Aave Arc excels at providing a flexible, on-chain permissioning layer that integrates directly with its battle-tested protocol. Institutions can access a familiar Aave V2 experience—including stable and variable interest rates, a wide range of assets like USDC and ETH, and robust risk parameters—but within a private liquidity pool where all participants are pre-vetted KYC'd entities. This model leverages Aave's existing security audits and over $10B in historical TVL on its mainnet, offering a proven, composable foundation.
LABS
Comparisons
Aave Arc vs. Compound Treasury: Permissioned DeFi Pools for Institutions
A technical comparison of Aave Arc and Compound Treasury, analyzing their architectures, compliance frameworks, and suitability for regulated entities seeking whitelisted liquidity pools and RWA integration.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Institutional Gateway to DeFi
Aave Arc and Compound Treasury represent two distinct architectural philosophies for bringing institutional capital into decentralized finance.
Compound Treasury takes a different approach by acting as a centralized, off-chain gateway that abstracts away blockchain complexity. It offers a fixed 4% APY on USDC by managing the underlying DeFi mechanics—such as supplying to Compound's public pools and managing liquidation risks—on behalf of institutions. This results in a trade-off of simplicity for control; users get a clean banking-like interface and predictable returns but sacrifice direct access to on-chain yields, governance (COMP tokens), and the ability to choose specific collateral assets.
The key trade-off: If your priority is on-chain integration, protocol governance, and asset flexibility within a permissioned cohort, choose Aave Arc. If you prioritize operational simplicity, fixed yield, and a fully managed service that insulates your treasury from crypto-native complexities, choose Compound Treasury.
tldr-summary
AAVE ARC VS. COMPOUND TREASURY
TL;DR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for institutional DeFi liquidity pools.
01
Choose Aave Arc for Customizable Compliance
Permissioning via Whitelisted Pools: Institutions (Permissioned Pool Managers) create isolated liquidity pools with their own KYC/AML provider (e.g., Fireblocks, Securitize). This allows for tailored risk and compliance frameworks per pool, crucial for funds with specific jurisdictional requirements.
02
Choose Compound Treasury for Simplicity & Direct Fiat
Turnkey Fiat-to-Yield Service: Provides a single, standardized interface for institutions to earn a fixed 4% APY on USD by depositing via US bank transfer. Removes blockchain complexity, making it ideal for treasuries new to crypto seeking a simple, predictable yield product.
03
Choose Aave Arc for Broader Asset Exposure
Access to Aave's Main Market Assets: Permissioned pools can tap into a wide variety of blue-chip collateral (e.g., ETH, wBTC, USDC) and borrowing assets from the main Aave protocol. This is critical for institutions looking to construct complex strategies or gain yield on diverse crypto assets.
04
Choose Compound Treasury for Capital Efficiency & Certainty
Non-Custodial with Guaranteed Rate: Funds are converted to USDC and deployed into Compound's public protocol, but the 4% APY is guaranteed by the Compound Treasury entity, not the volatile protocol rate. This provides yield certainty and simplifies accounting, a key factor for corporate treasury management.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Feature Matrix: Aave Arc vs. Compound Treasury
Direct comparison of permissioned DeFi pools for institutional capital deployment.
| Metric | Aave Arc | Compound Treasury |
|---|---|---|
Permissioning Model | Whitelist via KYC'd Guardians | Direct KYC via Fireblocks |
Primary Asset Focus | USDC, DAI, USDT | USDC only |
Interest Rate Model | Variable & Stable rates | Fixed rate (4% APY target) |
Collateral Support | Multiple assets (e.g., WBTC, ETH) | USDC only |
Liquidity Withdrawal | Subject to Guardian approval | On-demand (no lock-up) |
Integration Layer | Smart contract pools on Ethereum | API-first via Fireblocks |
Governance Token Exposure | AAVE stakers govern parameters | None (protocol-managed) |
pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS
Aave Arc vs. Compound Treasury: Permissioned DeFi Pools for Institutions
Key strengths and trade-offs for institutional DeFi liquidity management at a glance.
02
Aave Arc: Liquidity Integration
Direct access to Aave's mainnet liquidity and tech stack: Leverages the battle-tested Aave V2/V3 codebase, with over $10B in historical TVL. This matters for institutions seeking deep, established markets and a familiar developer experience with features like aTokens and rate switching.
04
Compound Treasury: Regulatory Clarity
Structured as a licensed money service business: Operates under a clear U.S. regulatory framework. This matters for public companies or funds with strict compliance mandates who prioritize working with a regulated counterparty over a permissioned protocol layer.
05
Aave Arc: Cons - Manager Dependency
Reliant on third-party pool managers: Liquidity and risk parameters are controlled by the chosen whitelisted entity. This matters if you require direct, sovereign control over pool governance or if your preferred custodian isn't an approved manager.
06
Compound Treasury: Cons - Fixed Product & Yield
Limited to USDC at a non-competitive fixed rate: Offers no exposure to other assets (ETH, wBTC) or variable market yields. With mainnet Compound USDC rates often higher, this matters for institutions seeking optimized returns or multi-asset strategies.
pros-cons-b
KEY DIFFERENTIATORS
Aave Arc vs. Compound Treasury: Permissioned DeFi Pools for Institutions
A direct comparison of the two leading institutional DeFi frameworks, focusing on architecture, compliance, and asset strategy.
03
Aave Arc: On-Chain Transparency & Control
Direct on-chain integration where institutions interact with a whitelisted, compliant smart contract pool. This matters for teams that require full visibility into positions, real-time risk parameters, and the ability to use the protocol's native governance token (AAVE) for parameter votes.
04
Compound Treasury: Off-Chain Legal Wrapper
Off-chain legal agreement with Coinbase, which manages the underlying DeFi strategy. This matters for legal and compliance departments more comfortable with traditional financial structures and counterparty risk assessment (Coinbase) versus pure smart contract risk.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
User Scenarios: When to Choose Which Platform
Aave Arc for Compliance Teams
Verdict: The clear choice for strict, on-chain KYC/AML enforcement. Strengths: Aave Arc's architecture is built around permissioned pools where only pre-approved, whitelisted addresses can interact. This provides a clear, auditable on-chain record of all participants, which is critical for regulated institutions like banks and asset managers. The model integrates directly with KYC providers (e.g., Fireblocks, Coinbase) to manage the whitelist, offering a turnkey compliance layer. Considerations: The ecosystem is smaller than mainnet Aave, leading to lower liquidity and fewer supported assets (primarily wBTC, USDC, ETH, AAVE). You are dependent on the chosen KYC provider's infrastructure and approval process.
PERMISSIONED DEFI FOR INSTITUTIONS
Technical Deep Dive: Architecture and Compliance Integration
Aave Arc and Compound Treasury represent two distinct architectural approaches to bringing institutional capital on-chain. This analysis breaks down their core technical models, compliance mechanisms, and integration pathways for CTOs and protocol architects.
Aave Arc is a permissioned layer on top of the public Aave protocol, while Compound Treasury is a whitelisted interface to the public Compound protocol. Aave Arc operates as a separate, permissioned market with its own liquidity pools and risk parameters, managed by "Guardians" (KYC providers). Compound Treasury acts as a managed service where institutions deposit fiat (USD) with the Compound team, who then deploy it into the public Compound USDC pool on their behalf. This makes Arc a self-service, on-chain compliance model, while Treasury is an off-chain, custodial service model.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Verdict: Strategic Recommendations for Institutions
A data-driven breakdown of the core architectural and compliance trade-offs between Aave Arc and Compound Treasury for institutional capital deployment.
Aave Arc excels at providing a flexible, on-chain permissioning layer that integrates directly with the existing Aave V2/V3 liquidity pools. This architecture allows institutions to tap into deep, established liquidity (historically over $10B in TVL on mainnet) while enforcing KYC/AML via a curated list of whitelisted addresses managed by Fireblocks, Securitize, or other verified guardians. The model offers superior composability with the broader DeFi ecosystem, enabling potential future integrations.
Compound Treasury takes a different, more insulated approach by offering a fixed 4% APY on USDC through an off-chain agreement with Circle and Coinbase. This results in a simplified, predictable yield product that abstracts away blockchain complexity and market volatility, but sacrifices the potential for higher, variable yields available in permissionless pools. The trade-off is operational simplicity for reduced composability and yield flexibility.
The key trade-off hinges on control versus convenience. If your priority is capital efficiency, ecosystem composability, and direct on-chain settlement, choose Aave Arc. Its guardian model and integration with protocols like Chainlink oracles provide a more native DeFi experience. If you prioritize regulatory certainty, off-balance-sheet simplicity, and a guaranteed yield without managing blockchain operations, choose Compound Treasury. Its partnership structure offers a familiar, fiat-like interface for treasury management.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall