Slither excels at deep, customizable static analysis because it is an open-source framework built on a rich intermediate representation of Solidity code. For example, it can detect over 100+ distinct vulnerability patterns out-of-the-box, from reentrancy to incorrect access control, and is used by major protocols like Aave and Compound in their CI/CD pipelines. Its strength lies in enabling developers to write custom detectors for protocol-specific logic, offering unparalleled flexibility for in-house security teams.
LABS
Comparisons
Slither vs MythX: Static Analysis Tools
A technical comparison of Slither and MythX, two leading static analysis frameworks for automated smart contract security. This guide analyzes detection capabilities, integration workflows, cost models, and ideal use cases for development teams.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Static Analysis Landscape
A data-driven comparison of Slither and MythX, the leading static analysis tools for smart contract security.
MythX takes a different approach by providing a comprehensive, SaaS-based security analysis platform. This strategy integrates multiple engines—including symbolic execution and taint analysis—into a single API call, resulting in a more automated, 'black-box' experience. The trade-off is less direct control over the analysis process, but it delivers extensive coverage with minimal configuration, processing thousands of contracts monthly for enterprises and auditors.
The key trade-off: If your priority is deep, customizable analysis and integration into bespoke development workflows, choose Slither. If you prioritize a turnkey, multi-engine analysis service with extensive vulnerability database coverage and professional reporting, choose MythX.
tldr-summary
Slither vs. MythX
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading Solidity static analysis tools at a glance.
01
Slither's Strength: Speed & Integration
Blazing-fast local analysis: Scans contracts in seconds, not minutes, enabling seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines (e.g., GitHub Actions). This matters for high-velocity development teams who need immediate feedback on every commit without waiting for external services.
< 10 sec
Typical scan time
03
MythX's Strength: Multi-Engine Analysis
Hybrid analysis suite: Combines static analysis, dynamic analysis, and symbolic execution in a single API call, uncovering vulnerabilities (e.g., reentrancy, integer overflows) that single-method tools miss. This matters for auditors and teams preparing for a formal audit who need maximum vulnerability coverage.
3+
Analysis engines
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Feature Comparison: Slither vs MythX
Direct comparison of static analysis tools for Ethereum smart contract security.
| Metric | Slither | MythX |
|---|---|---|
Primary Analysis Method | Static Analysis | Hybrid (Static + Symbolic) |
Detection Categories | 70+ vulnerability detectors | Customizable detection rules |
Integration | CLI, CI/CD, Foundry plugin | API, Remix, Truffle, Hardhat |
Pricing Model | Open Source (Free) | Freemium & Enterprise Tiers |
Real-Time Analysis | ||
Requires Solidity Compilation | ||
Gas Optimization Reports |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Slither vs MythX: Static Analysis Tools
A balanced comparison of two leading static analysis tools for Solidity smart contract security. Use this to decide which fits your development workflow and security posture.
05
Slither: Cost & Control
Free and open-source: No usage limits or subscription fees. Full control over execution environment and data. This matters for bootstrapped projects or teams with strict data sovereignty requirements.
06
MythX: Cost & Complexity
Freemium SaaS model: Free tier has limited analysis depth and request quotas; advanced features require a paid plan. This matters for budget-conscious teams whose analysis needs may outgrow the free tier quickly.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
Slither vs MythX: Static Analysis Tools
Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading Ethereum smart contract security analyzers at a glance.
02
Slither's Key Trade-off
Developer experience overhead: Primarily a command-line tool requiring Python setup. While powerful, it lacks the integrated, polished UI of cloud services. This matters for development teams seeking a seamless, low-friction security workflow within their CI/CD pipeline without managing local environments.
04
MythX's Key Trade-off
Cost and vendor lock-in: While offering a free tier, advanced analysis and high usage require a paid subscription, creating an ongoing operational cost. This matters for open-source projects or bootstrapped startups with limited budgets who prefer the one-time setup cost of a self-hosted tool like Slither.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose Slither vs MythX
Slither for Developers
Verdict: The definitive choice for deep, customizable static analysis during active development. Strengths:
- Free & Open-Source: Integrates directly into your CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) at zero cost.
- Fast & Precise: Runs in seconds, providing actionable feedback on specific vulnerabilities like reentrancy, integer overflows, and access control issues.
- Custom Detectors: Write your own analysis scripts in Python to enforce project-specific security patterns.
- Integration: Works seamlessly with Foundry and Hardhat projects via the
slither .command.
MythX for Developers
Verdict: Ideal for final, comprehensive security audits before mainnet deployment. Strengths:
- Multi-Engine Analysis: Combines static, dynamic, and symbolic execution (using tools like Manticore) for higher coverage.
- Smart Contract Standards: Pre-configured checks for compliance with ERC-20, ERC-721, and other major standards.
- Remix & Truffle Plugins: Easy to use directly from popular development environments. Trade-off: Requires a paid subscription for full analysis depth and unlimited scans, adding to operational cost.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to help you select the right static analysis tool for your smart contract security needs.
Slither excels at providing fast, actionable insights directly within a developer's workflow because it is a free, open-source command-line tool. For example, its detection of over 100 vulnerability patterns, such as reentrancy and incorrect access control, can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines for rapid feedback, with analysis often completing in under a second for typical contracts. This makes it ideal for early-stage development and teams prioritizing speed and cost-efficiency.
MythX takes a different approach by offering a comprehensive, cloud-based security analysis platform. This results in a trade-off between depth and convenience versus speed and cost. MythX leverages multiple analysis engines (static, dynamic, symbolic) and a proprietary database, providing a more thorough security audit. However, this comes with API call limits and a subscription model, starting with a free tier for 50 requests/month and scaling to enterprise plans.
The key trade-off: If your priority is developer velocity, open-source transparency, and zero-cost integration into local development and CI/CD (e.g., using Foundry or Hardhat), choose Slither. If you prioritize maximum security coverage, formal verification capabilities, and a managed service for auditing critical production contracts before mainnet deployment, choose MythX.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall