Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Notabene vs. Quadrata: Travel Rule (FATF) Compliance Solutions

A technical analysis comparing Notabene's enterprise API platform and Quadrata's decentralized passport network for solving Travel Rule compliance. Evaluates architecture, data models, integration complexity, and cost for CTOs and protocol architects.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The Travel Rule Compliance Imperative

A data-driven comparison of Notabene and Quadrata, two leading approaches to solving the FATF Travel Rule challenge for VASPs.

Notabene excels at providing a comprehensive, protocol-agnostic compliance network for high-volume VASPs because it focuses on secure, standardized data exchange. Its platform integrates directly with major blockchain explorers like Etherscan and supports a wide range of protocols including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Polygon, facilitating over 1 million compliance checks monthly. This makes it ideal for exchanges and custodians handling diverse asset flows who need to meet strict regulatory requirements across jurisdictions.

Quadrata takes a different approach by embedding compliance directly into the user's wallet via a Passport NFT, creating a portable identity layer. This strategy shifts the verification burden from the institution to the user, resulting in a trade-off: it enables seamless, reusable KYC across dApps and reduces per-transaction overhead, but may face adoption challenges in traditional, institution-first VASP environments that require direct counterparty data sharing.

The key trade-off: If your priority is institutional-grade data exchange and audit trails for a multi-chain VASP operation, choose Notabene. If you prioritize user-centric, reusable identity for a decentralized application ecosystem where compliance is a feature, choose Quadrada.

tldr-summary
Notabene vs. Quadrata

TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance

Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for two leading Travel Rule compliance solutions.

01

Notabene: Regulatory Network & Interoperability

Specific advantage: Operates the largest Travel Rule network, connecting 300+ VASPs across 40+ jurisdictions. This matters for global exchanges and custodians who need to transact with a wide variety of counterparties and ensure compliance with FATF Recommendation 16 across different regulatory regimes. Their focus is on secure, standardized data exchange (IVMS 101).

02

Notabene: Risk-Based Transaction Screening

Specific advantage: Provides real-time risk scoring for every transaction based on wallet screening, jurisdiction, and counterparty VASP data. This matters for institutions requiring granular compliance controls to prioritize high-risk transfers for manual review, optimizing operational efficiency while maintaining a strong compliance posture.

03

Quadrata: Identity-Powered Passport Network

Specific advantage: Issues reusable, on-chain Quadrata Passport NFTs that bundle KYC/AML status, accreditation, and country. This matters for DeFi protocols and dApps seeking to embed compliance directly into smart contracts for gated access, automated tax reporting (e.g., Form 1099), and permissioned liquidity pools without rebuilding KYC flows.

04

Quadrata: On-Chain Reputation & Compliance Layer

Specific advantage: Creates a portable, sybil-resistant identity layer that travels with the user across applications. This matters for building compliant Web3 products that need to verify user attributes (like citizenship or accreditation) in real-time for services like tokenized securities (ERC-3643), compliant stablecoins, or regulated gaming, reducing integration complexity.

NOTABENE VS. QUADRATA: TRAVEL RULE COMPLIANCE

Head-to-Head Feature & Technical Specification Matrix

Direct comparison of key technical and compliance features for blockchain-based Travel Rule (FATF) solutions.

Metric / FeatureNotabeneQuadrata

Primary Solution Focus

Cross-Border VASP-to-VASP Travel Rule

On-Chain Identity & Compliance Passport

Core Compliance Standard

FATF Recommendation 16, TRP

FATF Recommendation 16, KYC/KYB

Supported Jurisdictions

100+

50+

Blockchain Integration Method

API, SDK, Smart Contract Triggers

NFT Passport (Soulbound Token)

Real-Time Sanctions Screening

Transaction Risk Scoring

Direct VASP Interoperability

Identity Verification Providers

Onfido, Veriff, others

Built-in, Parallel

pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS ANALYSIS

Notabene vs. Quadrata: Travel Rule (FATF) Compliance Solutions

A data-driven comparison of two leading Travel Rule compliance platforms, highlighting their architectural approaches and ideal use cases for CTOs and compliance officers.

02

Notabene's Trade-off: Implementation Complexity

Specific disadvantage: Requires deeper integration for full rule-set automation (e.g., jurisdiction lookups, risk scoring). This matters for fast-moving fintechs who need a turnkey solution, as it may demand more internal compliance resources to configure and maintain.

04

Quadrata's Trade-off: Blockchain-Centric Scope

Specific disadvantage: Primarily optimized for on-chain environments and may require bridging for traditional VASP-to-VASP Travel Rule messaging. This matters for hybrid CeFi/DeFi institutions whose primary compliance burden is with off-chain counterparties, potentially necessitating a secondary solution.

pros-cons-b
TRAVEL RULE COMPLIANCE SHOWDOWN

Quadrata: Analysis of Pros and Cons

Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading approaches to FATF Travel Rule compliance.

02

Quadrata's Trade-off: Protocol-Centric Data Model

Focus on dApp Integration: Quadrata's model is optimized for smart contracts to query and act upon identity data. While it facilitates Travel Rule compliance by providing verified originator/beneficiary data, the primary workflow is not a dedicated VASP-to-VASP messaging protocol. This matters for financial institutions that require a dedicated, auditable communication channel specifically for compliance data exchange, rather than a general-purpose identity layer.

04

Notabene's Trade-off: Off-Chain Compliance Workflow

Enterprise-First Architecture: Notabene's solution is primarily an off-chain SaaS platform with API integrations. While robust for traditional finance workflows, it does not natively provide on-chain, composable identity primitives. This matters for decentralized applications (dApps) or L1/L2 protocols that require identity logic to be executed autonomously within smart contracts, limiting its utility in pure DeFi-native compliance designs.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

Decision Framework: Use Cases and User Scenarios

Notabene for VASPs

Verdict: The comprehensive, enterprise-grade solution for high-volume, cross-border compliance. Strengths: Notabene is purpose-built for the complex workflows of regulated Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). Its platform excels at orchestrating the Travel Rule's data exchange (IVMS 101 standard) across a vast network of 500+ counterparties. It offers deep integration with major custodians (Fireblocks, Copper), blockchains (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana), and sanctions screening tools (Chainalysis, Elliptic). For a global exchange like Coinbase or Binance, Notabene provides the audit trails, counterparty discovery, and regulatory reporting required for operating in multiple jurisdictions (FATF, EU's MiCA).

Quadrata for VASPs

Verdict: A strong complementary tool for identity verification, but not a standalone Travel Rule solution. Strengths: Quadrata's core value is its on-chain, reusable Passport NFT, which contains verified KYC/AML credentials. For a VASP, this can significantly streamline the initial customer onboarding and due diligence process. However, Quadrata does not manage the ongoing, transaction-by-transaction Travel Rule data sharing between VASPs. It is best deployed alongside a dedicated Travel Rule protocol like Notabene or Sygna Bridge to handle the compliance lifecycle from KYC to transaction screening.

verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation

A decisive breakdown of the Notabene and Quadrata approaches to Travel Rule compliance, helping you align your choice with core business priorities.

Notabene excels at providing a comprehensive, protocol-agnostic Travel Rule engine for high-volume, cross-border VASP-to-VASP transactions. Its strength lies in deep integration with major blockchain networks (Ethereum, Polygon, Solana) and a focus on the technical data exchange (IVMS 101) mandated by FATF. For example, its network processes over 1 million compliance checks monthly, demonstrating proven scalability for institutional corridors. Its partnership with firms like Bitso and integration with Chainalysis KYT provide a robust, enterprise-grade solution.

Quadrata takes a fundamentally different approach by embedding compliance directly into the wallet layer via a passport NFT. This strategy shifts the burden of identity verification (KYC) and jurisdictional screening to the user upfront, enabling compliant DeFi and on-chain applications without VASP intermediaries. This results in a trade-off: superior user experience for permissioned dApps but less focus on the traditional, high-volume inter-VASP messaging that is Notabene's core competency.

The key trade-off is between a transaction-focused compliance rail and an identity-centric access layer. If your priority is regulatory adherence for institutional crypto transfers, OTC desks, or exchange withdrawals, choose Notabene. Its specialized tooling for rule sets, liability management, and counterparty discovery is unmatched. If you prioritize enabling compliant user onboarding for DeFi, GameFi, or NFT platforms where users interact directly with smart contracts, choose Quadrata. Its passport system abstracts away complexity for developers seeking to build regulated on-chain products.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team
Notabene vs. Quadrata: Travel Rule (FATF) Compliance Solutions | ChainScore Comparisons