Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Now
Smart Contract Security Audits
Learn More
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View Services
LABS
Comparisons

Chainlink vs Pyth: New Chain Support

A technical analysis comparing Chainlink's decentralized pull oracles against Pyth's permissioned push model for integrating new blockchain networks. Focuses on speed, cost, security, and architectural trade-offs for engineering leaders.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The Oracle Integration Dilemma

Evaluating Chainlink and Pyth for new chain support reveals a fundamental trade-off between decentralization and speed.

Chainlink excels at providing a decentralized, generalized data feed network, making it the incumbent choice for established ecosystems. Its multi-chain strategy, powered by the Chainlink Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), enables secure data delivery to over 30 blockchains, including Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Polygon. This is backed by a network of over 1,000 node operators and a Total Value Secured (TVS) exceeding $9 trillion, demonstrating proven security for high-value DeFi protocols like Aave and Synthetix.

Pyth takes a different approach by prioritizing ultra-low latency and first-party data from over 100 major financial institutions and trading firms. Its pull-based oracle model allows new chains to integrate quickly by simply implementing a client to request data on-demand. This has enabled rapid deployment to over 60 blockchains, including Solana, Sui, and Aptos, often within weeks of a chain's mainnet launch, as seen with the Blast L2 integration.

The key trade-off: If your priority is battle-tested security, censorship resistance, and a vast library of price feeds for a mature DeFi ecosystem, choose Chainlink. If you prioritize minimal integration time, sub-second price updates, and specialized financial data for a high-performance, nascent chain, choose Pyth.

tldr-summary
Chainlink vs Pyth: New Chain Support

TL;DR: Core Differentiators

Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for teams evaluating oracle integration on emerging Layer 1s and Layer 2s.

01

Chainlink: Decentralized Network Consensus

On-chain aggregation via decentralized oracle networks (DONs): Data is aggregated from multiple independent nodes before being posted on-chain, providing inherent Sybil resistance. This matters for high-value DeFi protocols (e.g., Aave, Synthetix) where data manipulation resistance is non-negotiable, even on new chains.

1,000+
Oracle Networks
03

Pyth: Low-Latency, Publisher-Sourced Data

First-party data from 90+ major publishers: Data is pulled directly from trading firms and exchanges (e.g., Jane Street, CBOE) and aggregated off-chain via a pull oracle model. This matters for perpetuals DEXs and high-frequency trading apps (e.g., Drift, Hyperliquid) on new chains where sub-second price updates and institutional-grade data are critical.

90+
First-Party Publishers
04

Pyth: Permissionless Pull Oracle & On-Demand Updates

Any user can request a price update: The "Pull" model allows protocols to fetch the latest price on-demand, paying only for the data they use. This matters for low-volume or nascent chains where minimizing baseline gas costs is essential, and for applications with bursty or event-driven data needs.

CHAINLINK VS PYTH: NEW CHAIN SUPPORT

Head-to-Head: New Chain Support Features

Direct comparison of key metrics for deploying and integrating oracle services on new blockchain networks.

MetricChainlinkPyth

Native Chain Support (Q1 2025)

90+

70+

Average Time to Deploy New Chain

3-6 months

1-3 months

Primary Deployment Model

Permissioned Node Committee

Permissionless Publisher Network

Data Feed Launch Cost (Est.)

$50K - $500K+

Protocol-Subsidized

Requires Native Token Bridge

On-Chain Program Library

Chainlink CCIP

Pythnet Cross-Chain Attestations

pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS FOR INTEGRATION

Chainlink vs Pyth: New Chain Support

Key architectural and operational trade-offs for CTOs evaluating oracle dependencies for a new blockchain or L2.

03

Pyth: Ultra-Low Latency & High Throughput

Publisher-based pull oracle: Data is pushed on-chain by first-party publishers (e.g., Jump Trading, Jane Street) and delivered in a single block via Pythnet, enabling sub-second price updates. This architecture supports 400+ price feeds with high frequency. This matters for perpetual DEXs (like Hyperliquid), options protocols, and high-frequency trading applications where latency under 500ms is critical.

< 500ms
Update Latency
400+
Price Feeds
05

Chainlink: Consider for Security-Critical DeFi

Choose Chainlink if your chain's primary use case is general-purpose DeFi with high-value TVL, where the security model of decentralized node operators and a long track record (since 2019) outweighs the need for the absolute lowest latency. Ideal for: Lending/Borrowing Markets, Stablecoins, Insurance Protocols.

06

Pyth: Consider for High-Performance Perps & Options

Choose Pyth if your chain is a high-performance L1/L2 for derivatives, where sub-second price updates and cross-chain consistency are paramount, and you trust the curated network of professional trading firms as data publishers. Ideal for: Perpetual Futures DEXs, Options Platforms, Order Book Exchanges.

pros-cons-b
Chainlink vs Pyth: New Chain Support

Pyth: Pros and Cons for New Chains

Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance for CTOs evaluating oracle infrastructure for a new blockchain deployment.

01

Pyth's Speed & Low Latency

Sub-second price updates: Pyth's pull oracle model delivers data on-demand with latencies under 400ms. This matters for high-frequency DeFi (e.g., perpetuals, options) where stale data directly impacts liquidation efficiency and arbitrage opportunities.

02

Pyth's Cost Structure

No recurring gas costs for consumers: Protocols pay only for the data they pull (update fee), avoiding continuous on-chain aggregation costs. This matters for cost-predictable dApps on high-throughput chains where gas volatility can break economic models.

03

Chainlink's Decentralization & Security

70+ independent node operators securing data feeds with a proven anti-Sybil and staking model. This matters for high-value, slow-moving assets (e.g., RWAs, stablecoin reserves) where data integrity and censorship resistance are paramount over speed.

04

Chainlink's Ecosystem Maturity

1,500+ live price feeds and deep integrations with major DeFi protocols (Aave, Compound) and L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism). This matters for interoperability-focused chains seeking immediate composability with the largest TVL pools and established developer tooling.

05

Pyth's Native Cross-Chain Design

Single source, multi-chain delivery: Data is published once on Pythnet (Solana) and relayed via Wormhole to 50+ connected chains. This matters for rapid multi-chain deployment where maintaining feed consistency and reducing oracle management overhead is critical.

06

Chainlink's Data Diversity

Beyond price feeds: Offers Verifiable Random Function (VRF) for NFTs/gaming, CCIP for cross-chain messaging, and Proof of Reserve audits. This matters for chains building diverse dApp suites that need a one-stop infrastructure provider beyond just market data.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

Decision Framework: When to Choose Which

Chainlink for DeFi

Verdict: The default choice for established, high-value protocols requiring maximum security and decentralization. Strengths: Battle-tested on mainnet for 5+ years with over $8T in transaction value secured. Decentralized node operators (e.g., LinkPool, Staked, Figment) provide robust censorship resistance. Supports custom data feeds and off-chain computation via Chainlink Functions. Ideal for money markets (Aave, Compound), synthetics (Synthetix), and cross-chain bridges (CCIP).

Pyth for DeFi

Verdict: The performance leader for latency-sensitive, high-frequency applications on high-throughput chains. Strengths: Sub-second price updates (400ms median) are critical for perps DEXs (Hyperliquid, Drift) and options protocols. Publisher network includes major CEXs and trading firms (e.g., Jane Street, CBOE), providing institutional-grade data. Lower cost structure on Solana, Sui, Aptos. Best for low-latency arbitrage, leveraged trading, and real-time liquidation engines.

verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Verdict and Strategic Recommendation

Choosing between Chainlink and Pyth for new chain support is a strategic decision between proven decentralization and high-performance specialization.

Chainlink excels at providing a decentralized, battle-tested oracle network for new chains because of its permissionless node operator model and extensive track record. For example, its CCIP (Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol) is designed as a foundational messaging layer, enabling seamless data and token transfers across ecosystems, which is a critical feature for multi-chain deployments. Its support for over 15 blockchains, including Ethereum, Arbitrum, and Polygon, demonstrates a commitment to broad, long-term infrastructure.

Pyth takes a different approach by specializing in high-frequency, low-latency financial data through a pull-based model. This results in a trade-off: while it offers exceptional speed and precision for DeFi primitives like perpetuals and spot trading—with price updates as frequent as 400ms—its network is currently more curated and supports a narrower set of chains (e.g., Solana, Sui, Aptos) optimized for its performance-centric use case.

The key trade-off: If your priority is maximizing security, decentralization, and cross-chain composability for a generalized application, choose Chainlink. Its CCIP framework and extensive ecosystem integrations make it the safer, more versatile bet for a new chain's core infrastructure. If you prioritize ultra-low latency and institutional-grade data feeds specifically for high-performance DeFi, and your chain's architecture aligns with Pyth's supported networks, choose Pyth.

ENQUIRY

Build the
future.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected direct pipeline