GMX excels at deep liquidity and low-slippage trading for major assets, leveraging its unique multi-asset pool (GLP) on Arbitrum and Avalanche. For example, it consistently maintains over $400M in Total Value Locked (TVL), enabling large position sizes with minimal price impact. Its fee structure is straightforward, charging a small swap fee and borrowing costs directly from the GLP pool, making cost prediction transparent for traders.
LABS
Comparisons
GMX vs Gains Network: Leveraged Trading Platforms
A technical analysis comparing the core mechanisms, liquidity pools, and trade-offs of GMX and Gains Network for decentralized leveraged trading.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle for Decentralized Leverage
A data-driven comparison of GMX and Gains Network, the two leading platforms redefining on-chain derivatives.
Gains Network takes a different approach by offering an unparalleled breadth of synthetic assets—including forex, commodities, and equities—all from a single collateral pool (DAI) on Polygon and Arbitrum. This results in a trade-off: while it provides access to exotic markets like Tesla stock or gold, its maximum position sizes are generally lower than GMX's for blue-chip crypto pairs due to its different risk management model using Chainlink oracles and dynamic pricing.
The key trade-off: If your priority is high-volume, low-cost trading of major cryptocurrencies with maximum capital efficiency, GMX's GLP model is superior. If you prioritize access to a diverse, global portfolio of synthetic assets beyond crypto, Gains Network's gTrade is the clear choice. Your decision hinges on whether asset diversity or deep crypto liquidity is your primary requirement.
tldr-summary
GMX vs Gains Network
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key architectural and market strengths for two leading decentralized leveraged trading platforms.
01
GMX: Deep Liquidity & Market Dominance
Multi-Chain Liquidity Pools: Aggregates liquidity on Arbitrum and Avalanche into a single GLPs pool. This provides deep, unified liquidity for traders. Established Market Leader: Consistently holds the highest TVL (>$500M) and trading volume in the DeFi perpetuals sector. This matters for institutional traders and large positions where slippage is a primary concern.
$500M+
Combined TVL
2
Primary Chains
02
GMX: Zero Price Impact Trading
Unique GLP Model: Traders take the counterparty side against a diversified liquidity pool (GLP), not other traders. This enables large positions with zero price impact on entry/exit, a critical advantage for high-frequency or whale strategies. The trade-off is reliance on GLP staker incentives for liquidity provisioning.
03
Gains Network: Expansive Asset Universe
Synthetic Asset Coverage: Offers leverage on forex (FX), equities (like Tesla, Apple), and commodities (Gold, Oil), far beyond typical crypto pairs. Powered by Chainlink oracles and synthetic gDAI vaults. This matters for traders seeking traditional market exposure or diversified portfolios entirely on-chain.
100+
Tradable Assets
04
Gains Network: Capital Efficiency & High Leverage
Isolated gDAI Vaults: Each trading pair has a dedicated vault, isolating risk and allowing for tailored parameters. This architecture supports up to 150x leverage on crypto and 1000x on forex, the highest in DeFi. This matters for sophisticated traders using high leverage strategies, though it increases risk for liquidity providers in specific vaults.
05
GMX: For Whales & Low-Slippage Strategies
Choose GMX if: Your priority is executing large orders (>$100K) with minimal slippage, you prefer trading major crypto assets (BTC, ETH, LINK), and you value the proven security and liquidity of the largest protocol in the space. The ecosystem of yield-bearing GLP and GMX tokens is a bonus.
06
Gains Network: For Cross-Market Traders & Leverage Maximalists
Choose Gains if: You need exposure to FX, stocks, or commodities, you employ very high-leverage strategies, and you are comfortable with the specific risk profiles of isolated vaults. The platform is built for traders seeking maximal capital efficiency and a broader asset palette.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
GMX vs Gains Network: Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for decentralized leveraged trading.
| Metric | GMX | Gains Network |
|---|---|---|
Trading Asset Base | Crypto & Forex | Crypto, Forex, Stocks, Commodities |
Max Leverage (Crypto) | 50x | 150x |
Core Infrastructure | Arbitrum, Avalanche | Polygon, Arbitrum |
Fee Model | 0.1% Open/Close + Borrow Fees | 0.08% Open/Close + Rollover Fees |
Liquidity Model | GLP Pool (Multi-Asset) | DAI Vault (Single-Asset) |
Native Token Utility | GMX (Protocol Revenue) | GNS (Staking & Fee Discounts) |
Unique Feature | Zero Price Impact Swaps | Real-World Asset (RWA) Stocks |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
GMX vs Gains Network: Leveraged Trading Platforms
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs evaluating leveraged trading infrastructure. Data as of Q4 2024.
01
GMX: Superior Capital Efficiency
Multi-asset liquidity pool (GLP): Traders take leverage against a single, diversified basket of assets (e.g., BTC, ETH, stablecoins). This creates deep, unified liquidity, resulting in lower slippage for large orders (often <0.1% for $100k+ trades). This matters for institutional traders and high-volume strategies where execution cost is paramount.
02
GMX: Zero Price Impact Swaps
Oracle-based pricing: Trades are executed via Chainlink oracles, not an AMM curve. This eliminates front-running risk and MEV inherent to DEX pools. This matters for algorithmic trading firms and users who require predictable, manipulation-resistant pricing, especially during high volatility.
03
GMX: Complex Counterparty Risk
GLP holders are the liquidity counterparty: Profits from losing traders are distributed to GLP stakers, but losses from winning traders are paid from the same pool. During sustained, one-sided markets, this can lead to negative funding rates and GLP drawdowns. This matters for LPs who require predictable yield and protocols integrating GLP as collateral.
04
Gains Network: Isolated Asset Pairs
Dedicated DAI vaults per trading pair: Each market (e.g., BTC/DAI, ETH/DAI) has its own liquidity pool. This isolates risk; a depeg in one asset doesn't affect others. This matters for risk managers and LPs who want precise exposure control and protection from contagion.
05
Gains Network: Broader Asset Universe
Synthetic forex and commodities: Offers leveraged trading on traditional assets like EUR/USD, Gold (XAU), and Oil via Chainlink oracles. This matters for multi-strategy funds and traders seeking crypto-native exposure to macro markets without CEX KYC.
06
Gains Network: Higher Protocol Fees
Taker/maker fee model: Traders pay opening/closing fees (e.g., 0.08% taker) + borrowing fees. For high-frequency strategies, this creates a higher cost basis compared to GMX's zero-slippage model. This matters for quantitative trading bots and scalpers where fee structure directly impacts profitability.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
GMX vs Gains Network: Leveraged Trading Platforms
Key architectural and market differentiators for CTOs evaluating leveraged trading infrastructure.
01
GMX: Multi-Chain Liquidity Depth
Deep, unified liquidity pools on Arbitrum and Avalanche with over $500M in TVL. This enables large-cap crypto trades (BTC, ETH) with minimal slippage for positions up to millions. This matters for institutional traders and high-volume strategies where execution quality is paramount.
02
GMX: Zero Price Impact Model
Unique GLP pool model where liquidity providers (LPs) act as the counterparty, not an order book. Trades are executed via Chainlink oracles with no price impact, only a swap fee. This matters for traders who need predictable entry/exit costs without worrying about market depth on a per-asset basis.
03
Gains Network: Exotic Asset Coverage
Unmatched range of synthetic assets, including forex (EUR/USD), commodities (Gold, Oil), and equities (Tesla, Apple) via its gTrade platform. This matters for traders seeking exposure to traditional markets with crypto-native leverage (up to 150x on forex pairs).
04
Gains Network: Polygon PoS Efficiency
Built on Polygon for ultra-low transaction fees (<$0.01), making high-frequency trading and position management cost-effective. This matters for retail traders and strategies involving many small-to-medium sized positions where Ethereum L1 or even Arbitrum fees would be prohibitive.
05
GMX: Liquidity Provider Risk
GLP holders bear asymmetric risk. LPs are exposed to net trader P&L; during sustained profitable trading periods, the pool can depreciate. This matters for protocol architects considering integrating GMX's liquidity, as it requires robust risk management for stakers.
06
Gains Network: Oracle Dependency & Complexity
Heavy reliance on Pyth Network oracles for exotic price feeds. While low-latency, this introduces a centralization vector and complexity in managing multiple data sources. This matters for teams prioritizing maximal decentralization or those wary of oracle manipulation risks for less liquid synthetic assets.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
GMX for High Leverage Traders
Verdict: The go-to for maximum leverage and deep liquidity. Strengths: Offers up to 50x leverage on major assets like ETH and BTC, supported by a massive, multi-chain liquidity pool (GLP). The peer-to-pool model ensures high liquidity for large positions with minimal slippage. The platform is battle-tested with billions in cumulative volume. Trade-offs: Leverage is capped at 50x, and the asset selection is focused on blue-chip cryptos. Funding rates are dynamic and can be volatile during high market stress.
Gains Network for High Leverage Traders
Verdict: Superior for exotic pairs and higher leverage caps. Strengths: Unmatched leverage of up to 150x on forex (e.g., EUR/USD) and equity indices (like NASDAQ), alongside crypto. The unique DAI vault and keeper network provide isolated risk and efficient liquidations. Better for traders seeking extreme leverage on non-crypto assets. Trade-offs: Liquidity depth for the largest crypto positions may not match GMX's GLP. The platform is newer, with a smaller track record of handling extreme market events.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
A data-driven breakdown of the core trade-offs between GMX and Gains Network to guide your platform selection.
GMX excels at providing deep liquidity and low-slippage trading for major assets on Arbitrum and Avalanche, leveraging its unique GLP liquidity pool model. This results in a superior user experience for high-volume traders, evidenced by its consistently higher Total Value Locked (TVL), which has historically been 3-5x larger than Gains Network. Its permissionless listing model for established assets like ETH, BTC, and major stablecoins creates a robust, generalist market.
Gains Network takes a different approach by specializing in synthetic trading of a vast array of assets—including forex, commodities, and equities—all from a single collateral pool (DAI). This strategy enables unparalleled market diversity but introduces a reliance on its proprietary oracle system, gTrade, and centralized price feeds, creating a different trust model. The platform is optimized for leverage up to 150x on crypto and 1000x on forex, catering specifically to high-leverage niche traders.
The key architectural trade-off is liquidity model versus asset scope. GMX's multi-asset GLP pool spreads risk and provides organic liquidity but can experience temporary imbalances. Gains' single-collateral vault for synthetic assets offers clean exposure but concentrates systemic risk in its price feed mechanism and DAI vault solvency.
Consider GMX if your priority is trading major cryptocurrencies with maximum capital efficiency, deep liquidity, and a battle-tested model on leading L2s. Its integration ecosystem with protocols like Chainlink, Pyth, and Umami Finance makes it the default DeFi lego block for leveraged spots and perps.
Choose Gains Network when your use case demands access to non-crypto markets (e.g., Tesla stock, EUR/USD, gold) and extreme leverage in a single, streamlined interface. Its all-in-one DAI vault and gDAI staking simplify the backend for users seeking exotic synthetic exposure.
Final Decision Driver: For a CTO building a generalist DeFi suite, GMX's liquidity depth and composability are strategic advantages. For a protocol targeting traditional market entrants or hyper-specialized leverage products, Gains Network's synthetic asset engine provides a unique, scalable moat. Evaluate based on whether asset diversity or liquidity robustness aligns with your core user journey.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall