RedStone excels at low-cost, high-frequency data delivery across a vast network of over 60 chains by using a unique Data Availability Layer and on-demand push model. Data is signed off-chain and streamed via a decentralized network of providers, with users attaching signed data packages to their transactions. This results in minimal on-chain footprint and gas costs, making it ideal for high-throughput DeFi applications on L2s and alternative L1s like Arbitrum, Base, and Avalanche.
RedStone vs API3: Chain Portability
Introduction: The Cross-Chain Oracle Dilemma
Choosing an oracle for a multi-chain future requires evaluating fundamentally different architectures for data portability.
API3 takes a different approach with its first-party oracle design, where data providers like Amberdata and Kaiko run their own, fully transparent oracle nodes. This eliminates middlemen, aiming for higher security and data provenance at the source. The trade-off is a more traditional on-chain update model, which can incur higher gas costs per update on the destination chain but provides stronger guarantees for high-value, lower-frequency data feeds required by protocols like lending platforms on Ethereum mainnet.
The key trade-off: If your priority is cost-effective, high-frequency data across dozens of chains for applications like perpetual DEXs or yield aggregators, RedStone's architecture is superior. If you prioritize maximum security, first-party data provenance, and regulatory-grade transparency for critical financial logic on a core set of chains, API3's dAPIs are the stronger choice.
TLDR: Core Differentiators at a Glance
Key strengths and trade-offs for multi-chain oracle data delivery.
RedStone: Universal Data Feeds
Modular, multi-chain push model: Data is signed off-chain and streamed via a custom data availability layer, then pulled on-chain via a lightweight relayer. This enables instant, low-cost deployment to any EVM or non-EVM chain (e.g., zkSync, Starknet, Solana) without native oracle contracts. Ideal for rapid prototyping and deploying on emerging L2s.
RedStone: Cost Efficiency
Pay-for-what-you-use gas model: Users pay gas only for the data they request on-chain, not for continuous on-chain updates. This leads to ~90% lower operational costs for dApps with sporadic data needs (e.g., lending liquidations, periodic settlements). Trade-off: introduces minor latency for the on-chain pull transaction.
API3: First-Party Native Feeds
dAPI architecture with Airnode: Data is served directly from first-party providers (e.g., CoinGecko, Brave New Coin) to on-chain, chain-native smart contracts. This provides stronger security guarantees and data provenance as there's no intermediary aggregator. Best for high-value DeFi protocols on established chains like Ethereum, Arbitrum, or Polygon that prioritize security over chain count.
API3: On-Chain Composability
Fully on-chain, verifiable data points: dAPIs are standard smart contracts on each chain, making them natively composable with other DeFi legos (e.g., Aave, Compound). Updates are pushed on-chain at regular intervals, providing predictable latency. This model is optimal for perpetual DEXs, money markets, and options protocols requiring seamless, trust-minimized integration.
Head-to-Head Feature Comparison
Direct comparison of key metrics for multi-chain oracle data delivery.
| Metric | RedStone | API3 |
|---|---|---|
Native Chain Support (Count) | 60+ | 15+ |
Data Feed Delivery Method | On-Demand Pull (Data Feeds) | On-Chain Push (dAPIs) |
Gas Cost for Data Access | User-pays (per request) | Sponsor-pays (pre-funded) |
First-Party Data Provider Model | ||
Data Signed Off-Chain | ||
EVM Native Chain Support | ||
Non-EVM Chain Support (e.g., Solana, Cosmos) |
RedStone vs API3: Chain Portability
Key strengths and trade-offs for multi-chain data delivery at a glance.
RedStone's On-Chain Footprint & Cost
Minimal permanent on-chain storage: Only a tiny signature and timestamp are stored on-chain per data pull, with the bulk of data stored on Arweave. This results in ~80-90% lower gas costs for frequent updates compared to traditional push oracles. A major advantage for high-frequency DeFi applications on high-throughput L2s like Starknet or Optimism.
API3's Chain-Specific Deployment Overhead
Requires individual dAPI deployment per chain: Each supported blockchain (Ethereum, Avalanche, etc.) needs its own set of proxy contracts for each data feed. This creates higher initial setup cost and maintenance overhead for full multi-chain coverage. Best suited for protocols with a stable, long-term presence on a select few high-value chains where the cost of robust, chain-native feeds is justified.
RedStone's Flexibility for Experimental Chains
Instant compatibility with new rollups and appchains: The pull-based, meta-transaction model requires only a light client verifier, not a full oracle network deployment. This allows projects on emerging chains like Morph, Monad, or Berachain to integrate price feeds in days, not months. Critical for teams in fast-moving, multi-chain testnet phases.
API3's Security & Decentralization Guarantees
On-chain, verifiable decentralization proofs: dAPI operations and provider staking are transparently recorded on-chain. The security model is chain-native and auditable, with slashing for misbehavior. This provides stronger guarantees for high-value, low-latency applications on established DeFi hubs like Arbitrum or Avalanche, where oracle manipulation risk is a primary concern.
API3: Pros and Cons
Key architectural strengths and trade-offs for multi-chain data feeds at a glance.
API3: First-Party Oracle Security
Direct data source integration: dAPIs are composed of first-party data feeds run directly by the data providers (e.g., Amberdata, Kaiko). This eliminates intermediary layers, reducing trust assumptions and potential attack vectors. This matters for high-value DeFi protocols where oracle manipulation risk must be minimized.
API3: On-Chain Governance & DAO
Decentralized management: The API3 DAO governs dAPI updates, parameters, and revenue distribution. Data providers stake API3 tokens as collateral, creating cryptoeconomic security. This matters for protocols seeking permissionless, community-aligned oracle infrastructure that evolves without centralized control.
RedStone: Ultra-Lightweight Data Feeds
Modular data placement: RedStone uses a pull-based model where data is stored in a decentralized cache (like Arweave) and attached to transactions via signed meta-transactions. This drastically reduces on-chain gas costs and storage. This matters for high-throughput, cost-sensitive applications on L2s and new chains where every byte counts.
RedStone: Rapid Chain Integration
Chain-agnostic design: RedStone's core logic is off-chain, requiring only a lightweight on-chain connector (Relayer) for verification. This allows deployment to 50+ EVM and non-EVM chains (including Fuel, Starknet, Solana) in days, not months. This matters for protocols launching on emerging ecosystems that need price feeds immediately.
API3: Native Gas Cost Coverage
Sponsored data feeds: API3's dAPIs can be configured to sponsor the gas costs for updating their own on-chain data. This removes a major operational burden and cost from dApp developers. This matters for improving user experience and simplifying the economic model for applications with high update frequency needs.
RedStone: Custom Data Feeds & Composability
Flexible data sourcing: Developers can easily create custom data feeds by combining multiple sources (e.g., BTC price * ETH price) using RedStone's oracle core. The signed data packets are composable across DeFi. This matters for exotic derivatives, indexes, and structured products that require bespoke data inputs not available in standard feeds.
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which
RedStone for DeFi
Verdict: The superior choice for multi-chain DeFi applications requiring diverse, high-frequency data feeds. Strengths: Unmatched chain portability via its Data Access Layer. RedStone data is delivered as a signed data package, allowing it to be injected into any EVM or non-EVM chain (e.g., Arbitrum, Avalanche, zkSync) via simple push or pull mechanisms. This is ideal for protocols like lending (Aave, Compound forks) and perpetual DEXs (GMX clones) that need to deploy the same logic across many chains without re-architecting their oracle integration. Considerations: Requires developers to handle data verification on-chain, adding minor gas overhead. Best for teams comfortable with cryptographic verification patterns.
API3 for DeFi
Verdict: Optimal for sovereign, high-assurance applications on a primary chain like Ethereum Mainnet. Strengths: First-party oracles (dAPIs) provide direct data feeds from providers like Chainlink nodes, minimizing trust layers. This model excels for core money-layer protocols (e.g., MakerDAO, Liquity) where maximum security and data provenance on a single, high-value chain are paramount. The Airnode protocol simplifies first-party integration. Considerations: Chain portability is more managed; deploying a dAPI to a new chain requires explicit provider support and deployment, making rapid multi-chain expansion slower than RedStone's portable data package model.
Technical Deep Dive: Architecture and Security
This section compares the core architectural models of RedStone and API3, focusing on how they deliver data across chains and the security implications of their different approaches.
RedStone uses a pull-based model with off-chain data signing, while API3 uses a push-based model with on-chain data feeds. RedStone's oracles sign data off-chain, and users or dApps 'pull' this signed data on-demand, storing it in a decentralized cache like Arweave. API3's dAPIs are continuously updated 'push' feeds where first-party oracles write data directly onto the destination chain, making it natively available in the contract's storage.
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between RedStone and API3 for chain portability depends on your protocol's core need: maximum data availability or sovereign, verifiable data feeds.
RedStone excels at ubiquitous data delivery because of its modular, multi-layer architecture. It leverages the Arweave blockchain for permanent data storage and a decentralized cache layer (RedStone Cache) to push signed data to over 50+ EVM and non-EVM chains, including Arbitrum, Base, and Solana. For example, its Warp Contracts on Arweave enable seamless cross-chain state synchronization, a key metric for protocols like GMX and Radiant Capital that require the same price feed across multiple deployments.
API3 takes a different approach by championing first-party, verifiable data feeds through its dAPI architecture. This results in a trade-off: while its Airnode middleware simplifies direct provider-to-chain connectivity, native chain portability requires deploying a new dAPI on each target chain. Its strength is in providing cryptographically verifiable data provenance on-chain, a critical feature for high-value DeFi protocols on a primary chain, but expanding to a new ecosystem involves coordinating with data providers for that specific chain.
The key trade-off: If your priority is rapid, low-friction deployment of the same data feed across a dozen+ heterogeneous chains, choose RedStone. Its broadcast model is optimized for scale and reach. If you prioritize sovereign, verifiable data with direct provider accountability on one or two primary chains, choose API3. Its first-party model offers superior transparency and security for deep liquidity pools where data integrity is paramount.
Build the
future.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.