARY COMPARISON
Technical Deep Dive: Architecture and Performance
A data-driven analysis of the core architectural differences between Ethers.js and Viem, focusing on performance, bundle size, and developer experience for production-grade applications.
Yes, Viem is generally faster for most common operations. It uses a more modern, tree-shakable architecture and optimized data structures, leading to faster initial load times and more efficient request batching. For example, Viem's readContract calls can be up to 40% faster due to its streamlined internal pipeline and avoidance of redundant object instantiation. However, for complex, multi-step transaction building, the performance delta may be less noticeable.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to help engineering leaders choose the right Ethereum library for their project's specific needs.
Ethers.js excels at providing a stable, battle-tested foundation for complex dApp development because of its extensive API surface and mature ecosystem. For example, its comprehensive support for ENS, contract factories, and event filtering has made it the default choice for major protocols like Uniswap and Aave, which require deep integration with the EVM. Its long history and large community (over 1.6 million weekly npm downloads) ensure robust documentation and a wealth of Stack Overflow solutions for common issues.
Viem takes a different approach by prioritizing modularity, type safety, and bundle size efficiency. This results in a significant performance advantage, with Viem's core client being up to 10x smaller than Ethers.js, directly impacting dApp load times. Its first-class TypeScript support and account abstraction model align with modern development practices, making it the preferred library for newer, performance-sensitive stacks like those built with Next.js and for protocols like Wagmi.
The key trade-off: If your priority is stability, a vast ecosystem, and a gentle learning curve for a large team, choose Ethers.js. If you prioritize bundle size, type safety, modern architecture, and are building a new, performance-critical application, choose Viem. For teams managing a legacy codebase, a gradual migration using adapter patterns is often the most pragmatic path forward.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall