Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
Free 30-min Web3 Consultation
Book Consultation
Smart Contract Security Audits
View Audit Services
Custom DeFi Protocol Development
Explore DeFi
Full-Stack Web3 dApp Development
View App Services
LABS
Comparisons

Rocket Pool vs Jito: MEV-Accruing Liquid Staking

A technical comparison of two leading permissionless staking models, contrasting Rocket Pool's Ethereum-native, decentralized design with Jito's Solana-based, MEV-optimized validator client and reward distribution mechanisms.
Chainscore © 2026
introduction
THE ANALYSIS

Introduction: The MEV Frontier in Liquid Staking

A technical comparison of Rocket Pool and Jito, two leading protocols transforming staking rewards through MEV extraction.

Rocket Pool excels at decentralized, permissionless node operation and Ethereum-aligned security. Its core strength is a robust, battle-tested network of over 3,300 node operators securing more than 1.1 million ETH, making it the largest decentralized staking protocol. It accrues MEV via a permissionless, open market for block building, allowing any validator to capture value through tools like mev-boost. This design prioritizes censorship resistance and network resilience over maximizing extractable value per validator.

Jito takes a radically different approach by specializing in maximal MEV extraction on Solana. Its core innovation is the Jito-Solana client, which includes a proprietary mempool and bundling engine to capture and distribute arbitrage and liquidation opportunities. This specialization results in significantly higher staking yields—Jito's jitoSOL often delivers APYs 1-2% above base Solana staking—but creates a more centralized, specialized infrastructure layer dependent on Jito's technology stack and Solana's high-throughput, low-fee environment.

The key trade-off: If your priority is decentralized, Ethereum-native security and a permissionless operator set, choose Rocket Pool. Its architecture is ideal for protocols valuing censorship resistance and alignment with Ethereum's credibly neutral ethos. If you prioritize maximizing yield in a high-performance L1 environment and are comfortable with specialized, performant infrastructure, choose Jito. Its optimized MEV pipeline is built for Solana's speed, offering superior returns for yield-sensitive applications.

tldr-summary
Rocket Pool vs Jito

TL;DR: Core Differentiators

Key strengths and trade-offs for MEV-accruing liquid staking at a glance.

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON

Rocket Pool vs Jito: Feature Comparison

Direct comparison of MEV-accruing liquid staking protocols for Ethereum.

Metric / FeatureRocket PoolJito

Primary MEV Distribution

Smoothing Pool (Optional)

100% to Stakers

Avg. MEV Boost per Validator/Month

~0.1-0.3 ETH

~0.5-1.5 ETH

Node Operator Requirement (ETH)

8 ETH + RPL Collateral

None (Solana Validator)

Native Blockchain

Ethereum

Solana

Liquid Staking Token

rETH

jitoSOL

Validator Client

Self-Operated

Jito-Solana Client

Protocol Fee on MEV

15% of Smoothing Pool

0%

Total Value Locked

$3.5B+

$1.8B+

pros-cons-a
PROS AND CONS

Rocket Pool vs Jito: MEV-Accruing Liquid Staking

Key strengths and trade-offs for two leading MEV-integrated liquid staking solutions.

02

Rocket Pool: Mature Protocol & Security

Battle-tested with $3B+ TVL: Launched in 2021, it's one of the most established and audited LSD protocols. Features a smoothing pool that distributes MEV/priority fees evenly, reducing variance for node operators. This matters for risk-averse stakers and institutions seeking a proven, secure base layer.

$3B+
TVL
3,000+
Node Ops
03

Rocket Pool: Lower MEV Returns

MEV is Optional and Shared: The default smoothing pool dilutes high-MEV blocks across all operators, capping upside for sophisticated searchers. While optional, opting out requires technical skill. This matters for professional node operators who could earn significantly more by capturing MEV directly on other networks.

04

Rocket Pool: Higher Capital Efficiency Hurdle

16 ETH Bond Requirement: Node operators must bond 16 ETH (8 ETH + 8 ETH worth of RPL collateral) to run a minipool, creating a higher capital and complexity barrier than simple delegation. This matters for smaller operators who find the RPL tokenomics and bond requirement cumbersome.

06

Jito: Solana Performance & Low Fees

Built for Solana's High Throughput: Leverages sub-second block times and negligible transaction fees (<$0.01). Jito's liquid staking token (JitoSOL) can be used across Solana DeFi (e.g., Marinade, Raydium) with minimal friction. This matters for DeFi power users and arbitrageurs who need fast, cheap composability.

<$0.01
Avg Tx Fee
~400ms
Block Time
07

Jito: Solana Ecosystem Risk

Single-Chain Dependency: Tied entirely to Solana's performance and security. A network outage or consensus failure directly impacts staking operations. This matters for multi-chain portfolios or risk-diversified institutions who prefer Ethereum's more conservative, battle-tested consensus.

08

Jito: Centralized Relayer Trust

Relayer-Mediated MEV Flow: While the protocol is permissionless, the Jito relayer network is currently operated by the foundation, creating a potential central point of failure or censorship for block building. This matters for users with extreme decentralization requirements, though the team is working on decentralizing this component.

pros-cons-b
PROS AND CONS

Rocket Pool vs Jito: MEV-Accruing Liquid Staking

A data-driven comparison of the leading MEV-accruing liquid staking protocols on Ethereum and Solana. Key strengths and trade-offs at a glance.

02

Rocket Pool Con: Lower MEV Efficiency

Fragmented MEV capture: While rETH accrues priority fees and block rewards, its decentralized operator model makes it difficult to consistently capture cross-domain MEV (e.g., arbitrage bundles). This matters for stakers seeking maximum extractable yield beyond base staking APR.

04

Jito Con: Centralization & Ecosystem Risk

Reliance on Jito Labs: The MEV supply chain (client, relayer, block engine) is largely operated by a single entity. This matters for protocol risk and long-term neutrality. While stake is distributed, the critical infrastructure is not permissionless, creating a potential single point of failure.

CHOOSE YOUR PRIORITY

Decision Framework: When to Choose Which

Rocket Pool for DeFi

Verdict: The established, composable standard for Ethereum DeFi. Strengths: rETH is the most widely integrated LSD, supported by Aave, Curve, Balancer, and Uniswap V3. Its permissionless, decentralized node operator model provides strong censorship resistance, a key feature for DeFi protocols. The 8 ETH minipool design and RPL collateral offer a battle-tested security model for high-value applications. Considerations: MEV rewards are distributed to node operators; rETH holders benefit indirectly via staking yield but do not capture MEV directly.

Jito for DeFi

Verdict: The high-performance, MEV-optimized choice for Solana DeFi. Strengths: JitoSOL accrues 100% of MEV and tips on top of base staking yield, leading to consistently higher APY. Its integration with the Jito MEV network (searchers, bundlers, validators) creates a powerful flywheel. On Solana's high-throughput chain, JitoSOL enables fast, low-fee transactions for DeFi users. Considerations: Primarily a Solana-native asset; cross-chain DeFi integration is less mature than rETH's on Ethereum.

verdict
THE ANALYSIS

Verdict and Final Recommendation

Choosing between Rocket Pool and Jito depends on your protocol's core priorities: decentralized security or maximized staking yield.

Rocket Pool excels at providing a decentralized, permissionless, and security-focused staking layer for Ethereum. Its design, with a 16 ETH bond for node operators and a distributed network of over 3,000 node operators, directly strengthens Ethereum's censorship resistance and credibly neutral base layer. For builders prioritizing alignment with Ethereum's core values and requiring a trust-minimized, non-custodial staking primitive, Rocket Pool's rETH is the definitive choice, backed by a mature protocol with over 1.2 million ETH staked.

Jito takes a different approach by optimizing for maximal extractable value (MEV) accrual to boost staker yields. Its architecture, built on Solana, uses a network of searchers and the Jito-Solana client to capture and redistribute MEV through its JitoSOL liquid staking token. This results in a trade-off: while offering consistently higher APY—often 1-3% above base Solana staking—it centralizes block production around its MEV-aware validators, making it a performance-optimized but more centralized financial instrument.

The key trade-off: If your priority is decentralization, Ethereum alignment, and security as a non-negotiable, choose Rocket Pool. If you prioritize absolute yield maximization on a high-throughput chain and can accept a more centralized validator set, choose Jito. For Ethereum DeFi integrations, rETH's widespread adoption in protocols like Aave and Curve provides superior composability, while JitoSOL is the yield engine for Solana's most aggressive yield-seeking strategies.

ENQUIRY

Get In Touch
today.

Our experts will offer a free quote and a 30min call to discuss your project.

NDA Protected
24h Response
Directly to Engineering Team
10+
Protocols Shipped
$20M+
TVL Overall
NDA Protected Directly to Engineering Team