Mandatory Royalties enforce creator payments at the protocol level, as pioneered by platforms like Ethereum with its EIP-2981 standard and enforced by marketplaces like OpenSea via its Operator Filter. This approach provides predictable, on-chain revenue for creators, which is critical for funding long-term projects. For example, top collections like Bored Ape Yacht Club and Art Blocks have generated over $150M in creator royalties, demonstrating the model's viability for high-value IP.
LABS
Comparisons
Mandatory Royalties vs Optional Royalties: A Technical Comparison for NFT Marketplaces
This analysis contrasts NFT marketplaces that enforce creator royalties by design with those offering optional payments. We examine the technical mechanisms, revenue implications for creators, and strategic trade-offs for builders and protocol architects.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The Royalty Enforcement Battle
A technical breakdown of the infrastructure-level approaches to NFT creator compensation.
Optional Royalties adopt a market-driven approach, as seen on Solana and Blur, where royalties are a social contract rather than a technical mandate. This strategy prioritizes trader liquidity and fee minimization, often resulting in higher trading volumes. The trade-off is significant volatility in creator income; on Magic Eden, optional royalties led to a >60% drop in effective payout rates for some collections, shifting the financial burden to primary sales and alternative monetization.
The key trade-off: If your priority is guaranteed creator sustainability and protecting high-value IP, choose a mandatory royalty ecosystem like Ethereum with OpenSea or LooksRare. If you prioritize maximizing trader liquidity, lower fees, and community-driven economics, choose an optional framework like Solana with Tensor or Magic Eden. The decision fundamentally shapes your project's revenue model and community incentives.
tldr-summary
Mandatory vs. Optional Royalties
TL;DR: Core Differentiators
A data-driven breakdown of the two dominant NFT royalty enforcement models. Choose based on your protocol's priorities for creator revenue, marketplace competition, and user experience.
01
Mandatory Royalties: Creator-First
Enforced Revenue Stream: Royalties are hard-coded into the smart contract (e.g., ERC-2981, Manifold's Royalty Registry). This ensures creators like Art Blocks or Yuga Labs receive a guaranteed percentage (e.g., 5-10%) on all secondary sales, crucial for sustainable artist funding.
02
Mandatory Royalties: Protocol Control
Ecosystem Alignment: Marketplaces like OpenSea (with Operator Filter) or Blur (for protected collections) must comply, preventing a race to the bottom on fees. This protects the economic model of high-value collections and aligns incentives for long-term project health.
03
Optional Royalties: Market Efficiency
Lower Trader Fees: Marketplaces like Sudoswap and Magic Eden (on Solana) made royalties optional, reducing effective trading costs. This can increase liquidity and volume, as seen with Tensor's market share growth, appealing to high-frequency NFT traders.
04
Optional Royalties: User Sovereignty
Trader Choice & Composability: Allows for novel AMM-based trading (e.g., NFTX, BendDAO) where fixed royalties break the model. It empowers users, fostering a more competitive marketplace landscape but shifts the burden of supporting creators to optional tips or primary sales.
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Feature Comparison: Mandatory vs Optional Royalties
Direct comparison of creator revenue enforcement models for NFT marketplaces and protocols.
| Metric / Feature | Mandatory Royalties | Optional Royalties |
|---|---|---|
Royalty Enforcement | ||
Creator Revenue Guarantee | 100% of set rate | 0-100% (buyer-determined) |
Primary Marketplaces (e.g., OpenSea, Blur) | Enforced on all sales | Optional, often bypassed |
Secondary Sales Royalty | Always applied | Rarely paid (<20% of trades) |
Protocol-Level Support | Solana Metaplex, Ethereum EIP-2981 | Blur, SudoSwap AMM |
Typical Royalty Rate | 5-10% | 0-2.5% |
Market Liquidity Impact | Can reduce volume | Increases volume & arbitrage |
pros-cons-a
A Data-Driven Comparison
Pros and Cons: Mandatory Royalty Model
A technical breakdown of the core trade-offs between mandatory and optional NFT royalty enforcement models, based on on-chain data and protocol-level mechanics.
01
Mandatory Royalty: Pro
Guaranteed Creator Revenue: Enforces royalties at the protocol or marketplace smart contract level (e.g., Manifold's Royalty Registry, EIP-2981). This provides predictable, sustainable income for artists and protocol treasuries, crucial for long-term project viability.
5-10%
Typical Enforced Rate
02
Mandatory Royalty: Pro
Incentivizes High-Quality Curation: Marketplaces like OpenSea Pro (Blur) with optional royalties often prioritize liquidity over creator support. Mandatory models align marketplace success with creator success, fostering ecosystems like Art Blocks and Foundation that attract premium digital art.
03
Mandatory Royalty: Con
Reduced Secondary Market Liquidity: Enforced fees increase transaction costs, disincentivizing high-frequency trading and arbitrage. This can lead to fragmented liquidity, as seen when LooksRare volume plummeted after Blur's zero-fee model, pushing traders to venues with optional royalties.
>60%
Volume Shift to Blur (2023)
04
Mandatory Royalty: Con
Protocol-Level Complexity & Centralization: Enforcement requires smart contract modifications (e.g., transfer hooks) or a centralized registry, adding gas overhead and potential attack vectors. It can also lead to a walled garden effect, limiting composability with DeFi protocols like NFTX or Sudoswap.
05
Optional Royalty: Pro
Maximizes Trader Economics & Liquidity: By making royalties optional (e.g., Blur, Sudoswap), marketplaces reduce the effective cost of trading. This attracts volume and liquidity providers, creating deeper order books and better price discovery for blue-chip collections like Bored Ape Yacht Club.
<2%
Avg. Royalty Paid on Blur
06
Optional Royalty: Pro
Market-Driven Creator Incentives: Forces creators to build intrinsic value beyond royalties. Successful projects use staking rewards, token-gated utility, or physical redeemables to incentivize royalty payments. This aligns with a DeFi-native ethos where value is earned, not mandated.
pros-cons-b
MANDATORY VS. OPTIONAL ROYALTIES
Pros and Cons: Optional Royalty Model
A technical breakdown of the trade-offs between mandatory and optional creator fee enforcement on secondary NFT sales.
01
Mandatory Royalty: Pro
Guaranteed creator revenue: Enforces a fixed fee (e.g., 5-10%) on every secondary sale via protocol-level logic. This provides predictable, sustainable income for artists and projects like Art Blocks and Yuga Labs, crucial for funding ongoing development and community rewards.
02
Mandatory Royalty: Con
Reduced market liquidity & user friction: Enforced fees increase total transaction cost, disincentivizing high-frequency trading. Marketplaces like Blur that bypassed enforcement gained significant volume, demonstrating trader preference for lower costs. This can fragment liquidity across platforms.
03
Optional Royalty: Pro
Market-driven efficiency & lower fees: Allows marketplaces (e.g., Sudoswap, Blur) and traders to opt for minimal fees, increasing trading volume and liquidity. This model aligns with free-market principles and can lead to more competitive, user-friendly platforms.
04
Optional Royalty: Con
Erosion of creator economics: Relies on voluntary compliance, which often fails. Projects see royalty collection rates drop to <20% on optional platforms, severely impacting revenue. This undermines the Web3 value proposition of perpetual artist compensation, as seen in many Solana and Ethereum NFT downturns.
CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY
Decision Framework: When to Choose Which Model
Mandatory Royalties for NFT Creators
Verdict: The default choice for long-term sustainability and predictable revenue. Strengths: Guarantees a revenue stream from all secondary sales, enabling sustainable project development, community funding, and creator incentives. This model is critical for high-value art (e.g., Art Blocks) and brand-driven collections where creator reputation is paramount. It aligns with platforms like OpenSea (with enforcement) and Magic Eden's Ethereum marketplace. Key Metric: Projects like Bored Ape Yacht Club and Pudgy Penguins rely on this model for multi-million dollar annual creator revenue.
Optional Royalties for NFT Creators
Verdict: A high-risk model that can erode core project economics. Considerations: While it may increase initial trading volume due to lower buyer costs, it transfers value from creators to traders and speculators. This can starve projects of development funds, potentially harming long-term utility and value. Only viable for projects with alternative, robust monetization (e.g., strong tokenomics, gaming asset fees).
MANDATORY VS. OPTIONAL
Technical Deep Dive: Enforcement Mechanisms
A critical comparison of how different blockchain ecosystems enforce creator royalties, examining the technical, economic, and philosophical trade-offs between mandatory and optional models.
Mandatory royalties are programmatically enforced at the protocol or smart contract level, while optional royalties rely on marketplace or buyer goodwill. Mandatory systems, like those originally on Ethereum (ERC-721) with on-chain enforcement or Solana's Metaplex with a configurable royalty field, hard-code payment logic. Optional systems, adopted by marketplaces like Blur and OpenSea on select chains, make the royalty payment a suggestion that the seller can bypass. This fundamental difference creates a major split in creator revenue reliability and secondary market dynamics.
verdict
THE ANALYSIS
Final Verdict and Strategic Recommendation
Choosing between mandatory and optional royalties is a strategic decision balancing creator protection with market dynamics.
Mandatory royalties excel at ensuring creator sustainability by enforcing payment on all secondary sales. This model, championed by platforms like OpenSea with its Operator Filter, provides predictable revenue streams, which is critical for high-value generative art projects and established brands. For example, during the 2021-2022 NFT bull market, projects like Bored Ape Yacht Club generated over $150M in creator royalties, directly funding development and community initiatives.
Optional royalties take a different approach by prioritizing market efficiency and liquidity, as seen with marketplaces like Blur and Magic Eden's optional model on Solana. This strategy results in a trade-off: it can drive higher trading volume and lower transaction costs for users but shifts the financial burden from traders back to creators, who must rely more on primary sales and alternative monetization like token-gated utilities.
The key trade-off: If your priority is creator-centric economics and long-term project funding, choose a chain or marketplace enforcing mandatory royalties (e.g., Ethereum with OpenSea's filter). If you prioritize maximizing trader liquidity and adopting a free-market, volume-first approach, choose a protocol with optional royalties (e.g., Solana, Sei, or Arbitrum with Blur). The decision fundamentally aligns with whether you view royalties as a non-negotiable protocol-level feature or a flexible marketplace incentive.
ENQUIRY
Get In Touch
today.
Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.
NDA Protected
Confidentiality24h Response
Time to ValueDirectly to Engineering Team
No Sales Fluff10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall