Jupiter Aggregator excels at providing the best possible swap rates on Solana by aggregating liquidity across its native DEXs like Raydium, Orca, and Meteora. Its core strength is a hyper-optimized, single-chain-first approach, leveraging Solana's low fees and high throughput to execute complex routing logic (e.g., splitting orders across 20+ venues) in a single transaction. For example, it consistently achieves price improvements of 1-5%+ over direct DEX trades, processing millions of dollars in daily volume with sub-second finality.
LABS
Comparisons
Jupiter Aggregator vs 1inch Network: Cross-Chain Aggregation
A technical analysis comparing Solana's dominant liquidity aggregator, Jupiter, with Ethereum's established multi-chain leader, 1inch. We evaluate architecture, performance, cost, and ecosystem fit for CTOs and protocol architects.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle of Aggregation Philosophies
A data-driven comparison of Jupiter and 1inch, two dominant but philosophically distinct cross-chain liquidity aggregators.
1inch Network takes a different, multi-chain expansion strategy by deploying its aggregation and liquidity protocols (Aggregation Protocol and Fusion mode) across EVM chains like Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Polygon, as well as non-EVM chains via its 1inch Fusion API. This results in a broader but more fragmented reach; while it offers access to massive liquidity pools (e.g., over $10B in aggregated TVL), its performance and fee savings can be constrained by the underlying chain's limitations, such as Ethereum's base layer gas costs and slower block times.
The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing swap efficiency and user experience on Solana with the most advanced routing algorithms, choose Jupiter. If you prioritize broad, chain-agnostic coverage and need to serve users across Ethereum, its L2s, and other ecosystems, choose 1inch. Jupiter is the specialist for a high-performance chain, while 1inch is the generalist for a multi-chain world.
tldr-summary
Jupiter Aggregator vs 1inch Network
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for cross-chain aggregation.
01
Jupiter: Solana Native Performance
Optimized for Solana's high-throughput architecture: Routes across 100+ DEXs on a single, fast chain. This matters for high-frequency trading and arbitrage where sub-second finality and low fees (<$0.01) are critical. It's the de facto standard for Solana DeFi, integrating with protocols like Raydium, Orca, and Meteora.
< 1 sec
Typical Swap Time
$0.01
Avg. Fee
03
1inch: Multi-Chain Maturity & Security
Battle-tested across 15+ EVM and non-EVM chains: Leverages deep liquidity on Ethereum, Arbitrum, BNB Chain, etc. This matters for institutional protocols and cross-chain portfolios requiring proven security audits, gas optimization via Chi Gastoken, and aggregation from established DEXs like Uniswap, Curve, and PancakeSwap.
15+
Networks
$250B+
Total Volume
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Jupiter Aggregator vs 1inch Network: Cross-Chain Aggregation
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for leading cross-chain DEX aggregators.
| Metric | Jupiter Aggregator | 1inch Network |
|---|---|---|
Primary Chain / Ecosystem | Solana | Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, etc. |
Supported Chains (Direct) | 1 (Solana) | 15+ |
Cross-Chain Function | Via Jupiter LFG Launchpad (Limited) | 1inch Fusion & Protocol (Native) |
Avg. Swap Fee | 0.1% (Solana) | 0.3% (Ethereum) |
Key Integration Method | SDK & API | Fusion API & 1inch SDK |
Native Gas Token Abstraction | ||
Major Governance Token | JUP | 1INCH |
JUPITER VS 1INCH: CROSS-CHAIN AGGREGATION
Performance & Cost Benchmarks
Direct comparison of execution quality, supported networks, and cost structures for cross-chain DEX aggregation.
| Metric | Jupiter Aggregator | 1inch Network |
|---|---|---|
Primary Chain / Ecosystem | Solana | Ethereum, EVM L2s (Arbitrum, Base, etc.) |
Avg. Swap Slippage Saved | Up to 5% (Solana) | Up to 15% (Ethereum Mainnet) |
Supported Blockchains | 1 (Solana) | 15+ (EVM & Non-EVM via Fusion) |
Native Cross-Chain Swaps | ||
Typical Fee for $1k Swap | $0.10 - $0.30 | $5 - $15 (Ethereum Gas) |
Integrated DEXs & Liquidity Sources |
|
|
Native Token Utility | JUP (Governance, Fee Discounts) | 1INCH (Governance, Staking Rewards) |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Jupiter Aggregator vs 1inch Network: Cross-Chain Aggregation
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs evaluating cross-chain DEX aggregators.
01
Jupiter's Solana Native Advantage
Optimized for Solana's architecture: Achieves sub-second swaps by leveraging Solana's parallel execution and low-latency consensus. This matters for high-frequency trading bots and applications requiring instant settlement, like on-chain gaming or NFT minting. Supports native Solana tokens like $BONK and $JTO without bridging.
< 1 sec
Swap Latency
100+
Solana DEXs
02
1inch's EVM & Multi-Chain Dominance
Deep liquidity across 15+ EVM chains: Aggregates from Uniswap, Curve, and PancakeSwap on Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon, and Base. This matters for protocols with a multi-chain user base or teams managing treasury assets across several networks. The 1inch Fusion mode offers MEV-protected, limit-order-like swaps.
15+
Supported Chains
$250B+
Lifetime Volume
03
Jupiter's Route Complexity & Price Impact
Potential for higher slippage on large orders: While it splits across many Solana DEXs (Orca, Raydium), concentrated liquidity on Solana can lead to significant price impact for trades over ~$100K. This matters for institutional OTC desks or DAOs executing large treasury rebalances, where batch auctions or RFQ systems might be preferable.
04
1inch's EVM-Centric Gas Complexity
User must manage native gas tokens: Swaps on Ethereum or Arbitrum require holding and managing ETH. This adds UX friction and operational overhead compared to Solana's fee abstraction. This matters for consumer apps targeting non-crypto-native users or protocols building gasless transaction experiences.
pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS
Jupiter Aggregator vs 1inch Network: Cross-Chain Aggregation
Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading cross-chain DEX aggregators at a glance.
01
Jupiter's Pro: Unmatched Solana Integration
Native Solana speed and liquidity: Executes swaps in <1 second with access to 99% of Solana's DEX liquidity (e.g., Raydium, Orca). This matters for high-frequency traders and Solana-native protocols requiring minimal latency and maximum token coverage.
02
Jupiter's Pro: Advanced DeFi Tooling
Protocol-first features: Offers DCA, limit orders, and perps aggregation directly in the swap interface. This matters for sophisticated users and DAOs looking to execute complex strategies like dollar-cost averaging or hedging without leaving the platform.
03
Jupiter's Con: Limited EVM Footprint
Primarily Solana-centric: While expanding, its cross-chain swaps rely heavily on bridging to Solana. This matters for EVM-native teams (e.g., on Arbitrum, Base) who need deep, native aggregation across multiple EVM chains without a central hub.
04
1inch's Pro: EVM Liquidity Dominance
Deep multi-chain aggregation: Aggregates liquidity across 15+ EVM chains (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Polygon) and 300+ liquidity sources. This matters for protocols with multi-chain deployments needing the best rates across the entire EVM ecosystem from a single integration.
05
1inch's Pro: Battle-Tested Security & Governance
Estimated $500B+ in lifetime volume with a robust security audit history and a decentralized 1INCH token governance model. This matters for institutional integrators and CTOs prioritizing proven security, insurance funds (Fusion Mode), and protocol-owned liquidity.
06
1inch's Con: Higher Complexity & Fees on Ethereum
Gas-intensive routing: Advanced Pathfinder algorithm can incur high gas costs on Ethereum mainnet. This matters for retail users and high-volume bots making small trades, where network fees can negate routing advantages compared to simpler aggregators.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
Jupiter for DeFi on Solana
Verdict: The native, high-throughput engine for Solana DeFi. Strengths: Unmatched liquidity depth on Solana via Raydium, Orca, and Meteora. Jupiter Terminal offers a white-label swap widget. Jupiter Perps provides a unified perpetuals interface. Superior UX for high-frequency, low-cost operations typical of Solana DeFi (e.g., margin trading, yield farming). Considerations: Primarily Solana-centric. Cross-chain functionality is a newer addition via Jupiter Bridge API.
1inch Network for DeFi on EVM
Verdict: The established, multi-chain aggregator for EVM ecosystems. Strengths: Battle-tested aggregation across Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, and Optimism. 1inch Fusion enables gasless, MEV-protected swaps. 1inch Developer Portal offers extensive SDKs and APIs. Superior for protocols needing deep liquidity across multiple EVM chains and advanced order types (limit orders, stop-loss).
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
A data-driven conclusion on choosing the optimal cross-chain DEX aggregator for your protocol's needs.
Jupiter Aggregator excels at providing the deepest liquidity and best execution for Solana-centric operations because it is natively built for the high-throughput, low-fee environment. For example, it consistently sources routes across over 20 Solana DEXs like Raydium and Orca, processing over $1.5B in monthly volume and enabling complex meta-aggregation strategies like DCA and limit orders directly on-chain. Its tight integration with the Solana ecosystem makes it the undisputed leader for applications where speed and cost on Solana are paramount.
1inch Network takes a different approach by prioritizing multi-chain breadth and capital efficiency through its Fusion mode. This strategy results in a trade-off: while it aggregates across 15+ EVM and non-EVM chains (Ethereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, etc.), its routing on any single chain, especially newer L2s, may not match the depth of a native specialist. Its Fusion auctions allow for gasless, MEV-protected swaps by outsourcing execution to professional resolvers, a unique value proposition for users sensitive to gas costs on congested networks.
The key trade-off: If your priority is building a premier Solana application that demands the absolute best swap rates, access to advanced order types, and seamless integration with wallets like Phantom and Backpack, choose Jupiter. If you prioritize serving a multi-chain user base from a single integration, require sophisticated gas-saving mechanics like Fusion, or are heavily invested in the broader EVM ecosystem, choose 1inch. For CTOs, the decision hinges on whether your stack's center of gravity is a single high-performance chain or a diversified, chain-agnostic portfolio.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall