The Graph's Subgraph API excels at delivering high-performance, application-specific data through a decentralized indexing network. Developers define a subgraph manifest to index specific events and entities from a smart contract, resulting in millisecond query latency for complex, nested data. For example, a DeFi frontend can query a Uniswap subgraph for a user's liquidity positions across thousands of pools in a single request, bypassing the need for direct RPC calls. This model prioritizes speed and customization for protocols that own their data schema.
LABS
Comparisons
The Graph Subgraph API vs Covalent API
A technical analysis comparing two leading blockchain data indexing services. This guide examines data granularity, pricing models, real-time capabilities, and developer experience to help CTOs and architects choose the right backend infrastructure for tokenization platforms and dApps.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Battle for Reliable On-Chain Data
A technical breakdown of two dominant approaches to indexing and querying blockchain data for application development.
Covalent's Unified API takes a different approach by providing a normalized, multi-chain data warehouse. Instead of requiring custom indexing logic, Covalent extracts raw chain data into a consistent schema across 200+ supported blockchains, offering a single endpoint for balances, transactions, and log events. This results in a trade-off: you gain instant access to broad, historical data across chains without development overhead, but sacrifice the sub-second, bespoke query capabilities for deeply nested on-chain relationships.
The key trade-off: If your priority is ultra-fast, customizable queries for a specific protocol (e.g., building a sophisticated DeFi dashboard for your own smart contracts), choose The Graph. If you prioritize rapid development, cross-chain consistency, and access to raw historical data without maintaining infrastructure (e.g., building a portfolio tracker or tax reporting tool), choose Covalent.
tldr-summary
THE GRAPH PROS
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance.
01
Decentralized & Verifiable Data
Decentralized network: Data is indexed by a permissionless network of Indexers, secured by the GRT token. This matters for protocols requiring censorship resistance and data integrity guarantees, like Uniswap or Aave, where a single API failure is unacceptable.
02
Custom, High-Performance Queries
Flexible GraphQL API: Developers define custom data schemas and mappings in a Subgraph. This matters for complex, application-specific queries (e.g., "top liquidity providers for a specific pool over time") where pre-built endpoints are insufficient.
03
Strong Ecosystem & Composability
Deep protocol integration: Over 4,000+ live subgraphs powering major dApps like Uniswap, Balancer, and Lido. This matters for building on established DeFi primitives, as the data models and community tooling are already battle-tested.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
The Graph Subgraph API vs Covalent API
Direct comparison of key metrics and features for blockchain data indexing and querying.
| Metric / Feature | The Graph Subgraph API | Covalent API |
|---|---|---|
Data Model | Custom Subgraph (GraphQL) | Unified API (REST/GraphQL) |
Supported Chains | 40+ (EVM & non-EVM) | 200+ |
Pricing Model | Query Fees (GRT), Hosted Service | Usage-based (CQT), Unified Pricing |
Data Freshness | ~1 block (User-defined) | ~1-2 blocks |
Historical Data Depth | From subgraph deployment | Full chain history |
Developer Overhead | High (Define schema, mappings) | Low (Ready-to-query endpoints) |
Native Token Integration | GRT (Indexer staking) | CQT (Network utility) |
THE GRAPH VS COVALENT API
Pricing Model & Cost Analysis
Direct comparison of pricing, rate limits, and cost structure for blockchain data APIs.
| Metric | The Graph Subgraph API | Covalent API |
|---|---|---|
Pricing Model | Query Fee (GRT) + Indexer Staking | Pay-As-You-Go (USD/Crypto) |
Free Tier Queries/Day | ~100,000 | Unlimited |
Cost per 1M Complex Queries | $200 - $500 (est.) | $350 (Unified API) |
Historical Data Pricing | Standard Rate | No Extra Cost |
Multi-Chain Query Support | Per-Subgraph Deployment | Unified API (200+ Chains) |
Billing Complexity | High (GRT Management) | Low (Simplified Dashboard) |
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
When to Choose Which: A Use Case Analysis
The Graph Subgraph API for DeFi
Verdict: The superior choice for building complex, custom DeFi analytics and dashboards. Strengths: Unmatched for querying custom, application-specific logic. Build a subgraph to index events from protocols like Uniswap, Aave, or Compound to create bespoke dashboards tracking LP positions, health factors, or yield metrics. The decentralized network provides strong censorship resistance for critical financial data. Considerations: Requires development time to define and deploy the subgraph schema and mapping logic. Query costs are paid in GRT.
Covalent API for DeFi
Verdict: The faster, simpler choice for aggregating wallet balances and cross-chain portfolio data. Strengths: Instantly query unified wallet balances across 200+ chains, including tokens, NFTs, and historical valuations. Perfect for building portfolio trackers or tax reporting tools without any indexing setup. The single API key and consistent response format across chains drastically reduce integration time. Considerations: Less flexible for deeply customized, real-time event-driven data than a purpose-built subgraph.
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
The Graph Subgraph API vs. Covalent API
Key strengths and trade-offs for CTOs evaluating blockchain data infrastructure. Choose based on query complexity, data scope, and cost model.
02
The Graph: Decentralized Network
Censorship-resistant data layer: Queries are served by a decentralized network of Indexers, Curators, and Delegators, secured by the GRT token. This matters for mission-critical applications requiring high availability and data integrity without a single point of failure, aligning with Web3 ethos.
700+
Indexers
04
Covalent: Predictable Pricing
Simple, usage-based billing: Pay per API call with clear credit packages, avoiding the complexity of managing GRT stake or query fees. This matters for enterprise teams with fixed budgets who need predictable OpEx and don't want to manage crypto-economic incentives.
05
The Graph: Development Overhead
Subgraph development & maintenance cost: Requires engineering resources to write, test, deploy, and maintain subgraph mappings (in AssemblyScript/TypeScript). This is a significant upfront cost for teams that simply need fast access to common blockchain data without custom transformations.
06
Covalent: Query Flexibility Limit
Constrained by available endpoints: While rich, the data model is fixed. You cannot create custom joins or index niche events not already covered by Covalent's schemas. This is a limitation for novel protocols or applications requiring highly specialized, real-time data aggregates.
pros-cons-b
The Graph Subgraph API vs Covalent API
Covalent API: Pros and Cons
Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for two leading blockchain data indexing solutions.
01
The Graph: Custom Query Power
Full subgraph customization: Developers define their own data schema and indexing logic using GraphQL. This is critical for protocol-specific analytics (e.g., Uniswap V3 position tracking, Aave interest rate models) where off-the-shelf data is insufficient.
02
The Graph: Decentralized Network
Censorship-resistant indexing: Data is served by a decentralized network of Indexers, curators, and delegators. This matters for protocols requiring maximum uptime and data integrity, aligning with Web3 ethos. Over 700+ indexed subgraphs run on the decentralized network.
03
Covalent: Unified API
Single endpoint for 200+ chains: One consistent API structure (e.g., Get token balances for address) works across Ethereum, Polygon, Avalanche, and others. This eliminates the need to build and maintain separate indexers for each chain, accelerating multi-chain development.
04
Covalent: Historical Data Depth
No archival node requirement: Provides full historical data (wallet balances, NFT transfers, log events) from block 0 without needing to sync a node. This is essential for comprehensive portfolio apps, tax tools, and forensic analysis where complete history is non-negotiable.
05
The Graph: Development Overhead
Subgraph development cost: Requires writing and deploying a custom subgraph (in GraphQL and AssemblyScript), which adds significant upfront engineering time. Maintenance burden includes handling chain reorgs and logic upgrades. Not ideal for rapid prototyping.
06
Covalent: Query Flexibility Limit
Pre-defined schema constraints: While rich, the data model is fixed. Complex, highly customized queries (e.g., calculating a custom DeFi risk score across 10 protocols) may not be possible without post-processing. Best for standardized data consumption, not novel aggregations.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Decision Framework
A data-driven breakdown to guide your infrastructure choice between The Graph and Covalent.
The Graph's Subgraph API excels at delivering highly customized, low-latency queries for specific smart contracts because its decentralized network of Indexers processes and caches data from a defined subgraph manifest. For example, a protocol like Uniswap uses subgraphs to power its frontend with real-time swap data, achieving query latencies under 100ms. This model is ideal for applications that require deep, complex queries on a specific protocol's data schema, offering performance comparable to a dedicated database.
Covalent's Unified API takes a different approach by providing a normalized, multi-chain data warehouse. Instead of building custom indices, it offers a single set of endpoints (e.g., Get token balances for address, Get transactions) across 200+ supported blockchains. This results in a trade-off: you gain immense breadth and historical depth—querying an address's full history back to genesis—but sacrifice the sub-second, bespoke query optimization possible with a purpose-built subgraph. It's infrastructure versus customization.
The key trade-off is between specialization and generalization. If your priority is building a high-performance dApp frontend for a single protocol (e.g., an AMM, NFT marketplace, or lending platform) and you have engineering resources to define the schema, choose The Graph. Its decentralized network and GraphQL interface provide the tailored speed you need. If you prioritize aggregating wallet data, analyzing cross-chain user journeys, or building a product that must work across dozens of chains without maintaining individual indexers, choose Covalent. Its unified API delivers consistency at the expense of peak, single-protocol performance.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall